Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012    Full Text (PDF)

International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation

Volkan Hacıoğlu

The economic integration that has gained acceleration with globalization and information technologies changed the definition, structure and boundaries of international markets. Increasing intersectoral collaboration in industrial organization has caused the fulfilment of innovation based reforms in the hierarchical structure of multilateral organizations against new demands and social needs. The International Labour Organization (ILO), which has a general authority and reputation in the global economic system and strategic competition environment of Industry 4.0 era, also initiated a large scale structural reform movement in its objectives and normative functions with the Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization singed in Genova on June 10, 2008 for the first time after the Philadelphia Declaration on May 10, 1944, and Second World War. In this article, we analytically evaluate the innovation based reform plan of ILO and redefine its function in the framework of the theory of organization. The two models of organizational innovation are examined in order to construct the comprehensive and complete theoretical infrastructure of ILO information systems to integrate the Organizational Innovation Function, formulated by us onto that of Organizational Innovation System. In our work, as a result, we show that the raison d’être of ILO has broadened and developed by gaining global dynamism to comprehend, not only the tripartism of governmentemployer-employee, but also innovation based entrepreneurial functions. 

DOI :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012    Full Text (PDF)

Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü ve Enformasyon Sistemleri İnovasyonu

Volkan Hacıoğlu

Küreselleşme ve enformasyon teknolojileri ile hız kazanan iktisadî entegrasyon uluslararası piyasaların tanımını, yapısını ve sınırlarını değiştirmiştir. Endüstriyel organizasyonda sektörlerarası işbirliğinin artması, yeni talepler ve yeni toplumsal ihtiyaçlar karşısında çok uluslu örgütlerin hiyerarşik yapılanmalarında inovasyon temelli reformların gerçekleşmesine neden olmuştur. Endüstri 4.0 çağındaki küresel iktisadî sistemde ve stratejik rekabet ortamında genel bir otorite ve itibar sahibi olan Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü de 10 Haziran 2008 tarihinde Cenova’da gerçekleştirilen Uluslararası İşgücü Konferansı’nda imzalanan Adil Küreselleşme İçin Sosyal Adalet Deklarasyonu ile İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan ve 10 Mayıs 1944 tarihli Philadelphia Deklarasyonu’ndan bu yana hedeflerinde ve normatif fonksiyonlarında ilk defa geniş çaplı bir yapısal reform hareketi başlatmıştır. Bu makalede, Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü’nün inovasyon temelli reform planı analitik olarak değerlendirilmekte ve örgüt teorisi çerçevesi içinde fonksiyonları yeniden tanımlanmaktadır. Literatürde ilk defa tarafımızdan formüle edilen Örgütsel İnovasyon Fonksiyonu’nu Örgütsel İnovasyon Sistemi’ne entegre etmek suretiyle Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü enformasyon sistemlerinin kapsamlı ve bütünlüklü bir teorik altyapısını kurmak amacıyla iki temel örgütsel inovasyon modeli incelenmektedir. Çalışmamızda, sonuç olarak, 21. yüzyılda Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü’nün varlık nedeninin (raison d’être) işçi-işveren-hükümet üçlü yapısının yanısıra inovasyon temelli girişimcilik fonksiyonlarını da kapsayacak şekilde küresel dinamizm kazanarak genişlemiş ve gelişmiş olduğu ortaya konulmaktadır. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The definition in comparison to scope and scale of market structure changes and broadens beyond the traditional conception of the neoclassical economic theory in an era of globalization. The extent of the market for goods and services integrates with digital economies and networks all around the world. Rapidly developing technology, together with ever changing economic and social structure, cause new trends to occur and continue unprecedentedly in the 21th century. In line with the global and technological transformation of market structures and functions, the strategic significance of information is also increased within the decision making process of employees and employers, entrepreneurs and other economic agents. In today’s business world, innovation based production projects of innovative entrepreneurs are particularly effective and decisive on the formation of expectations and demand dynamics.

