Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015    Full Text (PDF)

The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions

Özlem Özgür Büyükdere

The paper presents the International Labour Organization (ILO), which has addressed economic, social, and political changes, through its policies and activities and has examined emerging problems and expectations for working life. The current research is based on a literature review. The establishment of the ILO is first discussed from the World War perspective, that is, based on seeking universal peace for social justice. Then, the ILO’s policies, which were adopted during the welfare state period and globalization age and shaped under the leadership of neoliberal policies, are examined. Lastly, the ILO’s new road map, which aims to accomplish its mission to improve global working and living conditions, is emphasized and policy suggestions are presented for future studies. Results show that the ILO established its policies by considering social structures and changes and international conjunctures for a century. Continuing this approach in the 21st century, the ILO pursues proactive policies with the aim of setting standards for working life in the structuring period of globalization. These developments demonstrate that the ILO’s current importance and effectiveness for working life and international economic relations will increase in the future. 

DOI :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015    Full Text (PDF)

100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler

Özlem Özgür Büyükdere

Makalede Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü’nün (UÇÖ), kuruluşundan bu yana dünyayı derinden etkileyen ekonomik, sosyal ve siyasal değişimlere, ortaya çıkan problemler ile çalışma hayatına yönelik beklentilere hangi politika ve faaliyetlerle karşılık verdiği incelenmiştir. Araştırmada literatür taraması ile elde edilen veriler kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada ilk olarak evrensel barış için sosyal adalet arayışına dayanan UÇÖ’nün kuruluş süreci dünya savaşları penceresinden ele alınmıştır. Ardından refah devleti dönemi ve sonrasında neoliberal politikaların önderliğinde şekillenen küreselleşme sürecinde UÇÖ’nün izlediği politikalar incelenmiştir. Son olarak, milenyum ile birlikte yeniden yapılanma sürecine giren UÇÖ’nün, dünya ölçeğinde çalışma ve yaşam koşullarının iyileştirilmesi misyonunu gerçekleştirmek için belirlediği yeni yol haritası üzerinde durulmuş ve yakın gelecekte izlenmesi gereken politikalar konusundaki önerilere yer verilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlar UÇÖ’nün, bir asırdır toplumsal yapılar ve değişmeler ile uluslararası konjonktürleri dikkate alarak politikalar oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu tutumunu 21. yüzyılda da devam ettiren UÇÖ, küreselleşmenin yapılandırılması sürecinde çalışma hayatı ile ilgili standart oluşturma amacıyla proaktif politikalar takip etmektedir. Bu gelişmeler günümüzde olduğu gibi gelecekte de UÇÖ’nün çalışma hayatı ve uluslararası ekonomik ilişkilerdeki önem ve etkinliğinin artacağını göstermektedir. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The International Labour Organization (ILO) was founded in 1919 because of the urgent need to improve the terrible working conditions during the Industrial Revolution. Its constitution was a response to inhumane working conditions. According to the ILO, universal and lasting peace can be established only if it is based on social justice. To date, two political arguments of this philosophy remain valid, namely, inhumane working conditions threaten universal and lasting peace and the failure of any country to adopt humane working conditions is an obstacle for other nations aiming to improve their conditions.

During the initial decades, economic recession and the balance between the market and state enabled the ILO to extend its standard setting activities. The ILO adopted several conventions and recommendations concerning unemployment and working hours, enlarged its research capacity, and collected statistical data. Later, in light of the World War II, The Declaration of Philadelphia was adopted in 1944. According to the declaration, which was a strong call for international cooperation for social progress, labor should not be regarded as a commodity.

In the 1950s and 1960s, after the World War II, the conjunctural expansion period and political climate helped the ILO’s values to become widespread. However, the Cold War restricted the organization’s sphere of action. After the decolonization movement, the ILO launched technical cooperation programs, such as the World Employment Programme. Conversely, the influence of technological and demographical changes on employment and production processes transformed the work force. However, such changes weakened the traditional labor movement. The ILO’s agenda included new skills for new jobs. In this period, the number of fundamental conventions of the organization increased to five.

In the 1980s, economic recession and neoliberal policies, such as privatization and labor market deregulation, restricted the ILO’s room to maneuver. In this period, the number of informal and precarious jobs considerably grew, and tripartism was substantially criticized. Multinationals expanded their power, and the number and intensity of crises increased because of the dominance of economic liberalization and financial markets. The social costs of such crises necessitated urgent social action; however, the constituents of the organization failed to reach a unified reaction, and standard setting facilities were delayed. 

Then, the ILO took its first step toward building a social floor to globalization and adopted a universal instrument, namely, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and its follow-up in 1998.

