Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/jos.1139572   IUP :10.26650/jos.1139572    Tam Metin (PDF)

Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187

Elif Ünal

Haçlı Seferleri, dünya tarihini derinden etkileyen ve iki asırlık bir sürece damgasını vuran Ortaçağ’ın en mühim hadiselerindendir. Papa II. Urbanus’un 27 Kasım 1095 tarihinde Clermont Konsili’nde yaptığı çağrı ile fiilen başlayan bu siyasî amaçlı askerî harekât Doğu’da Lâtin hâkimiyetinin kurulmasına imkân sağlamıştır. Nitekim Birinci Haçlı Seferi sırasında 1098 yılında önce Urfa ile Antakya’da devletler tesis eden Lâtinler, 15 Temmuz 1099’da Kudüs’ü zaptederek bir krallık kurmuş ve Filistin topraklarını işgale başlamışlardır. Bu süreçte Haçlıların eline geçen mevkilerden biri de Celîle bölgesinin kuzeyinde bulunan Tibnîn olmuş ve Haçlılar tarafından buraya Toron isimli bir kale inşa edilmiştir. Akabinde ise Tibnîn, asillerden Onfroi de Toron’a tevdi edilerek Kudüs Haçlı Krallığı’na bağlı bir lordluğa dönüştürülmüştür. Stratejik bakımdan oldukça mühim bir konumda yer alan Tibnîn ve burada inşa edilen kale, bölgedeki Haçlı istilalarında ve Müslümanlara karşı verilen mücadelelerde Franklara askerî, siyasî ve iktisadî bakımdan pek çok avantaj kazandırırken, Tibnîn hâkimleri de Lâtin Doğu tarihinin şekillenmesinde önemli bir rol oynamıştır. Bu çalışmada kaynakların verdiği bilgiler ışığında 1099-1187 yılları arasındaki süreçte Tibnîn ile Toron Kalesi’nin rolü kronolojik bir şekilde ele alınacak ve değerlendirilecektir.

DOI :10.26650/jos.1139572   IUP :10.26650/jos.1139572    Tam Metin (PDF)

A Medieval Crusader Castle: Tibnīn (Toron) 1099-1187

Elif Ünal

The Crusades were one of the most important occurrences of the Middle Ages, deeply affecting world history and leaving its mark over a period of two centuries. This politically motivated military campaign began with the call of Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont on November 27, 1095 and enabled the establishment of Latin rule in the East. As a matter of fact, the Latins, who’d established states in Edessa and Antioch first in 1098 during the First Crusade, founded a kingdom by capturing Jerusalem on July 15, 1099, after which they began invading the Palestinian territories. Toron (now Tibnīn/Tebnīn), located in Upper Galilee, was one of the areas the Crusaders captured in this process, and Crusaders built Castle Toron there. Afterward, Toron was entrusted to Humphrey I of Toron, one of the nobles in Galilee, who transformed it into a lordship of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Toron was in a very important strategic position, and the castle built there gave the Franks many military, political, and economic advantages in the Crusader invasions and struggles against the Muslims in the region. The rulers of Tibnīn also played an important role in shaping the history of the Latin East. This study will discuss and chronologically evaluate the role of Toron and Toron Castle between 1099-1187 in the light of the information given by the sources.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


