Research Article


DOI :10.26650/CONS2019-0004   IUP :10.26650/CONS2019-0004    Full Text (PDF)

Schenker Approach in Music Analysis

Ebru Bulur

20th century is a period when composers abandoned traditional norms. Various trends defying norms imposed by tonal harmony and composers who experimented with new forms left their imprint in last century. It is striking that Heinrich Schenker (1868–1935), Viennese music theorist, remained faithful to tonality, structured his analysis on tonic triad and derivations despite new trends. Schenker in this theory explained basic structure of musical pieces and hierarchical relations through technique of prolongation. This article aims to evaluate the Schenkerian analysis, under general headings. Hereby, ideas that Schenker developed over lifetime are provided in general; Schenkerian analysis is observed with examples in general section terms, harmonic structure, melodic notions, graphic notation. Analysis of work is avoided and to describe the technique, selection of samples, chosen from literature is used. Related resources are obtained through literature survey of relevant academic researches and analyses. Some new analysis techniques, that emerged in 20th century are briefly mentioned in essay but not examined in detail since each of them is topic of separate research. Due to limited number of Turkish sources on Schenker’s analysis, this article aims to remedy this deficiency in literature and provide general information on Schenker analysis.
DOI :10.26650/CONS2019-0004   IUP :10.26650/CONS2019-0004    Full Text (PDF)

Müzik Analizinde Schenker Yaklaşımı

Ebru Bulur

20. yüzyıl, bestecileri geleneksel kurallardan vazgeçiren bir yüzyıl olmuştur. Tonal düzenin getirdiği kurallara karşı çıkan pek çok akım, yeni denemelere girişen besteciler, çağa damgasını vurmuştur. Viyanalı müzik kuramcısı Heinrich Schenker’in (1868–1935) bu kadar yeni akımın içinde tonaliteye sadık kalan ve tüm analizini tonik akoru ve onun açılımları üzerine kurgulaması, ister istemez oldukça dikkat çekicidir. Bu makale, Schenker analizini, genel başlıklar altında inceleme amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Schenker’in kariyeri boyunca geliştirdiği fikirler ana hatlarıyla anlatılmaya çalışılmış, Schenker analizi genel kavramlar, armonik yapı, melodik kavramlar ve grafik notasyon, başlıkları altında örneklerle incelenmiştir. İlgili kaynaklara, bilimsel araştırmalara, analizlere, literatür taraması yoluyla ulaşılmıştır. Eser analizi yapılmamış, tekniği anlatabilmek için literatürden seçilmiş örnekler kullanılmıştır. 20. yüzyılda ortaya çıkan yeni analiz yöntemlerinin birkaçına genel olarak değinilmiş, ancak tüm bu yöntemlerin başlı başına başka bir araştırma konusu olması nedeniyle detaylandırılmamıştır. Schenker analizi hakkında Türkçe kaynakların sınırlı sayıda olması nedeniyle bu makale literatür eksikliğini bir nebze gidermeyi ve Schenker analizi hakkında genel bir fikir vermeyi amaçlamaktadır.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Heinrich Schenker, (1868–1935) is a Viennese music theorist. The Schenker analysis is a method of analyzing tonal music using Heinrich Schenker’s theory and analytical techniques. The preliminary conceptual framework for the Schenker analysis first appeared in the analyses that are published in Der Tonwillede (1921-24), however, ideas about fundamental content is not pronounced until the publication of Der Freie Satz (1935). The core of Schenker’s theory can be found in the three volumes of Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien: Harmonielehre (1906), Kontrapunkt I-II (1910, 1922), and Der Freie Satz (1935). Schenker’s last work, Der Freie Satz (Free Composition) is published shortly after the death of the author in 1935. 

The principles of this theory that Schenker developed for the study European music of the 18th and 19th centuries (late baroque ― early romanticist) are initially implemented by his pupils and himself. It reached a wider audience owing to the school, which Oswald Jonas and Felix Salzer founded in the USA. Especially after the translation of Der Freie Satz into English in 1979, this theory became a principal analytical method used by many music analysts by the 1980s. By the mid-1980s, two methods of musical analysis approaches became mainstream, one for analyzing tonal music and other for atonal music. One of these methods is ‘the Schenkerian’ analysis whereas the other is ‘the pitch class set’ analysis. As a result, a clear-cut separation between tonal and atonal analysis is set. 

