Journal of Social Policy Conferences

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018    Full Text (PDF)

Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work

Serpil Çiğdem

Working life has undergone a major change in recent years. With Industry 4.0, the impact of digital technologies on work is increasingly felt. In this context, ILO’s “Future of Work ” initiative, begun in October 2017, is an important study aimed at revealing these changes in work and working lives and the solutions needed. The Global Commission for the Future of Work, which met four times at the meeting held last November 2018, announced the content of the report on the future of work at the 108th International Labor Conference in 2019. In this context, one of the transformations in the business world has been the growth of digital labor platforms or the gig economy. The ILO has been working on work platforms since 2015, and the report Digital Labor Platforms and the Future of Work, published in October 2018, is one of the most important publications prepared to support the initiatives of the Global Commission for the Future of Work.


This study focuses on the rise of digital labor platforms and new forms of self-employment with a view to changing business organizations following the thematic discussions ILO has held on the future of work. At the same time, digital labor platforms were analyzed within the framework of employment, fundamental rights of working life, social protection and social dialogue which are the components of the decent work concept. At the end of the study, gig employees were found to work within one of the most problematic areas in terms of decent work. Although the Gig economy has seen significant growth in recent years, its impact on labor rights is largely underestimated. 

Keywords: Industry 4.0, Digital Labor Platforms, Gig Economy, Independent Contractors, Decent Work
DOI :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018    Full Text (PDF)

Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Serpil Çiğdem

Çalışma hayatı, son yıllarda büyük bir değişim sürecine girmiştir. Endüstri 4.0 ile birlikte dijital teknolojilerin çalışma hayatına etkisi giderek daha fazla hissedilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, ILO’nun Ekim 2017’de çalışmalarına başlattığı “işin geleceği” girişimi, iş ve çalışma yaşamındaki değişimi ve ihtiyaç duyulan çözümleri ortaya koymayı hedefleyen önemli çalışmalardan biridir. En son Kasım 2018’de gerçekleşen toplantıyla dört kez bir araya gelen İşin Geleceği Küresel Komisyonu, 2019’daki 108. Uluslararası Çalışma Konferansında işin geleceğine ilişkin raporun içeriğini açıklamıştır. Bu kapsamda iş dünyasında gerçekleşen dönüşümlerden biri dijital emek platformlarının ya da gig ekonomisinin giderek büyümesi olmuştur. 2015’ten bu yana dijital platformlar üzerine çalışmalar yapan ILO’nun Ekim 2018’de yayımladığı “Dijital Emek Platformları ve İşin Geleceği” adlı rapor, İşin Geleceği Küresel Komisyonu’nun girişimlerini desteklemek için hazırlanmış önemli çalışmalardan biridir.

Bu çalışma, ILO’nun işin geleceğine ilişkin gerçekleştirdiği tematik tartışmalardan değişen iş organizasyonları temelinde, dijital emek platformları ve yeni kendi hesabına çalışma biçimlerinin yükselişini konu edinmektedir. Aynı zamanda insana yakışır iş kavramının bileşenleri olan istihdam, çalışma yaşamına ilişkin temel haklar, sosyal koruma ve sosyal diyalog çerçevesinde dijital emek platformlarının analizi yapılmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda insana yakışır iş açısından en sorunlu alanlardan birinin gig çalışanlar olduğu görülmüştür. Gig ekonomisinde son yıllarda belirgin bir büyüme görülmesine rağmen emek hakları üzerindeki etkisi büyük ölçüde göz ardı edilmektedir. 

Keywords: Endüstri 4.0, Dijital Emek Platformları, Gig Ekonomisi, Bağımsız Yükleniciler, İnsana Yakışır İş

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In conclusion, based on the findings of the present study, it appears that political, demographic and economic factors are the predictors of the number of conventions ratified by member states. For future research, it is important to examine other possible factors affecting the number of conventions ratified. Thus further studies should focus on other variables, such as union density, social awareness and the role of trade unions in connection with the number of conventions ratified.