The 2000s came with broadening inequalities. As a response, the ILO shaped its new road map and adopted the Decent Work Agenda as the main instrument to support the social dimension of globalization. The concept of decent work returned to an official document within the ILO in 2008. The ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization brought together four strategic objectives, namely, rights at work, employment, social protection, and social dialogue and became the framework of the ILO’s primary goal. As a response to the Financial Crisis of 2008, the ILO adopted the Global Jobs Pact and took part in the Social Protection Floor Initiative. 

Then, the ILO deepened its cooperation with G20, which received a central position in the global governance system after 2008 and increased its recognition in the multilateral system. The Decent Work Agenda, Global Jobs Pact, and Millennium Development Goals later became references to G20 policies. Since then, the ILO has continued its efforts to deepen cooperation and dialogue with other international organizations as part of its reform policy. To date, apart from cooperating with international organizations, the ILO takes part in joint projects with several non-governmental organizations and provides technical assistance. 

The world of work is transformatively changing and uncertainty emerges about the capacity of existing institutions and policies to provide the future that all people desire. Aware of such transformative changes, the ILO adopted the ILO Centenary Declaration in 2019 as an integrated policy response. At the same time, it serves as a guide for social justice and lasting peace. In the declaration, the importance of work for human welfare and spiritual and material well-being is underlined, and the need for acting urgently to seize the opportunities and address the challenges using human-centered approaches is emphasized. Promoting decent work and international labor standards, strengthening the capacity of its tripartite constituents, and playing an important role in the multilateral system are the main goals of the ILO in its second century.

In today’s era of instant flow of information and communication, the timeliness of the ILO’s responses to extreme changes in the industrial and occupational structures will determine its effectiveness in the global governance system in the future. The application of information and communication technologies, green economy, and demographic changes will create new jobs. However, mass crowds who lack future capabilities will lose their jobs. Poverty, inequalities, and labor market problems continue despite economic growth. Evidence from recent years shows that Sustainable Development Goal 8 is unlikely to be achieved until 2030. Social partners are looking for a universal labor guarantee system, social dialogues that include rural and informal economies, and international cooperation. The ILO can strengthen social dialogue by balancing power relations between employers and workers and actively taking part in corporate social responsibility initiatives. Thus, the need for the ILO to build a universal framework for fair globalization is becoming increasingly important.