In the multilayered structure of his analysis, Schenker aimed to show the basic structure of a musical work through the technique of prolongation and the hierarchical relations. He used a special symbolic music notation in his system of analysis. Schenker with the analysis he made, synchronically synthesized many musical parameters with contrapuntal and harmonic component structure and explained about analyzing in a minimal level. The Schenkerian analysis, which refers to a kind of systematic analysis today continued to grow through the works of the students of Schenker after his death and inspired a variety of other analytical methods in later years. 

In this article, general information about the developments in music analysis in the 20th-century, some analysis methods and Schenker analysis will be given. While there are many works on the Schenker analysis in the relevant international literature, similar studies in Turkish are quite limited in number.

In the first section of the article, the general definition of analysis and some of the techniques of 20th-century analysis are discussed. Amongst 20th-century analysis techniques, Schenker analysis is chosen and examined in general. In the beginning, general concepts of Schenker analysis is introduced. Familiarity with key terms of the Schenker analysis is essential for understanding the theory itself. In Schenker analysis which is a formation of prolongation technique and layered structure, various melodic components used from background to foreground of a musical piece and usage of these components is briefly explained. Also, the peculiar chord system he developed, harmonic structure and the use of harmonic structure with melodic components are briefly mentioned. The graphic notation he applied is elaborated through concrete examples. Rather than attempting to analyze the musical piece, here it is limited to describe the Schenkerian analysis and classical analysis through a selection of examples from the relevant literature. 

In conclusion, it is underlined that there are differences between the Schenkerian analysis and traditional analyses in terms of gradation and while Schenkerian analysis appears to be difficult to understand for the beginners, still the Schenkerian analysis offers a convenient methodology for analyzing tonal pieces. Analysis means an interpretation and no particular method or form of analysis should be accepted superior to others.


