Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542   IUP :10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542    Tam Metin (PDF)

Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi

Melih ÇelikYasin Gültekin

Küreselleşmenin etkisi ve tüketicilerin tercihleri doğrultusunda artan talebe karşılık vermek amacıyla taşımacılık sektörü sürekli kendini geliştirmeye ve verimliliğini arttırmaya odaklanması gerekmektedir. Günümüzde optimal taşıma rotaları üzerinden taşımacılık operasyonlarını gerçekleştirmek bu yüzden kritik öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye-Fransa mermer taşımacılığında optimal rota çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleriyle belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Öncelikli olarak literatür taranarak rota seçimini etkileyen kriterlerden en çok üzerinde durulan 6 ana ve 18 alt olmak üzere 24 kriter belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen kriterler lojistik sektöründe taşımacılık hizmeti sağlayan şirket yöneticileri, operasyon uzmanları ve alanında uzman akademisyenlerin oluşturduğu gruba sunulmuş ve kriterler son haline getirilmiştir. Super Decision programı kullanılarak AHP yönteminin temeli olan hiyerarşik yapı oluşturulmuş ve kriter ağırlıkları elde edilmiştir. Sektörde Afyon-Lyon noktaları arasında taşımacılık hizmeti sağlayan işletmelerden günümüzde kullanılan 5 farklı rotanın maliyet ve transit süre bilgileri elde edilmiştir. EcoTransIT emisyon hesaplama aracıyla rotaların emisyon analizi yapılmıştır. TOPSIS yöntemiyle aynı lojistik uzmanlarınca değerlendirilen 5 rota AHP yöntemiyle elde edilen kriter ağırlıklarıyla beraber analiz edilmiş ve söz konusu iki nokta arasında optimal taşıma rotası belirlenmiştir. Analizler sonucunda denizyolu+iç suyolu intermodal taşımacılık rotası diğer alternatiflere göre sahip olduğu düşük maliyetin yanı sıra kısmen transit süre ve düşük emisyon değerleri avantajıyla Afyon-Lyon plaka mermer taşınmasında optimal rota olarak belirlenmiştir.

DOI :10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542   IUP :10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542    Tam Metin (PDF)

Determining Optimal Routes for Marble Transport Between Turkey and France Using the Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Melih ÇelikYasin Gültekin

In order to respond to increasing demand in line with the effects of globalization and the consumers’ preferences, the transportation sector has needed to focus on constantly improving itself and its efficiency. Currently, operating transportation operations through optimal transport routes have become critical. This study attempts to determine the optimal transportation route for exporting marble from Turkey to France using multicriteria decision-making methods. The study first reviews the literature to determine the 6 main and 18 sub-criteria that have been mentioned the most. The study submitted these criteria to groups made up of logistics company managers, operation executives, and scholars in order to get expert opinions. The study uses the program Super Decisions to create a hierarchy structure for the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and to calculate the criterion weights. The study collected information from companies providing service between Afyon and Lyon regarding the costs and transit times of the five different transportation routes that are currently used. The study then analyzed the emissions for each of these five routes using the tools from the emissions calculator software EcoTransIT. By using the criterion weights found using the AHP method, the five transportation routes were analyzed in terms of the same group using the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to determine which route is the most appropriate. After the analysis, the study compared the various routes and selected the seaway + inland waterway intermodal transportation route as the optimal one due to its low cost and minimal transit time and emission values.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Due to globalization and changes in consumer behaviors, the rising demand for products has increased trade volumes, which has in turn put pressure on the transportation sector, which is an indispensable part of global trade. In order to meet the constant rises in demand, the transportation sector has had to concentrate on improving itself and its efficiency in addition to trying to find novel solutions. In this sense, great importance is had in running transport operations through the optimal transportation routes. Having logistics companies transport products on efficient routes allows them to reduce transportation costs, which have the largest share of their operational costs, to increase customer satisfaction by delivering goods on time, and to gain advantages over other competitors.

This study attempts to determine the optimal transportation route for exporting marble from Turkey to France by combining the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision making methods.

