Research Article


DOI :10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015   IUP :10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015    Full Text (PDF)

Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch

Nesibe Betül Yurtseven

With the proliferation of digitalization and the Internet, humanity’s relationship with the flow of information has undergone a transformative shift from passive reception to active engagement. While the issue of how an audience receives the content presented in completed form in many media in the fields of communication and art, especially in films, remains currently significant, the matter of how an audience can be involved in the process of creation before contents or a work is completed is open for discussion. In line with this, the feature of interactivity, long integrated into video games and social media applications, is now observed being adapted to cinema in a highly efficient manner. Among these examples, Black Mirror: Bandersnatch (Slade, 2018) is a production worth  studying for both its form and content as the first adultoriented film to reach a mainstream audience. In addition to studies on interactive films from various perspectives, the presence of the need to examine and define the artistic features of the interactive structure has become apparent. For this purpose, the current study traces how the form content dichotomy, the most classic debate in cinema, can be evaluated regarding interactive films. Interactive narratives differ from the classical narrative form through their structure, which grants control to the audience and its branching story possibilities, and remains a topic under theoretical frameworks for defining its aesthetic elements and determining the relationship between them. This study attempts to build a bridge between the most classical theories and the newest ones through a detailed descriptive analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch.

DOI :10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015   IUP :10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015    Full Text (PDF)

İnteraktif Filmde Biçim ve İçerik: Black Mirror: Bandersnatch Filminin Analizi

Nesibe Betül Yurtseven

Dijitalleşmenin ve ardından internetin yaygınlaşması sayesinde, bilgi akışı ile ilişkimizin edilgen alımdan etken katılıma doğru bir dönüşüm sürecine girdiği tartışılmaktadır. Günümüzde, filmler başta olmak üzere iletişim ve sanat alanlarına dahil pek çok medyumda, tamamlanmış şekilde sunulan içeriği seyircinin nasıl alımladığı meselesi önemini korurken; seyircinin içerik/eser tamamlanmadan yaratım sürecine nasıl dahil olabileceği konusu, tartışmamız için önümüzde durmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, video oyunlara ve sosyal medya uygulamalarına uzun süredir entegre olan interaktivite özelliğinin, sinemaya da verimi yüksek şekilde uyarlanmaya çalışıldığını gördüğümüz örnekler birikmektedir. Bu örneklerden, geniş bir izleyici kitlesine sahip Netflix platformunda yayınlanan ilk yetişkinlere yönelik interaktif film olan Black Mirror: Bandersnatch, hem biçimi hem de içeriğiyle çalışılmaya değer bir yapımdır. İnteraktif filmlerin çeşitli açılardan ele alındığı çalışmalara ek olarak, interaktif yapının sanatsal özelliklerine eğilmenin ve bunları tanımlamanın bir gereklilik olduğu fark edilebilir. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada sinemanın en klasik tartışması olan biçim-içerik dikotomisinin, interaktif filmlerde nasıl ele alınacağının izi sürülmektedir. Hem kontrolü seyirciye veren yapısıyla hem de dallanan hikâye olasılıklarıyla klasik anlatı yapısından ayrılan interaktif anlatılar, estetik ögelerinin tanımlanması ve aralarındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi için kuramsal çerçeve oluşturulmaya devam edilen bir konu başlığıdır. En klasik kuramlar ile en yeni kuramlar arasında bir köprü kurmaya çalışılan bu çalışmada, örnek vaka olarak seçilen Black Mirror: Bandersnatch filminin betimsel analiz yöntemiyle ayrıntılı bir yapısal tahlili yapılmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Cinema was initially introduced as a technological innovation and rapidly garnered widespread acceptance, evolving into a powerful art form and pervasive medium. Throughout its history, cinema has continuously adapted to technological advancements, with innovations involving such aspects as scenario, color, sound, wide screen formats, digitalization, 3D, and IMAX enhancing the narrative possibilities and transforming its formal characteristics. In the contemporary era, the ubiquity of the Internet and rise of digital streaming platforms have ushered in a transition toward a viewer-centric content consumptive experience, particularly as audiences increasingly shift from passive spectators to active users, driven by a heightened demand for interactive consumption most notably in the realm of gaming.