PDF View

References

  • Babbitt, M. (1952). Review of “Structural hearing: tonal coherence in music” by Felix Salzer. Journal of the American Musicological Society(3), 260-265. google scholar
  • Beach, D. (1969). A Schenker bibliography. Journal of Music Theory, 2-37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/843213 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Beduschi, L. ve Meeús, N. (2010). Schenkerian analysis at the Sorbonne. Music Theory Pedagogy Online (24), 159-173. Music Theory Pedagogy Online. adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Brown, M. (1986). The diatonic and the chromatic in Schenker’s “Theory of harmonic relations”. Journal of Music Theory, 1-3. https://www.jstor.org/stable/843407 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Brown, M. (2005). Explaining tonality schenkerian theory and beyond. New York: University of Rochester Press. google scholar
  • Cadwallader, A. ve Gagne, D. (1998). Analysis of tonal music: A schenkerian approach. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Cook, N. (1987). A guide to musical analysis . New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Dallin, L. (1964). Techniques of twentieth century composition. Iowa: WM.C. Brown Company Publishers. google scholar
  • Drabkin, W. (2002). Heinrich Schenker. (T. Christensen, Dü.) The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, 812-843. google scholar
  • Edward, A. ve Schachter, C. (2003). Harmony and voice leading. Belmont,Ca: Wadsworth. google scholar
  • Forte, A. (1959). Schenker’s conception of musical structure. Journal of Music Theory, 3(1), 1-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/842996 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Forte, A. (1962). The compositional matrix. New York. google scholar
  • Forte, A. (1985). Pitch-class set analysis today. Music Analysis, 29-58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/854234 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Forte, A. ve Gilbert, S. E. (1982). Introduction to schenkerian analysis. New York: Norton google scholar
  • Garrison, R. (2012-2013). Unrolling Schenker’s ideas of musical “Unfolding”. Theory and Practice, 111-138. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43864908 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Hansen, N. C. (2010). The legacy of Lerdahl and Jackendoff’s ‘A Generative Theory of Tonal Music’: Bridging a significant event in the history of music theory and recent developments in cognitive music research. Danish Yearbook og musicology, 33-55. google scholar
  • Katz, A. T. (1935). Heinrich Schenker’s method of analysis. The Musical Quarterly, 21(3), 311-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035686 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Larson, S. (1997). The problem of prolongation in “Tonal” music: Terminology, perception, and expressive meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 101-136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/843763 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Lerdahl, F. ve Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Massachusetts: MIT Pres. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268189854 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Morgan, R. P. (1978). Schenker and the theoretical tradition: The concept of musical reduction. College Music Symposium, 18(1), 72-96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40373919 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Morris, R. D. (1998). Voice-leading spaces. Music Theory Spectrum, 20(2), 175-208. https://www.jstor.org/stable/746047 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Sadie, S. (Dü.). (2001). The new grove dictionary of music and musicians (2 b., Cilt 1). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Sadie, S. (Dü.). (2001). The new grove dictionary of music and musicians (2 b., Cilt 25). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Salzer, F. (1952). Structural hearing: Tonal coherence in music Volume I. New York: Charles Boni. google scholar
  • Say, A. (2002). Müzik sözlüğü. Ankara, Müzik Ansiklopedisi Yayınları google scholar
  • Schenker, H. (1954). Harmony. (O. Jonas, Dü., & E. M. Borgeses, Çev.) Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Schenker, H. (1969). Five graphic music analysis. New York: Dover. google scholar
  • Schenker, H. (1979). Free composition ııı of musical theories and fantasies. (E. Oster, Çev.) New York: New York, London, Longman. google scholar
  • Straus, J. N. (1987). The problem of prolongation in post-tonal music. Journal of Music Theory, 31(1), 1-21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/843544 adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Temperley, D. (2011). Composition, perception, and schenkerian theory. Music Theory Spectrum, 33(2), 146-168. doi:10.1525/mts.2011.33.2.146 google scholar
  • Wadsworth, B. K. (2016). Schenkerian analysis for the beginner. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 177-220. google scholar
  • Yüksel, M. (2013). Schenker analizi: Robert Schumann, “Askerin Marşı”, opus 68/2 sol majör. Akdeniz Sanat Dergisi, 3(6), 163-168. http://dergipark.gov.tr/akdenizsanat/issue/18005/189134 adresinden alındı google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Bulur, E. (2019). Schenker Approach in Music Analysis. Conservatorium, 6(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004


AMA

Bulur E. Schenker Approach in Music Analysis. Conservatorium. 2019;6(1):21-46. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004


ABNT

Bulur, E. Schenker Approach in Music Analysis. Conservatorium, [Publisher Location], v. 6, n. 1, p. 21-46, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Bulur, Ebru,. 2019. “Schenker Approach in Music Analysis.” Conservatorium 6, no. 1: 21-46. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004


Chicago: Humanities Style

Bulur, Ebru,. Schenker Approach in Music Analysis.” Conservatorium 6, no. 1 (May. 2024): 21-46. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004


Harvard: Australian Style

Bulur, E 2019, 'Schenker Approach in Music Analysis', Conservatorium, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21-46, viewed 11 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Bulur, E. (2019) ‘Schenker Approach in Music Analysis’, Conservatorium, 6(1), pp. 21-46. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004 (11 May. 2024).


MLA

Bulur, Ebru,. Schenker Approach in Music Analysis.” Conservatorium, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, pp. 21-46. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004


Vancouver

Bulur E. Schenker Approach in Music Analysis. Conservatorium [Internet]. 11 May. 2024 [cited 11 May. 2024];6(1):21-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004 doi: 10.26650/CONS2019-0004


ISNAD

Bulur, Ebru. Schenker Approach in Music Analysis”. Conservatorium 6/1 (May. 2024): 21-46. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2019-0004



TIMELINE


Submitted13.03.2019
First Revision10.06.2019
Last Revision16.06.2019
Accepted21.06.2019
Published Online28.06.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.