Firstly, the study discusses the importance of determining optimal transportation routes and the factors that affect efficiency based on the mode of transport. Afterwards, the study reviews the literature to determine the six main and 18 sub-criteria that are mentioned the most and have occurred the most in studies. These criteria were then submitted to groups consisting of logistics company managers, operation executives, and scholars in order to obtain expert opinions. These same groups filled out the paired comparisons matrices, which were then used based on the AHP method. Next, the study used the program Super Decisions to construct the hierarchy structure of the AHP method and to calculate the criteria weights.

The study made calculations within its scope by considering the values closest to the ideal solution and the most optimal route for transporting 20 tons of marble slabs along the Afyon-Lyon line and revealed the seaway + inland waterways intermodal transportation route (i.e., Route 5) to be the most optimal. Transportation operations along this route take 10 days to complete, with a carbon dioxide emission of 12.40 and a cost of 4,115€ (3,465 + 650). The next most optimal routes were determined respectively as the RORO+Railroad,1 Sea + Land, RoRo + Highway, and Highway routes. The RoRo + Railroad and the Seaway + Highway routes can be said to have similar values. The reason why the Highway Route ranked last is its higher costs and emissions compared to the other transportation routes. The low weight value of the transit time sub-criterion was another reason why the Highway Route ranked last, despite its speed advantage.

As a result of the analyses performed using the program SuperDecisions, cost is seen as the most important criterion with a weight of 0.53, with the other criteria in order of importance being found as reliability (0.19), product features (0.11), speed (0.08), flexibility (0.04), and environment (0.02). From this point of view, the most important criterion can be said to be cost when determining the optimal route for transporting marble slabs from Afyon to Lyon. The reliability criterion has the second highest weight and also plays an important role in determining the optimal route.

Due to the structural fragility of marble slabs, they must be delivered to their final destination without any damage, and this increased the importance of the reliability criterion. Product features also play an important role in determining routes. Marble slabs being a high tonnage product requires certain restrictions to be observed while being transported enroute.

