References

• Abubakar, I. R., & Aina, Y. A. (2019). The prospects and challenges of developing more inclusive, safe, re-silient and sustainable cities in Nigeria. Land Use Policy, 87, 104105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landuse-pol.2019.104105 google scholar
• Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18 (2), 180-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ijmr.12068 google scholar
• Ahonen, L., & Hâmâlâinen, T. (2012). CLIQ: A Practical Approach to the Quadruple Helix and More Open Innovation. In: MacGregor, S., & Carleton, T. (Eds.), Sustaining Innovation. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2077-4_2 google scholar
• Arnkil, R., Jârvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models. https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65758/978-951-44-8209-0.pdf google scholar
• Barrie, J., Zawdie, G., & Joâo, E. (2017). Leveraging triple helix and system intermediaries to enhance effective-ness of protected spaces and strategic niche management for transitioning to circular economy. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 16 (1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1386/ tmsd.16.1.25_1 google scholar
• Bellgardt, F., Gohlke, J., Haase, H., Parzonka, R., & Schicketanz, J. (2014). Triple helix and residential develop-ment in a science and technology park: the role of intermediaries. Triple Helix, 1, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40604-014-0010-1 google scholar
• Campbell, D. F. J. (2019). Global Quality of Democracy as Innovation Enabler: Measuring Democracy for Success. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72529-1 google scholar
• Campbell, D.F.J., Carayannis, E.G., & Rehman, S.S. (2015). Quadruple Helix Structures of Quality of Democ-racy in Innovation Systems: the USA, OECD Countries, and EU Member Countries in Global Comparison. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 467-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0246-7 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G. (2008). Conceptual Framework for an Analysis of Diversity and Heterogeneity in the Knowledge Economy and Society, Chapters, In: Elias G. Carayannis & Aris Kaloudis & Âge Mariussen (ed.), Diversity in the Knowledge Economy and Society, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi. org/10.4337/9781848441286 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3-4), 201-234. https://doi. org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix And Quintuple Helix And How Do Knowledge, Innovation And The Environment Relate To Each Other?: A Proposed Framework For A Trans-Disciplinary Analysis Of Sustainable Development And Social Ecology. International Journal of Soci-al Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2 (3), 327-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0058-3 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems, SpringerBriefs in Business 7, Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2014). Developed Democracies Versus Emerging Autocracies: Arts, Democracy, And Innovation In Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. Journal ofInnovation and Entrepre-neurship, 3 (1), 1-23. google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2017). Les systemes d’innovation de la quadruple et de la quintuple helice. Innovations, 54, 173-195. https://doi.org/10.3917/inno.pr1.0023 google scholar
• Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple innovation Helix and smart specialization: Knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, 10 (1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10 .17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple / Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Spe-cialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economics, 5, 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8 google scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1 (2), 72-73. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2 google scholar
• Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J., Grigoroudis, E., & Monteiro, S. P. D. O. (2017). Introduction. In: Monteiro, S. P. D. O., & Carayannis, E. G. (Eds.), The Quadruple Innovation Helix Nexus: A smart growth model, qu-antitative empirical validation and operationalization for OECD countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-33. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55577-9 google scholar
• Carayannis, E.G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D.F.J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Qu-intuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48 (1), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300 google scholar
• Champenois, C., & Etzkowitz, H. (2018). From Boundary Line to Boundary Space: The Creation of Hybrid Organizations as a Triple Helix Micro-Foundation. Technovation, 76, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-novation.2017.11.002 google scholar
• Cooper, D. (2009). University-civil society (u-cs) research relationships: The importance of a ‘fourth helix’ alongside the ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government (u-i-g) relations. South African Review of Sociology, 40(2), 153-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2009.10425106 google scholar
• Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & O’Kane, C. (2018). Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, 48 (1), 136-147. https:// doi.org/10.1111/radm.12310 google scholar
