Research Article


DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475    Full Text (PDF)

Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers

Mehmet Ak

The lands of Ottoman domination have attracted Western Travellers in almost all periods of history. The travellers visiting Turkish lands with different purposes penned lots of things they saw and were attracted to. They also recorded their observations, especially about the konargoçers called Yoruk or Turkman, which were one of the essential elements of Turkish Society in their travels. They referred to their tents in use due to their mobile way of life, depending on the seasonal variations in winter quarters, pasture and fall range, and their other types of domicile, either in detail or in general. They also referred to the equipment, set up and interior characteristics of the tents. While they mentioned the name, karaçadır, they did not speak of topak ev, alaçık, huğ and the names of the other types of domicile, but mostly, they described their general appearance and forms. Based on their observations, these travellers mostly tried to describe the surrounding as it was. However, there were some who could not get rid of their Orientalist point of view, as well as others who put forward a romantic perspective. The travellers unfolded both the different types of tents, and several other types of domicile used together with them while they put forward their regional and geographical distribution by mentioning the varieties of dwellings and tent types in their information.

Keywords: YorukTurkmanTentPastureTraveler
DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475    Full Text (PDF)

Batılı Gezginlerin Gözlemlerinde Yörük/Türkmen Çadırları

Mehmet Ak

Osmanlı Devletinin hâkim olduğu topraklar hemen hemen her dönem Batılı gezginlerin dikkatini çekti. Türk topraklarına çeşitli amaçlarla gelen gezginler, gezdikleri yerlerde gördükleri ve ilgilerini çeken birçok şeyi kaleme aldılar. Gezileri sırasında özellikle Türk toplumunun önemli unsurlarından birisi olan Yörük veya Türkmen olarak adlandırılan konargöçerler ile ilgili gözlemlerini de kayda geçirdiler. Bunların kışlak, yaylak ve güzlek arasında mevsim farkına bağlı olarak sürdürdükleri hareketli yapıları nedeni ile oturdukları çadırlar ve diğer mesken türlerini bazen ayrıntılı bir şekilde bazen de genel olarak ele aldılar. Çadırların donanım, kurulum ve iç mekân özelliklerine değindiler. Bu çadırlardan, karaçadır ismini sıkça verirlerken topak ev, alaçık, huğ ve diğer mesken türlerinin adlarından bahsetmediler ancak çoğunlukla şeklen tanıtıp çeşitli özellikleri veya genel görünümlerini betimlediler. Gözlemler sonucunda gezginler, var olan ortamı çoğu zaman olduğu gibi anlatmaya çalıştılar ancak romantik bir bakış açısı sergileyenler yanında zaman zaman oryantalist bakış açısından kurtulamayanlar da oldu. Gezginler, verdikleri bilgiler ile çadır türleri ve kullanılan meskenlerin çeşitliliğinden bahsedip bunların yöre ve bölge dağılımını ortaya koydukları gibi hem farklı çadır türlerinin, hem de çadırlar ile birlikte farklı meskenlerin aynı ortamda kullanıldığını gözler önüne serdiler. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The Turkish Geography in Ottoman domination has attracted Western Travellers in almost all periods of history. The Western travellers penned several tangible objects and cultural heritage that attracted their attention. Within that period, they also recorded their observations, especially about the konargoçers called Yoruk or Turkman, which were one of the essential elements of Turkish Society in their travels. Their tents in use due to their mobile way of life, depending on the seasonal variations in winter quarters. pasture and fall range, and their other types of domicile were the first things which attracted their attention. Especially, tents were described in detail in terms of their appearance, equipment and set up besides their structures, and sometimes, they were mentioned in general. These travellers mostly tried to describe the surrounding as it was, but there were some who could not get rid of their Orientalist point of view, and described the surrounding according to their ideology, as well as others who could not hide their admiration with a romantic perspective.

The types of the tents the konargoçers used and the travellers mentioned in their observations are various, such as topak ev, karaçadır and alaçık. Besides these tents, there were also huğ, hovel and soil covered dwellings with stone-walls. It is also observed that topak ev and karaçadır, or topak ev and hovel were used together.

