Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship

Eroğlu Utku Deniz; Sirkeci İbrahim

doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

Theoretical Article

DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0065 IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0065 Full Text (PDF)

Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship

The concept of citizenship has changed dramatically since the term was first used in ancient Greece. Recent citizenship debates have focused on the implications of commodified citizenship and growth of the “golden visa” market as these new schemes raise ethical and constitutional concerns. Paid-for citizenship schemes undermine the traditional notion of citizenship often marked by solidarity, rights and duties. Paid-for citizenship contradicts contemporary citizenship’s essential principle of equality. Therefore, the core challenge for Turkey and other countries offering paid-for citizenship is the unethical implications of distinguishing refugee/immigrant populations by financial capability in acquiring citizenship. While Turkey does not grant full-fledged refugee status to nonEuropean people and limit duration of their stay in Turkey, Citizenship by Investment programmes offer the rich people –including non-Europeansan opportunity to acquire Turkish citizenship. So, the new citizenship programme in Turkey is paving the way for discrimination based on the socioeconomic status of individuals. What’s more, this actually tends to push the citizenship concept into a narrow understanding despite the expansion of the modern citizenship concept towards more inclusive rights reaching beyond the boundaries of nation states. Taking this into account, this paper aims to illustrate the discrepancies between paid- for citizenship and refugee policies by highlighting the ethical questions arising from citizenship by investment programmes in Turkey.

Keywords: Citizenship for sale, commodified citizenship, golden visas, ethics of citizenship

DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0065 IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0065 Full Text (PDF)

Metalaşan (Altın) Vatandaşlığın Etik Boyutu

Deniz Eroğlu Utku, İbrahim Sirkeci

Vatandaşlık kavramı ilk kez Antik Yunan’da kullanılmasından bu yana oldukça değişmiştir. Bugün gelinen noktada vatandaşlık tartışmalarına satılık vatandaşlık ya da altın vatandaşlık olarak tanımlanabilecek yeni tartışmalar eklenmiş, böylece kavramla ilgili etik kaygılar da ortaya çıkmıştır. Satılık vatandaşlık, dayanışma, haklar ve ödevler gibi vatandaşlık kavramının işaret ettiği geleneksel değerleri zedelemektedir. Dahası , vatandaşlığın özünde yer alan eşitlik ilkesi ile de çelişmektedir. Türkiye ve diğer ülkelerinde konu ile ilgili önlerine çıkan başlıca çatışma unsuru göçmen/mülteci gruplarını, vatandaşlık elde etme konusunda finansal yeterlilikleri doğrultusunda değerlendirmenin yol açtığı etik olmayan durumdur. Türkiye Avrupa dışından gelenlere tam bir mülteci statüsü vermemekte, ülkede kalışlarını sınırlamaktadır. Öte yandan, yatırım yolu ile vatandaşlık yolu - Avrupa dışından gelenler dahil- herkese açıktır. Bu durum, vatandaşlık politiklarında sosyoekonomik bir ayrımcılığa yol açmaktadır. Ayrıca, ulus devlet sınırları ötesinde, daha kapsayıcı hakları dahil eden modern vatandaşlık kavramına karşın, daha dar bir vatandaşlık anlayışını da ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Çalışmamız, yatırım yoluyla vatandaşlık ile beraber, satılık vatandaşlık ve mülteci politikaları arasındaki uyuşmazlığı ele almakta ve bu uyuşmazlığın yol açtığı etik olmayan durumu ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords: Satılık vatandaşlık, meta vatandaşlık, altın vize, vatandaşlığın etiği

