Research Article


DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004    Full Text (PDF)

Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule

İdil Tunçer Kılavuz

This article mainly argues that the Russian national identity and the modern form of Russian nationalism were formed during the Soviet period including many nationalistic motifs from the Tsarist period. The study covers the Soviet period beginning from the Lenin to the late Brezhnev years. The first part of the article will explore the transformation of the state’s view from the descriptive “Great Russian (velikorusskii narod) chauvinism” to the acclaimed “velikii russkii narod,” the emergence of the National Bolshevik ideology and the concept of “Soviet patriotism.” Furthermore, it will discuss how Russian nationalism was controlled, used, and incorporated into the official ideology of the state. In the following section, developments in Russian nationalism in the Brezhnev period will be analyzed. From this period, the rise of the dissident form of Russian nationalism, the thoughts of dissident nationalists, and the tolerance and support that the Soviet state showed to the National Bolsheviks will be discussed. From the Brezhnev era until the early 1990s, Russian nationalism developed on almost the same line. 

DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004    Full Text (PDF)

Sovyetler Birliği’nde Rus Milliyetçiliği ve Rus Milli Kimliğinin Gelişimi

İdil Tunçer Kılavuz

Bu çalışmanın ana argümanı, Rus milli kimliğinin ve Rus milliyetçiliğinin modern şeklini, Çarlık döneminden kalma birçok milliyetçi motifi de tutarak, Sovyet döneminde bulduğudur. Bu çalışma Sovyet yönetiminin Lenin döneminden Brejnev döneminin sonuna kadar olan yıllarını ele alıyor. İlk bölümde, devletin görüşünün betimleyici “Büyük Rus (velikorusskii narod) Şovenizmi”nden, övgü yüklü “Büyük Rus halkı (velikii russkii narod)”na olan değişimi, Milli Bolşevik ideolojisinin ve “Sovyet vatanseverliği” kavramının ortaya çıkışı ve Rus milliyetçiliğinin rejim tarafından nasıl kontrol edildiği, kullanıldığı ve devletin resmi ideolojisi içine alındığı analiz edilecek. Daha sonraki bölümde Rus milliyetçiliğinde Brejnev döneminde yaşanan gelişmeler analiz edilecektir. Bu dönemde Rus milliyetçiliğinin muhalif formunun yükselişi, muhalif milliyetçilerin düşünceleri ve Sovyet devletinin Milli Bolşeviklere gösterdiği hoşgörü ve destek tartışılacaktır. Brejnev döneminden başlayarak 1990’ların başına kadar Rus milliyetçiliği hemen hemen aynı çizgide gelişmiştir.



EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The consciousness of most of the present-day Russian population was formed under the Soviet rule. They grew up during the Soviet period and inherited a Soviet lifestyle and worldview. The younger generation was raised by this generation. One of the arguments of this study is that in order to understand the identity of Russians and how they define themselves today, the Russian identity and their relations to the state during the Soviet period should be analyzed.

The influence of the Soviet era on today’s Russian identity and Russian nationalism still exists. The roots of the different currents of today’s Russian nationalism go back to the Soviet period. Most of the Russian nationalists today have a feeling of nostalgia toward the Soviet period. The Soviet era also seems to have an effect on Russian politics. Today, in the Russian Federation, the Soviet past is being partially and selectively rehabilitated.

This article mainly argues that the Russian national identity and the modern Russian nationalism were formed in the Soviet period, including many nationalistic motifs from the Tsarist period. This study covers the Soviet period beginning from the Lenin to the late Brezhnev years. The first part will discuss the transformation of the state’s view from the descriptive “Great Russian (velikorusskii narod) chauvinism” to the acclaimed “velikii russkii narod,” the emergence of the National Bolshevik ideology and the concept of “Soviet patriotism.” The study also explores how Russian nationalism was controlled, used, and incorporated into the official ideology of the state. In the following section, developments in Russian nationalism in the Brezhnev period will be analyzed. From this period, the rise of the dissident form of Russian nationalism, the thoughts of dissident nationalists, and the tolerance and support that the Soviet state showed to the National Bolsheviks will be discussed.