In order to establish an equilibrium state for demand and supply of labour at the full employment level, the amount and cost of information in labour markets must be at an optimum level. In this sense, the foundation of the micro infrastructures of macroeconomic equilibrium state of the economy requires technology based innovation of information systems. The flow of information disseminates through the economy via economic institutions and organizations. Besides, networks beyond markets play an important part of the information transmission mechanism. The information systems innovation within the general structure of organizations in the economy minimizes Keynesian coordination failures, and thereby accelerates the restoration of equilibrium after a randomly external and fully anticipated economic shock which is a sole source of informational frictions.

In accordance with the general definition of the International Labour Organization (ILO), labour market information comprises of all kinds of knowledge related with the structure and extent of the labour market. The structure and extend of the market, together with supply and demand, also relate to the social structure. The industry 4.0 formed by phenomenological new concepts such as internet of things, big data, digital technologies, virtual currencies, artificial intelligence and innovation, rendered it difficult to understand and define the continuously developing and broadening borders of networks beyond markets. The strategic decision making and learning processes, which are embedded in expectations models of economic agents, are getting more complex by cumulatively growing global integrations. The information systems that are decisive in qualified and unqualified employees’ search for work in the labour market also lead to changes in the formation of the division of labour. The classical proposition which asserts that the division of labour is limited with the extent of the market, now opens and paves new ways of philosophical interpretations and scientific intuitions by the introduction of information technologies.

Motivated by the characteristic conditions of an innovative paradigm shift, global socioeconomic transformation of societies and modus operandi of the business world, this article analytically, theoretically and practically examines the innovation based structural reforms and novelties in information systems infrastructure of ILO under a new construction of economic systems in a changing world. The plan of the article is as follows. The introductory first part depicts fundamental elements and background of the work in the context of adaptation and integration processes of global economies to large scale technological changes in the world. The second part is devoted to a comprehensive literary review and to the theoretical apprehension for organizational integration of information systems innovation in a conceptual framework.

The third part deals with the theory of functional and strategic information systems innovation. Different types of information systems innovations are defined according to particular organizational innovation models in the literature, and then information systems of innovation are set into a structural context of innovation ecosystems per se comprised of complex international systems of innovation. The fourth part is appropriated for innovation based structural reforms of ILO. These reforms fall under three chief functional categories, and each category signifies a particular portfolio in the hierarchical structure of the ILO headquarters. These three portfolios are the policy portfolio, management and reform portfolios, and field operations and partnership portfolios. Information systems of each portfolio are also examined in separate sections of the fifth part. The sixth part concludes with a general discussion and appreciation of the subject matter. Functional and strategic effects of structural reforms in the very constitution of the ILO indicate successful fulfilments of its chief aims. As a result, Keynesian coordination problems in global markets are also alleviated by the use of information technologies in the organizational infrastructure.


