Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958   IUP :10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958    Full Text (PDF)

Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach

Önder İnceBetül ÇetinerFatih Ecer

Logistics is a sector contributing substantially to the economic and social development of a country. Countries benefit from the logistics performance index (LPI) published periodically by the World Bank to evaluate their logistics performance, identify weaknesses, and develop accordingly. The following six essential criteria are used to assess the countries’ logistics performance: customs, infrastructure, international shipments, logistics quality and competence, monitoring and tracking, and timeliness. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the logistics performance of G20 countries before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) period. For this purpose, an integrated model based on the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) and the combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS), which are multi-criteria decision-making methods, was exploited. First, criterion weights were determined using the MEREC method. Second, the logistics performances of G20 countries were analyzed and compared using the CODAS method with respect to data from both before and during COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis results identified monitoring and tracing, customs clearance, international shipments, infrastructure, logistics quality, and adequacy and timing as the criteria weights during the pre-pandemic period and monitoring and tracing, international shipments, logistics quality and competence, customs, infrastructure, and timeliness during the pandemic period. Based on the CODAS method, the top five countries in the pre-pandemic period in the logistics performance ranking of the G20 countries were Germany, Japan, the UK, the United States of America, and France, respectively, and the top five countries in the ranking during the pandemic period were Germany, Canada, Japan, Spain, and France, respectively. In addition, to test the reliability and robustness of the model exploited, sensitivity and comparison analyses were performed. The results revealed that the pandemic affected the logistics performance of many countries. 

DOI :10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958   IUP :10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958    Full Text (PDF)

G20 Ülkelerinin COVID-19 Öncesi ve COVID-19 Dönemi Lojistik Performanslarının Kıyaslanması: MEREC ve CODAS Entegre Yaklaşımı

Önder İnceBetül ÇetinerFatih Ecer

Lojistik, ülkelerin ekonomik ve sosyal gelişiminde önemli paya sahip sektörlerden biridir. Ülkeler lojistik performanslarını değerlendirmek, zayıf yönleri tespit etmek ve bu doğrultuda gelişim göstermek adına Dünya Bankası’nın belirli periyodlarla yayınladığı lojistik performans indeksinden (LPI) faydalanmaktadırlar. Ülkelere ait lojistik performans düzeyinin değerlendirilmesinde gümrük, altyapı, uluslararası gönderiler, lojistik kalite ve yeterliliği, izleme ve takip ile zamanlama olarak altı temel kriter kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, COVID-19 dönemi öncesinde ve COVID-19 döneminde G20 ülkelerinin lojistik performanslarını değerlendirmektir. Bu amaçla çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden MEREC (Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) ve CODAS (Combinative Distance-based Assessment) temelli entegre bir model kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada pandemi öncesi ve pandemi dönemi verileri ışığında öncelikle MEREC yöntemi ile kriter ağırlıkları tespit edilmiş ve sonrasında CODAS yöntemi ile G20 ülkelerinin lojistik performansları analiz edilerek kıyaslama yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda pandemi öncesi dönemde kriter ağırlıkları sırasıyla; izleme ve takip, gümrükleme, uluslararası gönderiler, altyapı, lojistik kalitesi ve yeterliliği ile zamanlama olarak tespit edilmiştir. Pandemi sürecinde ise kriter ağırlıkları sırasıyla; izleme ve takip, uluslararası gönderiler, lojistik kalitesi ve yeterliliği, gümrükleme, altyapı, zamanlama olarak bulunmuştur. CODAS yöntemine göre G20 ülkelerinin lojistik performans sıralamasında pandemi öncesi dönemde yer alan ilk beş ülke sırasıyla Almanya, Japonya, İngiltere, Amerika ve Fransa iken pandemi sürecinde sıralamadaki ilk beş ülke sırasıyla Almanya, Kanada, Japonya, İspanya ve Fransa olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, kullanılan modelin güvenilirliğini ve sağlamlığını test etmek için duyarlılık ve karşılaştırma analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, pandeminin birçok ülkenin lojistik performansını etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In recent years, increased globalization and competition have increased the importance of logistics. The resulting increase in the logistics-based competition has created a need for a logistics performance assessment system. Many scales have been used for logistics performance assessment. While a company’s logistics performance at the micro level can be analyzed using various scales, the logistics performance of a country or region can be measured at the macro level. The logistics performance index (LPI) is an index widely used in macro-level assessments.

