Research Article


DOI :10.26650/sty.2022.1065473   IUP :10.26650/sty.2022.1065473    Full Text (PDF)

The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II

Dilek Tunçez

Water has been valuable for the continuity of humankind in every period from the past to the present. With factors such as technological developments in the architectural field such as aqueducts, waterways, fountains, and cisterns, water has been moved away from its source, and this has played a very important role in establishing new settlements. As one of the small-scale structures of Turkish–Islamic architecture, fountains have been built for the purposes of both charity and for satisfying needs. In this respect, fountains are important in terms of reflecting the cultural and aesthetic understanding of a period. Water shortages had arisen in Beyoglu due to its growing population. For this reason, fountain constructions in Beyoglu were carried out during the reign of Sultan Mahmud II both to satisfy needs and to reflect the ornamental style of the period. During periods when water architecture had been popular, the construction of fountains reflecting the architectural and decorative style of the period increased. Fountains from the reign of Sultan Mahmud II have an important place in Ottoman art in terms of showing architectural and ornamental changes in parallel with the changes the Ottoman Empire was undergoing in all areas. Within the scope of this study, nine fountains built in Beyoglu during the reign of Sultan Mahmud II have been chosen. These fountains have not been discussed in detail in any previous known study. The materials, decoration styles, epitaphs, and dimensions of the chosen fountain have been examined in detail. The study aims to transfer the dilapidated fountains to future generations as concrete examples of the period by trying to reveal its place in Turkish architecture.

DOI :10.26650/sty.2022.1065473   IUP :10.26650/sty.2022.1065473    Full Text (PDF)

II. Mahmut Dönemi Beyoğlu Çeşmeleri

Dilek Tunçez

İnsanoğlunun devamlılığı için su, geçmişten günümüze kadar her dönem değerli olmuştur. Mimari alanda gelişen teknoloji, su kemerleri, suyolları, çeşmeler, sarnıçlar gibi etmenlerle, su, kaynağından uzaklaşmış ve yeni yerleşim yeri kurulmasında oldukça önemli rol oynamıştır. Türk – İslam mimarisinin en küçük ölçekli yapılarından olan çeşmeler hem hayır hem de ihtiyacı karşılama amacı ile yapılmışlardır. Bu doğrultuda çeşmeler dönemin kültür ve estetik anlayışını yansıtması açısından önemlidir. Beyoğlu’nda artan nüfusa bağlı olarak bölgede su sıkıntısı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu sebeple II. Mahmut döneminde Beyoğlu’nda çeşme inşası hem ihtiyaca karşılık verme amaçlı hem de dönemin süsleme üslubunu yansıtacak şekilde yapılmıştır. Su mimarisinin revaçta olduğu dönemlerde, dönemin mimari ve dekoratif üslubunu yansıtan çeşmelerin yapımı artmıştır. II. Mahmut dönemi çeşmeleri, Osmanlı Devleti’nin tüm alanlarda yaşadığı değişimlere paralel şekilde mimari ve süsleme değişimlerini göstermeleri açısından Osmanlı Sanatında önemli yer tutmaktadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında, II. Mahmut dönemi Beyoğlu’nda inşa edilen dokuz adet çeşme tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma dahilindeki çeşmeler daha önceki çalışmalarda detaylıca ele alınmamıştır. Tespit edilen çeşmelerin malzemeleri, süsleme üslubu, kitabeleri ve ölçüleri detaylı olarak incelenmiştir. Türk mimarisindeki yeri ortaya konmaya çalışılarak, dönemin birer somut örneği olan harap durumdaki çeşmelerin gelecek nesillere aktarılması amaçlanmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Fountains have always had documental value in terms of showing changes in architecture over time as well as the tastes and technological levels of the state at the time. The population in the region north of Istanbul’s Golden Horn has gradually increased. The Taksim waterdistribution pipeline was built in order to meet the water needs of the region. It took its final form during the reign of Sultan Mahmud II in 1839. The nine fountains that were built in Beyoglu during that time are fed with water from the Taksim water-distribution pipeline. The fountains were built in accordance with the innovations and architectural changes brought by the period. The construction techniques and decoration elements in particular were compatible with the period. Accordingly, the ornamental elements that entered the Ottoman architecture after the Tulip Era in particular are noteworthy.

