Review


DOI :10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033    Full Text (PDF)

Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review

Hazar Altınbaş

Number of proposed advanced analysis methods, which try to successfully predict if applicants are going to default in credit applications show an increasing pattern, especially after the Global Financial Crisis. Alternative to conventional statistical classification methods, machine learning methods arrive on the scene; they have capability to reveal information from the data independently from constraints and assumptions. Along with machine learning methods, metaheuristic algorithms that substantially improves classification performances take part in studies. Combined usages of learning methods and metaheuristic algorithms aim to benefit from the contemporary data storage and process capacities at the highest level and greatly contribute to credit risk assessment field. In this review study, credit classification studies that adopt metaheuristic algorithms in the analyses are examined with a systematic process, for the period after 2000. By forming a general framework, classification methods, metaheuristic algorithm implementations, algorithms’ intended uses and performance assessment criteria are addressed. Examination showed that there is a growing interest, nevertheless method preferences are concentrated over a limited option. It is necessary to incorporate more novel metaheuristics and/or hybrid and combined usages to the studies. It is possible to say that progressive works parallel to the developments in computer and mathematical sciences will continuously contribute to the literature.

DOI :10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033    Full Text (PDF)

Modern Kredi Sınıflandırma Çalışmaları ve Metasezgisel Algoritma Uygulamaları: Sistematik Bir Derleme

Hazar Altınbaş

Kredi başvurularında, başvuranların temerrüde düşüp düşmeyeceklerinin başarılı şekilde tahmin edilmesi amacıyla önerilen gelişmiş analiz yöntemlerinin sayısı, özellikle Küresel Finans Krizi sonrası dönemde önemli bir artış göstermiştir. Geleneksel istatistiksel sınıflandırma yöntemlerine alternatif olarak bilgiyi, kısıtlar ve varsayımlardan bağımsız olarak doğrudan veri kümelerinden ortaya çıkarma yeteneğine sahip makine öğrenme yöntemleri kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu yöntemlerin yanı sıra, sınıflandırma performansları üzerinde çok büyük iyileştirmeler sağlayan metasezgisel algoritmalar da yazında kendilerine fazlaca yer bulmaya başlamıştır. Veri saklama ve işleme kapasitelerinde yaşanan artıştan en üst düzeyde faydalanmaya yönelik olarak öğrenme yöntemleri ile metasezgisel algoritmaların birlikte kullanımları, kredi risk değerlendirme alanına büyük katkılar sağlamaktadır. Bu derleme kapsamında 2000 sonrası dönemde yazına sunulmuş olan ve metasezgisel algoritmaların yer aldığı kredi sınıflandırma çalışmaları sistematik bir süreç ile incelenmiştir. Yazında karşılaşılan sınıflandırma yöntemleri, uygulanan metasezgisel algoritmalar ile kullanım amaçları ve sınıflandırma performans değerlendirme kriterleri ele alınmış ve mevcut duruma ilişkin genel bir çerçeve oluşturulmuştur. İnceleme, metasezgisel algoritmalar ile makine öğrenme yöntemlerine yönelik artan bir ilgi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır ancak yöntem tercihleri birkaç alternatif üzerine yoğunlaşmış durumdadır. Yeni geliştirilen metasezgisel algoritmaların ve/veya hibrit ve birlikte kullanımların alanda daha fazla yer alması gerekmektedir. Bilgisayar ve matematik bilimlerinde yaşanan gelişmeler ile paralel olarak ilerleyecek çalışmaların, yazına sürekli katkı sunmaya devam edeceğini söylemek mümkündür. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Review Subject: This systematic review examines studies in credit risk assessment field, that apply metaheuristic algorithms for classification and optimization purposes. Objective of these algorithms is to improve performances of credit applicants’ classifications as good or bad, which are predicted and interpreted as non-defaulters and defaulters, respectively. 

Study Questions: The review aims to shed light on the examples of metaheuristic algorithms usages in credit classification analyses and exhibit a contemporary framework. In this sense, answers to the following four questions are searched: 

1. What is the trend of metaheuristic algorithm applications over 2000-2018 period and which algorithms are used specifically?

