Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2021-865861   IUP :10.26650/JECS2021-865861    Full Text (PDF)

What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?

Ebru Çağlayan AkayFulden Kömüryakan

This study comparatively analyzes wage inequality in the Turkish labor force by estimating the generalized Mincer wage equation with quantile regression methods using the 2018 Turkish Household Budget Survey data. This is the first study on wage inequality in Turkey that includes a comparative analysis of conditional and unconditional quantile regression methods. The results indicate that conditional quantile regression estimates wage inequality to be lower than it actually is. In contrast, in unconditional quantile regression, wage inequality is higher. The results further provide evidence of wage inequality in the Turkish labor market and suggest that wage inequality is higher in low-wage segments.

DOI :10.26650/JECS2021-865861   IUP :10.26650/JECS2021-865861    Full Text (PDF)

Koşullu ve Koşulsuz Kantil Regresyon Modelleri Türkiye’de Ücret Eşitsizliği Hakkında Farklı Ne Söylüyor?

Ebru Çağlayan AkayFulden Kömüryakan

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk işgücündeki ücret eşitsizliğini genelleştirilmiş Mincer ücret denklemi çerçevesinde, koşullu ve koşulsuz kantil regresyon yöntemleri ile tahmin ederek karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz etmektir. Bu amaç için 2018 Türkiye Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi verileri analiz edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de Mincer ücret denklemini koşulsuz kantil regresyon yöntemi ile inceleyen ve koşullu ve koşulsuz kantil regresyon tahmin sonuçlarını karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz eden ilk çalışmadır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, koşullu kantil regresyon yönteminin ücret eşitsizliğini olduğundan daha az belirlediği, koşulsuz kantil regresyon yöntemine göre ise ücret eşitsizliğinin daha fazla olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, Türk işgücü piyasasında ücret eşitsizliğinin olduğunu ve ücret eşitsizliğinin ücret seviyesinin düşük olduğu kesimlerde daha fazla olduğu hakkında kanıtlar sunmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Wage inequality arises when the welfare level of some individuals in society is higher than others. Although wage inequality is relatively lower in developed economies, it remains a much more serious socioeconomic challenge for emerging market economies, along with labor force competition. Therefore, wage inequality is one of the most examined topics in literature.

This study examines the wage inequality by analyzing the Turkish Household Budget Survey (HBS) conducted by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT) in 2018. The HBS was administered to 15,551 households in Turkey. We analyze 5,455 employees who reported positive income in the survey year.

This study further comparatively analyzes wage inequality in the Turkish labor force by estimating the generalized Mincer wage equation with quantile regression methods. The generalized Mincer wage equation contains three sets of variables as human capital, demographic features, occupation and work types

Although ordinary least squares (OLS) is the best unbiased linear estimator to analyze the relationship between variables, it is based on the conditional mean of the distribution and breaks in cases of long-tailed distribution. Thereby OLS could take any arbitrary value in the case of long-tailed distributions. Since outliers and long-tailed distributions are quite common in the analysis of wage equations, Koenker and Bassett (1978) proposed a new method, termed as conditional quantile regression (CQR) to overcome the limitations of OLS and address this challenge. CQR is based on the estimation of conditional quantiles of distributions. In this way, CQR allows the estimation of the conditional quantile functions and determines the statistical differences of parameters in different quantiles of distribution. CQR is robust to heteroskedasticity and outliers, is more efficient than OLS in the case of the nongaussian error term, and elicits detailed information regarding the differentials in a distribution by computing several regression curves corresponding to different conditional quantiles in the distribution. Although the CQR method has several advantages, it can become limited in some situations. If the variables for different conditional quantiles alter, the interpretation of these variables may be affected. Since the distribution of the dependent variable at the θth quantile depends on the conditional distribution of the given explanatory variable in the CQR method, the distribution of inequality in the dependent variable may be affected by the inequality in the given explanatory variable. Hence, the inequality can be estimated as more or less than its actual value. Therefore, CQR may estimate coefficients that are sometimes not generalizable or interpretable for a population.

Firpo, Fortin, and Lemieux (2009) proposed a regression method termed as unconditional quantile regression (UQR) to overcome these limitations of CQR. UQR is used to estimate the effect of explanatory variables on the unconditional quantiles of a dependent variable. UQR makes it possible to analyze different relationships between the variables and elicits a more detailed result among different groups in the sample. UQR estimates more interpretable and generalizable coefficients than CQR as it marginalizes the effect over the distributions of other explanatory variables in the model. Basically, CQR estimates the impact on the dependent variable conditional on the explanatory variable for an observation, whereas UQR estimates the impact on the dependent variable at the θth quantile for all observations in a sample unconditional on the explanatory variable.

This is the first study on wage inequality in Turkey to apply a comparative analysis of conditional and unconditional quantile regression methods. The results suggest that CQR determines wage inequality as lower than it actually is. In contrast, in UQR, wage inequality is higher. The results further provide evidence on wage inequality in the Turkish labor market and suggest that wage inequality is higher in low-wage segments. 