The name, topak ev, was not given directly in the travellers observations, but described in detail, and its qualities were mentioned. The topak ev resembled a cage, egg, bent basket, circular structure or hemisphere. There is also information about its wooden sections and felt cover. It was reflected that the topak ev was also covered with goat, black sheep and cow skins, as well as felt. It was said that it provided protection against cold weather, described as adverse weather conditions. While its appearance was described, its equipment, set up, transportation by rolling it up and forms of utilisation, were mentioned in detail. Several evaluations were made, and the price information about felt covers and wooden sections were given by referring to their height and width. The population harbouring in the topak ev was also mentioned. When the geographical distribution of this tent is reviewed by observing the travellers narrations, it is apparent that it was used in the Mediterranean, Aegean, Marmara and Central Anatolia Regions. Likewise, the topak ev stands out as a type of tent that was used together with the karaçadır in almost all of these regions.

It was pointed out that the Karaçadır was weaved with sheep wool, though goat hair was mostly used. The Karaçadır was often mentioned in the notes of the travellers. The interior and the exterior equipment, its sections and intended use were described, as well as its weaving, equipment, set up, and usage characteristics. The waterproofing of the karaçadır was mentioned, and it was said to be cooler when compared to the topak ev. Its number of posts, width and height were also given. The tent flaps, referred to as tent canvas, the guy ropes, the side and front cover styles and the nails used to attach the bonds, were mentioned. Information was given about the stone-wall and straw lay around the karaçadır. It was asserted in the notes and observations of the travellers that the karaçadır, which was used in different parts and regions of the Turkish geography, was weaved and prepared in several different shapes and sizes.

The travellers did not mention the alaçık as another tent type, but the tent type which the travellers wandering around Teke Region called as karaçadır, is actually the alaçık. However, it was not popular in other regions. This tent was only described by its appearance, and few details were given.

The type of dwelling which the travellers called as a cottage, without giving a specific name, and was built with the canes cut from places close to swamps and lakes is known as a huğ. This dwelling was surrounded by cane hedges, surrounded by long nails and covered with canes again on beams and poles. In this sense, the huğ was transported short distances although it was considered as a permanent dwelling. It was observed that the dwellings made of adobe, and covered with clay, were used by the konargoçers besides other dwellings said to be made of cane, without giving a specific name.

Besides the dwelling mentioned as a cave covered with a wall-like soil, the existence of the dwelling mentioned as a circular cottage draws attention. Also, the inspiration in building it was said to be topak ev. The structure which was used with the topak ev, came into prominence with its woodworking, and called a wooden cottage by the travellers.

Additionally, there were also dwellings covered with soil on stone-walls and flat roof, described as primitive when compared to the houses of the settled society. The tent weaved with camel hair, its qualities and interior equipment was described without mentioning its special name.