Countries need to monitor their development in the logistics sector, notice the obstacles, and make development plans in this context. The LPI published by the World Bank once in 2 years is effective in determining countries’ current situation and their progress steps and is frequently used in research. Existing literature shows that the LPI data have been analyzed several times using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods (Rezaei et al., 2018; Ulutaş and Karaköy, 2019; Altıntaş, 2021; Stojanović and Puška, 2021). In this study, the 2023 LPI dataset, which is the latest and hitherto unutilized dataset in any study, has been evaluated using the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) and the combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) methods of G20 countries with strong economies. In 2018, an evaluation covering approximately 160 countries was conducted by logistics experts. The 2023 LPI data includes 4,090 assessments made by logistics experts from 139 countries between September 6 and November 5, 2022 (https://lpi.worldbank.org/). Accordingly, the index reports reflect the time elapsed from the previous report to the latest report.

Because the MEREC method is a fairly new and powerful objective-weighting method introduced in 2021 and the CODAS method emerged by combining two ranking methods, i.e., weighted product method and simple additive weighting, which are both advantageous and powerful, the CODAS method was preferred because it incorporates these aspects (Ghorabaee et al., 2016; Ghorabaee et al. 2021). In the study, six logistics performance criteria determined by the World Bank, namely, customs (K1), infrastructure (K2), international shipments (K3), logistics quality and competence (K4), monitoring and tracking (K5), and timeliness (K6), were determined by the MEREC method. The weights of the G20 countries were determined, and the performance evaluations and rankings of the G20 countries were conducted using the weights obtained in this direction. This study aimed to present a new methodological approach based on the MCDM to compare and evaluate the logistics performance of G20 countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using the World Bank data. 

For this purpose, the MEREC–CODAS model was used. First, the weighting of these six criteria that form the basis of the LPI for two separate periods was made using the MEREC method, and the performance ranking of countries was carried out with the CODAS method. Consequently, the priority order of the criteria was monitoring and tracking, customs, international shipments, infrastructure, logistics quality and competence, and timeliness before the pandemic and monitoring and tracking, international shipments, logistics quality and adequacy, customs, infrastructure, and timeliness during the pandemic period. While monitoring and follow-up were in the first place in both periods, the quality and adequacy of logistics became crucial factors during the pandemic period. The top five countries in terms of performance before the pandemic were Germany, Japan, the UK, the United States of America, and France, respectively, while the top five countries during the pandemic were Germany, Canada, Japan, Spain, and France, respectively. The last five countries before the pandemic were Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Argentina, and Russia, whereas those during the pandemic were Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Argentina, and Russia, respectively. Thus, differences in the logistics performance rankings of some countries are determined over the years.