The four main drivers of Industry 4.0 are the Internet of Things (IoT), the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), Cloud based manufacturing and smart manufacturing which helps in transforming the manufacturing process into one which is both intelligent and fully digitized. The nine pillars of Industry 4.0 are: big data and analytics, autonomous robots, simulation, system integration - horizontal and vertical system integration, the industrial internet of things, cyber security, the cloud, additive manufacturing, and augmented reality. The fourth Industrial Revolution transforms the global economy and society in an unprecedented way. Within industry, fundamental changes in business models occur as new production, consumption and distribution methods change and new forms of work emerge. The digital economy is a recently-emerging phenomenon of increasing importance given the estimates of double-digit annual growth around the world. There is a growing intersection between work and digital technologies, and a diversity of business models relating to that intersection. As a result, a profusion of terminology has emerged. This include both web-based platforms, where work is outsourced through an open call to a geographically dispersed crowdwork and location-based applications (apps) which allocate work to individuals in a specific geographical area. The gig economy is not a new concept, but it has been on the rise with the fourth Industrial Revolution. The rise of the gig economy is an important development in both economy and labor relations. In each period, short term, temporary contracts were observed. But today, there is a significant increase in the number of studies on the gig economy. The gig economy has received enormous attention over the past few years. Since 2015, the ILO has been working on digital work platforms to understand the impact of new forms of work organization on workers and employment in general. 

The rise of digital labor platforms increases the importance of the gig economy by assisting in the elimination of imbalances in the labor market and supporting future jobs. Despite performing valuable work for many highly successful companies, compensation from crowdwork is often lower than minimum wages. Workers must manage unpredictable income streams, and they work without the standard labour protections of an employment relationship. These platforms can classify workers as self-employed or independet contractors. As a result, in the absence of the application of employment law protection - especially minimum wage and collective wage agreements - a client can obtain a service much cheaper than the one provided by a traditional organisation. Despite the potential of crowdwork platforms to provide employment opportunities, there are a number of concerns related to the workers’ unclear employment status, unfair treatment, low earnings, non-payment, lack of social protection, and lack of voice.

This study assesses the impact of digital technologies on the labor market on the basis of ILO’s future of work, in the context of decent work. There is a growing intersection between work and digital technologies, and various business models and forms of employment are emerging. Standard employment contracts and the employment relationship established with an employer have changed significantly. However, legal regulations on working life only partially cover non-standard employment. The long-term trends in non-standard labor regulations stem from the rise of digital labor platforms or the gig economy. Despite the ILO’s efforts to create decent jobs, the appearance of digital labor platforms within the framework of employment, fundamental rights of working life, social protection and social dialogue has been found to be problematic in terms of the concept of decent work.