2. What are the main classifiers in the analyses with metaheuristic optimization improvement?

3. How are the performances of analyses with metaheuristic improvements are evaluated?

4. What is the most recent situation in credit risk classification with metaheuristic optimization?

Methodology: Prisma systematic review process is followed. Articles found in Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest databases are included. Reviews, conference proceedings, patents and theses are not included. Three group of keywords are used for searching:

Group 1: “credit scoring”, “credit evaluation”, “credit assessment”, “credit risk assessment”, “credit decision”;

Group 2: “classification”, “data mining”, “machine learning”, “statistical learning”, “soft computing”, “computational intelligence”;

Group 3: “metaheuristic”, “evolutionary computing”, “heuristic”, “genetic algorithm”, “genetic programming”, “swarm intelligence”, “evolutionary programming”

All included studies’ objectives are either classification and/or improvement of classification performances.

Results and Conclusions: By following the systematic process, a total of thirty articles are found over the examination period. Publishing trend shows at least one article is presented to the literature each year after 2005 and there is a strong positive trend after 2015. It seems like more and more researchers are attracted to make use of metaheuristic algorithms to optimize credit classification analyses. Studies report improved performances with metaheuristic algorithm utilizations.

Most metaheuristic algorithm designs are not suitable to classify observations in data sets. For this reason, they are used as an optimization technique rather than classifier itself. In the examined studies, only Genetic Programming is found to be used as both a classifier and optimization method, by virtue of its solution representation and solution space searching design. In credit risk assessment, as the first empirical studies used statistical learning methods like classical linear regression, logistic regression and discriminant analysis, machine learning and unsupervised methods became more popular in the last two decades. Neural network models, support vector machines, tree-based methods, Bayesian networks, fuzzy logic and k-nearest neighborhood models are preferred classifiers, while the former two are dominating the field.

Frequently used metaheuristic in the studies is Genetic Algorithm, which is also well-known in other research fields with intense data analysis. Genetic algorithm is followed by Genetic Programming, Particle Swarm Optimization, Tabu Search and Simulated Annealing. Choice of metaheuristic seem to be focused only on a few alternatives, though there are many other suggestions available in optimization literature.

Metaheuristics contribute to classifier performances in several ways. More widely, they are used for variable selection, to find optimum set of variables to teach the main classifier in the analyses. This selection provides classifier with a smaller set of variables and thus improve efficiency and effectivity. Parameter optimization comes after feature selection; in which several parameters of the classifiers are optimized. It is important to configure parameters in a proper way to achieve best results. Optimizing variables to be included and method parameters are both complex in nature, and best or near to best solution finding cannot be done by more conventional optimization techniques that aim to find exact solutions. Metaheuristics’ main advantage is their solution space searching mechanisms and can provide feasible solutions in reasonable times. Therefore, implementation of metaheuristic search algorithms into analyses significantly contributes to credit risk assessments/scorings.

This review shows that a solid literature is formed for metaheuristic applications in credit classification. More and more studies are expected to be presented in the future. There lies a huge potential by widening the choice of algorithms and hybrid/combined forms. By following this pace, credit risk management activities in banks may continue to benefit from developments in data analysis field.