PDF View

References

  • Allen, b. (1982). some stochastic processes of interdependent demand and technological diffusion of an innovation exhibiting externalities among adopters. International Economic Review, 23(3), 595–608. google scholar
  • Becker, S. W., & Whisler, T. L. (1967). The innovative organization: A selective view of current theory and research. Journal of Business, 40, 462-469. google scholar
  • Buitendam, A., & Pennings, J. M. (Ed.). (1987). New Technology as Organizational Innovation: The Development and Diffusion of Microelectronics. Ballinger Publishing Company. google scholar
  • Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 51, 107–108. google scholar
  • Child, J. (1987). Information technology, organization, and the response to strategic challenges. California Management Review, 30(1), 33–50. google scholar
  • Council on Competitiveness. (2004). 21st Century Innovation Working Group. Innovation, The New Reality for National Prosperity, Council on Competitiveness, Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193–210. google scholar
  • Daft, R. L. (1982). Bureaucratic versus nonbureaucratic structure and the process of innovation and change. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1(1), 129–166. google scholar
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–591. google scholar
  • Gordon, J. R., & Gordon, S. R. (1999). Information Systems: A Management Approach. America: Dryden Press. google scholar
  • Watanabe, C., & Fukuda, K. (2005). National Innovation Ecosystems: The Similarity and Disparity of Japan-US Technology Policy Systems toward a Service-Oriented Economy. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. google scholar
  • ILO. (2008). The Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (2013). Reform of the International Labour Organization’s Headquarters Organizational Structure, ILO. google scholar
  • ILO. (10 Haziran 2019). Policy Portfolio Information Systems, Erişim Tarihi: 10 Haziran 2019, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/isinventory/inventsheet.list?p_ searchkey=20190821171531&p_lang=en. google scholar
  • ILO. (5 Temmuz 2019). Management and Reform Portfolio Information Systems, Erişim Tarihi: 5 Temmuz 2019, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/isinventory/inventsheet.list?p_ searchkey=20190821172240&p_lang=en google scholar
  • ILO. (15 Ağustos 2019). Field Operations and Partnerships Portfolio Information Systems, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ağustos 2019, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/isinventory/ inventsheet.list?p_searchkey=20190821172557&p_lang=en google scholar
  • ILO. (20 Ağustos 2019). ILO Information Systems, Erişim Tarihi: 20 Ağustos 2019, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/isinventory/inventsheet.search. google scholar
  • Jalonen, H. (2012). The uncertainty of innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 1. google scholar
  • Krugman, P. (1979). A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), 253–266. google scholar
  • Lawrence, P. R., & J. W. Lorsch. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and ıntegration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Maupain, F. (2009). New foundation or new façade? The ilo and the 2008 declaration on social justice for a fair globalization. European Journal of International Law, 20(3), 823–852. google scholar
  • O’Connor, G. C. (2012). Innovation: From process to function. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3), 361–363. google scholar
  • Porter, M. E. (1988). Information Hierarchies. Symposium on Increasing Business Competitiveness Through Management Information Systems, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA. google scholar
  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Difusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press. Sorensen, O., & L. Fleming. (2004). Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy, 33, 1615–34. google scholar
  • Stigler, G. J. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185–193. google scholar
  • Swanson, E. B. (1994). Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Science, 40(9), 1069–1092. google scholar
  • Tornatzky, L., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technology innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. google scholar
  • Vagnani, G., Gatti, C., & Proietti, L. (2019). A conceptual framework of the adoption of innovations in organizations: A meta-analytical review of the literature. Journal of Management and Governance, 1–40. google scholar
  • Weigel, F. K., Hazen, B. T., Cegielski, C. G., & Hall, D. J. (2014). Difusion of innovations and the theory of planned behavior in information systems research: A meta-analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 31–43. google scholar
  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Hacıoğlu, V. (2019). International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(77), 97-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012


AMA

Hacıoğlu V. International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2019;0(77):97-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012


ABNT

Hacıoğlu, V. International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 77, p. 97-130, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Hacıoğlu, Volkan,. 2019. “International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 77: 97-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012


Chicago: Humanities Style

Hacıoğlu, Volkan,. International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 77 (May. 2024): 97-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012


Harvard: Australian Style

Hacıoğlu, V 2019, 'International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation', Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 77, pp. 97-130, viewed 20 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Hacıoğlu, V. (2019) ‘International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation’, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(77), pp. 97-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012 (20 May. 2024).


MLA

Hacıoğlu, Volkan,. International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 77, 2019, pp. 97-130. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012


Vancouver

Hacıoğlu V. International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation. Journal of Social Policy Conferences [Internet]. 20 May. 2024 [cited 20 May. 2024];0(77):97-130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012


ISNAD

Hacıoğlu, Volkan. International Labour Organization and Information Systems Innovation”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0/77 (May. 2024): 97-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0012



TIMELINE


Submitted02.08.2019
Accepted21.11.2019
Published Online31.12.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.