PDF View

References

  • Aleksynska, M., Berg, J., Foden, D., Johnston, H., Parent-Thirion, A., & Vanderleyden, J. (2019). Working Conditions in a Global Perspective. ILO–Eurofound. Doi: 10.2806/870542 google scholar
  • Anker, R., Chernyshev, I., Egger, P., Mehran, F., & Ritter, J. (2002). Measuring Decent Work with Statistical Indicators (No. 2). Geneva. google scholar
  • Arkan, Ç. (2016). Thoughts on Global Workforce Transformation in the Industry 4.0 Era. https://news.microsoft.com/uploads/2017/02/Thoughts-on-global-workforcetransformation-in-the-Industry-4.0-era.pdf google scholar
  • Athanasou, J. A. (2010). Decent work and its ımplications for careers. Australian Journal of Career Development, 19(1), 36–44. Doi: 10.1177/103841621001900108 google scholar
  • Bauer, C, & Wee, D. (2015). Manufacturing’s Next Act. McKinsey & Company, https:// www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/manufacturings-nextact. Erişim Tarihi:25/08/2019 google scholar
  • Berg, J. (2016). Income Security in the On-Demand Economy: Findings and Policy Lessons from a Survey of Crowdworkers. Conditions of work and employment series no. 74 .International Labour Office.Geneva. google scholar
  • Berg, J. M., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U. & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital Labour Platforms and The Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/--dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_645337.pdf google scholar
  • Bergvall‐Kåreborn, B. & Howcroft D. (2014). Amazon mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(3), 213–223. google scholar
  • Boulin, J. Y., Lallement, M., Messenger, J. C., & Michon, F. (2006). Decent Working Time : New Trends, New İssues. Geneva. google scholar
  • Bowles, P., & MacPhail, F. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on pathways from casual work to economic security: Canadian and international perspectives. Social Indicators Research, 88, 1–13 google scholar
  • Brancati, C. U., & Fernández-Macías, E. (2019). Digital Labour Platforms in Europe : Numbers , Profiles and Employment Status of Platform Workers. Luxembourg. google scholar
  • Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2016). Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig-Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity. Papers.ssrn.com, 44. google scholar
  • Buschoff, K. S., & Schmidt, C. (2009). Adapting labour law and social security to the needs of the “New self-employed”– comparing the UK , Germany and the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(2), 147–159. Doi: 10.1177/0958928708101867 google scholar
  • Byrne, A., & Waters, R. (2015). New world of work: Digital marketplace reshapes casual labour. Financial Times, August 5. https://www.ft.com/content/6a23a27c-3500-11e5b05b-b01debd57852. Erişim Tarihi:08/11/2019. google scholar
  • Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. R. (2013). Classifying Work in the New Economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 575–596. google scholar
  • Castells, M. (2008) Enformasyon çağı: Ekonomi, toplum ve kültür. Ağ toplumunun yükselişi (1 cilt, 2. bs), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Clinton, M., Totterdell, P., & Wood, S. (2006). A grounded theory of portfolio working experiencing the smallest of small businesses. International Small Business Journal, 24(2), 179–203. Doi: 10.1177/0266242606061843. google scholar
  • Cohen, L., & Mallon, M. (1999). The transition from organisational employment to portfolio working: Perceptions of “Boundarylessness.” Work. Employment&Society, 13, 329–352. google scholar
  • Cherry, M. (2009). Working for (virtually) minimum wage: Applying the fair labor standards act in cyberspace. Alabama Law Review, 60(5), 1077–1110. google scholar
  • Dallı, C. M. (2013). Gereksiz İşler Olgusu Üzerine. http://www.birikimdergisi.com/guncelyazilar/918/gereksiz-isler-olgusu-uzerine#.W7DCumgzbIU Erişim Tarihi:02/08/2019. google scholar
  • De Groen, W. P., & Maselli, I. (2016). The Impact of the Collaborative Economy on the Labour Market, CEPS Special Report, N. 138. google scholar
  • De Groen, W., Maselli, I., & Fabo, B. (2016). The Digital Market for Local Services: A one-Night Stand for Workers? An Example from the On-demand Economy. An Example from the On-Demand Economy. CEPS Special Report, (133). google scholar
  • De Silva, L., Millett, A. W., Rotondi, D. M., Sullivan, W. F., Fischer, E., & Sillings, M. (2000). Independent Contractors: Prevalence and Implications for Unemployment Insurance Programs. Planmatics. google scholar
  • De Stefano, V. (2016). The Rise Of The « Just-İn-Time Workforce »: On-Demand Work , Crowdwork And Labour Protection İn The « Gig-Economy ». Geneva. google scholar