PDF View

References

  • Morse, D. A. (1969). The Origin and Evolution of the I.L.O. and Its Role in the World Community. New York: Ithaca. google scholar
  • OECD. (1996). Trade, Employment and Labour Standards: A Study of Core Workers’ Rights and International Trade. Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • O’Grady, J. (June 1994). Case2: Province of Ontario, Canada: Removing the Obstacles to Negotiated Adjustments. Sengenberger W., Campbell, D. (Ed.), Creating economic opportunities: The Role of Labour Standards in Industrial Restructuring (ss. 255-278). Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • Onida, F. (July 2008). Labour Standards and ILO’s Effectiveness in the Governance of Globalization (CESPRI Working Paper No. 218). Milano: CESPRI. google scholar
  • Perez, J. B. (2013). The International Labour Organization (ILO) as an Actor of Global Governance: Sufficiently Involved to Help Overcome the Latest Financial and Economic Crisis?, Yearbook on Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, Universidad de Deusto. ISSN: 1885 - 298X, 11/2013, Bilbao. 109-139. google scholar
  • Plata-Stenger V. (9 March 2016), Europe, the ILO and the Wider World (1919-1954), Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, http://ieg-ego.eu/en/threads/transnational-movementsand-organisations/international-organisations-and-congresses/veronique-platastenger-europe-the-ilo-and-the-wider-world-1919-1954. google scholar
  • Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston, L., Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and the Quest for Social Justice, 1919-2009. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • Telljohann, V., da Costa, I., Müller, T., Rehfeldt, U. (June 2009). European and International Framework Agreements: Practical Experiences and Strategic Approaches (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions EF/08/102). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. google scholar
  • The Global Voice of Business. (May 2015). Paper on International Labour Standards in the Contemporary Global Economy. London: The International Bar Association Global Employment Institute. Thompson, E. P. (1966). The making of the English working class. New York: Vintage Books. google scholar
  • United Nations. (6-12 March 1995). Report of the world summit for social development. New York: UN. google scholar
  • United Nations. (8 September 2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/52/2, Fifty-fifth Session, Agenda Item 60 (b). New York: UN. google scholar
  • United Nations (16 September 2005) 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/60/1, Sixtieth Session, Agenda Items 46 and 120. New York: UN. google scholar
  • United Nations. (24 October 2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, Sixtieth Session, A/RES/60/1. New York: UN. google scholar
  • United Nations. (2006). Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of Organization, Sixty-first Session, Supplement No.1, A/61/1. New York: UN. google scholar
  • United Nations, (15 January 2008), Official List of Millennium Development Goals Indicators, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Host. aspx?Content=Indicators/OfficialList.htm. google scholar
  • Vaughan-Whitehead, D., Vazquze-Alvarez, R. (2018). Curbing Inequalities in Europe: The Impact of Industrial Relations and Labour Policies. Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (Ed.), Reducing Inequalities in Europe: How Industrial Relations and Labour Policies Can Close the Gap (ss. 1-67). Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  • Viilup, E., Przetacznik, J. (January 2016). Briefing The International Labour Organisation and International Trade, European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies Policy Department, DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2016_33. Brussels: European Parliament. google scholar
  • World Bank. (1990). World Development Report. Washington DC: World Bank. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization. (February 2004). A fair globalization: Creating opportunities for all. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • World Trade Organization. (18 December 1996). Singapore WTO Ministerial 1996: Ministerial Declaration, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.wto.org/ english/thewto_e/minist_e/min96_e/wtodec_e.htm. World Trade Organization, World Trade Report 2013: Factors Shaping the Future of the World Trade. Geneva: WTO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2019c). World Employment Social Outlook: Trends 2019. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (21 June 2019). ILO Centenary Declaration For The Future of Work, Adopted by International Labour Conference at its One Hunderd Eighth Session. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO, World Health Organization. (November 2009). Social Protection Floor Initiative: The Sixth Initiative of the CEB on the Global Financial and Economic Crisis and Its Impact on the Work of the UN System, Manual and Strategic Framework for Joint UN Country Operations. Geneva: ILO, google scholar
  • WHO. International Monetary and Financial Committee. (October 14, 2017). IMFC Statement by Guy Ryder Director General International Labour Organization,Thirty-Sixth Meeting. Washington D.C.: IMF. International Trade Union Confederation. Constitution, Adopted at the Founding Congress, Vienne, November 2006, Amended by the Third Congress, Berlin, May 2014. Brussels: ITUC CSI IGB. google scholar
  • Jakovleski, V., Jerbi, S., Biersteker, T. (19 June 2019). The ILO’s Role in Global Governance: Limits and Potential. google scholar
  • Gironde, C., Garbonier, G. (Ed.), The ILO@100: Adressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection (ss. 82-108). Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishing. google scholar
  • Jansen, M., Lee, E. (2007). Trade and Employment: Challenges for Policy Research, A Joint Study of the Intrenational Labour Office and the Secretariat of the World Trade Organization. Geneva: World Trade Organization Secretariat. google scholar
  • Kaufman, B. E. (2010). The theoretical foundation of ındustrial relations and its ımplications for labour economics and human resource management. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 74-108. google scholar
  • Kott, S. (19 June 2019). ILO: Social Justice in a Global World? A History in Tension. google scholar
  • Gironde, C., Garbonier, G. (Ed.), The ILO@100: Adressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection (ss. 21-39). Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishing. google scholar
  • Kunanayakam, T. (2013). The Declaration on the Right to Development in the Context of United Nations Standard Setting. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (Ed.), Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development (ss. 17-48). New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications. google scholar
  • Langille, B. A. (2003-2004). Re-reading of the Preamble of the 1919 ILO Constitution in Light of Recent Data on FDI and Worker Rights. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42(1), 87-99. google scholar
  • Lee, E. (1998). The Asian Financial Crisis: The Challenge for Social Policy. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • Marshall S., Fenwick C. (2016). Labour Law and Development: Characteristics and Challenges. Marshall S., Fenwick C. (Ed.), Labour Regulation and Development: Socio-Legal Perspectives (ss. 1-32). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, ILO, Geneva, Switzerland: Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  • ILO. (01 December 1999). ILO Calls For New Multilateral Initiative to Address Social Implications of Globalization, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/ global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_007962/lang--en/index.htm. google scholar