Contrary to the findings in the studies in the literature, the speed criterion can be remarkably described as having the second lowest weight (after environment) in this study. The reason for this is that very few situations require urgent transportation of marble slabs within the supply chain. Despite the increasing importance of the environmental factor (carbon dioxide emissions in particular being the main cause of global warming threatening the Earth) in the transportation sector, this study found it to have the lowest criterion weight. However, because the decision groups gave average values to the subcriteria of undamaged product delivery, capacity flexibility, and weight, carbon dioxide emissions are seen to still play an important role in determining the optimal route despite its low criterion weight. According to the findings regarding the environment criterion, the environmental factor can be said to still be ignored in the transportation sector, despite the regulations countries as well as global non-governmental organizations have made to protect the environment. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Arslanhan, H. ve Tosun, Ö. (2021). “Ulaştırma modu seçimi probleminin bütünleşik en iyi-en kötü ve waspas yöntemleriyle çözülmesi”. Pamukkale Universitesi Muhendislij Bilim Dergisi, 27(1), 13-23. google scholar
  • Banamyong, R. (2001). “Modelling freight logistics: the vientiane-singapore corridor”. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Integrated Logistics (ICIL), August 21-24, Nanyang Technological University & Carnegie Mellon University, Singapore, 441-446. google scholar
  • Bazaras, D., Batarliene, N., Palsaitis, R. ve Petraska, A. (2013). “Optimal road route selection crıterıa system for oversıze goods transportation”. The Baltic Journal ofRoad and Bridge Engineering, 8(1), 19-24. google scholar
  • Boardman, B. S., Malstrom, E. M.; Butler, D. P.; Cole, M. H. (1997). “Computer assisted routing of ıntermodal shipments”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 33(1-2), 311-314. google scholar
  • Bookbinder, H. J. ve Fox, S. N (1998). “Intermodal routing of canada-mexico shipments under Nafta”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 34(4), 289-303. google scholar
  • Brooks, R. M., Puckett, M. S., Hensher, A. D. ve Sammons, A. (2012). “Understanding mode choice decisions: a study of australian freight shippers”. Maritime Economic Logistics, 14(3), 274-299. https:// doi.org/10.1057/mel.2012.8 google scholar
  • Banamyong, R. (2001). “Modelling freight logistics: the vientiane-singapore corridor”. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Integrated Logistics (ICIL), August 21-24, Nanyang Technological University & Carnegie Mellon University, Singapore, 441-446. google scholar
  • Cho, H. J., Kim, S. Hy ve Choi, R. H. (2010). “An ıntermodal transport network planning algorithm using dynamic programming—a case study: from busan to rotterdam in ıntermodal freight routing”. Applied Intelligent, 36(3), 529-541. https://doi.org/1 0.1007/s10489-010-0223-6 google scholar
  • Çetinkaya, V. ve Deveci, D. A. (2020). “Optimal sürdürülebilir rota tespiti için gerekli göstergelerin bir çok kriterli karar verme yöntemi ile önem düzeyi tespiti”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 25-46. google scholar
  • De jong, G. ve Worterboer, P. (2004). New Values Of Time And Reliability in Freight Transport İn The Netherlands. Erişim: 23.03.2022 https://significance.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/2004-GDJ-New-values-of-time-and-reliability-in-freight-transport-in-the-Netherlands.pdf google scholar
  • Demir, E., Burgholzer; W., Hrusovsky, M., Arıkan E., Jammernegg, W. ve Woensel T. (2015). “A green ıntermodal service network design problem with travel time uncertainty”, Transportation Research Part B, 4, 1-19. google scholar
  • Ergin, H. ve Çekerol, S. G. (2008). “Intermodal yük tasımacılığı ve türkiye hızlı tüketim malları dağıtımı için uygulama denemesi”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22. google scholar
  • Gani, A. (2017). “The logistic performance effect in ınternational trade”. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.012 google scholar
  • Gosling, J., Purvis ve L. And Mohammed, N. (2010). “Supply chain flexibility as a determinant of supplier selection”. International Journal ofProduction Economics, 128(1), 11-21. google scholar
  • Ishfaq, R. (2012). “Resilience through flexibility in transportation operations”. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal ofSupply Chain Management, 15(4), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2012.709835 google scholar
  • Jung, H., Kim, J. ve Shin, K. (2019). “Importance analysis of decision making factors for selecting ınternational freight transportation mode”. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(1), 55-62. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.03.008 google scholar
  • Hao, C ve Yue, Y. (2016). “Optimization on combination of transport routes and modes on dynamic programming for a container multimodal transport”. Procedia Engineering, 137, 382-390. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.272 google scholar
  • Kaewfak, K., Ammarapala, V. ve Huynh, Van-Nam (2021). “Multi-objective optimization of freight route choices in multimodal transportation”. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 14(1), 794-807. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.210126.001 google scholar
  • Kasilingam, Raja G. (2012). Logistics and Transportation: Design and planning. Almanya: Springer. google scholar
  • Kengpol, A., Meethom, W. ve Tuominen, M. (2012). “the development of a decision support system in multimodal transportation routing within greater mekongsub-regioncountries”. International. Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), 691-701. google scholar
  • Kim, H.J ve Chang, Y.T (2014). “Analysis of an ıntermodal transportation network in korea from an environmental perspective”. Transportation Journal, 53(1), 79-106. google scholar
  • Koçak, D. ve Çoğurcu, E. Y. (2015). “Network modeli ile ağ analizi için çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleriyle karşılaştırmalı çözüm”. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 1(1), 1-42. google scholar
  • Khooban, Z., Farahani, Z. R. ve Rezapour, Shabnam (2011). Transportation. Logistics Operations And Management: Concepts And Models. London: Elsevier. google scholar
  • Konstantinus, A. ve Zuidgeest, M. (2019). “An ınvestigation into the factors ınfluencing ınter-urban freight mode choice decisions in the southern african development community region”. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 13, 1-11. google scholar
  • Macharis, C., Meers, D., ve Lier, V.T. (2015). “Modal choice in freight transport: combining multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic ınformation systems”. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 5(4), 355-372. google scholar
  • Meixell, J. M. ve Norbis, M. (2008). “A review of the transportation mode choice and carrier selection literatüre”. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(2), 183-211. https://doi. org/10.1108/09574090810895951 google scholar
  • Navarro, M. (2014). “Environmental factors and ıntermodal freight transportation: analysis of the decision bases in the case of spanish motorways of the sea”. Sustainability, 6(3), 1544-1566. https://doi. org/10.3390/su6031544 google scholar
  • Ömürbek, N. ve Şimşek, A. (2014). “Analitik hiyerarşi süreci ve analitik ağ süreci yöntemleri ile online alışveriş site seçimi”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırma Dergisi, 12(22), 306-327. https://doi.org/10.11611/ JMER214 google scholar
  • Petro, F. ve Konency, V. (2017). “Calculation of emissions from transport services and their use for the internalisation of external costs in road transport”. Procedia Engineering, 192(4), 677-682. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.117 google scholar
  • Reniers, G. ve Dullaert, W. (2013). “A method to assess multi-modal hazmat transport security vulnerabilities: hazmat transport sva”. Transport Policy, 28, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.002 google scholar
  • Ruijgrok, C. (2008). “Europeran Transport: Insight and Challanges”. Handbook of Logistics and SupplyChain Management, 2, 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080435930-003 google scholar
  • Sambracos, E. ve Ramfou, I. (2014). “Freight transport time savings and organizational performance: a systemic approach”. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 6(1), 19-40 google scholar
  • Seo, J. Y., Chen, F. ve Roh Y. S. (2017). “Multimodal transportation: the case of laptop from chongqing in China to Rotterdam in Europe”. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(3), 155-165. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.09.005 google scholar
  • Shih, H., Shyur, J. H. ve Lee, E. S. (2007). “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making”. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7-8), 801-813 google scholar
  • Stefanov, M. (2018). “Logistics interpretation of product characteristics of liquefied and compressed natural gas”. Research in Logistics&Production, 8(1), 39-52. google scholar
  • Stoilova, S. (2018). An Approach For Choosing The Optimal Route And Type Of Transport For Freight Carriage Using Compromise Programming. MATEC Web of Conferences 234:06002 (2018). google scholar
  • Tuzkaya, R. U. (2009). “Evaluating the environmental effects of transportation modes using an integrated methodology and an application”. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6(2), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327632 google scholar
  • Yang, X., Low, M.W.J ve Tang, C. L. (2011). “Analysis of ıntermodal freight from china to ındian ocean: a goal programming approach”. Journal Transport of Geography. 19(4), 515-527. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Çelik, M., & Gültekin, Y. (2022). Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 7(2), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542