Netflix as a digital streaming platform was traditionally regarded as avantgarde and experimental and also notably catapulted interactive film production into the mainstream in 2018. Marking a milestone in the evolution of interactive storytelling, Black Mirror: Bandersnatch (Slade, 2018) is a film based on the celebrated British dystopian science fiction series Black Mirror and stands out as the inaugural adult interactive film to have achieved mainstream recognition. Serving as the focal point of this research, the production diverges from traditional linear narratives by presenting choices to the audience, empowering them to shape the trajectory of the story. This work delves into the fundamental concepts of form and content in the realm of interactive films by utilizing Black Mirror: Bandersnatch as an illustrative case study.

The nature of interactive storytelling necessitates distinct techniques compared to the linear narrative prevalent in traditional cinema. Interactive cinema employs non linear narrative techniques and has roots dating back to the 1960s, although its initial experiments in physical cinema spaces remained largely experimental until the digital era and the proliferation of the Internet. The contemporary integration of interactivity into cinema has been accelerated by streaming technology, video game interaction, participatory culture, and software-facilitated interactive narratives, sparking both practical and theoretical discussions.

Cinema’s unique characteristics compelled early theorists to define its form, followed by realist theorists accentuating the significance of content. As another period of rapid aesthetic and technological transformation akin to the classical cinema discussions era is being witnessed, examining the structure of interactive films becomes paramount, given their capacity for multiple evolving stories. The contrast between the passive experience of traditional cinema and the active engagement inherent in interactive films underscores the necessity for adapting the concepts of form and content to this evolving cinematic genre.

The primary objective of this study is to articulate the definitions of form and content within the domain of interactive films. To fulfil this objective, an exploration of the following key questions has been undertaken:

1. What constitutes the form and content of interactive films?

2. How is the relationship between form and content manifested in interactive films?

This investigation delves into the structural dimensions of interactive narrative films, a novel paradigm in cinema. The inquiry commences by revisiting the classical dichotomy of form and content in cinema. Subsequently, the study navigates through the conceptualization of interactivity and the discernment of an interactive form. The pinnacle of this exploration involves a descriptive analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. Through this analysis, the study aims to define the film’s form and content and discern the intricate relationship between them. To accomplish this, the theoretical groundwork for the concept of interactivity is laid through a comprehensive discussion of form and content. Following this theoretical foundation, the film is subjected to an analysis by employing the specific categories of form and content. The analytical framework incorporates Hartmur Koenitz’s (2010, 2015) models for interactive digital narrative and protostory. The synthesis of this analysis culminates in a condensed presentation of the film’s form and content and is conveyed through illustrative figures. 

The study reveals the distinctive feature that enables the viewing of interactive films to lay in their unique form, which systematically presents content to the audience and facilitates access to all possible story alternatives. Koenitz’s (2010, 2015) definition characterizes this system as the software delivering content to the audience and the hardware on which the software operates. Notably, each of the scenes presenting all the possible story pathways were identified to constitute the content in interactive films.

The study emphasizes that, without the specific order the system imposes for presenting these scenes, the content would be unintelligible and, consequently, nonfunctional. This underscores how the form in interactive films not only fortifies the narrative but also more fundamentally renders the narrative possible.

Despite the limitations regarding the interactivity arising from a relatively low number of story alternatives in the analyzed film of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch, the study concludes that the production holds a significant place int the history of interactive cinema. This distinction stems from its capacity to present a dramatic narrative with diverse alternative storylines, thus contributing to the evolution and diversification of interactive storytelling within the cinematic landscape. 


