Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/di.2023.34.1.1171037   IUP :10.26650/di.2023.34.1.1171037    Tam Metin (PDF)

Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri

Kevser Özdoğan

Yeni bir yönetim olmaları sebebiyle Emevîlere birçok evâil haberi atfedilmektedir. Emevîlere atfedilen bu haberler, günümüze ulaşan en eski evâil çalışmaları arasında yer alan eserler özelinde incelenmiştir. Emevîlerin ilk olduğu söylenen konularda gerçekten ilk olup olmadıkları, Hz. Peygamber ile Hulefâ-yi Râşidîn dönemi uygulamalarını devam ettirip ettirmedikleri, Emevîlere ilklik atfedilmesinin sebepleri ve bu haberlerin Emevî algısına nasıl bir etkisinin bulunduğu tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Siyasî, dinî ve kültürel konularda Emevîlere atfedilen evâil haberleri incelendiğinde, Emevîler hakkındaki bu haberlerin Emevîleri kuran kişilerin o devletin atası olarak benimsenmesi için ve Emevîlerin devletleşme çabalarından dolayı özellikle evâil literatürüne dahil edildiği görülmüştür. Emevîlerin ilk olmamalarına rağmen ilk oldukları söylenen çoğu konularda nakledilen evâil haberlerinin asıl maksadının Emevîler için olumsuz bir imaj oluşturma çabası olduğu ve bu durumun da Emevî imajını kötü etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Özellikle dinî konularda Hz. Peygamber’in uygulamasına muhalefet edildiği söylenen bazı uygulamalarda ise Hz. Peygamber’in uygulamasını devam ettirdikleri tespit edilmiştir.

DOI :10.26650/di.2023.34.1.1171037   IUP :10.26650/di.2023.34.1.1171037    Tam Metin (PDF)

Establishing Government Based on Narration: al-Awāil Reports Attributed to the Umayyads

Kevser Özdoğan

Many al-awāil reports are attributed to the Umayyads because they were a newly formed state. This study analyzes alawāil reports attributed to the Umayyads specific to al-awāil works that are among the oldest extant al-awāil books. This study aims to determine whether the Umayyads were really the first ones in the fields as they are said to be and whether they continued the practices from the period of the Prophet and the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs. Additionally, this study researches the possible reasons why the Umayyads were attributed with being al-awāil reports in certain aspects and how al-awāil reports affected the perceptions toward the Umayyads. When analyzing al-awāil reports attributed to the Umayyads with regard to the political, religious and cultural fields, the reports about the Umayyads are understood to have been specifically included in al-awāil literature because reports wanted the founders of the Umayyads to be regarded as the ancestors of the state and to contribute to the Umayyad efforts to become a state. The study had concluded that the main purpose of most of al-awāils reported in many fields that considered the Umayyads to be the first-time (al-awwal) despite not really being the first had been to create a negative image for the Umayyads. In fact, these reports negatively affected the perceptions toward the Umayyads. As for certain practices that were especially claimed to be in contradiction with the Prophet’s practices, the Umayyads were determined to have actually continued the Prophet’s practices.


Before the production of separate works on al-awāil, which has the definitions of knowing the beginning of important works, the first things done and the first doers, and the one thing that happened before any other, al-awāil reports can be seen to have occurred in historical and prophetic biographical (al-Sīra al-Nabawiyya) sources. The legitimation of people or authority is well known to have been quite effective in the emergence of al-awāil narrations. Undoubtedly, the legitimacy of a new administration depends on gaining the acceptance of society with regard to political, religious, and cultural topics. However, an important obstacle appears to have existed for the Umayyad dynasty following the Khulafāʾ al-Rāshidūn period. This is because the practices of the Umayyad state concerning political and religious topics, as well as the narration stating, “Those to change the Sunnah of the Prophet for the first time will be one among the Umayyads” had both caused some controversy with regard to their legitimacy.

