References

• Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A. S. & Raggad, B. G. (1998). Assessing the perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Manpower, 19(8), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729810242235 google scholar
• Adaman, F., Çarkoğlu, A. & Şenatalar, B. (2005). Toplumun Kamu Yönetimine, Kamu Hizmetlerine ve Reforma Bakışı, [Society’s Perspective on Public Administration, Public Services and Reform]. TESEV Yayınları, https://www.tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/rapor_ Toplumun_Kamu_Yonetimine_Kamu_Hizmetlerine_Ve_Reforma_Bakisi.pdf google scholar
• Aksoy, V. (2016). Eğitim örgütlerinde meritokrasi ihlali sonucu oluşan yeni bir liderlik: Hafi liderlik. [A new leadership formed because of meritocracy violation in educational organizations: Light leadership]. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 54, 204-215. google scholar
• Aktan, C. C., & Acar, O. K. (2021). Önsöz [Preface]. (C.C. Aktan, and O.K. Acar, Eds.), Kamu Yönetiminde Kayırmacılık [Nepotism in Public Administration]. İzmir: SOBİAD Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları. google scholar
• Ayata, S. (1996). Patronage, party, and state: The politicization of Islam in Turkey. Middle East Journal, 50(1), 40-56. google scholar
• Aydoğan, İ. (2009). Favoritism in the Turkish educational system: Nepotism, cronyism and patronage. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 4(1), 19-35. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/epasr/issue/17479/182978 google scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2015). Sosyolojik Düşünmek [Thinking Sociologically]. (A. Yılmaz, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. google scholar
• Brinkerhoff, Derick. W. & Arthur A. Goldsmith (2002). Clientelism, Patrimonialism and Democratic governance: an overview and framework for assessment and programming. Maryland: U.S. Agency for International Development, Office of Democracy and Government. google scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. & Toprak, B. (2006). Değişen Türkiye’de Din, Toplum ve Siyaset [Religion, Society and Politics in a Changing Turkey]. İstanbul: TESEV. google scholar
• Dépelteau, F. & Powell, C. (eds) (2013). Applying Relational Sociology: Relations, Networks, and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı (DİB) (nd). Nisâ Suresi 58. Ayet Tefsiri [Interpretation of the 58th Aya of Nisa Surah]. https://kuran.diyanet.gov. tr/tefsir/Nis%C3%A2-suresi/551/58-ayet-tefsiri google scholar
• Durakoğlu, M. (2020). Çocuk Hâkimler Sorunu Yaşıyoruz [We Have a Problem with Juvenile Judges]. İstanbul Barosu Yayını, https://www. istanbulbarosu.org.tr/HaberDetay.aspx?ID=15367&Desc=%C3%87ocuk-H%C3%A2kimler-Sorunu-Ya%C5%9F%C4%B1yoruz google scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N. & Roniger, L. (1983). Patrons, Clients and Friends. Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Heper, M. & Keyman, F. (1998). Double-faced state: Political patronage and the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 34(4), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209808701251 google scholar
• Houcham, E. C.& Juan, J. L. (1998). Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press. google scholar
• İnalcık, H. (1994). Sultanizm üzerine yorumlar: Max Weber’in Osmanlı Siyasi Sistemi Tiplemesi [Commentaries on sultanism: Max Weber’s typing of the Ottoman political system]. Dünü ve Bugünüyle Toplum ve Ekonomi, (7), 5-26. google scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (1992). 1960 Sonrası Türk Siyasal Hayatına Bir Bakış: Demokrasi, Neo-patrimonyalizm ve İstikrar [A Look at Turkish Political Life After 1960: Democracy, Neo-patrimonialism and Stability]. (Üniversite Öğretim Üyeleri Derneği, Ed.), Tarih ve Demokrasi: Tarık Zafer Tunaya’ya Armağan [History and Democracy: Gift to Tarık Zafer Tunaya]. İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi, 87-126. google scholar
• Karpat, K. (2006). Osmanlı’da Değişim, Modernleşme ve Uluslaşma [Change, Modernization and Nationalization in the Ottoman Empire]. (D. Özdemir, Trans.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
• Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2005). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Kaufman, Robert R. (1974). The Patron-Client Concept and Macro-Politics: Prospects and Problems. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 284-308. google scholar