PDF View

References

  • Aeberhardt, R., Givord, P., & Marbot, C. (2011). Minimum wage and wage inequality in France: An unconditional quantile regression approach. Forthcoming in Documents de Travail de la DESE-Working Papers of the DESE. Erişim adresi: http://www.crest.fr/ google scholar
  • Alejo, J., Gabrielli, M., & Sosa-Escudero, W. (2014). The distributive effects of education: An unconditional quantile regression approach. Revista de Anâlisis Economico—Economic Analysis Review, 29(1), 53-76. http://dx.doi. org/0.4067/S0718-88702014000100003 google scholar
  • Bishop, J., Luo, F., & Wang, F. (2005). Economic transition, gender bias, and the distribution of earnings in China. Economics of Transition, 13(2), 239-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2005.00218.x google scholar
  • Borah, B., & Basu, A. (2013). Highlighting differences between conditional and unconditional quantile regression approaches through an application to assess medication adherence. Health Economics, 22(9), 1052-1070. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.2927 google scholar
  • Buchinsky, M. (1994). Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963-1987: Application of quantile regression. Econometrica, 62(2), 405-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2951618 google scholar
  • Buchinsky, M. (1998). Recent advances in quantile regression models: A practical guideline for empirical research. The Journal of Human Resources, 33(1), 88-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/146316 google scholar
  • Çelik, O. ve Selim S. (2014). Türkiye’de kamu ve özel sektör ücret farklılıklarının kantil regresyon yaklaşımı ile analizi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 21(1), 205-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.18657/yecbu.26375 google scholar
  • De la Rica, S., Dolado, J., & Llorens, V. (2008). Ceilings or floors? Gender wage gaps by education in Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 21(3), 751-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0128-1 google scholar
  • Firpo, S., Fortin, N., & Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regression. Econometrica, 77(3), 953-973. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6822 google scholar
  • Fournier, J., & Koske, I. (2012). The determinants of earnings inequality: evidence from quantile regressions. google scholar
  • OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2012(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/19952856 google scholar
  • Güriş, S., Çağlayan, E., & Saçaklı Saçıldı, İ. (2010). Schooling and wage distribution for male and female employees in the public and private sector. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 40, 146-154. google scholar
  • Güriş, S., Çağlayan, E., & Saçaklı, İ. (2009). Education, experience and male-female wage differentials after 2001 crisis. Öneri Dergisi, 8(31), 259-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.678684 google scholar
  • Hampel, F., Rochetti, E., Rousseeuw, P., & Stahel, W. (1986). Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Hao, L., & Naiman, D. Q. (2007). Quantile regression. United States of America, USA: Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Jarque, C., & Bera, A. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 55(2), 163-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1403192 google scholar
  • Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098 google scholar
  • Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1913643 google scholar
  • Machado, J., & Mata, J. (2001). Earning functions in Portugal 1982-1994: Evidence from quantile regressions. Empirical Economics, 26(1), 115-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001810000049 google scholar
  • MacKinnon, J., & White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7 google scholar
  • Maclean, J., Webber, D., & Marti, J. (2014). An application of unconditional quantile regression to cigarette taxes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 188-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.21724 google scholar
  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research. google scholar
  • Montenegro, C. (2001). Wage distribution in Chile: does gender matter? A quantile regression approach. Policy Research Report on Gender and Development, Working Paper Series 20. Erişim adresi: https://citeseerx.ist. psu.edu/ google scholar
  • OECD. (2021, 3 Ocak). Income inequality (indicator). Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/459aa7f1-en google scholar
  • Polachek, S. (2008). Earnings over the life cycle: The Mincer earnings function and its applications. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 4(3), 165-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0700000018 google scholar
  • Rahona-Lopez, M., Murillo-Huertas, I., & Salinas-Jimenez, M. (2016). Wage differentials by sector and gender: a quantile analysis for the Spanish case. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 19(1), 20-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1 080/17487870.2015.1028936 google scholar
  • Tang, Y., & Long, W. (2013). Gender earnings disparity and discrimination in urban china: Unconditional quantile regression. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 5(3), 202-212. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/20421338.2013.796743 google scholar
  • Tansel, A., & Acar, E. O. (2016). The formal/informal employment earnings gap: Evidence from Turkey. In J. A. google scholar
  • Bishop & J. G. Rodriguez (Eds.) Inequality after the 20th century: Papers from the Sixth ECINEQ Meeting (Research on economic inequality, Vol. 24) (pp. 121-154). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1049-258520160000024006 google scholar
  • Tansel, A., & Bodur, F. (2012). Wage inequality and returns to education in Turkey: A quantile regression analysis. Review ofDevelopment Economics, 16(1), 107-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00655.x google scholar
  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817-838. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912934 google scholar
  • Yu, K., Lu, Z., & Stander, J. (2003). Quantile regression: Applications and current research areas. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52(3), 331-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00363 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Çağlayan Akay, E., & Kömüryakan, F. (2021). What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(64), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861


AMA

Çağlayan Akay E, Kömüryakan F. What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2021;0(64):257-277. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861


ABNT

Çağlayan Akay, E.; Kömüryakan, F. What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 64, p. 257-277, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çağlayan Akay, Ebru, and Fulden Kömüryakan. 2021. “What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 64: 257-277. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çağlayan Akay, Ebru, and Fulden Kömüryakan. What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 64 (Apr. 2024): 257-277. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861


Harvard: Australian Style

Çağlayan Akay, E & Kömüryakan, F 2021, 'What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 64, pp. 257-277, viewed 20 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çağlayan Akay, E. and Kömüryakan, F. (2021) ‘What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(64), pp. 257-277. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861 (20 Apr. 2024).


MLA

Çağlayan Akay, Ebru, and Fulden Kömüryakan. What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 64, 2021, pp. 257-277. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861


Vancouver

Çağlayan Akay E, Kömüryakan F. What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 20 Apr. 2024 [cited 20 Apr. 2024];0(64):257-277. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861 doi: 10.26650/JECS2021-865861


ISNAD

Çağlayan Akay, Ebru - Kömüryakan, Fulden. What Do Conditional and Unconditional Quantile Regression Models Tell Us Something Different About Wage Inequality in Turkey?”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/64 (Apr. 2024): 257-277. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-865861



TIMELINE


Submitted21.01.2021
Accepted21.05.2021
Published Online11.08.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.