Research Article


DOI :10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009   IUP :10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009    Full Text (PDF)

Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law

Aydın Alber Yüce

The convocation of a general meeting (GM) prevents shareholders from being at a disadvantage when exercising their rights. Shareholders are informed in advance of the topics to be discussed at a general meeting, so they know when the meeting will take place and whether they will attend. In most cases, shareholders are not necessarily required to attend a GM because they may not have an interest in the topics that will be discussed there. Nevertheless, a GM must be convoked and an agenda announced in order to be able to make this decision. Some cases do not require applying these procedural rules for convening a GM. In particular, these aforementioned requirements can be waived if all shareholders are present together; in this case, a plenary meeting is held. This can occur when all shareholders are present and none of the shareholders object to the procedures for a plenary meeting. The shareholders that are present can pass resolutions at a plenary meeting as long as all shareholders remain present.

DOI :10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009   IUP :10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009    Full Text (PDF)

Einberufung Der Hauptversammlung Und Die Vollversammlung Nach Deutschem Recht

Aydın Alber Yüce

Die Einberufung einer Hauptversammlung beseitigt die Benachteiligung der Aktionäre bei der Ausübung ihrer Rechte. Denn auf diese Weise erfahren die Aktionäre sowohl, wann die Hauptversammlung stattfinden wird, als auch, ob sie an der Hauptversammlung teilnehmen oder nicht, da sie im Voraus über die auf der Hauptversammlung zu behandelnden Themen informiert werden. In den meisten Fällen ist es nicht erforderlich, dass die Aktionäre an der betreffenden Hauptversammlung teilnehmen, weil sie an den dort zu erörternden Themen nicht interessiert sind. Um diese Entscheidung treffen zu können, muss die Hauptversammlung jedoch einberufen und die Tagesordnung bekannt gegeben werden. In einigen Fällen müssen diese Verfahrensregeln für die Einberufung der Hauptversammlung nicht angewendet werden. Der Verzicht auf die vorgenannten Anforderungen ist insbesondere dann relevant, wenn alle Aktionäre gemeinsam anwesend sind; in diesem Fall wird eine “Vollversammlung” abgehalten. Wenn nämlich alle Aktionäre anwesend sind und keiner der Aktionäre dem Verfahren zur Vollversammlung widerspricht, können die erschienenen Aktionäre in der Vollversammlung Beschlüsse fassen, solange die Tatsache, dass alle Aktionäre anwesend sind, gewahrt bleibt.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Joint stock company is a capital company and at the same time, the capital of a joint stock company is divided into shares. Unlike sole proprietorships, this feature of a joint stock company brings it closer to a multi-partner structure. In other words, having many stakeholders is the nature of a joint stock company. In a multi-shareholder company, shareholders may have different opinions regarding the course and administration of the company’s affairs. Shareholders should have the opportunity to put these different opinions into practice, or at least to concretize them.

In German law, a general meeting of the joint stock company is how shareholders are able to influence the process of the company’s affairs. General assembly meetings can be stated as the place where shareholders are able to exercise their rights arising from holding shares in the joint stock company, especially their administrative rights. 

A general assembly is one of the organs of a joint stock company, the other organs being the board of directors and the supervisory board. While the board of directors is the administrative and representative body of the joint stock company, the general assembly is the board where shareholders exercise their administrative rights, as mentioned earlier. In order for shareholders to exercise these rights, they must come together, and this gathering is called a general assembly meeting.

Because a board of directors manages a joint stock company, shareholders are generally unfamiliar with the company’s affairs. This unfamiliarity with the affairs of the company results in shareholders being uninformed about such things as when general assembly meetings are to be held or whether an extraordinary general assembly meeting is required. This ignorance has created a new need.

In order to convene a general assembly, a call for a meeting must be made. Calling (convoking) a general assembly meeting prevents stakeholders from being disadvantaged in terms of exercising their rights. This is because convocation allows shareholders to both learn when the general shareholders’ meeting will be held and to decide on whether or not to participate in the general shareholders’ meeting, as they are informed in advance about the issues that will be discussed at the general shareholders’ meeting. In most cases, shareholders are not required to attend a general assembly meeting that has been called, as they may not have an interest in the issues that are to be discussed at the meeting. However, in order to make this decision, the general assembly meeting must be called and the agenda must be announced.