PDF View

References

  • Akyol, O., & Oğuzcan, D. (2019). İnteraktif sinema ve mobil oyun bileşimi “Eyes of sky” üzerine bir inceleme. F. google scholar
  • Aydoğan (Ed.), Endüstri 4.0 ve dijital medya (s. 37-56). Der Yayınları. google scholar
  • Andrew, J. D. (2010). Büyük sinema kuramları (Z. Atam, Çev.). Doruk Yayımcılık. google scholar
  • Aristoteles. (2013). Poetika şiir sanatı üzerine (S. Rifat, Çev.). Can Sanat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Arslan, A. (2009). İlkçağ felsefe tarihi (Cilt 3). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Ashwell, S. (2015, 26 Ocak). Standard patterns in choice-based games [Web log post]. https://heterogenoustasks. wordpress.com/2015/01/26/standard-patterns-in-choice-based-games/ google scholar
  • Balazs, B. (2019). Sinema kuramı (G. Aydın, Çev.). Doruk Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bazin, A. (2011). Sinema nedir? (İ. Şener, Çev.). Doruk Yayınları. google scholar
  • Borges, J. (1995). Yolları çatallanan bahçe (F. Özgüven, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Büker, S. (1989). Film ve gerçek. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Teknolojisi ve Yaygın Eğitim Vakfı. google scholar
  • Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Form. Retrieved April 2022, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/ english/ google scholar
  • Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2018). Medya ve iletişim sözlüğü (B. Taşdemir, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Chatman, S. (2009). Öykü ve söylem: Filmde ve kurmacada anlatı yapısı (Ö. Yaren, Çev.). De Ki Basım Yayım. google scholar
  • Collins. (2008). Thesaurus of the English language. HarperCollins Publishers. google scholar
  • Eco, U. (2021). Açık yapıt (T. Esmer, Çev.). Can Sanat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Erinç, S. (1998). Sanatın boyutları. Çınar Yayınları. google scholar
  • Hegel, G. W. (2019). Estetik. (T. Altuğ, & H. Hünler, Çev.). Kırmızı Kedi Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Koenitz, H. (2010). Towards a theoretical framework for interactive digital narrative. In R. Aylett, M.Y. Lim, S. Louchart, P. Petta, & M. Riedl, (Eds.), Interactive storytelling ICIDS 2010 Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 6432. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16638-9_22 google scholar
  • Koenitz, H. (2015). Towards a specific theory of interactive digital narrative. In H. Koenitz, G. Ferri, M. Haahr, D. Sezen, & T. Sezen (Eds.), Interactive digital narrative history, theory and practice (pp. 91-105). Routledge. google scholar
  • Koenitz, H., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., & Sezen, T. (2015a). Perspectives on interactive digital narrative. In H. Koenitz, G. Ferri, M. Haahr, D. Sezen, & T. Sezen (Eds.), Interactive digital narrative history, theory and practice (pp. 1-8). Routledge. google scholar
  • Koenitz, H., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., & Sezen, T. (2015b). The evolution of interactive digital narrative theory. In H. Koenitz, G. Ferri, M. Haahr, D. Sezen, & T. Sezen (Eds.), Interactive Digital Narrative History, Theory and Practice (pp. 67-76). Routledge. google scholar
  • Kuhn, A., & Westwell, G. (2012). A dictionary of film studies. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Manovich, L. (1995). What is digital cinema? The visual culture reader, 2, 405-416. google scholar
  • Moran, B. (1988). Edebiyat kuramları ve eleştiri. Cem Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Mutlu, E. (2008). İletişim sözlüğü. Ayraç Kitap+Evi. google scholar
  • Nişancı, İ. (2018). Teoride ve pratikte sinemada kurgu. Doruk Yayınları. google scholar
  • Odorico, S. (2015). Between interactivity, reality and participation: The interactive documentary form. MEI Mediation and Information, 39, 213-227. google scholar
  • Raurs0, N., Rasmussen, M., Persson, M., Petersen, T., Garöarsson, K., & Schoenau-Fog, H. (2021). Lean-back machina: Attention-based skippable segments in interactive cinema. Interactive storytelling 14th international conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 128-141). Springer. google scholar
  • Rezk, A., & Haahr, M. (2020). The case for invisibility: Understanding and improving agency in Black Mirror’s Bandersnatch and other interactive digital narrative works. Interactive storytelling 13th international conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 178-189). Springer. google scholar
  • Rezk, A., & Haahr, M. (2022). Beyond free will: Understanding approaches to agency and their suitability for Bandersnatch-like titles. Entertainment Computing, 43, 1-11. google scholar
  • Roth, C., & Koenitz, H. (2019). Bandersnatch, yea or nay? Reception and user experience of an interactive digital narrative video. TVX ‘19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM international conference on interactive experiences for TV and online video (pp. 247-254). Association for Computing Machinery. google scholar
  • Savaş, H. (2019). Film eleştirisinde biçim-içerik sorunu. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(17), 18-36. google scholar
  • Sezen, D. (2013). Bir sanatsal ifade aracı olarak dijital oyunlar. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 45, 129-147. google scholar
  • Spierling, U. (2015). Interaction design principles as narrative techniques for interactive digital storytelling. In H. Koenitz, G. Ferri, M. Haahr, D. Sezen, & T. Sezen (Eds.), Interactive digital narrative history, theory and practice (pp. 159-173). Routledge. google scholar
  • Stern, A. (2008). Embracing the combinatorial explosion: A brief prescription for interactive story R&D. Interactive storytelling first joint international conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 1-5). Springer. google scholar
  • Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 4(42), 73-93. google scholar
  • Şölenay, E. (1997). Sanatta biçim içerik sorunu. Anadolu Sanat, 7, 138-144. google scholar
  • Teksoy, R. (2009). Rekin Teksoy’un sinema tarihi (cilt 1). Oğlak Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Vosmeer, M., & Schouten, B. (2014). Interactive cinema: Engagement and interaction. Interactive storytelling: 7th international conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 140-147). Springer International Publishing. google scholar
  • Yaren, Ö. (2013). Sinemada anlatı kuramı. Z. Özarslan (Ed.), Sinema kuramları II: Beyazperdeyi aydınlatan kuramlar (s. 167-192). Su Yayınevi. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Yurtseven, N.B. (2023). Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. Filmvisio, 0(2), 91-126. https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015


