Research Article


DOI :10.26650/arcp2019-5134   IUP :10.26650/arcp2019-5134    Full Text (PDF)

What is Political Philosophy?

Murat Ertan Kardeş

This article focuses on two aspects of contemporary political philosophy. The first one is political philosophy as a philosophy strategy. The second one is political philosophy as an activity that considers the politicity of philosophy and what is political. Our basic claim is the impossibility of separating these two meanings of political philosophy. Rather than maintaining the distinction between the empirical and the speculative in terms of political philosophy, the basic attitude is to look at what is happening within the polis, whether the police remain without polites or whether the polis allow the political community to recognize it. The discovery of the politicity of philosophy is undoubtedly not something new, however, it has become a more evident focus of philosophy after World War II. Many different trends in contemporary philosophy have brought new ideas within this perspective: from Carl Schmitt to Leo Strauss, from Frankfurt School thinkers to many important figures of contemporary French philosophy, such as Claude Lefort and Cornelius Castoriadis; they all have developed critical, contemporary and radical philosophical thoughts. It can be easily claimed that this movement in political philosophy comes with a conjuncture in which the crisis has become more evident in the context of political praxis and concept. In the first phase, the fading of ideologies forced the return from 'theory' to philosophy. Secondly, the hopelessness and failures created by the actual communisms forced them to consider different praxis. Thirdly, structural crises and transformations in the world political order have also prepared the crisis of liberal political philosophies seeking answers to the existing crisis with their own concepts. It was no coincidence that after the pursuit of pure philosophy in the Belle Époque period, it was recollected as philosophy's politics. A singular, constituent praxis, and an orientation that desires emancipation, is the sole possibility of the idea of the universal. In this context, political philosophy is not only an abstraction practice on political things, but on the contrary, an activity on the establishment or disruption of the logic of political things. The togetherness of the necessity of understanding political things and research faithful to the idea of truth; reveals the vitality of plurality of political organizations against violence. 

DOI :10.26650/arcp2019-5134   IUP :10.26650/arcp2019-5134    Full Text (PDF)

Politik Felsefe Nedir?

Murat Ertan Kardeş

Bu makale çağdaş politik felsefenin iki kullanımı üzerine odaklanmıştır. Bunlardan birincisi bir felsefe stratejisi olarak politik felsefe. İkincisiyse felsefenin politikliğini ve politik-olanı düşünen bir etkinlik olarak politik felsefe. Temel iddiamız politik felsefenin bu iki anlamının ayrıştırılmasının imkansızlığıdır. Empirik-olan ile spekülatif-olan arasındaki ayrımı politik felsefe açısından sürdürmek yerine polisin içinde olup bitenlere, polisin polites'siz kalmasına ya da polisin, politik topluluğa olanak tanıyıp, tanımamasına bakmak onun temel tavrıdır. Felsefenin politikliğinin keşfi şüphesiz yeni değildir ancak felsefenin kendi odağına bunu alarak düşünmeye başlaması İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasında daha belirgin hale gelmiştir. Çağdaş felsefedeki birçok farklı akım bu odakla yeni düşünceler ortaya koymuştur: Carl Schmitt'ten Leo Strauss'a, Frankfurt Okulu düşünürlerinden başta Claude Lefort ve Cornelius Castoriadis gibi çağdaş Fransız felsefesinin birçok önemli isme, bahsedilen bu eleştirel, çağdaş ve radikal felsefe pratiklerini geliştirmişlerdir. Politik felsefedeki bu hareketliliğin, politik eylem ve kavram bağlamında krizin belirginleşmeye başladığı bir konjonktürle geldiği rahatlıkla iddia edilebilir. İlk evrede ideolojilerin sönümlenmeye başlaması "teori"den tekrar felsefeye dönüşü mecbur bırakmıştır. İkinci olarak ise fiili komünizmlerin yarattığı ümitsizlik ve başarısızlıklar farklı praksisleri düşünmeye zorlamıştır. Üçüncü olarak, dünya politik düzenindeki yapısal krizler ve dönüşümler, varolan krize karşı kendi kavramlarıyla yanıtlar arayan liberal politik felsefelerin de krizini hazırlamıştır. Belle Époque döneminde saf felsefe arayışından sonra felsefenin politikliğinin anımsanması da tesadüf olmamıştır. Tekil olanı, kurucu praksisi ve kurtuluşu arzulayan bir yönelim evrenselin düşüncesinin yegâne imkânıdır. Bu bağlamda politik felsefe sadece politik şeyler üzerine bir soyutlama pratiği değildir, aksine politik şeylerin mantığının kurulmasına ya da bozulmasına dair bir etkinliktir. Politik şeyleri anlama zorunluluğu ile hakikat fikrine sadık araştırmanın yan yanalığı, şiddet hallerine karşı politik örgütlenmelerin çoğulluğunun gerekli olduğunu ortaya koyar.