References

Amnesty International. (2018, April 24). Turkey: Thousands of Afghans swept up in ruthless deportation drive. Retrieved from http://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/04/turkey-thousands-of-afghans-swept-up-in-ruthless-deportation-drive/ google scholar
Armstrong, C. (2018). The price of selling citizenship. In Rainer Bauböck (Ed.), Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 25–28). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_5 google scholar
Baban, F., Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2017). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,43(1), 41–57. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1192996 google scholar
Barbulescu, R. (2018). Global mobility corridors for the ultra-rich the neoliberal transformation of citizenship. In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Debating transformation of national citizenship (pp. 29–32). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_6 google scholar
Bauböck, R. (2018). What is wrong with selling citizenship? It corrupts democracy! In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 37–41). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_8 google scholar
Bauböck, R., Ersbøll, E., Groenendijk, K., & Waldrauch, H. (2006). Introduction. In E. E. Rainer Bauböck, Kees Groenendijk and Harald Waldrauch (Ed.), Acquisition and loss of nationality comparative analyses policies and trends in 15 European countries,1(1), (pp. 15–34). Amsterdam University Press. google scholar
Bauböck, R., Honohan, I., Huddleston, T., Hutcheson, D., Shaw, J., & Vink., M. P. (2013). Access to citizenship and its impact on immigrant integration. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/29828/AccesstoCitizenshipanditsImpactonImmigrantIntegration.pdf?sequence=1BBCNews. (2018, May 28). Mamoudou Gassama: Mali ‘Spiderman’ to be made French citizen. Retrieved from https:// www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44275776 google scholar
Becker, G. S. (1987). Why not let immigrants pay for speedy entry? In Gary. S. Becker and G. Nashat (Ed.), The economics of life (pp. 58–60). New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
Bellamy, R., & Warleigh, A. (2001). Introduction: The puzzle of EU citizenship. In R. Bellamy & A. Warleigh (Eds.), Citizenship and governance in the European Union (pp. 3–18). London: Psychology Press. google scholar
Bendix, R. (1964). Nation-building and citizenship: Studies of our changing social order. New York: John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
Borna, S., & Stearns, J. M. (2002). The ethics and efficacy of selling national citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics,37(2), 193–207. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015070022625 google scholar
Brodie, J. (2002). Citizenship and solidarity: Reflections on the Canadian way. Citizenship Studies, 6(4), 377–394. google scholar
Cohen, J. H., & Sirkeci, I. (2011). Cultures of migration: The global nature of contemporary mobility. University of Texas Press. google scholar
Cummings, C., Pacitto, J., Lauro, D., & Foresti, M. (2015). Why people move: understanding the drivers and trends of migration to Europe. London: Overseas Development Institute. google scholar
Çağaptay, S. (2003). Citizenship policies in interwar Turkey. Nations and Nationalism, 9(4), 601–619. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00129 google scholar
Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ google scholar
Dönmez, R. Ö. (2011). Beyond state-led nationalism: ideal citizenship for Turkey. In R. Ö. Dönmez & P. Enneli (Eds.), Societal peace and ideal citizenship for Turkey. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books (pp.1–26). New York: Lexington Books google scholar
Džankić, J. (2012). The pros and cons of ius pecuniae: Investor citizenship in comparative perspective. Robert Schuman Centre for Advances Studies. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/21476/RSCAS_2012_14.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. google scholar
Džankić, J. (2012a). The Eurozone’s struggling economies are increasingly selling citizenship to raise much needed capital. Retrieved from (2019, May 15), https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2012/12/17/selling-citizenship-jelena-dzankic/ google scholar
Džankić, J. (2018). The Maltese Falcon, or: my Porsche for a passport! In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 33–36), Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_7 google scholar
Ergocun, G. (2019). 250+ apply for Turkish citizenship through investment. Retrieved from http://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/250-apply-for-turkish-citizenship-through-investment/1354045 google scholar
Espejo, O. P. (2018). What money can’t buy: Face-to-face cooperation and local democratic life. In R. Bauböck (Ed.),Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 43–46). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_9 google scholar
European Parliament. (2019). European parliament resolution on EU citizenship for sale. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+MOTION+P7-RC-2014-0015+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN google scholar
European Commission. (2019, January 1). Commission reports on the risks of investor citizenship and residence schemes in the EU and outlines steps to address them. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-19-526_en.htm google scholar
Fahim, K., & Zakaria, Z. (2019). Turkey has deported hundreds of Syrian migrants, advocates and refugees say. Retrieved fromhttps://http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/turkey-has-deported-hundreds-of-syrian-migrants-advocates-and-refugees-say/2019/07/22/14114c9c-ac87-11e9-9411-a608f9d0c2d3_story.html?utm_term=.faa3de0818fb google scholar
Fortier, A. M. (2013). What’s the big deal? Naturalisation and the politics of desire. Citizenship Studies,17(6-7), 697–711. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.780761 google scholar