Though a lot of first-time (al-awwal) practices were attributed to the Umayyads due to being a new administration, they are historically seen as the continuation of a process that had started with the Prophet. The attribution of such al-awāil reports to the Umayyads poses a problem as they had caused a certain paradigm regarding this dynasty. For this reason, the current study presents whether the Umayyads had really been the first ones with regard to the subjects in which they are said to have been the first, whether they had continued the practices from the period of the Prophet and the Khulafā’ al-Rāshidūn, and whether al-awāil narrations that were attributed to them regarding political, religious, and cultural subjects had been influential in the Umayyads gaining acceptance or not. This study also aims to determine whether these narrations had had a positive or negative impact on the perceptions toward the Umayyad State.

In this context, the study analyzes al-awāil reports attributed either to those descended from the Umayyad dynasty or to those officially employed by the Umayyad State specifically with regard to the earliest extant al-awāil works, namely al-Musannaf by Ibn Abī Shayba (d. 235/849), Kitab al-Awāil by Ibn Abī ‘Āṣim (d. 287/900), al-Aʻlāq alnafīsa by Ibn Rusta (d. 300/913), and al-Maḥāsin wa’l-Masāwī by Bayhaqi (d. 320/932). Although various al-awāil narrations are found to have been attributed to members of the Umayyad dynasty, this study has only analyzed the narrations in al-awāil sources mentioned above within the context of the Umayyad government’s legitimacy.

The study classified al-awāil narrations attributed to the Umayyads classified in political, religious, and cultural terms and then compared them to the practices that occurred during the time of the Prophet and the Khulafā’ al-Rāshidūn. At the same time, the study supported this method using the literature review, analysis, and holistic approach methods and avoided anachronism while doing this. Though studies on al-awāil do exist in the field of hadith, the fact that al-awāil narrations have not been studied in the context of the legitimacy of the Umayyad rulers who have an important place in Islamic history is what makes this study valuable.

This study takes the opinion that certain first-time practices such as maqsūrah, ad̲h̲ān, and mahr can be analyzed either both politically and religiously or both politically and culturally. In order to not fall into repetition, however, the study has preferred to evaluate such first-time practices under only one title that is thought to outweigh the others. Some of those to whom al-awāil reports had been attributed had also served the Caliphs from the Khulafāʾ al-Rāshidūn period. However, identifying an exact date when the practices attributed to them first occurred is quite obviously difficult as the concept of “first” has an ambiguous use. Because the Umayyads and their rulers had mostly converted to Islam in the later period after the conquest of Mecca, that the study prefers to accept first-time practices mentioned here to have happened during the Umayyad period needs to be stated.

al-Awāil reports mentioned in regard to administrative topics are seen to focus on the steps the Umayyads had taken, especially with regard to how the rulers had slowly moved away from society in order to become a monarch, establish their power, and institutionalize. While these al-awāil narrations generally involve Muʿāwiya ibn Abī Sufyān, Ziyad b. Abih and Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, certain events experienced at that time such as the Battle of Karbala are also noteworthily attributed as first-time events. The firsttime narrations related to altering the Sunnah of the Prophet, the titles used by the rulers, the vehicles they’d receive, being gifted a decapitated head, the Battle of Karbala, and adding Ziyād to the lineage of Abī Sufyān are understood to have been produced later for the purpose of creating negative perceptions toward the Umayyads.

Obviously al-awāil reports on building a city, passing the Balkh River, and constructing a ship with regard to the wars the Umayyads had fought to expand their borders were actually a continuation of the practices from the previous periods and cannot be regarded as actual first-time practices. Along with presenting the richness of the state, because the matters of ornamenting dirham coins, getting money from the bazaar, and quantity of mahr are closely related to ostentatiousness, they cannot be said to have contributed to the Umayyads’ good image. The aim of having such reports declared is understood to have been not to actually inform about this very subject but to stimulate and reinforce a negative image. However, all the first-time practices mentioned here can be said to have been positive steps the Umayyads had taken toward institutionalizing the state and therefore are worthy of being called first-time practices.