PDF View

References

  • Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund. Dialectique Négative, çev. Groupe de Trad., Paris: Payot, 2001. google scholar
  • Agamben, Giorgio. État d’exception, Homo Sacer, II-1, çev. Joël Gayraud, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2003. google scholar
  • Aristote, Politique, T. II, 1ère partie, livres III et IV, çev. Jean Aubonnet, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2002. google scholar
  • Arendt, Hannah. Qu’est-ce que la politique?, haz. U. Ludz, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1995. google scholar
  • Aron, Raymond. Demokrasi ve Totalitarizm, çev. V. Hatay, İstanbul: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1976. google scholar
  • Balibar, Étienne. Violence et Civilité, Wellek Library Lectures et autres essais de philosophie politique, Paris: Galilée, 2010. google scholar
  • Berktay, Fatmagül. Politikanın Çağrısı, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2010. google scholar
  • de la Boétie, Étienne. De la servitude volontaire ou Le Contr’un, [ouvrage publié en l’an 1549 et transcrit en langage moderne par Adolphe Rechastelet, 1836], Gallica Bibliothèque Numérique google scholar
  • -. Discours de la Servitude Volontaire, Paris: Mille et une Nuit, 1995. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. La reproduction. Eléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement, Paris: Minuit, 1970. google scholar
  • -. La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement, Paris: Minuit, 1979. google scholar
  • -. La Domination Masculine, Paris: Seuil, 1998. google scholar
  • Castoriadis, Cornelius. Institution Imaginaire de la Société, Éditions du Seuil, 1975. google scholar
  • -. Les carrefours du Labyrinthe, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1978 google scholar
  • -.Domaines de l’Homme, Les Carrefours du labyrinthe II, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1999. google scholar
  • -. Figures du pensable, Les Carrefours du labyrinthe VI, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1999. google scholar
  • Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari. Capitalisme et schizophrénie 1 : L’Anti-Œdipe, Paris: Éditions du Minuit, 1973. google scholar
  • Derrida, Jacques. De la Grammatologie, Paris: Éditions du Minuit, 1967 google scholar
  • -. Politique et amitié, Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2011. google scholar
  • Foucault, Michel. Histoire de la Sexualité 1, Volonté de Savoir, Paris: Gallimard, 1976. google scholar
  • -. Les Mots et les Choses: Une archéologie des sciences sociales, Paris: Gallimard, 1996. google scholar
  • Freund, Julien. “Choix de quelques lettres de la correspondance de Carl Schmitt“, Piet Tommissen (Hg.), Schmittiana II içinde, Eclectica, Brussel, 1990. google scholar
  • Gauchet, Marcel. Le désenchantement du monde, une histoire politique de la religion, Paris, Éditions Gallimard, 1996. google scholar
  • -. L’avènement de la démocratie 1 : La révolution moderne, Paris: Gallimard, 2007. google scholar
  • Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Vol. 2., çev. T. McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Yayınları, 1987. google scholar
  • Hayek, Friedrich von. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Londra: Routledge, 1982. google scholar
  • Hegel, G. W. F. Phénoménologie de l’Esprit, çev. B. Bourgeois, Paris: Vrin, 2007. google scholar
  • Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition, The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, çev. J. Anderson, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Yayınları, 1995. google scholar
  • -. La Société du Mépris, Vers une nouvelle Théorie Critique, çev. O. Voirol, Paris: La Découverte, 2006. google scholar
  • Kardeş, M. Ertan. «Bourdieu’nün ‘Politik Alan’ Kavramı ile Politik Felsefenin İlişkisi», Kutadgubilig içinde, Sayı 26, Ekim 2014, s. 169-184. google scholar
  • -. Schmitt’le Birlikte Schmitt’e Karşı, Politik Felsefe Açısından Carl Schmitt ve Düşüncesi, İstanbul: İletişim, 2015. google scholar
  • -. «Labirentte Kesişen Yollar: Cornelius Castoriadis’in Politik Felsefesine Giriş», Felsefi Düşün içinde, Nisan 2015, Sayı: 4, 113-136. google scholar
  • .“Walter Benjamin’in Politik Felsefesine Dair Öğeler”, Dar Kapıdaki Mesih: Walter Benjamin ve Politik Felsefesi, der. M. Ertan Kardeş, İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • -. Otorite Krizi Çağında Meşru Bir Otorite Figürü Mümkün Müdür?, E-yayın, İstanbul: Küyerel Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • Kojève, Alexandre. Hegel Felsefesine Giriş, çev. S. Hilav, İstanbul: YKY, 2001. google scholar
  • Laclau, Ernesto & Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy toward a radical democratic politics, Londra, New York: Verso, 2001. google scholar
  • Lefort, Claude. Essais sur le politique (XIXe-XXe siècles), Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1986. google scholar
  • Lyotard, Jean-François. Économie Libidinale, Paris: Éditions du Minuit, 1974. google scholar
  • Machiavel (Niccolò Machiavelli), Œuvres Complètes, Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1952. google scholar
  • McIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2007 google scholar
  • Mouffe, Chantal. On the Political, New York: Routledge, 2005. google scholar
  • Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001. google scholar
  • Platon, La République, çev. G. Leroux, Paris: Flammarion, 2004. google scholar
  • Poirier, Nicolas. «Cornelius Castoriadis. L’imaginaire radical», Revue du MAUSS, 2003/1 (no 21). google scholar
  • Rancière, Jacques. La Mésentente, Politique et Philosophie, Paris: Éditions Galilée, 1995. google scholar
  • -. “3. Les hommes comme animaux littéraires”, Revue Mouvements içinde, 2009. google scholar
  • Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Üniversitesi Belknap Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Revault d’Allonnes, Myriam. «Réponses à Alain Badiou», in Esprit, numéro 248, 1998. google scholar
  • -. Le Dépérissement de la politique, Généalogie d’un lieu commun, Alto Aubier, Paris, 1999. google scholar
  • Ricœur, Paul. “Le paradoxe politique”, Esprit, Nouvelle série, No. 250 (5), Mai 1957: ss. 721-745. google scholar
  • Schmitt, Carl. La Notion de Politique, suivie de Théorie du Partisan, çev. Marie-Louise Steinhauser, Paris: Flammarion, 1992. google scholar
  • -. Der Begriff des Politischen, Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2002. google scholar
  • -. La dictature, çev. Mira Köller et Dominique Séglard, Paris: Éditions du Seuil. google scholar
  • -. Gespräche über die Macht und den Zugang zum Machthaber / Gespräch über den Neuen Raum, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1994. google scholar
  • Strauss, Leo. What Is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies, Glencoe: Free Yayınları, 1959. google scholar
  • Sun Tzu, L’art de la guerre, çev. F. Wang, Paris: Flammarion, 2008. google scholar
  • Taylor, Charles. Multiculturalisme: Différence et démocratie, çev. D. A. Canal, Paris: Flammarion, 1994. google scholar
  • Vernant, Jean-Pierre. «Du mythe à la raison. La formation de la pensée positive dans la Grèce archaïque», Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations. 12ᵉ année, N. 2, 1957. google scholar
  • Weber, Max. La Domination, çev. I. Kalinowski, ed. Y. Sintomer, Paris: La Découverte, 2015. google scholar
  • Weil, Éric. Philosophie Politique, Paris: Vrin, 1996. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kardeş, M.E. (2019). What is Political Philosophy?. Archives of Philosophy, 0(51), 393-410. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134


