Research Article


DOI :10.26650/CONS2019-0012   IUP :10.26650/CONS2019-0012    Full Text (PDF)

Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology

Ulaş Özdemir

After World War II, the rapid spread of critical theory led to the emergence of many new fields of study under the social sciences and cultural studies. The literary centered ecocriticism, which was developed in the 1980s, and the critical or new musicology studies that developed in similar periods, influenced the existing paradigms with their critical approaches. The field of ecomusicology, which brings together the idea of ecocriticism with the discipline of musicology, has brought a new approach to the environment/nature issues in terms of sound and music, adding nature to the relationship between music and culture. Ecomusicology studies dealing with many issues in the context of environment/nature from an interdisciplinary perspective is both a scientific and an activist effort. By questioning the humannature relationship and trying to find answers to today’s environmental crises and sustainability problems by expanding the boundaries of musicology, ecomusicology has been a rapidly developing field since the 2000s. In this article, the emergence of ecomusicology as an ecocritical and naturecultural musicology approach, as well as conceptual and methodological discussions concerning this field are examined through the main sources. This article is intended to be a guide to future research in the field of ecomusicology in Turkey.
DOI :10.26650/CONS2019-0012   IUP :10.26650/CONS2019-0012    Full Text (PDF)

Ekoeleştirel ve Doğakültürel Bir Müzikoloji Yaklaşımı Olarak Ekomüzikoloji

Ulaş Özdemir

2. Dünya Savaşı sonrasında akademik alana hızla yayılan eleştirel düşünce, sosyal bilimler ve kültürel çalışmalar altında pek çok yeni çalışma alanının ortaya çıkmasını sağlamıştır. 1980’li yıllarda yaygın olarak gelişen edebiyat merkezli ekoeleştiri ve yine benzer dönemlerde gelişen eleştirel veya yeni müzikoloji çalışmaları, eleştirel yaklaşımlarıyla mevcut paradigmaları sarsmıştır. Ekoeleştiri düşüncesi ile müzikoloji disiplinini bir araya getiren ekomüzikoloji alanı ise müzik ve kültür arasındaki ilişkiye doğayı da katarak, çevre/doğa konusuna ses ve müzik açısından bakan yeni bir yaklaşım ortaya çıkarmıştır. Disiplinlerarası bir perspektifle çevre/doğa bağlamında birçok konuyla ilgilenen ekomüzikoloji çalışmaları, bilimsel ve aktivist bir çabadır. İnsan-doğa ilişkisini sorgulayan ve günümüzdeki çevre krizleri ile sürdürülebilirlik sorunlarına müzikolojinin sınırlarını genişleterek yanıtlar bulmaya çalışan ekomüzikoloji, 2000’li yıllardan itibaren tüm dünyada hızla gelişen bir alan olmuştur. Bu makalede, ekoeleştirel ve doğakültürel bir müzikoloji yaklaşımı olarak ekomüzikolojinin ortaya çıkışı, bu alanda yapılan çalışmalar ile alanla ilgili kavramsal ve yöntemsel tartışmalar konuyla ilgili temel kaynaklar üzerinden incelenmiştir. Bu makalenin, gelecekte Türkiye’de ekomüzikoloji alanında yapılacak araştırmalara yol gösterici olması hedeflenmiştir.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The relationship between human and nature is critically re-considered today. Particularly in Western culture, the way of thinking in which human and nature are constructed as opposites has been examined and criticized in depth through critical studies. After World War II, both the development of critical thinking in the academic field and the emergence of environmental crises all over the world have increased the debate on environmental/ nature awareness. From the late 1960s onwards, critical approaches began to multiply in different fields of science, and over time, they became more prominent with the discussions of postmodernism and poststructuralism. In parallel with the development of the idea of ecocriticism in the field of literature, critical or new musicology studies have influenced the existing paradigms in the field of musicology, and the question of what music is in this context has begun to be handled from a very broad perspective.

In this period in which the human-nature relationship was reconsidered, academic studies on the one hand and activist activities for the environment on the other hand increased, and scientific, artistic or activist studies were carried out in many subjects from the protection of natural life to the environmental crisis. Sustainability of ecosystems has been one of the most important topics among these studies. 

Studies that emerged as “critical musicology” in the UK or “new musicology” in the United States and developed under the influence of different critical theories have the approach that musicology should be critically considered as a science. Today, influencing the “old” musicological paradigms, the so-called new or critical musicology studies have also come into contact with different sub-branches of ethnomusicology and have created a broad framework of music sciences that can be regarded as “new (ethno)musicologies”. Thus, musicology has become an “intertextual field”. One such practice is ecomusicology, nurtured by both new (ethno)musicological approaches and ecocritical thinking.

The ecocritical approach in musicology developed in parallel with the spread of environmental concern in physics, natural and social sciences, especially in the 1970s, but it gained value as “ecomusicology” in North American and Scandinavian academic circles in the 2000s. The critical and activist approach of the new musicology studies to the positivist music research influenced ecomusicology. Different conceptual and methodological tools are used in ecomusicology studies that intersect with different fields such as sound studies, acoustics, bioacoustics, sociology, anthropology, philosophy, cultural studies, and environmental studies and sciences. 