  • Ducharme, L. M., Arslanalp, S., Goksu, B., Kostroch, D., Carlos Moreno-Ramirez, J., Martins, M., & Jamasali, J. K. (2018). Measuring the digital economy. Washington: International Monetary Fund. google scholar
  • Durward, D., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Crowd work. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(4), 281–286. google scholar
  • Eberhard, B., Pérez Alonso, A., Radovica, E., Avotina L., Peiseniece L., Caamaño Sendon M., & Joan Solé-Pla. (2017. Smart work: The transformation of the labour market due to the fourth ındustrial revolution (I4.0). International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 10(3), 47–66. google scholar
  • Erdoğan, E. ve Çiğdem, S. (2018) Gig Ekonomisi ve Freelance İşgücünün Yükselişi: Freelancer. Com Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme. Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Seçme yazılar-II, 229. google scholar
  • Eurofound. (2015). New Forms of Employment Eurofound New Forms of Employment. European Foundation For The Improvement Of Living And Working Conditions. Dublin. google scholar
  • Fabo, B., Karanovic, J., & Dukova, K. (2017). In search of an adequate policy response to the platform economy. Transfer, 23(2), 163–175. google scholar
  • Farrell, L. (2006). Making Knowledge common: Literacy and knowledge at work. New York: Peter Lang. google scholar
  • Felstinerf, A. (2011). Working the crowd : Employment and labor law in the crowdsourcing ındustry. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 32(1), 143–204. Doi: 10.15779/Z38Z92X google scholar
  • Freelancers Union&Elance-oDesk . (2017). Freelancing in America: A National Survey of the New Workforce. google scholar
  • Frenken, K. (2016). Sustainability Perspectives on the Sharing Economy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23(Kasım), 1–2. google scholar
  • Friedman, G. C. (2014). Workers without employers : Shadow corporations and the rise of the Gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–88. Doi: 10.4337/ roke.2014.02.03 google scholar
  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M., (2013). The Future of Employment: Education, How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerization?, OxfordUniversity, http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/ downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 28/08/2019 google scholar
  • Fudge, J., Tucker, E., & Vosko, L. (2002). The Legal Concept of Employment: Marginalizing Workers. google scholar
  • Garben, S. (2017). Protecting Workers in the Online Platform Economy : An Overview of Regulatory and Policy Developments in the EU. Luxembourg. google scholar
  • Ghai, D. (2003). Decent work: Concept and indicators. International Labour Review, 142(2). google scholar
  • GMB (2019). A New Year Resolution For Uber, https://www.gmb.org.uk/long-read/newyear-resolution-uber. Erişim Tarihi:05/11/2019. google scholar
  • Green, D. D., Walker, C., Alabulththim, A., Smith, D., & Phillips, M. (2018). Fueling the gig economy: A case study evaluation of Upwork.com. Management and Economics Research Journal, 04(Nisan), 104. google scholar
  • Hatfield, I. (2015). Self-Employment in Europe. google scholar
  • Heeks, R. (2017). Digital Economy and Digital Labour Terminology: Making Sense of the “Gig Economy”, “Online Labour”, “Crowd Work”, “Microwork”, “Platform Labour”, Etc (No. Paper No. 70 Digital). google scholar
  • Heinrich, M. (2019). INDUSTRY 4 . 0 : How İt Will Affect Employment And What Skills Will Be Required to Match The Requirements of The Market. google scholar
  • Huws, U., Spencer, N. H., & Syrdal, D. S. (2017). Work in the European GIG Economy: Research results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy. google scholar
  • ILO (1999). Decent Work, International Labour Conferance 87th Session 1999, Report Of The Director General, Geneva. google scholar
  • ILO (2008). Measurement of Decent Work.eneva. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/ public/-dgreports/--integration/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_098027.pdf google scholar
  • ILO (2012). Decent Work Indicators-Concepts and Definitions, International Labour Organizations, First Edition, Genava google scholar
  • ILO. (2015a). World Employment Social Outlook: The Changing Nature of Jobs. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/--publ/documents/publication/wcms_368626.pdf google scholar
  • ILO. (2015b). Non-standard forms of employment. Geneva. google scholar
  • ILO. (2016). Non-Standard Employment Around The World:Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects. Genea. google scholar
