Research Article


DOI :10.26650/gaad.867098   IUP :10.26650/gaad.867098    Full Text (PDF)

The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185

Zeki Can Hırçın

The foreign policy of William II, the third king of Sicily named the Good, was always venturesome. Even though the expeditions in three occasions to Egypt in 1170s and in one occasion to the Balearic Islands in 1181 resulted in nothing for the Kingdom at large expense, William was going to embark on a much bigger enterprise and this last one was going to pave the way for the Hauteville family to disappear from the history. The Family which gained visibility thanks to their fight with the Byzantines, was going to wear down due to the same reason. The habitual conflict between Italo-Normans and the Byzantine Empire fuelled by the King’s personal grudge against the Empire focused on Thessaloniki, the second largest city of Byzantium. Being one of the first signs of the Latin aggression that reaches up to the Fourth Crusade, this chain of events which coincides with a critical period of the Byzantines was going to result in dethroning of the Komnenos dynasty. The article studies the campaign of Sicilian Normans on the city of Thessaloniki, regarded as the second capital of Byzantium.

DOI :10.26650/gaad.867098   IUP :10.26650/gaad.867098    Full Text (PDF)

Sicilya Normanlarının Son Feri: 1185 Selânik Saldırısı

Zeki Can Hırçın

Sicilya Krallığı’nın üçüncü kralı olan, İyi lâkaplı II. William’ın dış siyaseti her zaman maceraperest olmuştu. 1170’lerde üç defa Mısır’a, 1181’de Balear adalarına düzenlediği çıkarmalar krallık için pahalı ve sonuçsuz girişimler olarak kalmış olmasına rağmen William bu seferlerin hepsinden daha büyüğüne kalkışacak ve bu girişim Hauteville sülâlesinin kısa sürede tarihten çekilmesine yol açacaktı. Bizans’la savaşarak tarih sahnesine çıkan hânedan, son enerjisini yine onunla savaşarak tüketti. İtalya Normanları ve Bizans İmparatorluğu arasında kronikleşmiş olan düşmanlığın devamı sayılabilecek çatışma, Kral William’ın kişisel düşmanlığıyla birleşerek imparatorluğun ikinci büyük şehri Selânik üzerinde yoğunlaştı. Bizans için çok hassas bir döneme tesadüf eden olaylar zinciri, Komnenos hânedanının imparatorluk tacını kaybetmesine sebep olacak, IV. Haçlı Seferi’ne kadar giden Latin saldırganlığının ilk ciddi işareti olacaktı. Çalışmada 1185 yılında Bizans’ın ikinci başkenti olarak addedilen Selânik kentine Sicilya Normanları tarafından düzenlenen saldırı değerlendirilecektir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In this article we focus on the causes, the scene, and the impact of the siege of Thessaloniki in 1185 by the Italo-Norman forces against the Byzantine Empire. ‘Adventurous’ king William II, the third king of Sicily called the Good, inherited an old animosity from his ancestors and considered that the time was ripe for the Kingdom of Sicily to launch forth an invasion of the Byzantine Empire, given its condition during the period. The Byzantines were ruled with terror by the tyrannical Andronikos I, so much so that the prominent class in the Empire dispersed towards the periphery of the Empire in fear of their lives and in some cases even supported the Normans. If one were to select three different periods of internal disorder in the entire history of the Byzantine Empire, Andronicus’ term would definitely be included. In other words, Eastern Empire writhed in pain in the hands of a descendent of its savior dynasty. Nevertheless, it was still the Roman Empire. 

