Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010    Tam Metin (PDF)

Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?

Salih TürediFurkan Yıldız

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; 1995-2018 yılları arasında MENA bölgesinde militarizasyon faaliyetlerinin çevresel kirliliğe neden olup olmadığını analiz etmektir. Bu amaca yönelik çalışmada iki aşamalı sistem-GMM metodu kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada bağımlı değişken olarak çevresel kirliliği temsilen CO2 emisyonu seçilmiştir. Temel bağımsız değişken ise militarizasyon faaliyetlerinin temsilcisi olarak askeri harcamaların GSYH’ye oranı olarak seçilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan diğer kontrol bağımsız değişkenler, ekonomik küreselleşme endeksi, doğal kaynak bolluğu, kişi başı GSYH, ticari açıklık ve toplam sermaye oluşumudur. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre CO2 emisyonu ile askeri harcamaların GSYH’ye oranı, doğal kaynak bolluğu, kişi başı GSYH ve ticari açıklık arasında pozitif, anlamlı bir ilişki; CO2 emisyonu ile ekonomik küreselleşme ve toplam sermaye oluşumu arasında negatif, anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmaktadır. Bu sonuçlara göre askeri harcamaların azaltılması, fosil enerji tüketiminin yenilenebilir enerji ile ikamesi, iktisadi büyüme ile çevresel sürdürülebilirliği birlikte gözeten politikalar önem arz etmektedir.

DOI :10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010    Tam Metin (PDF)

How Militarization Affects Environmental Pollution in MENA Countries

Salih TürediFurkan Yıldız

The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether militarization activities have caused environmental pollution in the MENA region between 1995 and 2018. To this end, the two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) was used. The dependent variable of the study is CO2 emissions, which represents the environmental pollution. The main independent variable of the study was chosen as the ratio of military expenditures to GDP, which represents military activities. Other independent variables used in the study are economic globalization index, natural resource abundance, GDP per capita, trade openness, and total capital formation. According to the study results, a significant positive relationship exists for CO2 emissions with the ratio of military expenditures to GDP, natural resource abundance, GDP per capita, and trade openness; a significant negative relationship exists for CO2 emissions with economic globalization and total capital formation. According to these results, having military expenditures reduced, fossil energy consumption replaced with renewable energy, and policies made that promote economic growth as well as environmental sustainability are crucial for reducing CO2 emissions.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


The world has witnessed an increase in environmental pollution in the past few decades. Various levels of environmental destruction have occurred in different parts of the world, the glaciers at the poles are melting due to global warming, and sea levels are rising; as a result of all this destruction, some species on Earth are disappearing, while others are in danger of extinction. In order to overcome this whole situation, global international action plans such as the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Climate Summit, and the United Nations (UN) Climate Change Conferences (COP) have been developed. Economic growth, population growth, increasing energy demands, and other various factors, national defense activities being one of them, lay behind the environmental destruction. Armies are dominant institutions in the modern world, possessing enormous infrastructure opportunities, technological capabilities, weapon systems, military bases, and personnel (Clark et al., 2010).

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region covers a geography where conflict and political, economic, social, and other instabilities reign. The region generally consists of countries governed by authoritarian regimes where rentier states prevail. The Arab Spring that took place in 2011 and spread to the Arabian Peninsula started in Tunisia. Having distanced itself from the West after the revolution, Iran has since been regarded as a threat by the Western world, facing embargoes and high security concerns. Established in 1948, Israel has constantly followed an expansionist policy in the region and occupied Palestinian lands in the process. This situation requires Israel to be constantly vigilant in terms of its military presence. Again, Egypt also got its share from the Arab Spring; the Morsi administration that came to power by democratic election faced a military coup from Sisi. Various examples of instability have also occurred in Saudi Arabia, the relatively stable country of the region, as well as the other remaining countries; as a result, military structures are constantly being fortified.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a relationship exists between military activities (militarization) and environmental pollution in the MENA region. The study uses data from the 1995-2018 period. The following sections will first discuss the relevant literature then mention the method and data set used. The study will end with the conclusion, discussing the findings and suggesting policies.

Literature

The factors behind environmental destruction include economic growth (Kahuthu, 2006; Saidi & Hammami, 2017; Shahbaz et al., 2017; Stern et al., 1996), rapid population growth (Pimentel et al., 2007; Sarbapriya et al., 2011; Shaw, 1989), increase in energy demand (Alam et al., 2007; Saboori & Sulaiman, 2013; Sehrawat et al.,2015), and economic globalization (Shahbaz et al., 2017; You & Lv, 2018; Koengkan et al., 2020; Yıldız, 2021). Another factor involves the military activities countries in the region carry out. The common opinion in the literature is that militarization activities increase CO2 emissions (i.e., environmental pollution, see Bildirici, 2017a, 2017b; Solarin et al., 2018; Ben Afia & Harbi, 2018; Zandi et al., 2019; Edmond & Boker, 2019; Gokmenoglu et al., 2020). Although few in number, studies are found in the literature showing military expenditures to increase environmental quality (see Ozcan & Apergis, 2018; Ullah et al., 2021).

