References

• Aristotle. Aristotle: Categories on interpretation. Prior analytics. Translated by Cooke, H.P., Tredennick, H. London: Harvard University Press, 1938. google scholar
• Aristotle. Categories and De interpretatione. Translated by J.L.Ackrill. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. google scholar
• Ashworth, E. Jeniffer. “Existential assumptions in late medieval logic.” American Philosophical Quarterly 10(2) (1973): 141-147. google scholar
• Ashworth, E. Jennifer. Language and Logic in the Post-medieval Period. Dortrecht: Reidel Publishing, 1974. google scholar
• Bäck, Allan. Aristotle’s theory of predication. Leiden: Brill, 2000. Caroll, Lewis. Symbolic Logic, Part I, Elementary. New York: NY Dover Publications, 1958 [1896]. google scholar
• Chatti, Saloua and Schang, Fabian. “The cube the square and the problem of existential import.” History and Philosophy of Logic 34(2) (2013):101-132. google scholar
• Church, Alonzo. “The history of the question of existential import of categorical propositions.” In Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, edited by Y. BarHillel, 417-24. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1965. google scholar
• Copi, Irving M. and Cohen, Carl. Introduction to Logic: Study Guide. US: Macmillan,1994. Copi, Irving M. Introduction to Logic. New York: Macmillan, 1953. google scholar
• De Rijk, Lambertus Marie. Petrus Abaelardus, Dialectica. First Complete Edition of the Parisian Manuscript. Assen: Van Gorcum/Hak and Prakke, 1956. google scholar
• Horn, Laurence R. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989. google scholar
• Horn, Laurence R. “All john’s children are as bald as the king of france: Existential import and the geometry of opposition.” Chicago Linguistics Society 33 (1997): 155-179. Hudson Mulder, Dwayne. “The existential assumpions of traditional logic.” History and Philosophy of Logic, 17(1-2) (1996):141-154. google scholar
• Hughes, G. Edward. and Londey, David. The elements of formal logic. New York: Harper and Raw, 1965. google scholar
• Johnson, William Ernest. Logic, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1921. google scholar
• Keynes, John Neville. Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic. London: Macmillan, 1906. google scholar
• Klima, Gyula. “Existence and reference in medieval logic.” In New essays in free logic, edited by Morscher, E. and Hieke, A., 197-226. Dortrecht: Springer, 2001. google scholar
• Klima, Gyula. John Buridan. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. google scholar
• Klima, Gyula. “Consequence”. In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic, edited by Catarina Dutilh Novaes and Stephen Read, 316-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. google scholar
• Klima, Gyula. Ars artium: essays in philosophical semantics, mediaeval and modern. Budapest: Institute of Philosopher, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1988. google scholar
• Kneale, William and Kneale, Martha, The development of logic. London: Oxford University Press, 1962. google scholar
• Londey, David G. and Johanson, Carmen J. The logic of Apuleius: Including a complete Latin text and English translation of the Peri Hermeneias of Apuleius of Madaura. Leiden: Brill Archive,1987. google scholar
• Moody, Ernest A. Truth and Consequence in Mediaeval Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1953. google scholar
• Morrison, John J. “The existential import of a proposition in Aristotelian logic.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 15(3) (1995):386-393. google scholar
• Ockham, W. (1998). Ockham’s Theory of Propositions: Part 2 of the Summa Logicae. Translated by Alfred J. Freddoso and Henry Shuurman. Indiana: St. Augustine’s Press, 1998. google scholar
• Parsons, Terence. “Things that are right with the traditional square of oppositions.” Logica Universalis, 2(1) (2008) :3-11. Parsons, Terence. Articulating medieval logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. google scholar
• Parsons, Terence. “The traditional square of opposition.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Summer 2017 edition. Edited by Zalta, E.N. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017. google scholar
• Read, Stephan. “Aristotle and Lukasiewicz on existential import.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1(3) (2015):535-544. google scholar
• Seuren, Pieter A. “The logic of thinking.” Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Mededelingen van de Afdelig Letterkunde, Niuwe Reeks, 65(9) (2002):5-35. google scholar
• Seuren, Pieter. A. The Logic of Language: Language From Within, volume 2. New York: Oxford Univerity Press, 2009. google scholar
• Seuren, Pieter A. “Does a leaking o-corner save the square?” in Around and beyond the square of opposition, edited by Béziau, J.Y., and Jacquette, D. Basel: Springer, 2012 google scholar
• Seuren, Pieter A. From Whorf to Montague: Explorations in the theory of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Strawson, Peter Frederick. Introduction to Logical Theory. New York: Routledge, 2011. google scholar
• Thom, Paul. The syllogism. München: Philosophie Verlag, 1981. Thomson, Manley. “Aristotle’s square of oppositions.” Philosophical Review 62 (1953):251-265. google scholar
• Wedin, Michael V. “Negation and quantification in Aristotle.” History and Philosophy of Logic 11(2) (1990) :131-150. google scholar

Citations