Geçici Koruma Yönetmeliği. (No: 29153). The Official Gazette 22/10/2014. Retrieved from http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/3.5.20146883.pdf google scholar
Glenn, E. N. (2011). Constructing citizenship: Exclusion, subordination and resistance. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 1–24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411398443 goldenvisas.com. (2019). UK tier 1 investor. Retrieved from https://http://www.goldenvisas.com/uk google scholar
Gökgöz, G., Arena, A., & Aydın, C. (2017). Comparative analysis of public attitudes towards Syrian refugees in Turkish cities of Ankara and Hatay. In D. E. Utku, K. O. Unutulmaz & I. Sirkeci (Eds.), Turkey’s Syrians: Today and tomorrow. Transnational Press London. google scholar
Guiraudon, V. (1998). Citizenship rights for non-citizens: France, Germany, and the Netherlands. In C. Joppke (Ed.), Challenge to the nation-state: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States (pp. 272–318). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Heater, D. (2008). A brief history of citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hidalgo, J. (2016). Selling citizenship: A defence. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(3), Retrieved from 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12117 google scholar
Hindess, B. (2002). Neoliberal citizenship, Citizenship Studies, 6(2), pp. 127–143. google scholar
Hurmi, B. T., & Temel, B. l. (2011). The European Union and Turkey: Transformation of the state-society relationship. In P. Enneli & R. Ö. Dönmez (Eds.), Societal peace and ideal citizenship for Turkey, (pp. 207–225). Lexington Books. google scholar
Ince, B. (2012). Citizenship and identity in Turkey: From Atatürk’s Republic To The Present Day. London: IB Tauris. google scholar
Isin, E. F., & Nyers, P. (2014). Introduction: Globalizing citizenship studies. In E. F. Isin & P. Nyers (Eds.), Routledge handbook of global citizenship studies (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge. google scholar
Isin, E. F., & Wood, P. (1999). Citizenship and identity (Vol. 448): Sage. google scholar
Isin E. F., & Bryan S. Turner. (2007). Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship Studies,11(1), 5–17. google scholar
Jenson, J. (2009). Redesigning citizenship regimes after neoliberalism: Moving towards social investment. In N. Morel & B. Palier and J. Palme (Eds.), What future for social investment? (pp. 27–44), Institute for Future Studies Research Paper. Retrieved from https://www.iffs.se/media/1705/what-f.pdf google scholar
Kirişçi, K. (2000). Disaggregating Turkish citizenship and immigration practices. Middle Eastern Studies, 36(3), 1–22. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200008701316 google scholar
Kochenov, D. (2018). Citizenship for real: Its hypocrisy, its randomness, its price. In R. Baub öck (Ed.), Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 51–55): Springer. google scholar
Koopmans, R., Michalowski, I., & Waibel, S. (2012). Citizenship rights for immigrants: National political processes and cross-national convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1202–1245. google scholar
Linklater, A. (1996). Citizenship and sovereignty in the post-Westphalian state. European Journal of International Relations, 2(1), 77–103. google scholar
Magni-Berton, R. (2014). Citizenship for those who invest into the future of the state is not wrong, the price is the problem. In A. Shachar & R. Bauböck (Eds.), Should citizenship be for sale? (pp. 11–12). EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2014/01: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. google scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
Mavelli, L. (2018). Citizenship for sale and the neoliberal political economy of belonging. International Studies Quarterly,62(3), 482–493. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy004 google scholar
McCluskey, M. T. (2003). Efficiency and social citizenship: Challenging the neoliberal attack on the welfare state. Indiana Law Journal, 78(2), 783–876. google scholar
McNevin, A. (2011). Contesting citizenship: Irregular migrants and new frontiers of the political. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
Oldfield, A. (1994). Citizenship: An unnatural practice. In P. H. Bryan S. Turner (Ed.), Citizenship: Critical concepts, Vol. 1, pp. 188–197. New York.Ong, A. (2005). (Re)Articulations of citizenship. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(4), 697–699. google scholar
Öke, M. K. (2011). Social rights as ideal citizenship. In P. Enneli & R. Ö. Dönmez (Eds.), Societal peace and ideal citizenship for Turkey (pp. 227–255). UK: Lexington Books. google scholar
Pfetsch, F. R. (2013). European citizenship: A concept of interrelatedness and conditionality. In S. K. Mitra (Ed.), Citizenship as cultural flow structure, agency and power (pp.87–106). London: Springer. google scholar
Polat, F. Ç., & Eda, K. (2017). Bir ötekileştirme pratiği: Türkiye’de yaşayan Suriyelilere yönelik tutumlar. Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1), 38–48. google scholar
Reichel, D. (2011). Do legal regulations hinder naturalisation? Citizenship policies and naturalisation rates in Europe. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/18734/RSCAS-2011_51.corr.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y google scholar
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Interior Directorate General of Migration Management. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/gecici-koruma5638 google scholar
Rubin, A. (2017). Turkish citizenship: the perils of hegemonic tendencies and the shadow of securitization. Citizenship Studies,21(8), 872–888 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1380648. google scholar