Looking at the aggressors, settled in Sicily, the aptly-titled Kingdom of Sicily was a powerhouse in the center of Mediterranean. A Norman power had somehow flourished in South Italy against puissance of the popes and the Holy Roman Empire, along with the Byzantine Empire. It became a kingdom in 1130 and later the pivot in the central Mediterranean by dominating Ifriqiya around the mid-twelfth century. Although its domination was short-dated in Ifriqiya, the Norman Kingdom continued to control the trade routes between European Mediterranean ports and Eastern coastal areas as a wealthy and powerful kingdom. It retained most of its power until the coronation of William II in 1166. From 1171 onwards, after his infancy, William II adapted an adventurous and ambitious foreign policy. Oversea expeditions of William II on three occasions to Egypt in 1170s had the aim to defend the Crusader States, but these ventures did not have any tangible outcome; and on one occasion to the Balearic Islands in 1181 resulted in a similar conclusion. These oversea campaigns were carried at a substantial financial expense by the Kingdom. Nevertheless, the Kingdom was wealthy, and William was eager to undertake a much bigger enterprise. The habitual conflict between the Italo-Normans and the Byzantine Empire, supported by the King’s personal grudge against the Empire was now focused on Thessaloniki, the second largest city of the Eastern Empire. The siege was successful, and it was concluded in a short time of nine days, but the aftermath was going to be inauspicious for the aggressors. The Hauteville Family that first gained visibility thanks to their fight with the Byzantines, was going to exhaust all its energy and resources due to the same reason. 

Along with its brand-new ruling dynasty, the Angelos, the refreshed Empire could face their fearful enemy. Withdrawing in front of the eager Imperial forces in the western Thrace, the Normans would have felt that this retreat was just a beginning. Indeed, the Norman Kingdom of Sicily was going to disappear from history in less than 10 years after that conflict. 

On the other hand, the chain of events triggered by the Norman attack, which coincided with a critical period in the Byzantine history, was going to result in dethroning of the powerful Komnenos dynasty on behalf of the Angelos, mostly deemed weak by the modern historians. However, the siege against the Eastern Empire is the one of most prominent signs of the Latin aggression that was going to reach up to the Fourth Crusade. 