This study discusses the legal provisions that exist in German law regarding a number of procedural issues, including how a general assembly meeting is to be called, when the call has to take place, and the persons who are allowed to make the call. In particular, many conditions must occur in order to enable participation in a general assembly meeting, such as the invitation to the general assembly meeting needing to be sent to shareholders a specific period of time before the meeting, the agenda needing to be announce beforehand, and the place and time of the meeting to also be determined in advance.

In some cases, these procedural rules regarding the convening of the general assembly do not need to be applied. The elimination of these aforementioned requirements is particularly relevant when all shareholders are present together, in which case a plenary meeting can be held. Indeed, if all the shareholders are together and none of the shareholders object to the procedure for convening a plenary meeting, these shareholders are able to adopt resolutions in the capacity of a general assembly as long as all the shareholders remain together.

Some essential and indispensable conditions must occur for the convening of an uncalled general assembly meeting (plenary meeting). First of all, the assembled shareholders must have already been convened in the form of a general assembly. In this sense, a general meeting of shareholders cannot be convened if the shareholders have come together only by chance and in a manner completely devoid of corporative purposes (e.g., during a vacation). Again, all shareholders or their representatives must be present in order for a general assembly meeting to be convened without the application of the rules regarding the convocation. Another condition in this regard is that none of the shareholders or their representatives are to object to the general assembly meeting being held in this manner. Moreover, waiving the application of the rules regarding the call for shareholders’ meetings requires that the will of all shareholders to adopt resolutions among themselves be maintained throughout the meeting. Because no interest is found worth protecting due to the fact that all shareholders are together, the shareholders are not expected to adhere to the agenda of a general assembly meeting. In such a case, an item may be added to the agenda by unanimous vote, and adopting resolutions regarding new items remains possible as long as the meeting quorum of 100% is maintained.