The main rival of Marxism, the ideology of the new Soviet regime, was nationalism. In the beginning of the Soviet period, all the expressions of Russian nationalism were called “Great Russian Chauvinism” and were strongly suppressed. These pressures continued into the mid-1930s. Under the threat of the upcoming World War, the Soviet regime under Stalin’s leadership aimed to mobilize Russian nationalist sentiments. Therefore, Russian nationalism was integrated into the state ideology. However, Russian nationalism was not allowed to be expressed as a separate ideology independent of the state ideology. Marxism–Leninism remained one of the important sources of legitimization of the Soviet regime. Being aware of the dominance of Russians within the state and in the country, and of the possible harmful effects of Russian nationalist sentiments aiming to separate the Russian nation from the Soviet state, the Soviet regime always tried to control Russian nationalism and to preserve the Russian/Soviet Union identification in the minds of the Russians. In addition, some Soviet leaders regarded partial identification with Russian nationalism as beneficial because this would increase the legitimacy of the regime in the eyes of the Russians. Eventually, a degree of identification between the Russians and the Soviet state was achieved.

The Russian nationalism under the Soviet rule until the 1960s developed in a strictly controlled line dictated by the Soviet state. In the early years of the Soviet regime, until the first half of the 1930s, all forms of Russian nationalism were punished by the regime. However, in this period, a new kind of Russian nationalism, which blended Russian nationalist themes with Marxist–Leninist themes, emerged. These groups were close to or within the political establishment.

After 1934, Russian nationalism was used by the regime for its own goals and to create identification with the Soviet state in the minds of the Russians. However, the regime never lost control over Russian nationalism. Russian nationalism was incorporated in the official ideology of the state and was not allowed to go outside the boundaries defined by the state. Until the 1960s, Russian nationalism was state-based. Toward the end of the Khrushchev era, different expressions of Russian nationalism, which were defined outside the discourse of the state, emerged.

During the Brezhnev period, Russian nationalism became an ideology from below. For the first time in this period, a strong tendency among Russian nationalists saw the Russian nation as a separate ethnic group from the Soviet state; they began expressing their thoughts on the harmful effects of the Soviet administration on the Russians. Furthermore, National Bolshevism became a strong Russian nationalist tendency. During the Brezhnev period, the National Bolsheviks were not only tolerated but also supported. The revival of Russian nationalism began as well as gained momentum in the Brezhnev era. During the Brezhnev period, Russian nationalism found its own form and the main concerns of Russian nationalist thought, its worldview, and the proposals became clear.

During the Brezhnev period, two main Russian nationalist approaches emerged. One was the group that worried about what they perceived as the moral and demographic crisis of the Russians. They were concerned that the Russians were losing their values, culture, and tradition. As a solution, they offered the revival of the Russian Orthodox values, pre-revolutionary Russian culture, and peasant traditions. They were against modernization and had concerns about the devastating effects of the Soviet administration on the Russians. Representatives of this group were dissident nationalists and rural prose writers. Although the rural prose writers were much more successful in finding a modus vivendi with the regime, both groups shared the above-mentioned thoughts.

The most important development in terms of Russian nationalism during the Brezhnev era was the emergence of dissident Russian nationalism, which influenced all groups of Russian nationalists. Dissident Russian nationalists have defined the Russian nation as a separate ethnic group from the state. They rejected the official ideology of the state. They considered the state a non-Russian and anti-Russian element. They believed that the Soviet state had harmful effects on the Russian nation.

Another nationalist group comprised the National Bolsheviks. Their primary concern was that the Russian military and political power should be increased both with regard to other countries and other nations within the Soviet Union. They regarded the Soviet state as the representative and protector of the Russians.

