Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2022.18.1036321   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2022.18.1036321    Tam Metin (PDF)

Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi

Elif Kök

19. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında, Rusya’nın Asya içlerine doğru topraklarını genişletme süreci, Orta Asya’nın kültürel mirası açısından yeni bir sürecin başlangıcı olmuştur. Orta çağdan itibaren görkemli Timurlu anıtlarıyla efsaneleşen Semerkand şehri, bu süreçte en fazla öne çıkan merkezdir. Rusya’nın askerî hareketlerine bu yeni toprakları çeşitli yönleriyle belgelemekle görevli bilim insanları ve sanatçılar da eşlik etmiştir. Rus ordusunun Türkistan seferini ve bölgenin doğal, kültürel, etnografik değerlerini belgelemekle görevlendirilen ressam Vasili Vereşçagin, Oryantalist gelenekten bazı yönleriyle farklılaşan bir tutum sergilemiştir. Resimlerinde genellikle yerel ve etnografik unsurları detay titizliğiyle yansıtır. Bununla birlikte, bölgedeki Rus hakimiyetini yüceltme yönündeki vurgular da birçok resminde belirgindir. Vereşçagin’in Semerkand konulu resimleri, o dönemde Rusya’nın Orta Asya halklarına ve tarihine yönelik bakış açısına ve Doğu dünyasının karşısında Rusya’nın kendini kavramsal olarak nasıl konumlandırdığına dair ipuçları sunmasının yanında, Timurlu anıtlarının 19. yüzyıl sonlarındaki durumu hakkında da detaylı birer görsel belgedir. Bu yazıda, Vereşçagin’in Semerkand resimleri tarihsel ve düşünsel bağlamı çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiş ayrıca anıtların durumu da dönem fotoğraflarıyla karşılaştırılarak incelenmiştir.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2022.18.1036321   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2022.18.1036321    Tam Metin (PDF)

Timurid Monuments as Seen by The Russian Painter Vasily Vasilyevich Vereshchagin (1842-1904): Documentation of the Cultural Heritage in Central Asia

Elif Kök

The expansion of Russia into Asia in the second half of the 19th century was a beginning of a new era for the cultural heritage of Central Asia. Samarkand, which has become legendary since the Middle Ages with its magnificent Timurid monuments, was the most prominent center in this period. During the military activities of Russia, scientists and artists were also tasked with documenting various aspects of these lands. Vasily Vereshchagin was tasked with documenting both the military process of the Russian army and the cultural characteristics of the region, but his approach somewhat differs from many other Orientalists of the period. His paintings often reflect local and ethnographic elements with meticulous attention to detail; however, the emphasis on glorifying Russian dominance in these territories is also evident. His Samarkand scenes can be described as detailed visual documents about the situation of the Timurid monuments at the end of the 19th century, as well as providing clues about Russia’s perspective on the peoples of Central Asia, its history, and how Russia conceptually positioned itself against the Eastern world. In this paper, Vereshchagin’s Samarkand scenes are evaluated within the framework of their historical context, and the condition of the monuments is examined by comparison with the photographs of the same period.