PDF View

References

  • Ahrweiler, Helene, Byzance et la Mer, la marine de guerre: la Politique et les Institutions Maritimes de Byzance aux VIIe-XVe siecles, Paris, 1966. google scholar
  • Altan, Ebru, Antakya Haçlı Prinkepsliği Tarihi, Kuruluş Devri (1098-1112), Ankara: TTK, 2018. google scholar
  • Altan, Ebru, İkinci Haçlı Seferi (1147-1148), Ankara: TTK, 2003. google scholar
  • Annales Cassinenses, a. 1000-1212, ed. G. Pertz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Scriptores, XIX, Hannover, 1866, anno 1185, 1190, s. 313-314. google scholar
  • Annales Ceccanenses, ed. G. Pertz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Scriptores, XIX, Hannover, 1866, anno 1185, s. 287. google scholar
  • Annales Cavenses, ed. G. Pertz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Scriptores, III, Hannover, 1839, anno 1185, s. 193. google scholar
  • Aube, Pierre, Les empires normands dOrient: XIe-XIIIe siecle, Paris, 1983. google scholar
  • Brand, Charles M., Byzantium Confronts the West 1180-1204, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1968. google scholar
  • Chalandon, Ferdinand, Histoire de la Domination Normande en Italie et en Sicile, I-II, Paris, 1907. google scholar
  • Chronica Ignoti Monachi Cisterciensis S. Mariae de Ferraria, ed. A. Gaudenzi, Societa Napoletana di Storia Patria, Monumenti Storici, ser. I, Napoli 1888, anno 1184, s. 31. google scholar
  • Eustathios of Thessaloniki, The Capture of Thessaloniki, İngilizce çev. John R. Melville Jones, Canberra, 1988. google scholar
  • Gregory, Timothy E., “Dyrrachion”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, I, 668. google scholar
  • İbn Cübeyr, Rihletul-Kinânî, çev. İsmail Güler, Endülüsten Kutsal Topraklara, İstanbul, 2008. google scholar
  • Kazhdan, Alexander P., “Doux”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, I, 659. google scholar
  • Kazhdan, Alexander P., “Parakoimomenos”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, III, 1584. google scholar
  • Kazhdan, Alexander P.-Nancy P. Sevcenko, “Demetrios of Thessalonike”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, I, 605-606. google scholar
  • Khoniates, Niketas, Niketas Khoniates’in Historia’sı (1180-1195): Komnenos Hânedanı’nın Sonu ve II. Isaakios Angelos Devri, çev. Işın Demirkent, İstanbul, 2006. google scholar
  • Khoniates, Niketas, Historia (Ioannes ve Manuel Komnenos Devirleri), çev. Fikret Işıltan, Ankara, 1995. google scholar
  • Kinnamos, Ioannes, Ioannes Kinnamos Historia’sı (1118-1176), çev. Işın Demirkent, Ankara: TTK, 2001. google scholar
  • La Continuation de l'Histoire des Croisades de Guillaume de Tyr, Collection des Memoires Relatifs a l’Histoire de France, ed. ve modern Fransızca çev. Bernard le Tresorier, Paris, 1824. google scholar
  • la Lumia, Isidoro, Storie Siciliane, I, Palermo, 1881. google scholar
  • Loud, G. A., The Age of Guiscard: Southern Italy and the Norman Conquest, New York, 2013. google scholar
  • Murray, Alan V., “Outremer”, The Crusades: An Encyclopedia (Santa Barbara, 2006), III, 911-912. google scholar
  • Norwich, John Julius, The Kingdom in the Sun 1130-1194, New York, 1970. google scholar
  • Ostrogorsky, Georg, Bizans Devleti Tarihi, Ankara: TTK, 2015. google scholar
  • Öztürk, Murat, “Sicilya Normanlarının Doğu Akdeniz’deki Bahrî Faaliyetleri 549-584 (1154-1189)”, FSM İlmî Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 14 (2019), s. 195-228. google scholar
  • Pryor, John H. ve Elizabeth M. Jeffreys, The Age of Dromon: The Byzantine Navy ca 500-1204, Leiden-Boston, 2006. google scholar
  • Raybaud, L. P. (Gouvernement), “Protosebastos”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, III, 1741. google scholar
  • Rogers, Randall, Latin Siege Warfare in the Twelfth Century, Oxford, 1992. google scholar
  • Salernolu Romuald, Romualdi Salernitani Chronicon [A. m. 130 - A. C. 1178], ed. C. Garufi, Rerum google scholar
  • Italicarum Scriptores, nuova editione, vol. VII, Citta di Castello, 1935. google scholar
  • Stanton, Charles D., Norman Naval Operations in the Mediterranean, Woodbridge, 2016. google scholar
  • Stephenson, Paul, Byzantium’s Balkan Frontier a Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900-1204, Cambridge, 2000. google scholar
  • Tafrali, Oreste, Thessalonique des origines auXIVe siecle, Paris, 1919. google scholar
  • Theotokis, Georgios, The Norman Campaigns in the Balkans 1081-1108, Woodbridge, 2014. google scholar
  • Treadgold, Warren, The Middle Byzantine Historians, Basingstoke, 2013. google scholar
  • Whitaker, Maria Cabanillas, “Acropolis”, Encyclopedia of the City, ed. Roger W. Caves, New York 2005, s. 4-5. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Hırçın, Z.C. (2021). The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185. The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, 0(37), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098


AMA

Hırçın Z C. The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185. The Journal of Southeastern European Studies. 2021;0(37):59-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098


ABNT

Hırçın, Z.C. The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185. The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 37, p. 59-78, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Hırçın, Zeki Can,. 2021. “The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185.” The Journal of Southeastern European Studies 0, no. 37: 59-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098


Chicago: Humanities Style

Hırçın, Zeki Can,. The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185.” The Journal of Southeastern European Studies 0, no. 37 (Apr. 2024): 59-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098


Harvard: Australian Style

Hırçın, ZC 2021, 'The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185', The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, vol. 0, no. 37, pp. 59-78, viewed 26 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Hırçın, Z.C. (2021) ‘The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185’, The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, 0(37), pp. 59-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098 (26 Apr. 2024).


MLA

Hırçın, Zeki Can,. The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185.” The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, vol. 0, no. 37, 2021, pp. 59-78. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098


Vancouver

Hırçın ZC. The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185. The Journal of Southeastern European Studies [Internet]. 26 Apr. 2024 [cited 26 Apr. 2024];0(37):59-78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098 doi: 10.26650/gaad.867098


ISNAD

Hırçın, ZekiCan. The Final Luster of Normans of Sicily: the Attack on Thessaloniki in 1185”. The Journal of Southeastern European Studies 0/37 (Apr. 2024): 59-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.867098



TIMELINE


Submitted23.01.2021
Accepted27.04.2021
Published Online31.12.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.