From the Brezhnev period to the fall of the Soviet Union, Russian nationalism developed on almost the same line. Russian national identity and Russian nationalism found their modern forms during the Soviet period. Considering how much the Soviet and Russian identities have been identical in the past, and while the Soviet past is being partially and selectively rehabilitated in the Russian Federation today, the Soviet period provides important clues to understand the relations between the nation and the state in the new era.


PDF View

References

  • Acton, E. (1986). The Present and the Past Russia. New York: Longman. google scholar
  • Agursky, M. (1986). The Prospects of Russian Nationalism. In R. Conquest (Ed.), The Last Empire: Nationality and the Soviet Future. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. google scholar
  • Agursky,M. (1987). The Third Rome: National Bolshevism in the USSR. Boulder, Col: Westview Press. google scholar
  • Barghoorn, F. C. 1986. Russian Nationalism and Soviet Politics: Official and Unofficial Perspectives. In R. Conquest (Ed.) The Last Empire: Nationality and the Soviet Future (pp.30-77). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. google scholar
  • Barghoorn, F. C. (1976). Soviet Russian Nationalism. Westport, Conn.:Greenwood Press. google scholar
  • Bourdeaux, M. (1975). Patriarch and Prophets: Percecution of the Russian Ortodox Church. London and Oxford:Mowbrays. google scholar
  • Brown, D. (1978). Soviet Russian Literature since Stalin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Carr, E.H. (1958). A History of Soviet Russia, cilt. V-VII: Socialism in One Country. London: Macmillan. google scholar
  • Carter, S. (1990) Russian Nationalism: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. London: Pinter Publishers. google scholar
  • D’Encausse H. C. (1981). Decline of an Empire: The Soviet Socialist Republics in Revolt. New York: Newsweek Books. google scholar
  • Dawisha, K. & Parrot, B. (1994). Russia and the New States of Eurasia: The Politics of Upheaval. New York: google scholar
  • Cambridge University Press. Dunlop, J. (1983). The Faces of Contemporary Russian Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Filipov, D. (2017). For Russians, Stalin is the ‘most outstanding’ figure in world history, followed by Putin. The Washington Post, 26 June, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/06/26/for-russians-stalin-is-the-most-outstanding-figure-in-world-history-putin-is-next/?utm_term=.3223d3849b1a, google scholar
  • Geyer, G. A. (1971). “ A New Quest for the Old Russia”, Saturday Review, 25 December. google scholar
  • Hosking, G. A. (1973). The Russian Peasant Rediscovered: Village Prose of the 1960s. Slavic Review, 32 (4), 705-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/2495492. google scholar
  • Hutchinson, J. & Smith, A.D (Eds.). 1994. Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Kohn, H. (1971). Soviet Communism and Nationalism: Three Stages of a Historical Development. In Edward Allworth (Ed.), Soviet Nationality Problems. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Kohn,H. (1983). Panislavizm ve Rus Milliyetçiliği. İstanbul: Kervan Kitapçılık. google scholar
  • Laqueur,W. (1993). Black Hundred: The Rise of Extreme Right in Russia. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. google scholar
  • Lenin V.I. (1973). Collected Works, cilt 33. Progress Publishers: Moscow. google scholar
  • Lenin,V.I. (1974). Collected Works, cilt 29. Progress Publishers: Moscow. Malaya Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya. (1960). cilt IX, Moscow. google scholar
  • Nahoylo, B. & Swoboda, V. (1990). Soviet Disunion: A History of the Nationalities Problem in the USSR. New York: The Free Press. google scholar
  • Nationalism, A Report by a Study Group of Members of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1939). London: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Pospielovsky, D. (1984). The Russian Church under the Soviet Regime, 1917-1982. New York: St. Vladimir Seminary Press. google scholar
  • Putin, V. (2005). Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/page/290. google scholar
  • Reddaway, P. (Ed.) (1972). Uncensored Russia. New York: American Heritage Press. Rywkin, M. (1994). Moscow’s Lost Empire. New York: M.E.Sharp Inc. google scholar