Schierup, C. U., & Ålund, A. (2011). The end of Swedish exceptionalism? Citizenship, neoliberalism and the politics of exclusion. Race & Class, 53(1), 45–64. google scholar
Shachar, A. (2011). Picking winners: Olympic citizenship and the global race for talent. Immigr. & Nat’lity L. Rev.,32, 523. google scholar
Shachar, A. (2017). Citizenship for sale? In A. Shachar, R.Buböck, I. Bloemraad & M. Wink (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Shachar, A. (2018). Dangerous liaisons: money and citizenship. In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Debating transformations of national citizenship, (pp. 7–15), Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_2 google scholar
Shachar, A., & Bauböck, R. (2014). Should citizenship be for sale? Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/29318/RSCAS_2014_01.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y google scholar
Sirkeci, I. (2003). Migration, ethnicity and conflict: The environment of insecurity and Turkish Kurdish international migration. (PhD Thesis). University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. google scholar
Sirkeci, I. (2007). Human insecurity and streams of conflict for a re-conceptualization of international migration. Population Review, 46(2), 32–50. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1353/prv.2008.0003 google scholar
Sirkeci, I. (2010). Güvensizlik ve çatışma ekseninde uluslararası göç ve vatandaşlık. In F. Kartal (Ed.), Yurttaşlık tartışmaları yeni yaklaşımlar (pp. 89–118). Ankara: TODAIE Yayınları. google scholar
Sirkeci, I, Utku, D., & Yüceşahin, M. M. (2019). Göç çatışma modelinin katılım, kalkınma ve kitle açıkları üzerinden bir değerlendirmesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 59(1), 199–226. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016 google scholar
Smith, R. M. (2002). Modern citizenship. In E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of citizenship studies (pp. 105–115). London: Sage Publications. google scholar
Soyarık-Şentürk, N. (2009). Legal and constitutional foundations of Turkish citizenship: Changes and continuities. In F. Keyman, & A. İçduygu (Eds.), Citizenship in a global world (pp. 136–156). New York: Routledge. google scholar
Soylu, R. (2019). Revealed: Middle East nationals fuel Turkish billion-dollar citizenship Bonanza. Retrieved fromhttps://www.middleeasteye.net/news/turkey- citizenship-by-investment-scheme-foreigners-billion google scholar
Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. University of Chicago Press. google scholar
Sözen, Ü. S. (2016). Fragile balance of EU-Turkey readmission agreement. Turkish Migration Policy (pp.149–168). Transnational Press London. spiegel.de. (2013). Citizenship for sale in malta. Retrieved fromhttps://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/malta-passes-bill-giving-citizenship-to-foreigners-for-payment-a-933360.html google scholar
Spiro, P. J. (2018). Cash-for-Passports and the end of citizenship. In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 17–19): Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_3 google scholar
sputnik. (2017, January 1). Hükümet suriyelilerden 44 milyar dolar bekliyor. from Retrieved from https://tr.sputniknews.com/turkiye/201701141026768574-suriye-yabancilara-vatandaslik/ google scholar
Stewart, A. (1995). Two conceptions of citizenship. British Journal of Sociology, 46(1) 63–78. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/591623 google scholar
Tanasoca, A. (2016). Citizenship for sale: Neomedieval, not just neoliberal? European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 57(1), 169–195. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000059 google scholar
TC Ministry of Interior. (2019). Acquisition of Turkish citizenship for foreign investors. Retrieved from https://www.nvi.gov.tr/pages/yabanci-yatirimcilarin-turk-vatandasligini-kazanmalari.aspx google scholar
Terzioğlu, A. (2018). The banality of evil and the normalization of the discriminatory discourses against Syrians in Turkey. Anthropology of the Contemporary Middle East and Central Eurasia, 4(2), 34–47. The Governorship of İstanbul. (2019, July 22) .Statement on irregular migration. Retrieved from http://www.istanbul.gov.tr/duzensiz-gocle-mucadele-ile-ilgili-basin-aciklamasi google scholar
Tilly, C. (1997). A primer on citizenship. Theory and Society, 26(4), 599–603. google scholar
Toktas, S. (2005). Citizenship and minorities: a historical overview of Turkey’s Jewish minority. Journal of Historical Sociology, 18(4), 394–429. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2005.00262.x google scholar
trthaber. (2019, January 6). Retrieved from https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/2018-yilinda-55-bin-894-duzensiz-gocmen-sinir-disi-edildi-400145.html google scholar
Turan, İ. (1969). Cumhuriyet tarihimiz (our republican history). İstanbul: Çağlayan Ktb. google scholar
Turner, B. S. (1993). Citizenship And Social Theory (Vol. 24). Sage.UNHCR. (2019). Turkey: Key facts and figures. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/unhcr-turkey-stats google scholar
Üstel, F. (2016). Makbul vatandaşın peşinde: II. Meşrutiyet’ten bugüne vatandaşlık eğitimi. İletişim Yayınları: İstanbul.Van Fossen, A. (2007). Citizenship for sale: Passports of convenience from Pacific Island tax havens. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 45(2), 138–163. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040701317477 google scholar
Vardar, D. (2009). European-Turkish relations and the question of citizenship. In F. Keyman, & A. İçduygu (Eds.), Citizenship in a global world: European questions and Turkish experiences. Routledge. google scholar
Yeğen, M. (2004). Citizenship and ethnicity in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 51–66. google scholar
Yeğen, M. (2008). The dialectic and the tragedy of citizenship. European Political Science, 7(1), 98–112. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210149 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format