• Damaskopoulos, P. (2005). Network Topography of the New Economy: Organizational Passages from Know-ledge to Innovation. In: Doukidis, G., Mylonopoulos, N., & Pouloudi, N. (Eds.), Social and Economic Transformation in the Digital Era. IGI Global, 220-234. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-158-2.ch014 google scholar
• Dhar, B. K., Shaturaev, J., Kurbonov, K., & Nazirjon, R. (2023). The causal nexus between innovation and economic growth: An OECD study. Social Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13261 google scholar
• Doh, P. (2018). A Quadruple Helix Framework for University-led Community Innovation Systems in Africa. In: Pekkola, E., Kivisto, J., Kohtamâki, V, Cai, Y., & Lyytinen, A., (Eds.), Theoretical andMethodological Perspectives of Higher Education Management and Transformation: an advanced reader for PhD students. 87-104. Tampere: Tampere University Press. google scholar
• Dubina, I.N., Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2012). Creativity Economy and a Crisis of the Economy? Coevolution of Knowledge, Innovation, and Creativity, and of the Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0042-y google scholar
• Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20 (6), 1725-1753. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr060 google scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 25-32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159839 google scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Implications for Policy and Evalua-tion, Working Paper 2002-11, Science Policy Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, ISSN 1650-3821. google scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix--University-Industry-Government Relations: A La-boratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14 (1), 14-19. https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2480085 google scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29 (2), 109-123. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 google scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. (2010). Innovation and economic development. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (2), 833-872. North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02004-6 google scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363 google scholar
• Gonzalez-Martinez, P., Garria-Perez-De-Lema, D., Castillo-Vergara, M., & Bent Hansen, P. (2021). Systematic review of the literature on the concept of civil society in the quadruple helix framework. Journal of tech-nology management & innovation, 16 (4), 85-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242021000400085 google scholar
• Hasche, N., Höglund, L., & Linton, G. (2020). Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: creating value within a Swedish regional innovation system. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32 (6), 523544. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2019.1643134 google scholar
• Howells, J., (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35 (5), 715728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 google scholar
• Höglund, L., & Linton, G. (2018). Smart specialization in regional innovation systems: a quadruple helix pers-pective. R&D Management, 48 (1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12306 google scholar
• Iqbal, J., Kousar, S., & Ul Hameed, W. (2018). Antecedents of sustainable social entrepreneurship initiatives in Pakistan and Outcomes: Collaboration between quadruple helix sectors. Sustainability, 10 (12), 4539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124539 google scholar
• Ivanova, I. (2014). Quadruple helix systems and symmetry: a step towards helix innovation system classification. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0201-z google scholar
• Jang, H., & Mennis, J. (2021). The role of local communities and well-being in Unesco world heritage site conservation: An analysis of the operational guidelines, 1994-2019. Sustainability, 13 (13), 7144. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su13137144 google scholar
• Job, H., Becken, S., & Lane, B. (2017). Protected Areas in a neoliberal world and the role of tourism in sup-porting conservation and sustainable development: an assessment of strategic planning, zoning, impact monitoring, and tourism management at natural World Heritage Sites. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25 (12), 1697-1718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1377432 google scholar
• Khalaf, R. W. (2020). The implementation of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: Continuity and compati-bility as qualifying conditions of integrity. Heritage, 3 (2), 384-401. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3020023 google scholar
• Kimatu, J. N. (2016). Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0044-x google scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. google scholar
• Kolehmainen, J., Irvine, J., Stewart, L., Karacsonyi, Z., Szabo, T., Alarinta, J., & Norberg, A. (2016). Quadruple helix, innovation and the knowledge-based development: Lessons from remote, rural and less-favoured regions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0289-9 google scholar
• Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. Sage. google scholar
