References

• Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper 24196. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. google scholar
• Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K.N., & Hamouda, A.M. (2023). Re-thinking data strategy and integration for artificial intelligence: Concepts, opportunities, and challenges. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7082. google scholar
• Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. google scholar
• Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31-50. google scholar
• Aquino, Y. S. J. (2023). Making decisions: Bias in artificial intelligence and data-driven diagnostic tools. Australian Journal of General Practice, 52(7), 439-442. google scholar
• Babic, B., Gerke, S., Evgeniou, T., & Cohen, I. G. (2021). Beware explanations from AI in health care. Science, 373(6552), 284-286. google scholar
• Bagaric, M. (2016). Three things that a baseline study shows don’t cause indigenous over-imprisonment: Three things that might but shouldn’t and three reforms that will reduce indigenous over-imprisonment. Harvard J Racial & Ethnic Just, 103. google scholar
• Bagaric, M., Hunter, D., & Stobbs, N. (2019). Erasing the bias against using artificial intelligence to predict future criminality: Algorithms are color blind and never dash. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 88(4), 1037-1081. google scholar
• Bagaric, M., Svilar, J., Bull, M., Hunter, D., & Stobbs, N. (2022). The solution to the pervasive bias and discrimination in the criminal justice system: Transparent and fair artificial intelligence. American Criminal Law Review, 59(95), 95-148. google scholar
• Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 1052-1092. google scholar
• Barocas, S., & Selbst, A.D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671-732. google scholar
• Bates, D.W., Saria, S., Ohno-Machado, L., Shah, A., & Escobar, G. (2014). Big data in health care: Using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Affairs, 33(7), 1123-1131. google scholar
• Bird, K. A., Castleman, B. L., & Song, Y. (2023). Are algorithms biased in education? Exploring racial bias in predicting community college student success. Ed Working Paper No. 23-717. Annenberg Institute: Brown University. google scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (2000). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage Publishing. google scholar
• Bozkurt, V., & Gursoy, D. (2023). The artificial intelligence paradox: Opportunity or threat for humanity?, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2297114 google scholar
• Castelluccia, C., & Le Metayer, D. (2019). Understanding algorithmic decision-making: opportunities and challenges. European Parliament. google scholar
• Celi L. A., Cellini, J., Charpignon, M. L., Dee, E. C., Dernoncourt, F., Eber, R. et al (2022). Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities: A global review. PLOS Digit Health, 31; 1(3), e0000022. google scholar
• Charpignon, M. L., Byers, J., Cabral, S., Celi, L. A., Fernandes, F., Gallifant, J. et al. (2023). Critical bias in critical care devices. Critical Care Clinics, 39(4), 795-813. google scholar
• Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. The Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357. google scholar
• Coleman, J. S., Campbell , E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. US Office of Education. google scholar
• Colon-Rodriguez, C. J. (2023, 12 July). Shedding light on healthcare algorithmic and artificial intelligence bias. US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health. Retrieved from https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/news/shedding-light-healthcare-algorithmic-and-artificial-intelligence-bias google scholar
• Dressel, J., & Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4, eaao5580. google scholar
• Edwards, B., & Cheok, A. D. (2018). Why not robot teachers: Artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 32(4), 345-360. google scholar
• Erdi, P. (2020). Ranking: The unwritten rules of the social game we all play. Oxford University Press. google scholar
• European Commission (2022). Mitigating diversity biases ofAI in the labor market. Horizon Europe Project Report. google scholar
• European Network Against Racism (2020). Artificial intelligence in HR: How to address racial biases and algorithmic discrimination in HR?. ENAR Publishing. google scholar
• European Parliament (2020). Skills and jobs for future labour markets: European policies and Skills Agendas 2010-2020. EMPL in Focus. google scholar
• Franca, T. J. F., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence applied to potential assessment and talent identification in an organizational context. Heliyon, 9(4), e14694. google scholar
• Hale, K. E. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to circumvent the teacher shortage in special education: A phenomenological investigation. Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University, USA. google scholar
• Harari, Y. N. (2017). Reboot for the AI revolution. Nature, 550(19), 324-327. google scholar
• Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In Data ethics: Building trust: How digital technologies can serve humanity (pp. 621-653). Globethics Publications. google scholar
• IFOW (2020). Artificial intelligence in hiring: Assessing impacts on equality. Institute for the Future of Work. Retrieved from https://assets-global.website-files.com/64d5f73a7fc5e8a240310c4d/64d5f73b7fc5e8a240310ea0_5f71d338891671faa84de443_IFOW%2B-%2BAssessing%2Bimpacts%2Bon%2Bequality.pdf google scholar
• ILO (2023). Artificial intelligence in human resource management: A challenge for the human-centred agenda?. ILO Working Paper 95. google scholar
• Kamulegeya, L. H., Okello, M., Bwanika, J. M., et al. (2019). Using artificial intelligence on dermatology conditions in Uganda: A case for diversity in training data sets for machine learning. African Health Sciences, 23(2), 753-763. google scholar
• King, M. (2022). Harmful biases in artificial intelligence. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(11), E48. google scholar
• Kizilcec, R.F., & Lee, H. (2022). Algorithmic fairness in education. In Holmes W., Porayska-Pomsta, K. (Eds), The ethics of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 174-202). Taylor & Francis. google scholar
• Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Bus Res, 13, 795-848. google scholar