EXPORT

APA

Eroğlu Utku, D., & Sirkeci, İ. (2020). Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(62), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

AMA

Eroğlu Utku D, Sirkeci İ. Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2020;0(62):365-380. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

ABNT

Eroğlu Utku, D.; Sirkeci, İ. Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 62, p. 365-380, 2020.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Eroğlu Utku, Deniz, and İbrahim Sirkeci. 2020. “Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 62: 365-380. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

Chicago: Humanities Style

Eroğlu Utku, Deniz, and İbrahim Sirkeci. “Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 62 (May. 2024): 365-380. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

Harvard: Australian Style

Eroğlu Utku, D & Sirkeci, İ 2020, 'Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, pp. 365-380, viewed 17 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Eroğlu Utku, D. and Sirkeci, İ. (2020) ‘Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(62), pp. 365-380. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065 (17 May. 2024).

MLA

Eroğlu Utku, Deniz, and İbrahim Sirkeci. “Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, 2020, pp. 365-380. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

Vancouver

Eroğlu Utku D, Sirkeci İ. Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 17 May. 2024 [cited 17 May. 2024];0(62):365-380. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065 doi: 10.26650/JECS2020-0065

ISNAD

Eroğlu Utku, Deniz - Sirkeci, İbrahim. “Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/62 (May. 2024): 365-380. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0065

Issue 622020, P. 365-380

TIMELINE

Submitted	03.09.2019
Accepted	10.06.2020
Published Online	07.12.2020

LICENCE

Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Journal of Economy Culture and Society

Theoretical Article

Ethics of Commodified (Golden) Citizenship

Metalaşan (Altın) Vatandaşlığın Etik Boyutu

PDF View

References

Citations

EXPORT

APA

AMA

ABNT

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Chicago: Humanities Style

Harvard: Australian Style

Harvard: Author-Date Style

MLA

Vancouver

ISNAD

TIMELINE

LICENCE

SHARE