Methodology and Data Set

This study aims to empirically examine the effect of militarization on environmental pollution in 12 MENA countries over the period of 1995-2018 using dynamic panel data analysis. The two-step system GMM was used to analyze the relationships among the variables. The prediction model created for this purpose is as follows:

This function can be converted to dynamic panel data form and written as follows:

In the equation (N = the 12 MENA countries), t=1,2,3....(T = 1995-2018 = 23). stands for unit effects and stands for error term with white noise. Because the lagged variable of the dependent variable is included in the set of explanatory variables in the equation, the model thus transforms into a dynamic format. Also, in the model represent the coefficients of the explanatory variables.

In the model, lnCO2 is the dependent variable of countries’ carbon dioxide emissions per capita in metric tons (1,000 kilograms) and represents environmental pollution. lnmilex is the main explanatory variable of the model (i.e., militarization). The other explanatory variables are economic globalization index (lneglob) natural resource abundance (lnnatural), per capita GDP (lnpgdp), trade openness (lntrade) and total capital formation (lngfc). Descriptive information and data sources regarding the variables are given in Table 1. The expression ln in front of the variables indicates the analysis to use the natural logarithmic value for all variables.

Findings

Pearson correlation and scatter diagram analysis (see Figure 3) are use prior to the econometric analysis to obtain preliminary findings regarding the direction of the relationships (i.e., positive or negative) between variables. The Pearson correlation findings show lnCO2 to have significant positive correlations with lnmilex (0.548), lneglob (0.385), lnnatural (0.288), lnpgdp (0.917), and lntrade (0.392), and a significant negative correlation with lngfc (-0.219). Meanwhile, when taking into account the distribution of the observations of the variables and the slopes of the regression lines, the scatter diagram analysis is also seen to support the Pearson correlation analysis findings.

Dynamic panel data estimation results are given in Table 2. Firstly, the Wald test shows the predicted model to be statistically significant at the 1% level. The validity of the generated instrument variables was tested next using the Hansen test. The significance value of the Hansen test statistics is seen to be greater than 0.05, as expected. Finally, the autocorrelation test was used to find the model has one first-order autocorrelation (pAR(1) < 0.05) and no second-order autocorrelation (pAR(2) > 0.05). Therefore, the diagnostic tests reveal consistent results. Analysis results show lneglob and lngfc to have significant negative effects on lnCO2 and lnmilex, lnnatural, lntrade and lnpgdp to have statistically significant positive effects on lnCO2. 

The coefficients obtained at the end of the analysis indicate a 1% increase in military expenditures in the MENA region to increases CO2 emissions by 0.011%, a 1% increase in economic globalization to reduce CO2 emissions by 0.073%, a 1% increase in natural resource abundance to increase CO2 emissions by 0.0025%, a 1% increase in per capita GDP to increases CO2 emissions by 0.032%, a 1% increase in trade openness to increase CO2 emissions by 0.027%, and a 1% increase in total capital formation to reduce CO2 emissions by 0.014%.