• Kuzma, E., Padilha, L. S., Sehnem, S., Julkovski, D. J., & Roman, D. J. (2020). The relationship between innovation and sustainability: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120745. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120745 google scholar
• Lahi, A. (2019). Triple Helix, as an acceleration model of Sustainable Development Goals. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 5 (2), https://doi.org/10.26417/ejes.v5i2.p101-105 google scholar
• Laituri, M., Davis, D., Sternlieb, F. & Galvin, K. (2021). SDG Indicator 11.3.1 and Secondary Cities: An Analysis and Assessment. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10 (11), 713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10110713 google scholar
• Liljeblad, J., & Oo, K. T. T. (2020). World heritage sustainable development policy & local implementation: Site management issues using a case study of Sri Ksetra at Pyu ancient cities in Myanmar. Sustainable Development, 28(3), 468-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2037 google scholar
• Lindberg, M., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2014). Quadruple Helix As A Way To Bridge The Gender Gap İn Entrepreneurship: The Case Of An Innovation System Project in The Baltic Sea Region. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5 (1), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0098-3 google scholar
• MacGregor, S. P., Marques-Gou, P., & Simon-Villar, A. (2010). Gauging readiness for the quadruple helix: a study of 16 European organizations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1, 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13132-010-0012-9 google scholar
• Malva, J. O., Amado, A., Rodrigues, A., Mota-Pinto, A., Cardoso, A. F., Teixeira, A. M., ... & Verissimo, M. T. (2018). The quadruple helix-based innovation model of Reference Sites for Active and Healthy Age-ing in Europe: The Ageing@ Coimbra case study. Frontiers in Medicine, 132. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fmed.2018.00132 google scholar
• Marmara Municipalities Union (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2023 from https://www.marmara.gov.tr/en google scholar
• Marmara Urban Forum (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2023 from https://maruf21.marmaraurbanforum.org/ google scholar
• Marmara Municipalities Union. (2022). MARUF21 Report (Marmara Municipalities Union Publication No: 150). https://mbbkulturyayinlari.com/maruf21-report google scholar
• Martmez-Cordoba, P. J., Amor-Esteban, V., Benito, B., & Garaa-Sânchez, I. M. (2021). The commitment of Spanish local governments to sustainable development goal 11 from a multivariate perspective. Sustaina-bility, 13 (3), 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031222 google scholar
• McAdam, M, & Debackere, K. (2018). Beyond ‘triple helix’ toward ‘quadruple helix’ models in regional innovation systems: implications for theory and practice. R&DManagement, 48 (1): 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12309 google scholar
• McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2012). The development of University Technology Transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level: Lessons for the future. Technovation, 32 (1), 57-67. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.001 google scholar
• McAdam, M., Miller, K., & McAdam, R. (2016). Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakehol-der perspective. Technovation, 50, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.002 google scholar
• McGranahan, G., Schensul, D., & Singh, G. (2016). Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it? Environment and Urbanization, 28 (1), 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815627522 google scholar
• Metcalfe, A. S. (2010). Examining the trilateral networks of the triple helix: Intermediating organiza-tions and academy-industry-government relations. Critical Sociology, 36 (4), 503-519. https://doi. org/10.1177/0896920510365920 google scholar
• Meyer, M., Kuusisto, J., Grant, K., De Silva, M., Flowers, S., & Choksy, U. (2019). Towards New Triple Helix Organisations? A Comparative Study of Competence Centres as Knowledge, Consensus and Innovation Spaces. R&D Management, 49 (4), 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12342 google scholar
• Miller, K., McAdam, R., Moffett, S., Alexander, A., & Puthusserry, P. (2016). Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R&D Management, 46 (2), 383-399. https:// doi.org/10.1111/radm.12182 google scholar
• Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R&D Management, 48(1), 7-24. https://doi. org/10.1111/radm.12228 google scholar
• Mitton C., Adair, C.E., McKenzie E., Patten, S.B., & Waye P.B. (2007) Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quarterly, 85, 4, 729- 768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x google scholar
• Nordberg, K. (2015). Enabling Regional Growth in Peripheral Non-University Regions—The Impact of a Quadruple Helix Intermediate Organisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 334-356. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13132-015-0241-z google scholar
• Parveen, S., Senin, A. A., & Arslan, U. M. A. R. (2015). Organization culture and open innovation: A quadruple helix open innovation model approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5 (1), 335-342. google scholar