The fact that the Umayyads had used issues related to worshipping and aḥkām [judgement], especially the ad̲hān, minbar, and khuṭbah, for political purposes to make people adapt to their administration and accept their legitimacy was considered to be in a manner that contradicted the Prophet’s practices and thus caused religious criticism. As a result, the Abbasids used this against the Umayyads and turned it into propaganda to lay the foundations for their own state. No first-time practices are found that can be attributed to the Umayyads regarding the hajj, qira’at, qāḍī, and testimony, and even though these were all practiced during the period of the Prophet and the Khulafāʾ alRāshidūn, these can be taken as other negative attitudes toward the Umayyads regarding religion, especially when not considering the background of the situation regarding the hajj and qira’at. As a result, these were found to have become elements that put the Umayyads at a disadvantage.

With regard to cultural practices (i.e., al-awāil reports on naming and clothing attributed to the Umayyads), the Umayyads were understood to have not been the first ones to do these. The names Abd al-Malik and Abd al-Aziz had been given personally by the Prophet, and the shoes (khuff) and cotton fabric types narrated in al-awāils had also been used during the time of the Prophet. While a regional first-time practice did exist regarding water and snow, the Umayyads were observed to have made practices contrary to those of the Prophet, although different al-awāil reports are found about riding on a camel or horse during a funeral. In this case, the Umayyads cannot be argued to have brought about an innovation or bid’ah to the society in general.

In conclusion, certain al-awāil reports attributed to the Umayyads can be said to have been especially included in al-awāil literature as a result of the state founders’ efforts to be taken on as the fathers of that state and to institutionalize it. However, the Umayyads were seen to have been unsuccessful at being adopted by the society and forming an origin story but to have been successful with regard to gaining power. Most of al-awāil narrations that had created negative impressions about the Umayyads actually had the characteristic of having maintained the practices of the Prophet and the Khulafāʾ alRāshidūn. However, they were the first ones from their own period regarding topics where they’d continued the practices of the Prophet and the Khulafāʾ al-Rāshidūn. They were also seen to have actually continued the Prophet’s practices with regard to certain practices in which al-awāil reports say they opposed the Prophet, especially about religious subjects. Yet, because the Umayyads had acted differently from the Prophet regarding the topics of ad̲h̲ān, the minbar, and khuṭbah, which the Abbasids in fact had politicized despite being religious elements, the perception had occurred that Umayyads were generally not cautious enough about religion. Moreover, the real purpose of many of al-awāil narrations about the Umayyads that stated them to have been the first ones despite not actually being the first, was obviously to create a negative impression of them. 