  • ILO. (March 2000). Report of the Working Party on the Social Dimensions of the Liberalization of International Trade, ILO Governing Body, 277th Session, GB.277/16. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (November 2000). Framework for studies on integrated policies to achieve a wider sharing of the benefits of globalization, ILO Governing Body, 279th Session, GB.279/ WP/SDG/3. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (November 2001). Enhancing the action of the Working Party on the Social Dimension of Globalization: Next steps, ILO Governing Body, 282nd Session, GB.282/ WP/SDG/1. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2002). Decent Work and the Informal Economy, Report No VI, International Labour Conference 90th Session. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (12 February 2008), The ILO at a Glance, Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (10 June 2008). ILO Declaration on Social Justice For A Fair Globalization, Adopted by International Labour Conference at its Ninety-seventh Session. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2009). The Financial and Economic Crisis: A Decent Work Response. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (19 June 2009). Recovering from the Crisis: A Global Jobs Pact, Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its 98th Session. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2010). Review of the follow-up to the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, International Labour Conference 99th Session Seventh Item on the Agenda Report VII. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2012). Fundamental principles and rights at work: From commitment to action International Labour Conference 101st Session Sixth Item on Agenda Report VI. Geneva:ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2013). Report of the Director-General: Towards the ILO Centenary: Realities, renewal and tripartite commitment (Report 1(A), International Labour Conference, 102nd Session). Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2015). Report of the Director-General: The Future of Work Centenary Initiative (Report 1, International Labour Conference, 104th Session). Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2017). A Reflection on the Future of Work and Society. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (29-30 September 2017). The ILO Global Commission for the Future of Work: Paper Presented at the G7 Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting. Turin, Italy: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2019a). Global Commission on the Future of Work: Work for a Brighter Future. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2019b). Conventions and Recommendations, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/ conventions-and-recommendations/lang--en/index.htm. google scholar
  • Charnovitz, S. (2000). The International Labour Organization in its Second Century. Von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R. (Ed.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (ss. 147-184). Heidelberg: Max Planc Institute. google scholar
  • Coxson, C. R. (1999). The 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work: Promoting Labor Law Reforms Through the ILO as an Alternative to Imposing Coercive Trade Sanctions. Penn State International Law Review, 17(3), 469-504. google scholar
  • Delican, M. (2017). Uluslararasılaşma ve küreselleşme bağlamında karşılaştırmalı endüstri ilişkileri: gelişmeler ve teorik yaklaşımlar. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 72, 1-33. google scholar
  • Ebert, F. C., & Posthuma, A. (2011). Labour Provisions in trade arrangements: current trends and perspectives. (International Labour Organization International Institute for Labour Studies Disscussion Paper Series No. 205) Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • Global Deal. (2018). Building Trust in a Changing World of Work: The Global Deal for Decent Work and Inclusive Growth Flagship Report 2018. Geneva: ILO, Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • Gravel, E., Kohiyama T., & Tsotroudi K. (2014) A legal perspective on the role of ınternational labour standards in rebalancing globalization. Revue Interventions économiques, Papers in Political Economy, 49, 1-20. Hansenne, M. (1994). Promoting Social Justice in the new global economy. Monthly Labor Review, 3-4. google scholar
  • Igwe, I. O. C. (April 2018). History of the ınternational economy: the bretton woods system and its ımpact on the economic development of developing countries. Athens Journal of Law, 4(2), 105-126. google scholar
  • ILO. (1919), Constitution of the International Labour Organization, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:62:0::NO:62:P62_LIST_ ENTRIE_ID:2453907:NO google scholar
  • ILO. (10 May 1944), Declaration Concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organization (Declaration of Philadelphia). Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (1995). World Employment 1995: An ILO Report. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (1996). World Employment Report 1996/97: National Policies in a Global Context. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (June 1999). Report of the Director-General: Decent Work, International Labour Office 87th Session. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (18 June 1998). ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and Its Follow-Up: Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its Eighty-sixth Session. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (22 March 1999). Statement by Mr. Juan Somavia Director General of the International Labour Office Upon Taking his Oath of Office, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/dgo/speeches/somavia/1999/oath.htm. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Özgür Büyükdere, Ö. (2019). The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(77), 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015


AMA

Özgür Büyükdere Ö. The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2019;0(77):59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015


ABNT

Özgür Büyükdere, Ö. The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 77, p. 59-96, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Özgür Büyükdere, Özlem,. 2019. “The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 77: 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015


Chicago: Humanities Style

Özgür Büyükdere, Özlem,. The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 77 (May. 2024): 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015


Harvard: Australian Style

Özgür Büyükdere, Ö 2019, 'The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions', Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 77, pp. 59-96, viewed 20 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Özgür Büyükdere, Ö. (2019) ‘The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions’, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(77), pp. 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015 (20 May. 2024).


MLA

Özgür Büyükdere, Özlem,. The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 77, 2019, pp. 59-96. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015


Vancouver

Özgür Büyükdere Ö. The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions. Journal of Social Policy Conferences [Internet]. 20 May. 2024 [cited 20 May. 2024];0(77):59-96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015


ISNAD

Özgür Büyükdere, Özlem. The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0/77 (May. 2024): 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015



TIMELINE


Submitted15.10.2019
Accepted10.12.2019
Published Online31.12.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.