PDF View

References

  • Binge C and Thölke U, ‘§ 25 Stellung Der Hauptversammlung Im Organisationsgefüge’, Münchener Anwaltshandbuch Aktienrecht (3rd edn, Verlag C H Beck 2018) google scholar
  • Bohnet U, ‘§ 26 Vorbereitung Der Hauptversammlung’, Schüppen/Schaub, Münchener Anwaltshandbuch Aktienrecht (3rd edn, Verlag C H Beck 2018) google scholar
  • Bungert H, ‘§ 35 Zustandigkeit Der Hauptversammlung’, Münchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts Bd. 4 (5th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2020) google scholar
  • Cahn A and von Spannenberg MS, ‘AktG § 53a-Gleichbehandlung Der Aktionare’, beck-online. GROSSKOMMENTAR GesamtHrsg: Henssler Hrsg: Spindler/Stilz Stand: 01.07.2023 (Verlag C H Beck 2023) google scholar
  • Drinhausen F, ‘AktG § 118 Allgemeines’, Hölters | Weber, Aktiengesetz Kommentar (4th edn, C H Beck/Verlag Vahlen 2020) google scholar
  • ——, ‘AktG § 121 Allgemeines’, Hölters | Weber, Aktiengesetz Kommentar (4th edn, C H Beck/ Verlag Vahlen 2020) google scholar
  • ‘Entwurf Eines Gesetzes Für Kleine Aktiengesellschaften Und Zur Deregulierung Des Aktienrechts’, , Deutscher Bundestag — 12. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 12/6721 (1994) google scholar
  • Grigoleit HC and Rachlitz R, ‘AktG § 53a-Gleichbehandlung Der Aktionare’, Grigoleit, Aktiengesetz (2nd edn, Verlag C H Beck 2020) google scholar
  • Herrler S, ‘AktG § 118 Allgemeines’, Grigoleit, Aktiengesetz (2nd edn, Verlag C H Beck 2020) google scholar
  • ——, ‘AktG § 121 Allgemeines’, Grigoleit, Aktiengesetz (2nd edn, Verlag C H Beck 2020) google scholar
  • Hoffmann J, ‘AktG § 118 Allgemeines’, Spindler/Stilz, Aktiengesetz, vol I (4th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2019) google scholar
  • Hoffmann, Jochen. „AktG § 118 Allgemeines“. In beck-online.GROSSKOMMENTAR GesamtHrsg: Henssler Hrsg: Spindler/Stilz Stand: 01.07.2023. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2023. google scholar
  • Koch J, Aktiengesetz Kommentar Begründet von Uwe Hüffer (17th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2023) google scholar
  • Kubis D, ‘AktG § 118 Allgemeines’, Münchener Kommentar zum AktG, vol 3 (5th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2022) google scholar
  • ——, ‘AktG § 121 Allgemeines’, Münchener Kommentar zum AktG, vol 3 (5th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2022) google scholar
  • Liebscher T, ‘AktG § 121 Allgemeines’, Henssler/Strohn, Gesellschaftsrecht (5th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2021) google scholar
  • Mayer BR and vom Kolke MA, ‘AktG § 53a-Gleichbehandlung Der Aktionare’, Hölters/Weber, Aktiengesetz (4th edn, Verlag C H Beck-Vahlen 2022) google scholar
  • Nodoushani M, ‘Kein Vollversammlungsprivileg Bei Kollusivem Zusammenwirken von Aktionaren’ [2009] BGH, Beschluss vom 20.04.2009 - II ZR 148/07 (OLG Schleswig); BeckRS 2009, 17653, GWR 2009 google scholar
  • Paefgen WG, ‘AktG § 53a Gleichbehandlung Der Aktionare’, Henssler/Strohn, Gesellschaftsrecht (5th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2021) google scholar
  • Paschos N, ‘AktG § 118a Virtuelle Hauptversammlung’, beck-online.GROSSKOMMENTAR GesamtHrsg: Henssler Hrsg: Spindler/Stilz Stand: 01.01.2023 (Verlag C H Beck 2023) google scholar
  • Pluta J, ‘§ 121’, Heidel (Hrsg.) - Aktienrecht und Kapitalmarktrecht (3rd edn, Nomos Verlag 2011) google scholar
  • Raiser T and Veil R, Recht Der Kapitalgesellschaften (5th edn, Verlag Franz Vahlen 2010) google scholar
  • Rieckers O, ‘AktG § 121 Allgemeines’, Spindler/Stilz, Aktiengesetz (4th edn, Verlag C H Beck 2019) google scholar
  • ——, ‘AktG § 121 Allgemeines’, beck-online. GROSSKOMMENTAR-Aktiengesetz: Stand: 01.07.2023 (Verlag C H Beck 2023) google scholar
  • Ruppert A, ‘C. Einberufung Der Hauptversammlung Und Mitteilungspflichten’, Praxis der Hauptversammlung (Erfolgreiche Vorbereitung und Durchführung) (4th edn, RWS Verlag Kommunikationsforum GmbH 2018) google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Yüce, A.A. (2024). Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, 0(74), 183-227. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009


AMA

Yüce A A. Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul. 2024;0(74):183-227. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009


ABNT

Yüce, A.A. Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 74, p. 183-227, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yüce, Aydın Alber,. 2024. “Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0, no. 74: 183-227. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yüce, Aydın Alber,. Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0, no. 74 (Dec. 2024): 183-227. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009


Harvard: Australian Style

Yüce, AA 2024, 'Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law', Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, vol. 0, no. 74, pp. 183-227, viewed 23 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yüce, A.A. (2024) ‘Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law’, Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, 0(74), pp. 183-227. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009 (23 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Yüce, Aydın Alber,. Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, vol. 0, no. 74, 2024, pp. 183-227. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009


Vancouver

Yüce AA. Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul [Internet]. 23 Dec. 2024 [cited 23 Dec. 2024];0(74):183-227. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009 doi: 10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009


ISNAD

Yüce, AydınAlber. Convocation Of General Meetings and Plenary Meetings Under German Law”. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0/74 (Dec. 2024): 183-227. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0009



TIMELINE


Submitted16.11.2023
Accepted02.02.2024
Published Online07.03.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.