This study evaluates the writing styles, writing sizes, constructors, and people who wrote the epitaphs of these fountains. When taking all the epitaphs into account, constructor as well as poet/calligraphy information has been obtained for six fountains. Only one epitaph was written in prose, with the others having been written in verse. Two epitaphs were written in Thuluth calligraphy, and three epitaphs are written in Ta’liq calligraphy. The ornamental slabs of the fountains are made of marble. Noteworthily, only one fountain has a bowl holder. One of the most important structural elements of fountains is the opening that provides passage to the storage section. The openings have been made with dimensions that allow a person access. The cover systems, on the other hand, have no specific standard. Ornamental elements are mostly concentrated in the main usage area. These ornamental elements are the ones that entered Ottoman art mostly through the Westernization process. Herbal decorations have been made such as curly branches, stylized flowers, acanthus leaves, rosettes, chrysanthemums, or leaves coming out of a vase. In addition, objective and geometric decorations were used exclusively, such as curtains, tassels, bows, crescent and star and volute, and S- and C-shaped curves.

The fountains from the reign of Sultan Mahmud II are distinctly different from the classical Ottoman forms with their design principles and decorations. However, one architectural behavior has been exhibited that is unique to the Ottoman Empire. The fountains from this period were no longer just intended to meet the people’s water needs, as had been the case in previous centuries. Nor do they possess the intense decorations as in the 18th century. Architecturally, they were built not only to bring water to the city (i.e., satisfy water needs) but also as a city ornament with decorative elements. An increase in ornate fountains has been observed since the 18th century. However, due to the decreased need and the changes in socio-economic structures, the Beyoglu fountains from the reign of Sultan Mahmud II period are seen to have been simplified, with a decrease in attempts at innovation.

As a result, the chosen fountains are important in terms of showing the artistic understanding of the late Ottoman Empire. Ornamental elements were used and included in architectural elements, ones that had developed since the Tulip Era. However, the 18th century lacked creativity, as the fountains were seen to have been built more simply. The effects from Westernization, which had inspired the changes in Ottoman architecture and decoration, were maintained. These fountains have a unique place in the history of art and are understood to have been more functional compared to the periods when fountain architecture was the most popular. These fountains met water needs in the 19th century and are concrete examples of the period, but they are in quite a dilapidated state these days. 