• Kıray, M. (1995). Siyasi Himayecilikten Dinsel Grup Himayeciliğine [From Political Protection to Religious Group Protectionism] (A. Bayramoğlu, Ed.). Türkiye’de Toplumsal Değişim [Social Change in Turkey], İstanbul: Yeni Yüzyıl. google scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33 (6–7), 845–879. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300607 google scholar
• Köse, A. (2008). Küreselleşme çağında bir aidiyet zemini ve örgütlenme şekli olarak hemşehrilik [Citizenship as a ground of belonging and a form of organization in the age of globalization]. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 3(1), 221-232. google scholar
• Lewis, B. (1993). Modern Türkiye’nin Doğuşu [The Emergence of Modern Turkey]. Kıratlı, M. (trans.). Ankara: TTK google scholar
• Lin, N. (1999). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51. google scholar
• Loewe, M., Blume, J., Schönleber, V., Seibert, S., Speer, J. & Voss, C. (2007). The impact of favoritism on the business climate: A study on Wasta in Jordan. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2218821 google scholar
• Memurlar. Net (2019). Makam Sahibi Olmak için ya İmamHatipli ya da Trabzonlu Olacaksın. Available at “https://www.memurlar.net/ haber/873915/makam-sahibi-olmak-icin-ya-imam-hatipli-ya-da-trabzonlu-olacaksin.html google scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma, Desen ve Uygulama için bir Rehber [Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation]. (S. Turan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel. google scholar
• Mutlu, K. (2000). Problems of nepotism and favoritism in the police organization in Turkey. An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 23(3), 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510010343056 google scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri, Nitel veNicel Yaklaşımlar [Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches]. (S. Özge, Trans.). 1. Cilt. Ankara: Yayınodası. google scholar
• Roniger, L. (1983). Modern patron-client relations and historical clientelism. Some clues from ancient Republican Rome. European Journal of Sociology, 24, 63-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600003969 google scholar
• Sabahaddin, P. (2007). Gönüllü Sürgünden Zorunlu Sürgüne [From Voluntary Exile to Forced Exile]. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
• Sayari, S. (1977). Political Patronage in Turkey. (E. Gellner and J. Waterbury. Ed.). Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies içinde (p. 103–113). London: Duckworth. google scholar
• Sayarı, S. (2011). Clientelism and Patronage in Turkish Politics and Society. (B. Toprak and F. Birtek, Eds.), Essays in Honor of Şerif Mardin: The Post-Modern Abyss and the New Politics of Islam: Assabiyah Revisited içinde (p. 81-94). İstanbul: Bilgi University. google scholar
• Scott, C. J. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66 (1), 91-113. doi:10.2307/1959280 google scholar
• Sennett, R. (2014). Otorite [Authority], Durand K (trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. google scholar
• Søren, S. (2018). The Power of Sultanism. (R. Hinnebusch and O. Imady, Eds.), The Syrian Uprising: Domestic Origins and Early Trajectory, London, New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Stokes, S.C. (2007). Political Clientelism. (C. Boix and S. C. Stokes, Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics içinde (s. 604-627). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Theobald, R. (1983). The Decline of Patron-Client Relations in Developed Societies. European Journal of Sociology, 24 (1), 136-147. google scholar
• Türk Sanayicileri ve İş İnsanları Derneği (TUSIAD) (1983). Kamu Bürokrasisi [Public Bureaucracy]. October 1, 1983. https://tusiad.org/tr/ yayinlar/raporlar/item/9076-kamu-burokrasisi google scholar
• Türk Sanayicileri ve İş İnsanları Derneği TUSIAD (1995). Optimal Devlet [Optimal State]. February 1995. https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/ raporlar/item/1798-optimal-devlet google scholar
• Weber, M. (1968). Bureaucracy. (G. Roth and C. Wittich, Eds.), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Society. New York: Bedminster Press, 956-1005. google scholar

Citations