  • Schapiro, L. (1977). The Origin of the Communist Autocracy: Political Opposition in the Soviet State. First Phase, 1917-1922. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Simon, G. (1991). Nationalism and Policy toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union: From Totalitarian Dictatorship to Post-Stalinist Society. Boulder: Westview Press. google scholar
  • Slovar inostrannykh slov. (1949). Moscow, 1949. google scholar
  • Smith, G. (1990). Nationalities Policy from Lenin to Gorbachev. In Graham Smith (Ed.), The Nationalities Question in the Soviet Union (pp.1-20). London: Longman. google scholar
  • Smith, K. E. (2002). Mythmaking in the New Russia. Politics and Memory During the Yeltsin Era. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press. google scholar
  • Solzhenitsyn, A. (1975). Sakharov i kritika ‘Pisma vozhdiam’. Kontinent 2, 350-359. google scholar
  • Solzhenitsyn, A. (1981a). As Breathing and Consciousness Return. In Aleksadr Solzhenitsyn (Ed.), From Under The Rubble (pp.3-25). Washington D.C.: Regnery Gateway. google scholar
  • Solzhenitsyn, A. (1981b). Repentence and Self-Limitation in the Life of Nations. In Aleksadr Solzhenitsyn (Ed.), From Under The Rubble (pp.105-143). Washington D.C.: Regnery Gateway. google scholar
  • Solzhenitsyn, A. (1974). Letter to the Soviet Leaders. New York: Harper and Row. google scholar
  • Solzhenitsyn,A. (1980). The Mortal Danger. New York: Harper and Row. google scholar
  • Spechler, D. (1990). Russian Nationalism and Soviet Politics. In L. Hajda ve M. Beissinger (Eds.), The Nationalities Factor in the Soviet Politics and Society (pp.281-304), Boulder. San Fransisco: Westview Press. google scholar
  • Spinka, M. (1956). The Church in Soviet Russia. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Struve, G. (1951). Soviet Russian Literature, 1917-1950, Norman, Oklahama: University of Oklahoma Press. google scholar
  • Vujacic,V. (2007). “Stalinism and Russian Nationalism: A Reconceptualization”, Post-Soviet Affairs, 23 (2), 156-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.23.2.156. google scholar
  • Warren,M. (2000). “Putin Revives Soviet National Anthem”, The Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/1377685/Putin-revives-Soviet-national-anthem.html. google scholar
  • Werth, A. (1965). Russia at War, 1941-1945. New York: E. P. Dutton and Company. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kılavuz, İ.T. (2017). Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 26(2), 79-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004


AMA

Kılavuz İ T. Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences. 2017;26(2):79-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004


ABNT

Kılavuz, İ.T. Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 26, n. 2, p. 79-110, 2017.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kılavuz, İdil Tunçer,. 2017. “Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 26, no. 2: 79-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kılavuz, İdil Tunçer,. Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 26, no. 2 (May. 2025): 79-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004


Harvard: Australian Style

Kılavuz, İT 2017, 'Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule', Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 79-110, viewed 28 May. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kılavuz, İ.T. (2017) ‘Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule’, Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 26(2), pp. 79-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004 (28 May. 2025).


MLA

Kılavuz, İdil Tunçer,. Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 26, no. 2, 2017, pp. 79-110. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004


Vancouver

Kılavuz İT. Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences [Internet]. 28 May. 2025 [cited 28 May. 2025];26(2):79-110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004 doi: 10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004


ISNAD

Kılavuz, İdilTunçer. Formation of Russian Nationalism and the Russian National Identity under Soviet Rule”. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 26/2 (May. 2025): 79-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2017.26.2.0004



TIMELINE


Submitted18.07.2017
Accepted31.07.2017

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.