PDF View

References

  • Abdou, H. A. (2009). Genetic programming for credit scoring: The case of Egyptian public sector banks. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(9), 11402–11417. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.076 google scholar
  • Altinbas, H., & Akkaya, G. (2017). Improving the performance of statistical learning methods with a combined meta-heuristic for consumer credit risk assessment. Risk Management, 19(4), 255–280. google scholar
  • Boughaci, D. ve Alkhawaldeh, A. A. K. (2018). A new variable selection method applied to credit coring. Algorithmic Finance, 7(1–2), 43–52. doi:10.3233/AF-180227 google scholar
  • Chen, M. C., & Huang, S. H. (2003). Credit scoring and rejected instances reassigning through evolutionary computation techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 24(4): 433–441. doi:10.1016/S957-4174(02)00191-4 google scholar
  • Chen, N., Ribeiro, B., & Chen, A. (2016). Financial credit risk assessment: a recent review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 45(1), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10462-015-9434-x google scholar
  • Chi, B. W., & Hsu, C. C. (2012). A hybrid approach to integrate genetic algorithm into dual scoring model in enhancing the performance of credit scoring model. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2650–2661. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.120 google scholar
  • Chomboon, K., Chujai, P., Teerarassammee, P., Kerdprasop, K., & Kerdprasop, N. (2015). An empirical study of distance metrics for k-nearest neighbor algorithm. 3rd International Conference on Industrial Application Engineering 2015 içinde (ss. 280–285). doi:10.12792/iciae2015.051 google scholar
  • Dua, D., & Graff, C. (2017). {UCI} Machine Learning Repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • Gorzałczany, M. B., & Rudziński, F. (2016). A multi-objective genetic optimization for fast, fuzzy rule-based credit classification with balanced accuracy and interpretability. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 40, 206–220. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.037 google scholar
  • Habibi, A., & Hosseini, S. S. (2016). Ranking bank customers using Neuro-Fuzzy network and optimization algorithms. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 40–44. google scholar
  • Hoffmann, F., Baesens, B., Mues, C., Van Gestel, T. ve Vanthienen, J. (2007). Inferring descriptive and approximate fuzzy rules for credit scoring using evolutionary algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1), 540–555. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.044 google scholar
  • Huang, C.-L., Chen, M.-C., & Wang, C.-J. (2007). Credit scoring with a data mining approach based on support vector machines. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 847–856. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.007 google scholar
  • Huang, J. J., Tzeng, G. H., & Ong, C. S. (2006). Two-stage genetic programming (2SGP) for the credit scoring model. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 174(2), 1039–1053. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.05.027 google scholar
  • Huang, S.-C., & Wu, C.-F. (2011). Customer credit quality assessments using data mining methods for banking industries. African Journal of Business Management, 5(11), 4438–4445. google scholar
  • Hüllermeier, E. (2005). Fuzzy methods in machine learning and data mining: Status and prospects. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 156(3), 387–406. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2005.05.036 google scholar
  • Jadhav, S., He, H., & Jenkins, K. (2018). Information gain directed genetic algorithm wrapper feature selection for credit rating. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 69, 541–553. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.033 google scholar
  • Kaynar, O., Arslan, H., Görmez, Y. ve Işık, Y. E. (2018). Makine öğrenmesi ve öznitelik seçim yöntemleriyle saldırı tespiti. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 11(2), 175–185. doi:10.17671/gazibtd.368583 google scholar
  • Koutanaei, F. N., Sajedi, H., & Khanbabaei, M. (2015). A hybrid data mining model of feature selection algorithms and ensemble learning classifiers for credit scorin. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 11–23. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.07.003 google scholar
  • Lanzarini, L. C., Villa Monte, A., Bariviera, A. F., & Jimbo Santana, P. (2017). Simplifying credit scoring rules using LVQ+ PSO. Kybernetes, 46(1), 8–16. doi:10.1108/K-06-2016-0158 google scholar
  • Liu, X., Fu, H., & Lin, W. (2010). A modified support vector machine model for credit scoring. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(6), 797–804. doi:10.1080/18756891.2010.9727742 google scholar
  • Louzada, F., Ara, A., & Fernandes, G. B. (2016). Classification methods applied to credit scoring: Systematic review and overall comparison. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 21(2), 117–134. doi:10.1016/j.sorms.2016.10.001 google scholar
  • Marinaki, M., Marinakis, Y., & Zopounidis, C. (2010). Honey bees mating optimization algorithm for financial classification problems. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 10(3), 806–812. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.09.010 google scholar
  • Marinakis, Y., Marinaki, M., Doumpos, M., Matsatsinis, N., & Zopounidis, C. (2008). Optimization of nearest neighbor classifiers via metaheuristic algorithms for credit risk assessment. Journal of Global Optimization, 42(2), 279–293. doi:10.1007/s10898-007-9242-1 google scholar
  • Marqués, A. I., García, V., & Sánchez, J. S. (2013). A literature review on the application of evolutionary computing to credit scoring. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(9), 1384–1399. doi:10.1057/jors.2012.145 google scholar
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 google scholar
  • Ong, C. S., Huang, J. J., & Tzeng, G. H. (2005). Building credit scoring models using genetic programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 29(1), 41–47. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.01.003 google scholar
  • Oreski, S., Oreski, D., & Oreski, G. (2012). Hybrid system with genetic algorithm and artificial neural networks and its application to retail credit risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16), 12605–12617. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.023 google scholar
  • Oreski, S., & Oreski, G. (2014). Genetic algorithm-based heuristic for feature selection in credit risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 2052–2064. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.004 google scholar
  • Oreški, S., & Oreški, G. (2018). Cost-sensitive learning from imbalanced datasets for retail credit risk assessment. TEM JOURNAL-Technology, Education, Management, Informatics, 7(1), 59–73. doi:10.18421/TEM71-08 google scholar
  • Qiuju, Z. (2017). Personal credit scoring model research based on the RF-GA-SVM model. Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, (38), 235–242. google scholar
  • Reddy, K. N., & Ravi, V. (2013). Differential evolution trained kernel principal component WNN and kernel binary quantile regression: Application to banking. Knowledge-Based Systems, 39, 45–56. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2012.10.003 google scholar
  • Sun, C., & Jiang, M. (2008). Construction and application of GA-SVM model for prsonal credit scoring. Journal of Information & Computational Science, 5(2), 567–574. doi:10.2495/ameit140271 google scholar
  • Tsakonas, A., & Dounias, G. (2007). Evolving neural-symbolic systems guided by adaptive training schemes: Applications in finance. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 21(7), 681–706. doi:10.1080/08839510701492603 google scholar
  • Vukovic, S., Delibasic, B., Uzelac, A., & Suknovic, M. (2012). A case-based reasoning model that uses preference theory functions for credit scoring. Expert Systems With Applications, 39(9), 8389–8395. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.181 google scholar
  • Wang, D., Zhang, Z., Bai, R., & Mao, Y. (2018). A hybrid system with filter approach and multiple population genetic algorithm for feature selection in credit scoring. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 329, 307–321. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2017.04.036 google scholar
  • Wang, J., Hedar, A., Wang, S., & Ma, J. (2012). Rough set and scatter search metaheuristic based feature selection for credit scoring. Expert Systems With Applications, 39(6), 6123–6128. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.011 google scholar
  • Zhang, H., He, H., & Zhang, W. (2018). Classifier selection and clustering with fuzzy assignment in ensemble model for credit scoring. Neurocomputing, 316, 210–221. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.07.070 google scholar
  • Zhou, L., Lai, K. K., & Yu, L. (2009). Credit scoring using support vector machines with direct search for parameters selection. Soft Computing, 13(2), 149–155. doi:10.1007/s00500-008-0305-0 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Altınbaş, H. (2020). Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review. Istanbul Business Research, 49(1), 146-175. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033