PDF Görünüm


  • Acar, Abdurrahman. “Evâil Edebiyatı Üzerine”. Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi 3/12 (2002), 6-15. google scholar
  • Akaslan, Yaşar. “Fâtiha Sûresi’nin Kırâat İhtilâfları Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi”. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 44 (Haziran 2018), 109-141. google scholar
  • Akbaş, Mehmet. “Ölü Bedenlere Kasdetme Girişimi Olarak İslam Tarihinde İlk Baş Kesme Hadisesinin Ortaya Çıkışı ve Emeviler Döneminde Başları Kesilenler”. İslam Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2/1 (2017), 53-67. google scholar
  • Akpınar, Ömer Faruk. “Evâil Literatürü ve Ebû Arûbe el-Harrânî’nin (v.318-931) Kitabu’l-Evâil’i”. İslâm Tarihi ve Medeniyetinde Şanlıurfa Sempozyumu (25-27 Mart 2016) Tebliğler I. ed. Kasım Şulul, Ömer Sabuncu. 475-489. Şanlıurfa: Şanlıurfa Büyükşehir Belediyesi, 2016. google scholar
  • Algül, Ayşe Betül. Hz. Peygamber Döneminde Mehir Uygulamaları ve Mehrin Hikmetleri. Karabük: Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2019. google scholar
  • Arslantaş, Nuh. Emeviler Döneminde İslam Dünyasında Yahudiler. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2016. google scholar
  • Ayalon, A. “Malik”. Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition. 6/261-262. Leiden: Brill, 1991. google scholar
  • Azizova, Elnure. Hz. Peygamber Döneminde Çalışma Hayatı ve Meslekler. İstanbul: İSAM, 2011. google scholar
  • Bakır, Abdulhalik. “Orta Çağ İslam Dünyasında Deri, Tahta ve Kâğıt Sanayi”, Belleten 65 (Nisan 2001), 75-160. google scholar
  • Belâzürî, Ahmed b. Yahyâ b. Câbir b. Dâvûd. Fütûhu’l-büldân. nşr. Abdullah Üneys et-Tabbâ‘. Beyrut: Müessesetü’l-Maârif, 1987. google scholar
  • Berkol, Ceyhun. Geçmişten Günümüze Anadolu’da Keten Dokumacılığı. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2008. google scholar
  • Beyhakî, İbrahim b. Muhammed. el-Mehâsin ve’l-mesâvî. Beyrut: Dâru Sâdır, ts. google scholar
  • Bozok, Sabiha. Sezgin Örme Pamuklu Kumaşlarda Tekrarlı Yıkamalar ve Kumaş Özelliklerine Etkisi. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2011. google scholar
  • Buhârî, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. İsmail. Şahîhu’l-Buhâri. Riyâd: Dâru’s-Selâm 1999. google scholar
  • Dadan, Ali. Eski Araplara Göre Türkler (Câhiliye Döneminden Emevîler’in Sonuna Kadar). İstanbul: Hikmetevi Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • Dûrî, Abdülazîz. “Emîr”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 11/121-123. Ankara: TDV Yayınları, 1995. google scholar
  • Ebû Dâvud, Süleyman b. el-Eş‘as el-Ezdî el-Sicistânî. Sünenü Ebû Dâvûd. thk. Heysem b. Nizâr Temîm. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Erkâm, 1420/1999. google scholar
  • Fîrûzâbâdî, Mecdüddin. Kamûsu’l-muhît. thk. Enes Muhammed eş-Şâmî, Zekeriya Cabir Ahmed. Kahire: Dâru’l-Hadis, 2008. google scholar
  • Hizmetli, Mustafa. Tarihte Şehir ve Pazar. Ankara: Araştırma Yayınları, 2012. google scholar
  • İbn Ebî Âsım, Ebû Bekr Ahmed b. Amr eş-Şeybânî. Kitâbu’l-evâ'il. thk. Muhammed b. Nâsır el-Acemî. b.y.: Dâru’l-Hulefâ, ts. google scholar
  • İbn Ebî Şeybe, Ebû Bekr Abdullah b. Muhammed b. İbrâhîm. el-Muşannef. thk. Hamed b. Abdullah el-Cemâa, Muhammed b. İbrahim el-Luheydan. 16 cilt. Riyad: Mektebetu’l-Rüşdî, 2004. google scholar
  • İbn Hacer, Ahmed b. Alî el-Askalânî. el-İşâbe fî temyîzi’ş-şahâbe. thk. Adil Ahmed Abdulmevcûd, Ali Muhammed Muavvaz. 9 cilt. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, 2010. google scholar
  • İbn Havkal, Ebü’l-Kâsım Muhammed b. Alî en-Nasîbî. “Şûretü’l-arz”. thk. J. H. Kramers, Islamic Geography. ed. Fuad Sezgin. 35/1-528. Frankfurt: Publications of the Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science, 1992. google scholar
  • İbn Hişâm, Ebû Muhammed Cemâlüddîn Abdülmelik el-Himyerî. es-Siretu’n-nebeviyye. thk. Mustafa Sakâ vd. 2 cilt. Turâsi’l-İslâm, ts. google scholar
  • İbn Kesîr, Ebü’l-Fidâ’ İmâdüddîn İsmâîl b. Şihâbiddîn. Ömer el-Bidâye ve’n-nihâye. thk. Ahmed Câd. 7 cilt. Kahire: Dâru’l-Hadîs 2006. google scholar
  • İbn Kesîr, Ebü’l-Fidâ’ İsmâîl b. Şihâbiddîn Ömer. Tefsîrü’l-Kur ’âni’l- 'azîm. thk. Sami b. Muhammed es-Sellâme. 8 cilt. Riyad: Daru’l-Taybe, 1999. google scholar
  • İbn Kuteybe, Ebû Muhammed Abdullah b. Müslim. el-Ma'ârif. thk. Servet Ukkâşe. Kahire: Dâru’l-Maârif, ts. google scholar
  • İbn Mâce, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. Yezîd el-Kazvînî. Sünenü İbn Mâce. Riyâd: Dâru’s-Selâm 1999. google scholar