• Larrazabal, A. J., Nieto, N., Peterson, V., Milone, D. H., & Ferrante, E. (2020). Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117(23), 12592-12594. google scholar
• Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., & Livan, G. (2019). Early co-authorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers, Nature Communications, 10, 51-70. google scholar
• Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To predict and serve?. Significance, 13(5), 14-19. google scholar
• Mahmud, H. A. K. M., Islam, N., Ahmed, S. I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121390. google scholar
• Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. google scholar
• Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35. google scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 53-63. google scholar
• Mittermaier, M., Raza, M. M., Kvedar, J. C. (2023). Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: Challenges and mitigation strategies. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6, 113. google scholar
• Napierala, J., Kvetan, V. (2023). Changing job skills in a changing world. In: Bertoni, E., Fontana, M., Gabrielli, L., Signorelli, S., Vespe, M. (eds) Handbook of computational social science for policy (pp. 243-259). Springer, Cham. google scholar
• Nazer, L. H., Zatarah, R., Waldrip, S., Ke, J. X. C., Moukheiber, M., Khanna, A. K., et al. (2023). Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. PLOS Digital Health, 2(6), e0000278. google scholar
• Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., et al. (2020). Bias in data-driven artificial intelligence systems-an introductory survey. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov, 10(3), e1356. google scholar
• Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366, 447-453. google scholar
• Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R., Gowda, S., Heffernan, N., & Heffernan, C. (2014). Population validity for educational data mining models: A case study in affect detection. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 487-501. google scholar
• OECD (2023). OECD employment outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the labour market. OECD Publishing. google scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Books. google scholar
• Oracle (2019). AI in human resources: The time is now. Retrieved from https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/applications/hcm/oracle-ai-in-hr-wp.pdf google scholar
• Özer, M., & Perc, M. (2022). Improving equality in the education system of Türkiye. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 2022, 42(2), 325-334. google scholar
• Özer, M. (2023). The Matthew effect Turkish education system. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(4), 704-712. google scholar
• Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of Royal Society Interface, 11(98), 20140378. google scholar
• Perc, M., Özer, M., & Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communications, 5, 61. google scholar
• Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O., & Topol, E. J. (2022). AI in health and medicine. Nature Medicine, 28, 31-38. google scholar
• Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (Eds.). (2023). Digital transformation of educational institutions accelerated by covid-19: A digital dynamic capabilities approach. Emerald Publishing. google scholar
• Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Columbia University Press. New York. google scholar
• Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 1-22. google scholar
• Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y., & Ghassemi, M. (2021). Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nature Med, 27, 2176-2182. google scholar
• Smith, H. (2020). Algorithmic bias: should students pay the price? AI & Society, 35, 1077-1078. google scholar
• Silberg, J., & Manyika, J. (2019). Notes from the AI frontier: Tackling bias in AI (and in humans). McKinsey Global Institute. google scholar
• Srinivas, N. (2023, February 24). The ethical debate of AI in criminal justice: Balancing efficiency and human rights. Manage Engine Insights. google scholar
• Retrieved from https://insights.manageengine.com/artificial-intelligence/the-ethical-debate-of-ai-in-criminal-justice-balancing-efficiency-and-human-rights// google scholar
• Stefan, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence and its impact on young people. Seminar Report from the Council of Europe. google scholar
• Storm, K. I. L., Reiss, L. K., Guenther, E. A., Clar-Novak, M., & Muhr, S.L. (2023). Unconscious bias in the HRM literature: Towards a critical-reflexive approach. Human Resource Management Review, 33(3), 100969. google scholar
• Suleyman, M. (2023). The coming wave: Technology, power, and the twenty-first century’s greatest dilemma. Crown: New York. google scholar
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gür, B. S., Perc, M., & Özer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economics culture and Society, 61, 41-64. google scholar
• Tuffaha, M. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence bias on human resource management functions: Systematic literature review and future research directions. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 11(4), 35-58. google scholar
• Ulnicane, I., & Aden, A. (2023). Power and politics in framing bias in artificial intelligence policy. Review of Policy Research, 40, 665-687. google scholar
• UNESCO (2023). The teachers we need for the education we want: The global imperative to reverse the teacher shortage. UNESCO & Education 2030 Factsheet. google scholar
• Varsha, P. S. (2023). How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems-A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3, 100165. google scholar
• Vicente, L., & Matute, H. (2023). Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases. Scientific Reports, 13, 15737. google scholar
• Zhang, J., Zhang, Z. M. (2023). Ethics and governance of trustwothy medical artificial intelligence. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23, 7. google scholar
• Zuckerman, H. A. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press. google scholar
• Zuckerman, H. (1989). Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage: The theory and its intellectual biography. In Mongardini, C., Tabboni, S. (Eds), Robert K. Merton and contemporary sociology (pp. 153-176). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. google scholar

Citations