AMA

Çelik M, Gültekin Y. Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. Journal of Transportation and Logistics. 2022;7(2):233-259. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542


ABNT

Çelik, M.; Gültekin, Y. Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, [Publisher Location], v. 7, n. 2, p. 233-259, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çelik, Melih, and Yasin Gültekin. 2022. “Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics 7, no. 2: 233-259. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çelik, Melih, and Yasin Gültekin. Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics 7, no. 2 (Jul. 2024): 233-259. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542


Harvard: Australian Style

Çelik, M & Gültekin, Y 2022, 'Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi', Journal of Transportation and Logistics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 233-259, viewed 20 Jul. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çelik, M. and Gültekin, Y. (2022) ‘Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi’, Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 7(2), pp. 233-259. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542 (20 Jul. 2024).


MLA

Çelik, Melih, and Yasin Gültekin. Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022, pp. 233-259. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542


Vancouver

Çelik M, Gültekin Y. Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. Journal of Transportation and Logistics [Internet]. 20 Jul. 2024 [cited 20 Jul. 2024];7(2):233-259. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542 doi: 10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542


ISNAD

Çelik, Melih - Gültekin, Yasin. Türkiye-Fransa Mermer Taşımacılığında Optimal Rotanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 7/2 (Jul. 2024): 233-259. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1192542



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim21.10.2022
Kabul07.12.2022
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma30.12.2022

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.