PDF View

References

  • Ak, Mehmet. Teke Yörükleri (1800-1900). Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • Arundell, Fr. V. J. A Visit to the Seven Churches of Asia; with Excursion into Psidia; Containing Remarks on the Geography and Antiquities of those Countries. London: Published by John Rodwell, 1828. google scholar
  • Arundell, Fr. V. J., Discoveries in Asia Minor; İncluding a Description of the Ruins of Several Ancient Cities, and Especially Antioch of Psidia. Volume I. London: Publisher in Ordinary to this Majesty, 1834. google scholar
  • Arundell, Fr. V. J., Discoveries in Asia Minor; İncluding a Description of the Ruins of Several Ancient Cities, and Especially Antioch of Psidia. Volume II. London: Publisher in Ordinary to this Majesty, 1834. google scholar
  • Burckhardt, John Lewis. Travels in Syria and the Holy Land. London: Published by the Association for Promoting the Discovery of the İnterior Parts of Africa, 1822. google scholar
  • Clark, Francis E. The Holy Land of Asia Minor. New York: By Charles Scribner’s Sons, Published, 1914. google scholar
  • Corancez, Louis Alexandre Olivier. Itineraire d’une Partie Peu Connue de L’Asie Mineure. Paris: De l’imprimerie de P. Gueffier, Rue Guenegaud, 1816. google scholar
  • Crucis, Ricoldus De Monte. Doğu Seyahatnamesi Bir Dominikan Keşişin Anadolu ve Ortadoğu Yolculuğu. Çeviren Ahmet Deniz Altunbaş. İstanbul: Kronik Kitap Yayınları, 2018. google scholar
  • Davis, E. J. Anatolica; or, the Journal of a Visit to Some of the Ancient Ruined Cities of Caria, Phrygia, Lycia, and Pisidia. London: Grant and Co., Printers, 1874. google scholar
  • Davis, E. J. Life in Asiatic Turkey, a Journal of Travel in Cilicia, (Pedias and Trach(ea) İsauria, and Parts of Lycaonia and Cappadocia. London: Printed by Edward Stanford, 1879. google scholar
  • Davis, E. J. Anadolu XIX. Yüzyılda Karya, Frigya, Likya ve Pisidya Antik Kentlerine Yapılan Bir Gezinin Öyküsü. Çeviren Funda Yılmaz. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 2006. google scholar
  • De Chateaubriand, F. A. Itineraire de Paris a Jerusalem et de Jerusalem a Paris. Tome Second. Paris: Le Normant, İmprimeur-Libraire, 1812. google scholar
  • De La Broquiere, Bertrandon. Bertrandon De La Broquiere’in Denizaşırı Seyahati. Çeviren İlhan Arda. İstanbul: Eren Yayınları, 2000. google scholar
  • Fellows, Charles. A Journal Written During an Excursion in Asia Minor. London: Printed by Richard and John E. Taylor, 1839. google scholar
  • Fellows, Charles. An Account of Discoveries in Lycia, Being a Journal Kept During a Second Excursion in Asia Minor. London: Printed by Richard and John E. Taylor, 1840. google scholar
  • Fellows, Charles. Travels and Researches in Asia Minor, More Particularly in The Province of Lycia. London: Printed by John Edward Taylor, 1852. google scholar
  • Hamilton, William J., Researches in Asia Minor, Pontus, and Armenia; with Some Account of their Antiquities and Geology. I. cilt. London: Printed by William Clowes and Sons, 1842. google scholar
  • Hawley, Walter A. Asia Minor. New York: Printed by William Brendon and Son LTD., 1918. google scholar
  • Kinneir, John Macdonald. Journey Througe Asia Minor, Armenia, and Koordistan, in the Years 1813 and 1814; with Remarks on the Marches of Alexander, and Retreat of the Ten Thousand. London: Printed by John Murray, 1818. google scholar
  • Krickl, Ernst. 1892 Lykia Günlüğü. Çeviren Z. Zühre İlkgelen, Filiz Dönmez Öztürk. İstanbul: Suna ve İnan Kıraç Vakfı-Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 2005. google scholar
  • Lennep, Henry J. Van, Travels in Little-Known Parts of Asia Minor; with İllustrations of Biblical Literature and Researches in Archeology. Volume II. London: Printed by W. Clowes and Sons, 1870. google scholar
  • Lennep, Henry J. Van. Bible Lands: their Modern Customs and Manners Illustrative of Scripture. New York: Harper & Brothers, Publishers, 1875. google scholar
  • Michaud, M. ve M. Poujoulat. Correspondance d’Orient 1830-1831. Tome I. Paris: Ducollet LibraireEduteur, 1833. google scholar
  • Mursaloğlu, Şemsettin. Büyük Reyhanlı Türkmen Aşireti Tarihi. İzmir: Karınca Matbaacılık, 1984. google scholar
  • Percy, Earl. Highlands of Asiatic Turkey. London: Printed by Enbia Office, 1901. google scholar