Russian painter Vasily Vereshchagin, who had a worldwide reputation during his lifetime, is known for his realistic attitude and choice of subjects from an Orientalist perspective. On the other hand, he is among the closest witnesses of Russia’s expansion toward Asia. Since he officially accompanied the Russian military mission and was tasked with illustrating/documenting the occupied regions in all details, he had the opportunity to observe some Asian lands closely in those years when the issues of “Easternness”, “Westernness” and identity were the subject of debate among the Russian intelligentsia. Written sources of those years indicate that a significant value was attributed to Turkestan and Samarkand, among all the occupied lands in Asia. Because, as it is known, Samarkand has been the leading center of Central Asia and Islamic cultures since the Middle Ages: The capture of Samarkand, which includes the memory of Timur, one of the legendary leaders of the medieval Islamic world, and the magnificent Timurid monuments, was seen as an important gain for Russia at that time, not only expanding its territory but also with its cultural connotations. Having a geopolitical and symbolic significance for both native residents and Western narratives, Samarkand has undoubtedly been privileged to some extent in terms of culture and administration among these newly captured lands by Russia. On a larger scale, Samarkand has also become a showcase for Russia in the colonization process: Preserving, restoring, documenting, and exhibiting the “legendary” architectural heritage of Samarkand, which was undoubtedly one of the most interesting cities of the East thanks to the repetitive narratives since the Middle Ages, has been a subject that Russia has meticulously focused on since the first years of their domination of Turkestan. From the very beginning, scientific expeditions were organized with the participation of experts from different disciplines and in addition to the geographic or ethnologic research, they recorded the local architecture with many photographs and paintings in all detail and prepared comprehensive albums in this context. Vereshchagin’s realistic style and almost photographic attitude must be the main reason why he was chosen among the other war painters of the period to create a visual archive of the region. Looking at his paintings, it can be said that they almost have a “documentary” flavor rather than a desire to bring artistic innovation. In his Turkestan series, including scenes of Samarkand, besides the depictions of architecture and urban history, there are also daily life scenes, some war and front views, or scenes pointing to the poverty and misery of the local people. But in the context of cultural heritage, it should be emphasized that Vereshchagin’s interest is not just a “documentary” or “scientific” attitude or even an artistic enthusiasm. All these scenes can be interpreted, on a larger scale, as a manifestation of Russia’s efforts to legitimize its colonization process at the international level. Suggesting that Russia has protected the historical and ethnographic values of Turkestan, these paintings were exhibited in many Western countries, accordingly, they can be regarded as an attempt to legitimize the expansion of Russia’s dominance in Central Asia, implying a “civilizing” mission in the occupied lands. This whole process also gives us clues about the dynamics of Russian Westernization. Therefore, Vereshchagin’s paintings can be interpreted as significant visual documents to understand the debates of that period, as well as their artistic values. Certainly, the documentation and preservation of the Timurid monuments in those years were carried out mainly with a political mission; however, it should be emphasized that all these activities ensured the survival of the monuments. Vereshchagin’s Samarkand scenes reflect the appearance of the monuments with a clarity and vitality that photographs could not offer at that time, in this sense, they can be described as important visual documents in terms of art history. In this context, in the first part of this paper, the symbolic importance that the Russians attributed to the East, and more specifically to the Turkestan/Samarkand region during the colonization process is discussed. Then, on this basis, the appearance of the Timurid monuments in the 1870s is examined as documented by Vereshchagin and compared with other sources. When his paintings are compared with the photographs in the Turkestan albums prepared in the same years, they also contain some differentiating details. For example, in some of his paintings, it is seen that he made some attempts to “complete” the damaged parts of the buildings. Another remarkable detail is that a rather large painting from the Turkestan series about Timur’s tomb was presented to the Turkish Republic as a gift by the Soviet delegation much later, during the Stalin era. It can be thought that a painting depicting Timur’s tomb was carefully chosen as a diplomatic gift because such a theme reminds both of common historical ties and Russia’s power and dominance in the region. The presentation of this gift to Turkey, which is exhibited in the State Museum of Fine Arts (Ankara) today, is also discussed in this paper based on Turkish and Russian documents and newspapers of that period. To sum up, in this article, Vereshchagin’s paintings are examined both in their context in Russian orientalism and to record the Timurid architectural heritage visually as a document. 