  • İbn Manzûr, Ebü’l-Fazl Cemâlüddîn Muhammed b. Mükerrem. Lisânü’l-arab. Beyrut: Dâru Sâdır, ts. google scholar
  • İbn Rüste, Ebû Alî Ahmed b. Ömer. el-A 'lâku’n-nefise. ed. M. J. De Goeje. b.y.: Brill, 1892. google scholar
  • İbn Sa‘d, Muhammed b. Sa’d b. Menî‘ ez-Zührî. Kitabu ’t-tabakâti’l-kebîr. thk. Ali Muhammed Ömer. 9 cilt. Kahire: Mektebetu’l-Hancî, 2001. google scholar
  • İbnü’l-Esir İzzüddîn Ebi’l-Hasan Alî b. Muhammed el-Cezerî. el-Kâmil fi’t-târîh. thk. Ebü’l-Fidâ’ Abdullah el- Kâdî. 11 cilt. Lübnan: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, 2010. google scholar
  • İbnü’l-Esîr, İzzüddîn Ebü’l-Hasan Alî b. Muhammed el-Cezerî. Usdu’l-gâbefî ma nfeti’ş-şahâbe. thk. google scholar
  • Ali Muhammed Muavvez, Adil Ahmed Abdulmevcûd. 8 cilt. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, 2008. google scholar
  • İbnü’l-Esîr, Mecdüddîn Ebi’s-Seâdât el-Mübârek b. Muhammed el-Cezerî. Tetimmetü Câmiu’l-uşûl li-ehâdîsi’r-Resûl. thk. Beşir Muhammed Uyûn. 12 cilt. b.y.: Dâru’l-Fikr, 1389/1969. google scholar
  • Kalkaşendî, Ebü’l-Abbâs Ahmed. Şubhu’l-a'şâ. 15 cilt. Kahire: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-Mısrıyye, 1922. google scholar
  • Lang, Katherine H. Awa’il in Early Arabic Historiography: Beginnings and İdentity in the Middle Abbasid Empire. Illinois: The University of Chicago, Doktora Tezi, 1997. google scholar
  • Müslim, Ebü’l-Hüseyn Müslim b. el-Haccâc. Sahîh-i Müslim. nşr. Ebû Kuteybe Nazar Muhammed el-Feryâbî. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kurtuba, 2009. google scholar
  • Orhan, Zeynep. Evâil Türü Rivayetlerin Hadis İlmine Katkısı. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2008. google scholar
  • Özel, Ahmet. “Abdullah b. Nevfel”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 1/126. İstanbul: TDV Yayınları, 1988. google scholar
  • Özkuyumcu, Nadir. “İbn Ebû Bekre”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 19/425-426. İstanbul: TDV Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Pakalın, Mehmet Zeki. Osmanlı Tarih Deyimleri ve Terimleri Sözlüğü. 3 cilt. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1993. google scholar
  • Plessner, M. “Melik”. İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 7/664-665. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, ts. google scholar
  • Sahnûn, Saîd et-Tenûhî. el-Müdevveneti’l-kübrâ. 5 cilt. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, 1994. google scholar
  • Semhûdî, Ebü’l-Hasen Nûrüddîn Alî b. Abdillâh b. Ahmed b. Alî el-Hasenî. Vefâ 'ü’l-vefâ bi-ahbâri dâri ’l-Muştafâ, thk. Muhammed Muhyeddin Abdülhamid. 4 cilt. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, ts. google scholar
  • Serahsî, Şemseddîn. Kitabu’l-mebsût. 31 cilt. Beyrut: Daru’l-Marife, t.y. google scholar
  • Söylemez, Mehmet Mahfuz. “Vâsıt Kentinin Kuruluşu ve İlk Sakinleri Üzerine”. Çorum İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 1/2 (Aralık 2002), 147-172. google scholar
  • Şâfiî, Muhammed b. İdrîs. el-Ümm. thk. Rıfat Fevzi Abdulmuttalib. 11 cilt. b.y.: Daru’l-Vefâ’, 2001. google scholar
  • Şâmî, Muhammed b. Yûsuf es-Sâlihî. Sübülü’l-hüdâ ve’r-reşâd f sîreti hayri’l-'ibâd. thk. Ali Hasan Mahmud Habibe. 12 cilt. Kahire: İhyâi’t-Turasi’l-İslâmi, 1418/1997. google scholar
  • Taberî, Ebû Ca‘fer Muhammed b. Cerîr. Târîhu’t-Taberî, Târîhu’l-ümem ve’l-mülûk. 6 cilt. Lübnan: Daru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, 2012. google scholar
  • Tirmizî, Ebû Îsâ Muhammed b. Îsâ b. Sevre. Câmi u t-Tirmizî. thk. Salih b. Abdilazîz b. Muhammed b. İbrahim. Riyâd: Dâru’s-Selâm, 1999. google scholar
  • Togan, Zeki Velidi “Amu-Derya”. İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 1/419-426. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1978. google scholar
  • Utku, Nihal Şahin Kızıldeniz -Çöl, Gemi ve Tacir-. İstanbul: Klasik Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • Ya'kflbî, Ebü’l-Abbâs Ahmed b. Ebî Ya'kflb İshâk. Kitâbü’l-büldân. thk. M. J. De Goeje. y.y., 1892. google scholar
  • Ya’kubî, İbn Vâdıh Ahmed b. İshak b. Câfer. Târîhu’l-Ya'kubî. thk. Abdü’l-Emir Muhanna. 2 cilt. Beyrut: y.y., 2010. google scholar
  • Yazıcı, Mahmut. “Sahâbe Evâili ve İlk Dönem Uzmanları”. Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 13/25 (2014), 125-160. google scholar
  • Zehebî, Şemsüddîn Muhammed b. Ahmed b. Osmân. Siyeru a 'İcmi’n-nübelâ ’. thk. Şuayb el-Arnavut, Muhammed Nuaym el-Urkususî. 25 cilt. Beyrut: Müessesetü’r-Risâle, 1982. google scholar


Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın



Özdoğan, K. (2023). Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri. darulfunun ilahiyat, 34(1), 33-64.


Özdoğan K. Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri. darulfunun ilahiyat. 2023;34(1):33-64.


Özdoğan, K. Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri. darulfunun ilahiyat, [Publisher Location], v. 34, n. 1, p. 33-64, 2023.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Özdoğan, Kevser,. 2023. “Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri.” darulfunun ilahiyat 34, no. 1: 33-64.

Chicago: Humanities Style

Özdoğan, Kevser,. Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri.” darulfunun ilahiyat 34, no. 1 (Sep. 2023): 33-64.

Harvard: Australian Style

Özdoğan, K 2023, 'Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri', darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 33-64, viewed 30 Sep. 2023,

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Özdoğan, K. (2023) ‘Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri’, darulfunun ilahiyat, 34(1), pp. 33-64. (30 Sep. 2023).


Özdoğan, Kevser,. Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri.” darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 34, no. 1, 2023, pp. 33-64. [Database Container],


Özdoğan K. Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri. darulfunun ilahiyat [Internet]. 30 Sep. 2023 [cited 30 Sep. 2023];34(1):33-64. Available from: doi: 10.26650/di.2023.34.1.1171037


Özdoğan, Kevser. Rivayetten İktidara Bir Temel: Emevîlere Atfedilen Evâil Haberleri”. darulfunun ilahiyat 34/1 (Sep. 2023): 33-64.


Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma22.03.2023


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.