This study aims to reveal the role and importance of Toron Castle, an important castle built by the Crusaders in the Eastern Mediterranean, from the end of 1105 when it was constructed until 1187. After the capture of Jerusalem on July 15, 1099, the Crusaders started an invasion in Galilee and advanced to Tibnīn, an important position of the region. At the end of 1105, a castle was built by Hugh of St. Omer, which the Crusaders named Toron. Toron Castle is located on the road connecting Tyre, Damascus, and Banias and was described as the first great castle established in Upper Galilee. The castle enabled the main road from Damascus to Tyre to be blocked. Due to Toron Castle and its strategically important location, the Crusaders gained control over the area stretching from Damascus to the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem and were able to keep the regions north of Tyre and Galilee under pressure and control. Toron Castle became an important attack and defense base in the struggles against the regional Muslim forces. Toron did not just have military importance, however. The castle also served as a center around which the settlement developed, allowing it to serve multiple functions as a civil, administrative, and economic structure. When Hugh of St. Omer died shortly after the completion of the castle’s construction, King Baldwin I handed the castle’s administration over to the Crusader noble Humphrey I of Toron. Thus, Toron became one of the important lordships of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Toron played an important role for the Kingdom of Jerusalem because the land on which the castle was built contained highly fertile agricultural land with the surrounding climate favorable for agriculture. The fortress also controlled the trade route from Damascus to Tyre. In 1107 during the reign of Humphrey I of Toron, the fortress was attacked by the Governor of Tyre. However, the Muslims failed to capture the castle. The castle of Toron was effective at keeping the city of Tyre under control during this period and undertook an important task in the struggles against the Fāṭimids and Damascus. During the reign of Humphrey II of Toron, the castle became a regional fortified center in parallel with the growth of the lordship and played an effective role in defending the northern areas of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. During this period, the boundaries of the Lordship of Toron expanded to include Banias. Toron Castle also played an important role in defending Banias against Muslims. After the death of Humphrey II, Humphrey IV became the head of the lordship. During his reign, the Toron family lost their rule of Toron, with management of castle being transferred to the royal family. The chronicles record that Toron became an important tax collection center under the rule of the royal family and contributed to the economy of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. The castle and lordship of Toron continued to exist as an important center that played a role in shaping the administrative, military, economic, and social life of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem in the region until it was conquered by Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn in 1187. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Adler Elkan Nathan, Seligsohn Max. “Une nouvelle chronique samaritaine” içinde Revue des etudes juives 46/ 91 (janviermars, 1903): 123-146. https://www.persee.fr/doc/rjuiv_0484-8616_1903_ num_46_91_4608?q=Tibnin. google scholar
  • Albertus Aquensis. Historia Ierosolimitana: History of the Journey to Jerusalem. İngilizce Çev. Susan B. Edgington. Oxford, 2007. google scholar
  • Alptekin, Coşkun. Dımaşk Atabegliği: Tog-Teginliler. İstanbul, 1985. google scholar
  • _____. The Reign of Zangi. Erzurum, 1978. google scholar
  • Altan, Ebru. İkinci Haçlı Seferi (1147-1148). Ankara, 2003. google scholar
  • _____. Antakya Haçlı Prinkepsliği Tarihi Kuruluş Devri (1098-1112). Ankara, 2018. google scholar
  • _____. “Renaud de Châtillon: Antakya Prinkepsi (1153-1160) Mâverâ-i Ürdün Senyörü (1171-1187)”. Tarih Dergisi 55 (2012/1):1-30. google scholar