The field of ecomusicology, where ecocritical thinking and musicology come together, has included nature in music and culture studies, and has greatly expanded its field of study, and has enabled the study of all kinds of sounds existing in nature. Ecomusicologists, who are open to other disciplines conceptually and methodically, are interdisciplinary. With their political positions on environment/nature issues, ecomusicologists seeking to respond to ecological crises through music research by developing environmental/ nature awareness both in academia and outside academia, therefore go one step beyond the musicology with the answers they find and become “involved” in environmental/ nature issues. Another important issue on which ecomusicology focuses is the sustainability of music cultures as ecosystems.

Ecomusicology tends to approach and discuss the objects in question from an expanding point of view by critically examining not only what we mean by “nature”, but also by “music”. In other words, ecomusicology, as an ecocritical and naturecultural musicology approach, is an interdisciplinary field that raises critical questions about the relationship between music, culture, and nature and seeks answers to these questions. Today ecomusicology is a rapidly evolving field as an ecocritical and naturecultural musicology approach with a wide range of study subjects, conceptual world, and methodological tools. In this article, the history and development process of the ecomusicology field is examined in detail with the aim of presenting a perspective for future research in this field in Turkey.


PDF View

References

  • Allen, A. S. (2011). Ecomusicology: Ecocriticism and musicology. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 64(2), 391–394. google scholar
  • Allen, A. S. (2013). Ecomusicology. Grove Music Online. Retrieved 12 June 2019, from https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-1002240765 google scholar
  • Allen, A. S. (2016). Ecomusicology between poetic and practical. In H. Zapf (Ed.), Handbook of ecocriticism and cultural ecology (pp. 644–663). Berlin: De Gruyter. google scholar
  • Allen, A. S. (2017). Greening the curriculum: Beyond a short music history in ecomusicology, Journal of Music History Pedagogy, 8(1), 91–109. google scholar
  • Allen, A. S. ve Dawe, K. (Eds.). (2016). Current directions in ecomusicology: Music, culture, nature. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Allen, A., Titon, J. T. ve Glahn, D. V. (2014). Sustainability and sound: Ecomusicology inside and outside the academy. Music & Politics, 8(2), 1–26. google scholar
  • Archer, W. K. (1964). On the ecology of music. Ethnomusicology, 8(1), 28–33. google scholar
  • Bates, D. G. (2009). 21. yüzyılda kültürel antropoloji: İnsanın doğadaki yeri (S. Aydın vd., Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bookchin, M. (2019). Derin ekolojiye karşı toplumsal ekoloji (E. Günok, Çev.). Cogito, 93, 147–166. google scholar
  • Bourse, M. ve Yücel, H. (2017). Kültürel çalışmaları anlamak (H. Yücel, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Callenbach, E. (2011). Ekoloji: cep rehberi (E. Özkan, Çev.). İstanbul: Sinek Sekiz Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Cook, N. (1999). Müziğin ABC’si. (T. Doğan, Çev.). İstanbul : Kabalcı Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Cook, N. ve Everest, M. (2001). Preface. In N. Cook & M. Everest (Eds.), Rethinking music (pp. v-xii). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • De Bolla, P. (2005). Sanat ve estetik (K. Koç, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Devall, B. ve Sessions, G. (2019). Derin ekoloji (E. Günok, Çev.). Cogito, 93, 136–146. google scholar
  • Dolar, M. (2013). Sahibinin sesi: Psikanaliz ve ses (B. E. Aksoy, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Edgar, A. ve Sedgwick, P. (Ed.). (2007). Kültürel kuramda anahtar kavramlar (M. Karaşahan, Çev.). İstanbul: Açılım Kitap. Erol, A. (2009). Müzik üzerine düşünmek. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları. google scholar
  • Feld, S. (2003). A rainforest acoustemology. In M. Bull & L. Back (Eds), The Auditory Culture Reader (pp. 223–39). Oxford: Berg Publishers. google scholar
  • Feisst, S. (2016). Music and ecology. Contemporary Music Review, 35(3), 1–3. google scholar
  • Fubini, E. (2006). Müzikte estetik (F. Genç, Çev.). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Garrard, G. (2016). Ekoeleştiri: Ekoloji ve çevre üzerine kültürel tartışmalar (E. Genç, Çev.). İstanbul: Kolektif Kitap. google scholar
  • Hendy, D. (2014). Gütültü: Sesin beşeri tarihi (Ç. Çidamlı, Çev.). İstanbul: Kolektif Kitap. google scholar
  • Hooper, G. (2006). The discourse of musicology. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. google scholar
  • Ingram, D. (2010). The jukebox in the garden: Ecocriticism and American popular music since 1960. Amsterdam: Rodopi. google scholar
  • Keller, M. S. (2016). Linnaeus, zoomusicology, ecomusicology, and the quest for meaningful categories. Musicological Annual, 52(2), 163–176. google scholar
  • Kerman, J. (1985). Contemplating music: Challenges musicology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Kovel, J. (2017). Doğanın düşmanı: Kapitalizmin sonu mu, dünyanın sonu mu? (G. Koca, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Maus, F. E. (2010). What was critical musicology? Radical Musicology. 10. Retrieved 12 June 2019, from http:// www.radical-musicology.org.uk/special_critmus/maus.htm google scholar