PDF Görünüm


  • Abaşin, Sergey. “Vereşçagin Bez Kolonializma: Kak Postsovetskaya Rossiya ne Otmeçaet 150-Letie Zavoevaniya Sredney Azii”. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie 1/161 (2020): 307-314. google scholar
  • Başkan, Seyfi. Ankara Devlet Resim ve Heykel Müzesi. İstanbul: Ak Yayınları, 1989. google scholar
  • Benois, Alexandre. The Russian School of Painting. New York: Albert A. Knopf, 1916. google scholar
  • Broecke, Marcel Peter Rene van den. Ortelius ’Theatrum Orbis Terrarum (1570-1641). Utrecht: Netherlands Geographical Studies 380, 2009. google scholar
  • Bulgakov, Fyodor İlyiç. Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin i Ego Proizvedeniya. S.Peterburg: Tipografiya A.S. Suvorina, 1896. google scholar
  • Demin, Lev. S Molbertom po Zemnomu Şaru: Mir Glazami V.V. Vereşçagina. Moskova: Mysl, 1991. google scholar
  • Dostoyevski, Fyodor Mihayloviç. Bir Yazarın Günlüğü II. Çev. Kayhan Yükseler. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2021. google scholar
  • “Gazi Hz. Dün M. Karahanı Kabul Ettiler.” Cumhuriyet, 17 Kânunuevvel 1929, 3. google scholar
  • Gorshenina, Svetlana. “Samarkand and Its Cultural Heritage: Perceptions and Persistence of the Russian Colonial Construction of Monuments”. Central Asian Survey 33/2 (2014): 246-269. google scholar
  • Gorshenina, Svetlana ve Vera Tolz. “Constructing Heritage in Early Soviet Central Asia: The Politics of Memory in a Revolutionary Context”. Ab Imperio 4 (2016): 77-115. google scholar
  • “Karahanın Getirdiği Hediyeler.” Vakit, 16 Aralık 1929, 1. google scholar
  • “Konstantin Petroviç Kaufman”. Voennaya Entsiklopediya. 12. Moskova: Tipografiya T-va İ. D. Sytin, 1913, 461-463. google scholar
  • Köksal, Ayşe Hazar. “Ankara’da Bir Resim ve Heykel Müzesi Kuruluşu Öyküsü”. Ankara Resim ve Heykel Müzesi. Ed. Zeynep Yasa-Yaman. Ankara: T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, 2012, 71-90. google scholar
  • Krestovskiy, Vsevolod Vladimiroviç. V Gostyah u Emira Buharskogo. S.Peterburg: İzdaniye A.S. Suvorina, 1887. google scholar
  • Kruber, Aleksandr, Sergey Grigor’yev, Aleksandr Barkov ve Sergey Çefranov. Aziatskaya Rossiya. Moskova: T-va İ.N. Kuşnerev i K., 1903. google scholar
  • Kurat, Akdes Nimet. Rusya Tarihi. Başlangıçtan 1917’ye Kadar. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 2014. google scholar
  • Özel, Mehmet. Ankara Resim ve Heykel Müzesi. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1992. google scholar
  • Sarınay, Yusuf. Türk Milliyetçiliğinin Tarihî Gelişimi ve Türk Ocakları 1912-1931. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat, 2005. google scholar
  • Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, David. “Vasilij V. Vereshchagin’s Canvases of Central Asian Conquest”. Cahiers d’Asie Centrale 17/18 (2009): 179-209. google scholar
  • Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, David. Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration. New Haven ve Londra: Yale University Press, 2010. google scholar
  • Sela, Ron. “The “Heavenly” Stone (Kök Tash) of Samarkand: A Rebels’ Narrative Transformed”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17/1 (2007): 21-32. google scholar
  • “Sketches of Central Asia” Pall Mall Gazette, 9 Nisan 1873, 10-11. google scholar
  • Tolz, Vera. “Orientalism, Nationalism, and Ethnic Diversity in Late Imperial Russia”. The Historical Journal 48/1 (2005): 127-150. google scholar
  • Turkestanskiy Albom, Çast Arheologiçeskaya I-II. Haz. A. L. Kun ve N. V. Bogaevski. Türkistan: 1871-1872. google scholar
  • Uzelli, Gönül. XVIII-XIX. Yüzyıllarda Rus Resim Sanatı. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, 2002. google scholar
  • Uzelli, Gönül. “Vasili V. Vereşçagin’in Gözünden 1877-1878 Osmanlı-Rus Savaşı”. Art-Sanat 9 (2018): 215-228. google scholar
  • Vambeıy, Arminius. Bir Sahte Dervişin Orta Asya Gezisi. Çev. Abdurrahman Samipaşazâde Abdülhalim. İstanbul: Kitabevi, 2009. google scholar
  • Vandov, Dimitır. Atatürk Dönemi Türk-Sovyet İlişkileri. İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları, 2014. google scholar
  • Vasili Vereşçagin. Moskova: Gosudarstvennaya Tretyakovskaya Galereya, 2018. google scholar
  • Verestchagin, Vassili. Realism. Second Appendix to Catalogue of the Verestchagin Exhibition, Inter-State Industrial Exposition of Chicago, 1889. google scholar


Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın



Kök, E. (2022). Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi. Art-Sanat, 0(18), 263-294.


Kök E. Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi. Art-Sanat. 2022;0(18):263-294.


Kök, E. Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 18, p. 263-294, 2022.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kök, Elif,. 2022. “Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 18: 263-294.

Chicago: Humanities Style

Kök, Elif,. Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 18 (Jul. 2024): 263-294.

Harvard: Australian Style

Kök, E 2022, 'Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 18, pp. 263-294, viewed 13 Jul. 2024,

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kök, E. (2022) ‘Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi’, Art-Sanat, 0(18), pp. 263-294. (13 Jul. 2024).


Kök, Elif,. Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 18, 2022, pp. 263-294. [Database Container],


Kök E. Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 13 Jul. 2024 [cited 13 Jul. 2024];0(18):263-294. Available from: doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2022.18.1036321


Kök, Elif. Ressam Vasili Vasilyeviç Vereşçagin’in (1842-1904) Çizgileriyle Timurlu Anıtları: Asya Kültürel Mirasının Belgelenmesi”. Art-Sanat 0/18 (Jul. 2024): 263-294.


Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma29.07.2022


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.