  • _____. “Venedik’in Haçlı Seferi (1122-1124)”. Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Merçil’e Armağan. Ed. Emine Uyumaz vd., içinde 299-307. İstanbul, 2013. google scholar
  • _____. “Nur al-Din Mahmud b. Zangi (1146-1174): One of the Prominent Leaders of the Struggle against the Crusaders”. Tarih Dergisi 59 (2014/1): 63-87. google scholar
  • _____. “Haçlılara Karşı Mücadelenin Önde Gelen Liderlerinden Nûreddin Mahmud b. Zengî (1146-1174)”. Tarih Bilincine Adanan Bir Ömür Prof. Dr. Abdülkadir Donuk Armağanı. Ed. Mualla Uydu Yücel-Fatma Aysel Dıngıl Ilgın, içinde 225-244. İstanbul, 2017. google scholar
  • _____. “Haçlı Devletlerinde (Outremer) Kullanılan Unvanlara Dâir”. Tarih Dergisi- Turkish Journal of History 71 (2020): 67-81. google scholar
  • _____. “Sûr”. DİA. XXXVII: 535-537. google scholar
  • Anna Komnena. Alexiad: Malazgirt’in Sonrası. Çev. Bilge Umar. İstanbul 1996. google scholar
  • Anonim Gesta Francorum Et Aliorum Hiesorolymitanorum. Çev. Ergin Ayan. Anonim Haçlı Tarihi. İstanbul, 2013. google scholar
  • Azîmî. Azîmî Tarihi: Selçuklular Dönemiyle İlgili Bilgiler (H. 430-538=1038/39-1143/44). Çev. Ali Sevim. Ankara, 2006. google scholar
  • Barber, Malcolm. The Crusader States. London, 2012. google scholar
  • Bezer, Gülay Öğün. “İmâdüddin Zengî”. DİA. XLIV: 258-261. google scholar
  • Bilge, Mustafa L. “Gazze”. DİA. XIII: 534-536. google scholar
  • _____. “Halîl”. DİA. XV: 305-307. google scholar
  • _____. “Hayfa”. DİA. XVII: 41-43. google scholar
  • Buhl, F. “Hayfa”. EI2. III: 324-326. google scholar
  • Buzpınar, Ş. Tufan. “Havran”. DİA. XVI: 539-541. google scholar
  • Cahen, Claude. La Syrie Du NordA L’Epoque Des Croisades Et la Principaute Franque D’Antioche. Paris, 1940. google scholar
  • Chauvet, Adolphe. Conference sur la Palestine et la Syrie. Rouen, 1891. google scholar
  • Conder, Claude R. ve Kitchener H. The Survey of Western Palestine Memoirs of the Topography, Orography, Hydrography, and Archaeology. Ed. E. H. Palmer-Walter Besant. II. London, 1881. google scholar
  • Copeland, Lorraine ve Wescombe, Peter. Inventory ofstone-age sites in Lebanon. Beyrut, 1965. google scholar
  • Curvers, H. ve Stuart, B. “Qal‘at Tibnîn: Archaeology for a Future Conservation Plân”. Archaeology & History in Lebanon 20 (2004): 9-20. google scholar
  • Çelik, Aydın. Fâtımîler Devleti Tarihi (909-1171). Ankara, 2018. google scholar
  • David Odalric De Caixal i Mata. Historia Militar de las Cruzadas en Tierra Santa. 2011. Erişim 06.07. 2022, https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Historia_Militar_de_las_Cruzadas_en_Tier. html?id=8LsQAwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y. google scholar
  • Demirci, Mustafa. “Sevâd”. DİA. XXXVI: 576-578. google scholar
  • Demirkent, Işın. Urfa Haçlı Kontluğu Tarihi (1098-1146). I-II. Ankara 1974, 1994. google scholar
  • _____. Haçlı Seferleri. İstanbul, 1997. google scholar
  • _____. “Kudüs Krallığı’nda Devlet İdaresi”. Haçlı Seferleri Tarihi, Makaleler-Bildiriler-İncelemeler, içinde 249-259. İstanbul, 2007. google scholar
  • _____. “Mevdûd b. Altuntegin”. DİA. XXIX: 427-429. google scholar
  • Ehrenkreutz, Andrew. Saladin. New York, 1972. google scholar
  • Ehrlich, Michael. “The Frankish Impact on the Urban Landscape, Toron-Tibnîn”. Towns andMaterial Culture in the Medieval Middle East. Ed. Yaacov Lev, içinde 49-50. Leiden, 2002. google scholar
  • Ellenblum, Ronnie. Crusader Castles and Modern Histories. New York, 2007. google scholar
  • Ellisseeff, N. Nûr ad-Dîn Un Grand Prince Musulman de Syrrie au Temps des Croisades. II. Damas, 1967. google scholar
  • Emecen, Feridun. “Akkâ”. DİA. II: 265-267. google scholar
  • Nüveyrî. Nihâyet el-Ereb fî Funûn el-Edeb. Nşr. Necîb Mustafa Fevvâz-Hikmet Kaşlî Fevvaz. XXVIII. Beyrut, 2004. google scholar
  • Ernoul. Chronique d’Ernoul et de Bernard le Tresorier. Nşr. Mas Latrie. Paris, 1871. Ernoul Kroniği Haçlı Seferleri Tarihi: Selahaddin Eyyubi ve Kudüs’ün Fethi. Çev. Ahmet Deniz Altunbaş. İstanbul, 2020. google scholar
  • Fleming, W. B. History of Tyre. London, 1915. google scholar
  • Folda, Jaroslav. Crusader Art in the Holy Land, From the Third Crusade to the Fall of Acre. Cambridge, 2005. Fulcherius Carnotensis. Kudüs Seferi: Kutsal Toprakları Kurtarmak. Çev. İlcan Bihter Barlas. İstanbul, 2009. Grabois, Aryeh. “Galilee”, The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Alan V. Murray. II: 495-497. Oxford, 2006. google scholar