  • Perrot, Georges ve Charles Chipiez. History of Art in Phrygia, Lydia, Caria and Lycia. London: Printed by Chapman and Hall Limited, 1892. google scholar
  • Sarre, Friedrich. Reise in Kleinasien (Sommer 1895) Forschungen Zur Seldjukischen Kunst und Geographie des Landes. Berlin: Druck Von Otto Elsner, 1896. google scholar
  • Sarre, Friedrich. Küçükasya Seyahati (1895 Yazı) Selçuklu Sanatı ve Ülkenin Coğrafyası Üzerine Araştırmalar. Çeviren Dârâ Çolakoğlu. İstanbul: Pera Turizm ve Ticaret A.Ş. Yayını, 1998. google scholar
  • Seiff, Julius. Reisen in der Asiatischen Türkei. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung, 1875. google scholar
  • Spratt, T. A. B. ve Edward Forbes. Travels in Lycia, Milyas, and the Cibyratis. Volume I. London: Printed by S. & J. Bentley, Wilson and Fley, 1847. google scholar
  • Spratt, T. A. B. ve Edward Forbes. Milyas, Kibyratis ve Likya’da Yolculuklar. Çeviren Doğan Türker. I. cilt. Antalya: Suna-İnan Kıraç Akdeniz Medeniyetleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayını, 2008. google scholar
  • Tavernier, John Baptista. The Six Voyages of John Baptista Tavernier, a Noble Man of France Now Living, Through Turky into Persia and the East-İndies. London: Printed for R. L. and M. P., 1678. google scholar
  • Tavernier, Jean Baptiste. Tavernier Seyahatnamesi. Çeviren Teoman Tunçdoğan. İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi, 2006. google scholar
  • Taylor, Bayard. The Lands of the Saracens; or, Pictures of Palestine, Asia Minor, Sicily and Spain. New York: Printer, Stereotyper and Electrotyper, Carton Building, 1859. google scholar
  • Texier, Charles, Küçük Asya Coğrafyası Tarihi ve Arkeolojisi. Çeviren Ali Suat. 1. cilt. Ankara: Enformasyon ve Dökümantasyon Hizmetleri Vakfı Yayını, 2002. google scholar
  • Texier, Charles, Küçük Asya Coğrafyası Tarihi ve Arkeolojisi. Çeviren Ali Suat. 2. cilt. Ankara: Enformasyon ve Dökümantasyon Hizmetleri Vakfı Yayını, 2002. google scholar
  • Tozer, Henry Fanshawe, Researches in the Highlands of Turkey İncluding Visit to Mounts İda, Athos, Olympus, and Pelion, to the Mirdite Albanians, and Other Remote Tribes. Volume I. London: Printed by William Clowes and Sons, 1869. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ak, M. (2019). Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers. Journal of Turkology, 29(2), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475


AMA

Ak M. Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers. Journal of Turkology. 2019;29(2):347-366. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475


ABNT

Ak, M. Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers. Journal of Turkology, [Publisher Location], v. 29, n. 2, p. 347-366, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ak, Mehmet,. 2019. “Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers.” Journal of Turkology 29, no. 2: 347-366. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ak, Mehmet,. Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers.” Journal of Turkology 29, no. 2 (Nov. 2024): 347-366. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475


Harvard: Australian Style

Ak, M 2019, 'Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers', Journal of Turkology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 347-366, viewed 15 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ak, M. (2019) ‘Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers’, Journal of Turkology, 29(2), pp. 347-366. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475 (15 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Ak, Mehmet,. Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers.” Journal of Turkology, vol. 29, no. 2, 2019, pp. 347-366. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475


Vancouver

Ak M. Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers. Journal of Turkology [Internet]. 15 Nov. 2024 [cited 15 Nov. 2024];29(2):347-366. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475 doi: 10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475


ISNAD

Ak, Mehmet. Yoruk/Turkman Tents in Observations of Western Travellers”. Journal of Turkology 29/2 (Nov. 2024): 347-366. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.646475



TIMELINE


Submitted08.09.2019
Accepted24.10.2019
Published Online13.11.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.