AMA

Altınbaş H. Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review. Istanbul Business Research. 2020;49(1):146-175. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033


ABNT

Altınbaş, H. Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review. Istanbul Business Research, [Publisher Location], v. 49, n. 1, p. 146-175, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Altınbaş, Hazar,. 2020. “Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review.” Istanbul Business Research 49, no. 1: 146-175. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033


Chicago: Humanities Style

Altınbaş, Hazar,. Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review.” Istanbul Business Research 49, no. 1 (Dec. 2024): 146-175. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033


Harvard: Australian Style

Altınbaş, H 2020, 'Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review', Istanbul Business Research, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 146-175, viewed 4 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Altınbaş, H. (2020) ‘Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review’, Istanbul Business Research, 49(1), pp. 146-175. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033 (4 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Altınbaş, Hazar,. Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review.” Istanbul Business Research, vol. 49, no. 1, 2020, pp. 146-175. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033


Vancouver

Altınbaş H. Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review. Istanbul Business Research [Internet]. 4 Dec. 2024 [cited 4 Dec. 2024];49(1):146-175. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033 doi: 10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033


ISNAD

Altınbaş, Hazar. Metaheuristic Algorithms and Modern Credit Classification Methods: A Systematic Review”. Istanbul Business Research 49/1 (Dec. 2024): 146-175. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0033



TIMELINE


Submitted20.06.2019
Accepted08.06.2020
Published Online10.07.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.