  • _____. “Tancred”. The Crusades: An Encyclopedia, Ed. Alan V. Murray. IV: 143-145. Oxford, 2006. google scholar
  • Grousset, Rene. Histoire des croisades et du royaume franc de Jerusalem. I. Paris, 1948. google scholar
  • Gülsoy, Ersin. “Safed”. DİA. XXXV: 445-447. google scholar
  • Hamilton, Bernard. The Leper King and His Heirs: Baldwin IV and the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. New York, 2000. google scholar
  • Heidemann, S. “Zangî”. EI2. XI: 451-452. google scholar
  • Honigmann, E. “Tel-Bâşir”. İA. II: 819-820. google scholar
  • Ioannes Kinnamos. Ioannes Kinnamos’un Historia’sı (1118-1176). Çev. Işın Demirkent. Ankara, 2001. google scholar
  • Itinerarium peregrinorum et gesta regis Ricardi. Ed. William Stubbs. London, 1864. google scholar
  • İbn Cübeyr. Endülüsten Kutsal Topraklara. Çev. İsmail Güler. İstanbul, 2003. google scholar
  • İbn Hallikân. Ibn Khallikan’s Biographical Dictionary. Çev. William Mac Guckinde Slane. III. Paris,1868. google scholar
  • İbn Şeddâd. The Rare and Excellent History ofSaladin. Çev. Donald Sidney Richards. London, 2002. google scholar
  • İbnü’l-Esîr. el-Kâmil Fi’t-Târih. Çev. Abdülkerim Özaydın. X-XI. İstanbul, 1987. google scholar
  • İbnü’l-Kalânisî. Zeylü Târîhi Dımaşk. Haz. H. F. Amedroz. Beyrut, 1908; İngilizce Çev. (Kısmen) H. A. R. google scholar
  • Gibb. The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades. London, 1932. google scholar
  • İbn Tağrîberdî. en-Nücûmü’z-zâhire, RHC. Or. III: 481. Paris, 1884. google scholar
  • İlhan, Avni. “Bâtıniyye”. DİA. V: 190-194. google scholar
  • Karaca Gölgesiz, Sevtap. “Kudüs Haçlı Krallığı 1099-1187”. Doktora Tezi. Ege Üniversitesi, 2012. google scholar
  • Karakuş, Nadir. Haçlı Seferlerinde Haşhaşîler. İstanbul, 2018. google scholar
  • Kaya, Pınar. “Sultan Sencer Devrinde (1118-1157) Bâtınîlerle Yapılan Mücadeleler”. Tarih Dergisi 58 (2013/2): 43-64. google scholar
  • Kesik, Muharrem. Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti Tarihi Sultan I. Mesud Dönemi (1116-1155). Ankara, 2003. google scholar
  • _____. Dânişmendliler (1086-1178) Orta Anadolu’nun Fâtihleri. İstanbul, 2017. google scholar
  • Lavergne, M. “Şûr”. EI2. IX: 883-885. google scholar
  • Le Strange, Guy. Palestine Under the Moslems: A Description of Syria and the Holy Land from A.D. 650 to 1500. London, 1890. google scholar
  • Makdisî. Kitab ahsan al-taqasîm f ma'rifat al-aqâlîm, BibliothecageographorumArabicorum. Ed. M. J. D. Goige. III. Leiden, 1906. google scholar
  • Marie-Luise ve Favreau-Lilie. “Tyre”. The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Alan V. Murray. IV: 1210-1211. Oxford, 2006. google scholar
  • Mayer, Hans E. “Studies in the History of Queen Melisende”. Dumbarton Oaks Papers 26 (1972): 95-182. google scholar
  • . “Die Herrschaftsbildung in Hebron”. Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palastina-Vereins 1953 101/1 (1985): 64-81. google scholar
  • Murray, Alan V. “Banyas”, The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Alan V. Murray. I: 151-152. Oxford, 2006. google scholar
  • _____. “Fauquembergues”, The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Alan V. Murray. II: 609. Oxford, 2006. google scholar
  • Öz, Mustafa. “Cebeliâmil”. DİA. Ek-1: 251-252. google scholar
  • _____. “Haşîşiyye”. DİA. XVI: 418-419. google scholar
  • Özaydın, Abdülkerim. “Hasan Sabbâh”. DİA. XVI: 347-350. google scholar
  • Özer, Serkan. “Fâtımî-Haçlı İlişkileri (1098-1171)”. Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, 2015. google scholar
  • Öztürk, Murat. “Fâtımîler’in Deniz Gücü ve Akdeniz Hâkimiyeti”. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2012. google scholar
  • Piana, Mathias ve Curvers, H. “The Castle of Toron (Qal‘at Tibnîn) in South Lebanon: Preliminary Results of the 2000/2003 Campaigns”. Bulletin d’Archeologie et d’Architecture Libanaises 8 (2005): 333-356. google scholar
  • Piana, Mathias. “The Crusader Castle of Toron: First Results of İts İnvestigation”. Crusades. Ed. Benjamin Z. Kedar vd., içinde Vol. V: 173-191. London & New York: Routledge, 2006. google scholar