AMA

Yurtseven N B. Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. Filmvisio. 2023;0(2):91-126. https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015


ABNT

Yurtseven, N.B. Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. Filmvisio, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 2, p. 91-126, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yurtseven, Nesibe Betül,. 2023. “Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch.” Filmvisio 0, no. 2: 91-126. https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yurtseven, Nesibe Betül,. Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch.” Filmvisio 0, no. 2 (May. 2024): 91-126. https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015


Harvard: Australian Style

Yurtseven, NB 2023, 'Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch', Filmvisio, vol. 0, no. 2, pp. 91-126, viewed 19 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yurtseven, N.B. (2023) ‘Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch’, Filmvisio, 0(2), pp. 91-126. https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015 (19 May. 2024).


MLA

Yurtseven, Nesibe Betül,. Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch.” Filmvisio, vol. 0, no. 2, 2023, pp. 91-126. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015


Vancouver

Yurtseven NB. Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. Filmvisio [Internet]. 19 May. 2024 [cited 19 May. 2024];0(2):91-126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015 doi: 10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015


ISNAD

Yurtseven, NesibeBetül. Form and Content in Interactive Film: An Analysis of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch”. Filmvisio 0/2 (May. 2024): 91-126. https://doi.org/10.26650/Filmvisio.2023.0015



TIMELINE


Submitted03.11.2023
Accepted21.12.2023
Published Online12.01.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.