Conclusion

This study has analyzed the effect of militarization on environmental pollution in the MENA region. The study used the two-step system GMM and chose the amount of CO2 emissions to represent environmental pollution and the ratio of military expenditures to total GDP to represent militarization. Other controlled variables thought to have an impact on CO2 emissions are economic globalization, abundance of natural resources, trade openness, per capita GDP, and total capital formation. The results produce empirical evidence for the existence of a positive relationship for CO2 emissions with military expenditures, abundance of natural resources, trade openness, and per capita GDP and of a negative relationship for CO2 emissions with economic globalization and total capital formation. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Abbas, Q., Nurunnabi, M., Alfakhri, Y., Khan, W., Hussain, A., & Iqbal, W. (2020). The role of fixed capital formation, renewable and non-renewable energy in economic growth and carbon emission: A case study of Belt and Road Initiative project. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(36), 45476–45486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10413-y google scholar
  • Adebayo, T. S., & Beton Kalmaz, D. (2021). Determinants of CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Egypt. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 28(2), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10651-020-00482-0 google scholar
  • Ahmed, S., Alam, K., Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2020). Militarisation, energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Myanmar. Defence and Peace Economics, 31(6), 615–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2018.1560566 google scholar
  • Alam, S., Fatima, A., & Butt, M. S. (2007). Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradation. Journal of Asian Economics, 18(5), 825–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2007.07.005 google scholar
  • Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877 google scholar
  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of errorcomponents models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304- 4076(94)01642-D google scholar
  • Ben Afia, N., & Harbi, S. (2018). The relationship between CO2 emissions and military effort. Journal of Economics Studies and Research, 2018, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.342225 google scholar
  • Bildirici, M. E. (2017a). CO2 emissions and militarization in G7 countries: Panel cointegration and trivariate causality approaches. Environment and Development Economics, 22(6), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1700016X google scholar
  • Bildirici, M. E. (2017b). The effects of militarization on biofuel consumption and CO2 emission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.103 google scholar
  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1998), 115–143. google scholar
  • Chakraborty, D., & Mukherjee, S. (2013). How do trade and investment flows affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from panel data. Environmental Development, 6, 34–47. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envdev.2013.02.005 google scholar
  • Clark, B., & Jorgenson, A. K. (2012). The treadmill of destruction and the environmental impacts of militaries 1: Environmental impacts of militaries. Sociology Compass, 6(7), 557–569. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00474.x google scholar
  • Clark, B., Jorgenson, A. K., & Kentor, J. (2010). Militarization and energy consumption: A test of treadmill of destruction theory in comparative perspective. International Journal of Sociology, 40(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659400202 google scholar
  • Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2003). Determining the trade–environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00021-4 google scholar
  • Edmond, N. D., & Boker, P. (2019). Economic growth, military spending and environmental degradation in Africa. MPRA Working Paper (No. 97455). google scholar
  • Erdogan, S., Gedikli, A., Çevik, E. İ., & Öncü, M. A. (2022). Does military expenditure impact environmental sustainability in developed Mediterranean countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18226-3 google scholar
  • Farhani, S., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(20), 15663–15676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1 google scholar
  • Günay, H. F., & Topal, M. H. (2021). Does quality of governance affect tax effort in Sub-Saharan Africa? Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 6(2), 414–434. google scholar
  • Hanif, I., Faraz Raza, S. M., Gago-de-Santos, P., & Abbas, Q. (2019). Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: Some empirical evidence. Energy, 171, 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.011 google scholar
  • Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis—Advantages and challenges. TEST, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x google scholar
  • Hussain, J., Khan, A., & Zhou, K. (2020). The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO2 emission in belt & road ınitiative countries: A cross-country analysis. Energy, 199, 117409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117409 google scholar
  • Jorgenson, A. K., Clark, B., & Kentor, J. (2010). Militarization and the environment: A panel study of Ccrbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970–2000. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.1.7 google scholar
  • Kahuthu, A. (2006). Economic growth and environmental degradation in a global context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005- 0785-3 google scholar
  • Khan, S., Peng, Z., & Li, Y. (2019). Energy consumption, environmental degradation, economic growth and financial development in globe: Dynamic simultaneous equations panel analysis. Energy Reports, 5, 1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.004 google scholar
  • Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., & Santiago, R. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of globalisation on CO2 emissions of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09752-0 google scholar
  • Langnel, Z., Amegavi, G. B., Donkor, P., & Mensah, J. K. (2021). Income inequality, human capital, natural resource abundance, and ecological footprint in ECOWAS member countries. Resources Policy, 74, 102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102255 google scholar
  • Lankoski, L. (2010). Linkages between environmental policy and competitiveness. OECD Environment Working Papers (No. 13). https://doi.org/10.1787/218446820583 google scholar
  • Mahmood, H., Maalel, N., & Zarrad, O. (2019). Trade openness and CO2 emissions: Evidence from Tunisia. Sustainability, 11(12), 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123295 google scholar
  • Mikayilov, J. I., Galeotti, M., & Hasanov, F. J. (2018). The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1558–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.06.269 google scholar
  • Ohlan, R. (2015). The impact of population density, energy consumption, economic growth and trade openness on CO2 emissions in India. Natural Hazards, 79(2), 1409–1428. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11069-015-1898-0 google scholar
  • Ozcan, B., & Apergis, N. (2018). The impact of internet use on air pollution: Evidence from emerging countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(5), 4174–4189. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11356-017-0825-1 google scholar
  • Pimentel, D., Cooperstein, S., Randell, H., Filiberto, D., Sorrentino, S., Kaye, B., Nicklin, C., Yagi, J., Brian, J., O’Hern, J., Habas, A., & Weinstein, C. (2007). Ecology of increasing diseases: Population growth and environmental degradation. Human Ecology, 35(6), 653–668. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10745-007-9128-3 google scholar
  • Qayyum, U., Anjum, S., & Sabir, S. (2021). Armed conflict, militarization and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from South Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125299. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125299 google scholar
  • Rahman, M. M. (2020). Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. Journal of Environmental Management, 253, 109742. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109742 google scholar
  • Rahman, Z. U., & Ahmad, M. (2019). Modeling the relationship between gross capital formation and CO2 (a)symmetrically in the case of Pakistan: An empirical analysis through NARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8), 8111–8124. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11356-019-04254-7 google scholar
  • Roodman, D. (2009a). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x google scholar
  • Roodman, D. (2009b). How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106 google scholar
  • Saboori, B., & Sulaiman, J. (2013). Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: Evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 60, 892–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.099 google scholar
  • Saidi, S., & Hammami, S. (2017). Modeling the causal linkages between transport, economic growth and environmental degradation for 75 countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53, 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.031 google scholar
  • Sarbapriya, R., & Aditya, I. (2011). Impact of population growth on environmental degradation: Case of India. Journal of Economics, 2(8), 72–77. google scholar
  • Sehrawat, M., Giri, A. K., & Mohapatra, G. (2015). The impact of financial development, economic growth and energy consumption on environmental degradation: Evidence from India. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 26(5), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1108/ MEQ-05-2014-0063 google scholar
  • Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008 google scholar
  • Shaw, R. P. (1989). Rapid population growth and environmental degradation: Ultimate versus proximate factors. Environmental Conservation, 16(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0376892900009279 google scholar
  • Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., & Ozturk, I. (2018). Determinants of pollution and the role of the military sector: Evidence from a maximum likelihood approach with two structural breaks in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(31), 30949–30961. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11356-018-3060-5 google scholar
  • Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24(7), 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0 google scholar
  • Ullah, S., Andlib, Z., Majeed, M. T., Sohail, S., & Chishti, M. Z. (2021). Asymmetric effects of militarization on economic growth and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Pakistan and India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9484–9497. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11356-020-11142-y google scholar
  • Wang, K., Wu, M., Sun, Y., Shi, X., Sun, A., & Zhang, P. (2019). Resource abundance, industrial structure, and regional carbon emissions efficiency in China. Resources Policy, 60, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.001 google scholar
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press. google scholar
  • Xiaoman, W., Majeed, A., Vasbieva, D. G., Yameogo, C. E. W., & Hussain, N. (2021). Natural resources abundance, economic globalization, and carbon emissions: Advancing sustainable development agenda. Sustainable Development, 29(5), 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sd.2192 google scholar
  • Yameogo, C. E. W., Omojolaibi, J. A., & Dauda, R. O. S. (2021). Economic globalisation, institutions and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Research in Globalization, 3, 100035. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100035 google scholar
  • Yıldız, F. (2021). Globalization, international trade, and CO2 convergence: Evidence from G7 countries. In Handbook of research on the empirical aspects of strategic trade negotiations and management (pp. 53–64). IGI Global. google scholar
  • You, W., & Lv, Z. (2018). Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: A spatial panel approach. Energy Economics, 73, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016 google scholar
  • Zandi, G., Haseeb, M., & Abidin, I. S. Z. (2019). The impact of democracy, corruption and military expenditure on environmental degradation: Evidence from top six ASEAN countries. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7443 google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Türedi, S., & Yıldız, F. (2022). Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 42(1), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010