• Pinto, J.T.M., Morales, M.E., Fedoruk, M., Kovaleva, M., & Diemer, A. (2019). Servitization in Support of Sustainable Cities: What Are Steel’s Contributions and Challenges? Sustainability, 11 (3), 855. https://doi. org/10.3390/su11030855 google scholar
• Ponchek, T. (2016). To Collaborate or Not to Collaborate? A Study of the Value of Innovation from a Sectoral Perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 43-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0290-3 google scholar
• Poppen, F., & Decker, R. (2018). The Intermediary as an Institutional Entrepreneur: Institutional Change and Stability in Triple-Helix Cooperation. Triple Helix, 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-018-0063-7 google scholar
• Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, Strategy and Budget Presidency. (2013). The Tenth Development Plan (2019-2023), https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Onuncu_Kalkinma_Plani-2014-2018.pdf, (20 July 2023). google scholar
• Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, Strategy and Budget Presidency. (2019). The Eleventh Development Plan (2019-2023), https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023. pdf, (20 July 2023). google scholar
• Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). ‘Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Poli-cy and Practice in the Knowledge Society”, Industry and Higher Education, 27 (4), 237-262. https://doi. org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165 google scholar
• Roller, M. R. (2019). A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compa-red to Other Qualitative Methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3385 google scholar
• Reis J.S.d.M., Espuny, M., Nunhes, T.V., Sampaio, N.A.d.S., Isaksson, R., Campos, F.C.d., & Oliveira, O.J.d. (2021). Striding towards Sustainability: A Framework to Overcome Challenges and Explore Opportunities through Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 13 (9), 5232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095232 google scholar
• Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied Qualitative Research Design: A Total Quality Framework Ap-proach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. google scholar
• Roman, M., Varga, H., Cvijanovic, V., & Reid, A. (2020). Quadruple Helix models for sustainable regional in-novation: Engaging and facilitating civil society participation. Economies, 8(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ economies8020048 google scholar
• Schoonmaker, M.G., & Carayannis, E.G. (2013). Mode 3: A Proposed Classification Scheme for the Knowledge Economy and Society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 556-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0097-4 google scholar
• Shibasaki, S. (2018). Yakushima Island: Landscape History, World Heritage Designation, and Conservation Status for Local Society. In: Chakraborty, A., Mokudai, K., Cooper, M., Watanabe, M., & Chakraborty, S. (Eds.), Natural Heritage of Japan Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism. Springer, Cham. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-61896-8_7 google scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 20-24. https://doi. org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882 google scholar
• Silvestre, B. S., & Jîrca, D. M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244 google scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2003). Case Studies. In: Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 134-164. google scholar
• Van Horne, C., & Dutot, V. (2017). Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9503-6 google scholar
• Villarreal, O., & Calvo, N. (2015). From the Triple Helix model to the Global Open Innovation model: A case study based on international cooperation for innovation in Dominican Republic. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 35, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.10.002 google scholar
• Williams, K. (2010). Sustainable cities: research and practice challenges, International Journal of Urban Susta-inable Development, 1 (1-2), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463131003654863 google scholar
• Willis, B. (2014). The Advantages and Limitations of Single Case Study Analysis. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2014/07/05/the-advantages-and-limitations-of-single-case-study-analysis/ google scholar
• Yang, Y., Holgaard, J. E., & Remmen, A. (2012). What can triple helix frameworks offer to the analysis of eco-innovation dynamics? Theoretical and methodological considerations. Science and Public Policy, 39 (3), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs025 google scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. google scholar
• Yokakul, N., & Zawdie, G. (2009). The Role of Triple Helix for Promoting Social Capital, Industrial Technology and Innovation in the SME Sector in Thailand. Science Technology & Society, 14 (1), 93-117. https://doi. org/10.1177/097172180801400104 google scholar
• Zhou, C., & Etzkowitz, H. (2021). Triple Helix Twins: A Framework for Achieving Innovation and UN Sustai-nable Development Goals. Sustainability, 13 (12), 6535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126535 google scholar
• Zhang, C., Sun, Z., Xing, Q., Sun, J., Xia, T., & Yu, H. (2021). Localizing indicators of SDG11 for an integrated assessment of urban sustainability—A case study of Hainan province. Sustainability, 13(19), 11092. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su131911092 google scholar