  • ILO (2018) . Job Quality in the Platform Economy. 2nd Meeting of the Global Commission on the Future of Work.Geneva. google scholar
  • ILO. (2019). World Employment Social Outlook: Trends 2019. Geneva. google scholar
  • INTERNATIONAL FEREDARION of ROBOTICS (2016), World Robotics Report 2016, https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/world-robotics-report-2016 Erişim Tarihi: 05/11/2019. google scholar
  • IPSE. (2017). Exploring the Rise Of Self-Employment in the Modern Economy. London. google scholar
  • Işığıçok, Ö. (2005). XXI. yüzyılda istihdam ve insana yakışır İş. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi. google scholar
  • ITU. (2017). ICT Facts and Figures 2017. Geneva. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/ Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 02/08/2019. google scholar
  • Johnston, H., & Land-Kazlauskas, C. (2018). Organizing on-demand: Representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the Gig economy. International Labour Office, 94, 54. Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12235.90400 google scholar
  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 341–365. google scholar
  • Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in 2018: World’s Internet Users Pass the 4 Billion Mark. We are Social. google scholar
  • Kemp, S. (2019). Digital in 2019: Global Internet Use Accelerates. We are Social. google scholar
  • Kuhn, P. J., & Schuetze, H. J. (2001). Self-Employment dynamics and self-employment trends: A study of canadian men and women, 1982-1998. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’économique, 34(3), 760–784. google scholar
  • Kuhn K. M., & Maleki A. (2017). Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and ınstaserfs: understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 183–200. google scholar
  • Kuzgun, İ. (2004). Türkiye’de esnek istihdam biçimlerinin düzenlenmesi. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 17–31. google scholar
  • Lehdonvirta, V., Kässi, O., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2019). The global platform economy: A new offshoring ınstitution enabling emerging-economy microproviders. Journal of Management, 45(2), 567–599. google scholar
  • Moore, A. (2018). Gig ? Sharing ? The Changing Workplace And The New Self-Employed Economy, (May). https://reason.org/wp-. Erişim Tarihi: 3/10/2019. google scholar
  • Muntaner, C. (2018). Digital platforms, gig economy, precarious employment, and the invisible hand of social class. International Journal of Health Services, 48(4), 597– 600. Doi: 10.1177/0020731418801413 google scholar
  • OECD (2017). OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. Doi: 10.1787/9789264276284-en google scholar
  • Öztuna, B. (2017), “Endüstri 4.0: Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi ile Çalışma Yaşamının Geleceği”, Ankara, Gece Kitaplığı. google scholar
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Politicizing contingent work: Countering neoliberal labor market regulation...from the bottom up?, South Atlantic Quarterly 111(4), 741–761. google scholar
  • Pesole, A., Urzí Brancati, M. ., Fernández-Macías, E., Biagi, F., & González Vázquez, I. (2018). Platform Workers in Europe. EUR29275 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Doi: 10.2760/742789. google scholar
  • Pintaldi, F. (2008). Non-standard and Informal Employment in Italy. Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing, 1–5. http://www.wiego.org/sites/default/ files/publications/files/Pintaldi_Informal_empl_Italy.pdf google scholar
  • Rüßmann, M., & ark. (2015). Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity And Growth in Manufacturing Industries. Boston Consulting Group (BCG), pp.1-14. google scholar
  • Platman, K. (2004). “Portfolio careers” and the search for flexibility in later life. Work, Employment&Society, 18(3), 573–599. Doi: 10.1177/0950017004045551 google scholar
  • Ravenelle, A. J. (2017). Sharing economy workers: Selling, not sharing. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 281–295. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsw043 google scholar
  • Rogers, B. (2016). Employment rights in the platform economy : Getting back to basics. Harv. L. & Pol’y Rev., 10, 479. google scholar
  • Said, C. 2015. “Growing Voices Say Gig Workers Need Protections, Benefits”, SFGate, http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Growing-voices-say-gig- workers-needprotections-6079992.php (02/05/2018). google scholar
  • Santos, B. P., Charrua-Santos, F. ve Lima, T. M. (2018). Industry 4.0: An overview. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2236(July), 1–7. google scholar