  • . “Die Burg Toron (Qal’at Tibnîn) Im Südlichen Libanon” in Burgen und Stadte der Kreuzzugszeit: Studien zur international Architekturund Kunstgeschichte 65 (2008): 396-407. Michael Imhof Verlag: Petersberg. google scholar
  • Prie-Gordon H. “The Reigning Princes of Galilee”. The English Historical Review XXVII/CVII (1912): 445-461. google scholar
  • Pringle, Denys. The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom ofJerusalem: A Corpus. II. Cambridge, 1998. google scholar
  • _____. Secular Buildings in the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: An Archaeological Gazetteer. New York, 1997. google scholar
  • _____. “Chastel Neuf”. The Crusades: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Alan V. Murray. I: 241-242. Oxford, 2006. google scholar
  • Radufuls Cadomensis. The Gesta Tancredi A History of the Normans on the First Crusade. Çev. Bernard-David Bachrach. Hampshire, 2005. google scholar
  • Rey, E.G. Les familles d’outre-mer. Paris, 1866. google scholar
  • Riley-Smith, Jonathan. The Feudal Nobility and The Kingdom ofJerusalem, 1174-1277. London, 1974. google scholar
  • Robinson, Edward- Eli Smith. Biblical Researches in Palestine, Mount Sinai and Arabia Petraea: A Journal of Travels in the Year 1838. New York, 1841. google scholar
  • Runciman, Steven. Haçlı Seferleri Tarihi. Çev. Fikret Işıltan. I-II. Ankara, 2019. google scholar
  • Sahillioğlu, Halil. “Antakya”. DİA. III: 228-238. google scholar
  • Sheir, A. M. The Fief of Tibnm (Toron) andİts Castle the Age of the Crusades AD (1105-1266AH 498-664): A Study ofİts Economic, Political and Military Role. Munich: GRIN Publishing, 2015. google scholar
  • . “The Military Role of the Fief of Tibnîn Against the Muslims in the Age of the Crusades (AH 498-583/ AD 1105-1187)”. Journal ofReligious Culture 188 (2014): 1-20. google scholar
  • Sıbt İbnü’l-Cevzî. Mir’âtü’z-zamân fî târîhi’l-a’yân. RHC. Or., III: 517 vdd. google scholar
  • Smail, R.C. Crusading Warfare, 1197-1193. Cambridge, 1995. google scholar
  • _____. “Crusaders’ castles in the twelfth century”. Cambridge Historical Journal X/II (1951): 133-149. google scholar
  • Smith, G. Adam. Jerusalem: The Topography, Economics and History from the Earliest Times to AD 70. I. London, 1907. google scholar
  • Süryânî Mihael. Süryanî Patrik Mihail’in Vakâyinâmesi (1042-1195). Çev. Hrant D. Andreasyan. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumunda Yayınlanmamış Nüsha, 1944. google scholar
  • Şeşen, Ramazan. Salâhaddîn Devrinde Eyyûbîler Devleti. İstanbul, 1983. google scholar
  • _____. Salâhaddîn Eyyûbî ve Devlet. İstanbul, 1987. google scholar
  • Tabulae Ordinis Theutonici: ex tabularii regii Berolinensis codice potissimum. Ed. Ernestus Strehlke. Berlin, 1869. google scholar
  • Tomar, Cengiz. “Taberiye”. DİA. XXXIX: 323-324. google scholar
  • ______. “Şam”. DİA. XXXVIII: 311-315. google scholar
  • Turan, Abdulkadir. “Nûreddin Mahmud Zengî ve Devri”. Doktora Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, 2018. google scholar
  • Urfalı Mateos. Urfalı Mateos Vakayi-Namesi (952-1136) ve Papaz Grigor’un Zeyli (1136-1162). Çev. Hrant D. Andreasyan. Ankara, 2000. google scholar
  • Usta, Aydın. “Müslüman Haçlı Mücadelelerinde Haşîşîler”. Tarih Dergisi 44 (2008): 1-23. google scholar
  • _____. “Haçlı Seferleri Döneminde Sur Şehri”. Belleten LXXXIII/297 (2019): 439-468. google scholar
  • Ünal, Elif. Haçlı Seferleri Döneminde Doğu Akdeniz Şehirleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2020. google scholar
  • Willermus Tyrensis. A History ofDeeds done Beyond the Sea. Çev. E. A. Babcock ve A.C. Krey. I-II. New York, 1943. google scholar
  • Yâkût el Hamevî. Mu’cemü’l-büldân. Nşr. Heyet. I-IV. Beyrut, 1977. google scholar
  • Foundation for Medieval Genealogy. “Jerusalem, Nobilitiy, Lords of Toron”. Erişim, 01.06.2022. https://fmg. ac/Projects/MedLands/JERUSALEM.htm. google scholar
  • Samaria. “Samaria: Historical Region, Palestine”. Erişim 05.05.2022. google scholar
  • https://www.britannica.com/place/Samaria-historical-region-Palestine. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Ünal, E. (2022). Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187. Şarkiyat Mecmuası, 0(41), 123-158. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572