AMA

Kardeş M E. What is Political Philosophy?. Archives of Philosophy. 2019;0(51):393-410. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134


ABNT

Kardeş, M.E. What is Political Philosophy?. Archives of Philosophy, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 51, p. 393-410, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kardeş, Murat Ertan,. 2019. “What is Political Philosophy?.” Archives of Philosophy 0, no. 51: 393-410. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kardeş, Murat Ertan,. What is Political Philosophy?.” Archives of Philosophy 0, no. 51 (Jun. 2024): 393-410. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134


Harvard: Australian Style

Kardeş, ME 2019, 'What is Political Philosophy?', Archives of Philosophy, vol. 0, no. 51, pp. 393-410, viewed 24 Jun. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kardeş, M.E. (2019) ‘What is Political Philosophy?’, Archives of Philosophy, 0(51), pp. 393-410. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134 (24 Jun. 2024).


MLA

Kardeş, Murat Ertan,. What is Political Philosophy?.” Archives of Philosophy, vol. 0, no. 51, 2019, pp. 393-410. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134


Vancouver

Kardeş ME. What is Political Philosophy?. Archives of Philosophy [Internet]. 24 Jun. 2024 [cited 24 Jun. 2024];0(51):393-410. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134 doi: 10.26650/arcp2019-5134


ISNAD

Kardeş, MuratErtan. What is Political Philosophy?”. Archives of Philosophy 0/51 (Jun. 2024): 393-410. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5134



TIMELINE


Submitted24.11.2019
Last Revision01.12.2019
Accepted06.12.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.