AMA

Türedi S, Yıldız F. Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2022;42(1):217-235. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010


ABNT

Türedi, S.; Yıldız, F. Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 42, n. 1, p. 217-235, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Türedi, Salih, and Furkan Yıldız. 2022. “Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 42, no. 1: 217-235. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010


Chicago: Humanities Style

Türedi, Salih, and Furkan Yıldız. Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 42, no. 1 (Dec. 2022): 217-235. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010


Harvard: Australian Style

Türedi, S & Yıldız, F 2022, 'Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?', İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 217-235, viewed 7 Dec. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Türedi, S. and Yıldız, F. (2022) ‘Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?’, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 42(1), pp. 217-235. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010 (7 Dec. 2022).


MLA

Türedi, Salih, and Furkan Yıldız. Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 42, no. 1, 2022, pp. 217-235. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010


Vancouver

Türedi S, Yıldız F. Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi [Internet]. 7 Dec. 2022 [cited 7 Dec. 2022];42(1):217-235. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010


ISNAD

Türedi, Salih - Yıldız, Furkan. Militarizasyon MENA Ülkelerinde Çevresel Kirliliği Nasıl Etkiliyor?”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 42/1 (Dec. 2022): 217-235. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.1.0010



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim06.11.2021
Kabul02.03.2022
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma30.03.2022

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.