AMA

Ünal E. Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187. Şarkiyat Mecmuası. 2022;0(41):123-158. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572


ABNT

Ünal, E. Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187. Şarkiyat Mecmuası, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 41, p. 123-158, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ünal, Elif,. 2022. “Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187.” Şarkiyat Mecmuası 0, no. 41: 123-158. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ünal, Elif,. Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187.” Şarkiyat Mecmuası 0, no. 41 (Mar. 2024): 123-158. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572


Harvard: Australian Style

Ünal, E 2022, 'Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187', Şarkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 0, no. 41, pp. 123-158, viewed 1 Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ünal, E. (2022) ‘Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187’, Şarkiyat Mecmuası, 0(41), pp. 123-158. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572 (1 Mar. 2024).


MLA

Ünal, Elif,. Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187.” Şarkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 0, no. 41, 2022, pp. 123-158. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572


Vancouver

Ünal E. Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187. Şarkiyat Mecmuası [Internet]. 1 Mar. 2024 [cited 1 Mar. 2024];0(41):123-158. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572 doi: 10.26650/jos.1139572


ISNAD

Ünal, Elif. Bir Ortaçağ Haçlı Kalesi: Tibnîn (Toron) 1099-1187”. Şarkiyat Mecmuası 0/41 (Mar. 2024): 123-158. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1139572



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim02.07.2022
Kabul19.08.2022
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma28.10.2022

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.