PDF View

References

  • Bayfidan (Tunçez), Dilek.“19. Yüzyıl Beyoğlu Çeşmeleri.” Yüksek Lisans tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sanat Tarihi Anabilim Dalı, 2018. google scholar
  • Cezar, Mustafa. “Ondokuzuncu Yüzyılda Beyoğlu Neden ve Nasıl Gelişti.” XI. Türk Tarih Kongresi Bildirileri (5-9 Eylül 1990) içinde 2673-2690. VI.cilt. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumları Yayınları, 1994. google scholar
  • Çeçen, Kazım. İstanbul’un Vakıf Sularından Taksim ve Hamidiye Suları. İstanbul: İSKİ Yayınları, 1992. google scholar
  • Denktaş, Mustafa. “Anadolu Türk Mimarisinde Çeşmeler.” Türkler Ansiklopedisi. VII: 872-877. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2012. google scholar
  • Egemen, Affan. İstanbul’un Çeşme ve Sebilleri. İstanbul: Arıtan Yayınevi, 1993. google scholar
  • Ertuğ, Necdet. İstanbul Tarihi Çeşmeler Külliyatı I. İstanbul: İSKİ Yayınları, 2006. google scholar
  • Ertuğ, Necdet. İstanbul Tarihi Çeşmeler Külliyatı II. İstanbul: İSKİ Yayınları, 2006. google scholar
  • Ertuğ, Necdet. İstanbul Tarihi Çeşmeler Külliyatı III. İstanbul: İSKİ Yayınları, 2006. google scholar
  • Eyice, Semavi. “Çeşme.” TDVİA. VIII: 277-287. İstanbul: Türk Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 1993. google scholar
  • İnalcık, Halil. “Hüsrev Paşa.” TDVİA. XIX: 37-40. İstanbul: Türk Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Kara Pilehvarian, Nuran. “Osmanlı Çeşme Mimarisi.” Türkler Ansiklopedisi. VII:247-251. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2012. google scholar
  • Karahan, Abdülkadir. “Enderunlu Vasıf.” TDVİA. XI:189-190. İstanbul: Türk Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 1995. google scholar
  • Koç, Hamza. “İskeçeli Mir-i Alem-zade Rif’at ve Saki-Namesi.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature Volume 3 Issue 4, (Autumn 2017):109-126. google scholar
  • Nirven, Saadi Nazım. İstanbul Suları. İstanbul: İstanbul Halk Basımevi, 1946. google scholar
  • Ödekan, Ayla. “Çeşme.” Eczacıbaşı Sanat Ansiklopedisi. I: 396-397. İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, 2008. google scholar
  • Özcan, Abdülkadir. “Halet Efendi”, TDVİA. XV:249-251. İstanbul: Türk Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 1997. google scholar
  • Saylan, İbrahim. “Yusuf Şükrü Harputî ve Eserlerinin Hadis Açısından Değeri.” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Temel İslam Bilimler Anabilim Dalı, 2008. google scholar
  • Süreyya, Mehmed. Sicill-i Osmani. Hazırlayan Nuri Akbayar. Çeviren Seyit Ali Kahraman. II. cilt. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Türk Yayınları, 1996. google scholar
  • Süreyya, Mehmed. Sicill-i Osmani. Hazırlayan Nuri Akbayar. Çeviren Seyit Ali Kahraman. V. cilt. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Türk Yayınları, 1996. google scholar
  • Tanışık, İbrahim Hilmi. İstanbul Çeşmeleri I İstanbul Ciheti. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1943. google scholar
  • Tanışık, İbrahim Hilmi. İstanbul Çeşmeleri II Beyoğlu ve Üsküdar Cihetleri. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1945. google scholar
  • Tanman, M. Baha. “Galata Mevlevihanesi.” TDVİA. XIII: 317-321. İstanbul: Türk Diyanet 1996. google scholar
  • Vakıf Su Tahlilleri 19. ve 20. Yüzyılda İstanbul Suları [İstanbul Su Külliyatı XIII]. Proje yöneticisi Ahmet Kala, Yayına hazırlayan Ahmet Tabakoğlu ve diğ. I. cilt. İstanbul: İSKİ Yayınları, 2000. google scholar
  • Vakıf Su Defterleri: Su Keşif Defteri (1842-1862) [İstanbul Su Külliyatı XXVII]. Proje yöneticisi Ahmet Kala, Yayına hazırlayan Ahmet Tabakoğlu ve diğ. I. cilt. İstanbul: İSKİ Yayınları, 2003. google scholar
  • Yakıt, İsmail. Türk - İslam Kültüründe EbcedHesabı ve Tarih Düşürme. İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınları, 1992. google scholar
  • Yüngül, Naci. Taksim Suyu Tesisleri. İstanbul: Sular İdaresi Yayınları, 1952. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Tunçez, D. (2022). The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II. Journal of Art History, 0(31), 515-565. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473


AMA

Tunçez D. The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II. Journal of Art History. 2022;0(31):515-565. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473


ABNT

Tunçez, D. The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II. Journal of Art History, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 31, p. 515-565, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Tunçez, Dilek,. 2022. “The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II.” Journal of Art History 0, no. 31: 515-565. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473


Chicago: Humanities Style

Tunçez, Dilek,. The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II.” Journal of Art History 0, no. 31 (May. 2025): 515-565. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473


Harvard: Australian Style

Tunçez, D 2022, 'The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II', Journal of Art History, vol. 0, no. 31, pp. 515-565, viewed 12 May. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Tunçez, D. (2022) ‘The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II’, Journal of Art History, 0(31), pp. 515-565. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473 (12 May. 2025).


MLA

Tunçez, Dilek,. The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II.” Journal of Art History, vol. 0, no. 31, 2022, pp. 515-565. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473


Vancouver

Tunçez D. The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II. Journal of Art History [Internet]. 12 May. 2025 [cited 12 May. 2025];0(31):515-565. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473 doi: 10.26650/sty.2022.1065473


ISNAD

Tunçez, Dilek. The Beyoglu Fountains from the Era of Sultan Mahmud II”. Journal of Art History 0/31 (May. 2025): 515-565. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2022.1065473



TIMELINE


Submitted30.01.2022
Accepted15.06.2022
Published Online20.06.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.