  • Schmidt, F. A. (2017). Digital Labour Markets in the Platform Economy. Mapping the Political Challenges of Crowd Work and Gig Work. Freidrich Ebert Stiftung. google scholar
  • Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum. google scholar
  • Siberman, M. S. ve Harmon, E. (2017). Rating Working Conditions in Digital Labor Platforms. Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - Exploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies. http://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2017-to-be-added google scholar
  • Smith, R.ve Leberstein, S. 2015. Rights on Demand: Ensuring Workplace Standards and Worker Security in the On-Demand Economy. National Employment Law Project. New York. google scholar
  • Stefano, V. D. E. (2016). The Rise of The « Just-in-Time Workforce »: On-Demand Work , Crowdwork And Labour Protection in the « Gig-Economy ». Geneva. google scholar
  • Taeihagh, A. (2017). Crowdsourcing, sharing economies and development. Journal of Developing Societies, 33(2), 191–222. Doi: 10.1177/0169796X17710072 google scholar
  • Tucker, D. (2002). “Precarious” Non-Standard Employment – A Review of the Literature . Wellington. www.lmpg.dol.govt.nz google scholar
  • Upwork&Freelancers Union. (2017). Freelancing in America: 2017. google scholar
  • Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0 – A Glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20(1), 233–238. google scholar
  • Von Broembsen, M. (2012). People want to work, yet most have to labour: Towards decent work in South African supply chains. Law, Democracy & Development, 16(1), 1–28. google scholar
  • Vuksanović, D., Ugarak, J., & Korčok, D. (2016). Industry 4.0: The future concepts and new visions of factory of the future development, 293–298. Doi: 10.15308/ sinteza-2016-293-298 google scholar
  • World Bank. (2006). Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs. Washington DC. https:// openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7421. Erişim Tarihi: 02/09/2019. google scholar
  • World Bank. (2015). Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing. http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24702763/global-opportunity-online-outsourcing google scholar
  • World Economic Forum. (2016). The Future of Jobs - Reports - World Economic Forum. Research Report, (January), 12. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/thefuture-of-jobs-report-2018 google scholar
  • World Economic Forum. (2018). The Future of Jobs 2018. Executive Summary. google scholar
  • Youssra, R., & Sara, R. (2018). Big data and big data analytics: Concepts, types and technologies. Int J Res Eng, 5(9), 524–528. google scholar
  • http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ik-yeni-ekonomi/sirketler-z-kusagi-kapinizda-29575932 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Çiğdem, S. (2019). Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(77), 157-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018


AMA

Çiğdem S. Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2019;0(77):157-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018


ABNT

Çiğdem, S. Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 77, p. 157-199, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çiğdem, Serpil,. 2019. “Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 77: 157-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çiğdem, Serpil,. “Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 77 (May. 2024): 157-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018


Harvard: Australian Style

Çiğdem, S 2019, 'Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work', Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 77, pp. 157-199, viewed 20 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çiğdem, S. (2019) ‘Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work’, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(77), pp. 157-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018 (20 May. 2024).


MLA

Çiğdem, Serpil,. “Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 77, 2019, pp. 157-199. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018


Vancouver

Çiğdem S. Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work. Journal of Social Policy Conferences [Internet]. 20 May. 2024 [cited 20 May. 2024];0(77):157-199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018


ISNAD

Çiğdem, Serpil. “Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0/77 (May. 2024): 157-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018



TIMELINE


Submitted10.09.2019
Accepted13.11.2019
Published Online31.12.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.