  • Myerson, G. (2004). Ekoloji ve postmodernliğin sonu (E. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: Everest Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özdağ, U. (2017). Çevreci eleştiriye giriş: Doğa, kültür, edebiyat. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özgün, E. Ş. (2018.) Soundscape çalışmalarına etnomüzikolojiden bir bakış. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(17), 182–191. google scholar
  • Özkişi, G. Z. (2013). Müzik disiplini bağlamında feminist müzik teorisi ve cinsiyet semantiği. Turkish Studies, 8(12), 889–961. google scholar
  • Pedelty, M. 2012. Ecomusicology: Rock, folk, and the environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. google scholar
  • Plumwood, V. (2004). Feminizm ve doğaya hükmetmek (B. Ertür, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Rehding, A. (2011). Ecomusicology between apocalypse and nostalgia. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 64(2), 409–414. google scholar
  • Ridley, A. (2004). Müzik felsefesi: tema ve varyasyonlar (B. Aydın, Çev.). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Schippers, H. (2015). Applied ethnomusicology and intangible cultural heritage: Understanding “ecosystems” of music as a tool for sustainability. In S. Pettan & J. T. Titon (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Ethnomusicology (pp. 134–157). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Scott, D. B. (2006). Postmodernizm ve müzik (M. Erkan ve A. Utku, Çev.). S. Sim (Ed.), Postmodern düşüncenin eleştirel sözlüğü kitabı içinde (s. 157–170). Ankara: Ebabil Yayınları. google scholar
  • Stobart, H. (ed.). 2008. The new (ethno)musicologies. Maryland: Scarecrow Press. google scholar
  • Stock, J. P. J. (1997). New musicologies, old musicologies: Ethnomusicology and the study of Western music. Current Musicology, 62, 40–68. google scholar
  • Titon, J. T. (2009). Music and sustainability: An ecological viewpoint. The World of Music, 51(1), 119–137. google scholar
  • Titon, J. T. (2013). The nature of ecomusicology. Music E Cultura, 8(1), 8–18. google scholar
  • Truax, B. (1978). Handbook for acoustic ecology. Vancouver: ARC Publications. google scholar
  • Truax, B. (1984). Acoustic communication. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing. google scholar
  • Yıldız, B. (2013). Etnomüzikoloji’de tarihsel yaklaşımlar ve yöntem tartışmaları: “Yeni” alan araştırmaları ve “yeni” (etno) müzikoloji. A. Öztürkmen (Haz.), Müzik, dans, gösterim: Tarihsel ve kuramsal tartışmalar kitabı içinde (s. 9–32). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Matbaası. google scholar
  • Yöre, S. ve Nettl, B. (2012). Bruno Nettl ile etnomüzikolojik değerlendirmeler. International Journal of Human Sciences. 9(2), 1189–1205. google scholar
  • Wall, D. (2013). Yeşil politika (İ. E. Kelso, Çev.). İstanbul: Yeni İnsan Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Williams, R. (2012). Anahtar sözcükler: Kültür ve toplumun sözvarlığı (S. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Özdemir, U. (2019). Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology. Conservatorium, 6(2), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012


AMA

Özdemir U. Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology. Conservatorium. 2019;6(2):117-137. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012


ABNT

Özdemir, U. Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology. Conservatorium, [Publisher Location], v. 6, n. 2, p. 117-137, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Özdemir, Ulaş,. 2019. “Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology.” Conservatorium 6, no. 2: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012


Chicago: Humanities Style

Özdemir, Ulaş,. Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology.” Conservatorium 6, no. 2 (May. 2024): 117-137. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012


Harvard: Australian Style

Özdemir, U 2019, 'Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology', Conservatorium, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 117-137, viewed 17 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Özdemir, U. (2019) ‘Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology’, Conservatorium, 6(2), pp. 117-137. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012 (17 May. 2024).


MLA

Özdemir, Ulaş,. Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology.” Conservatorium, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, pp. 117-137. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012


Vancouver

Özdemir U. Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology. Conservatorium [Internet]. 17 May. 2024 [cited 17 May. 2024];6(2):117-137. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012 doi: 10.26650/CONS2019-0012


ISNAD

Özdemir, Ulaş. Ecomusicology as an Ecocritical and Naturecultural Approach to Musicology”. Conservatorium 6/2 (May. 2024): 117-137. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0012



TIMELINE


Submitted31.08.2018
Accepted05.11.2019
Published Online13.11.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.