PDF View

References

  • Akben, İ. ve Çelebi, F. A. (2022). “COVID-19 Pandemi Döneminde E-Ticaret ve E-Lojistik: Giyim Sektörü İnternet Sayfaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 32-54. google scholar
  • Akçacı, T. ve Çınaroğu, M. S. (2020). “Yeni Koronavirüs (COVID-19) Salgınının Lojistik ve Ticarete Etkisi”. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 19 (COVID-19 Special Issue), 447- 456. google scholar
  • Altıntaş, F. F. (2021). “Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının CRITIC Tabanlı WASPAS ve COPRAS Teknikleri ile Analizi”. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25 (1), 117-146. google scholar
  • Arvis, J.-F., Mustra, M. A., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., & Saslavsky, D. (2010). “Connecting to Compete 2010: The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators”. World Bank, 14-23. google scholar
  • Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., Karlygash, D. & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to Compete 2018 Trade Logistics in the Global Economy the Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington. google scholar
  • Aydıner, E. & Şener, H. Y. (2021). “Bir İşletmenin Lojistik Hizmet Sağlayıcılarının Farklı Kıtalar ve Pandeminin Etkisi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 53-73. google scholar
  • Ayyıldız, S. & Yalçın, S. (2018). “Türkiye’de Yer Alan Lojistik Dostu Şehirlerin Bütünleşik ENTROPİ-CODAS Kullanılarak Belirlenmesi”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(4), 127-140. google scholar
  • Baghersad, M., Zobel C.W., (2021). “Assessing the Extended Impacts of Supply Chain Disruptions on Firms: An Empirical Study”. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 231. google scholar
  • Başar, S. İ., & Bozma, G. (2017). “Ülkelerin Lojistik Performanslarının Belirleyicileri”. Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (20), 447-458. google scholar
  • Bozkurt, C. & Mermertaş, F. (2019). “Türkiye ve G8 Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performans İndeksine Göre Karşılaştırılması”. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 107-117. google scholar
  • Çınaroğlu, E. (2021). “CRITIC Temelli MARCOS Yöntemi ile Yenilikçi ve Girişimci Üniversite Analizi”. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management - JEIM. Cilt 10, Sayı 1, 111-133. google scholar
  • De Souza, Robert, Mark Goh, Sumeet Gupta, & Luo Lei (2007). “An Investigation Into the Measures Affecting the Integration of ASEAN’s Priority Sectors”. Regional Economic Policy Support Facility, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Manila. google scholar
  • Demir, G. (2021). Türk bankacılık sisteminin finansal performansının ROC-ITARA-CODAS yöntemleriyle analizi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(3), 831-847. google scholar
  • Ece, N. J. (2020). “COVID-19 Salgınının Konteyner Taşımacılığı ve Limanlarına Etkisi”. Mersin Üniversitesi Denizcilik ve Lojistik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 47-66. google scholar
  • Ecer, F. (2020). “Çok Kriterli Karar Verme”. Seçkin Yayıncılık: Ankara. google scholar
  • Ecer, F. (2021). A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110916. google scholar
  • Ecer, F. (2022). An extended MAIRCA method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for coronavirus vaccine selection in the age of COVID-19. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(7), 5603-5623. google scholar
  • Ecer, F., & Aycin, E. (2023). “Novel Comprehensive MEREC Weighting-Based Score Aggregation Model for Measuring Innovation Performance: The Case of G7 Countries”. Informatica, 34(1), 53-83. google scholar
  • Ecer, F., & Zolfani, S. H. (2022). Evaluating economic freedom via a multi-criteria MEREC-DNMA model-based composite system: Case of OPEC countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(4), 1158-1181. google scholar
  • Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., Mardani, A., & Alrasheedi, M. (2021). “Assessment of Renewable Energy Resources Using New Interval Rough Number Extension of the Level Based Weight Assessment and Combinative Distance-Based Assessment”. Renewable Energy, 170, 1156-1177. google scholar
  • Erdaş, Y., & Ecer, F. (2022). Covid-19 salgınında sanal alışveriş platformlarının performanslarının ölçülmesi: AHP-MAIRCA modeli. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(34), 619-641. google scholar
  • Erkan, B. (2014). “Türkiye’de Lojistik Sektörü ve Rekabet Gücü”. Assam Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, 1(1), 44-65. google scholar
  • Fırat, S. (2023). “Küresel Krizlerin Türk Lojistik Sektörüne Etkileri: 2008 Küresel Finansal Krizi ve COVID-19 Sağlık Krizi”. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 89-102. google scholar
  • Genç, E. ve Kaya, E. (2021). “COVID-19 Pandemi Sürecindeki Gümrük Mevzuatı Değişikliklerinin Lojistik Faaliyetlerine ve Çalışanların İş Motivasyonuna Etkisi”. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD), 8(1), 161-175. google scholar
  • Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). “Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC)”. Symmetry, 13(4), 525. google scholar
  • Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2016). “A New Combinative DistanceBased Assessment (CODAS) Method For Multi-Criteria Decision Making”. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 3(50), 25-44. google scholar
  • Guner, S., & Coskun, E. (2012). Comparison of impacts of economic and social factors on countries’ logistics performances: a study with 26 OECD countries. Research in logistics & production, 2(4), 330-343. google scholar
  • Harun, A., Wahab, N. A., & Shamsudin, M. N. (2018). “Measuring Logistics Performance in ASEAN Countries Using LPI”. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(2), 304-309. google scholar
  • Hezam, I. M., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Cavallaro, F., Saha, A., Ali, J. & StreimikienE, D. (2022). “A Hybrid Intuitionistic Fuzzy-MEREC-RS-DNMA Method for Assessing the Alternative Fuel Vehicles With Sustainability Perspectives”. Sustainability, 14(9), 5463. google scholar
  • Ho, S., Xing, W., Wu, W., & Lee, C. C. (2021). “The Impact of COVID-19 On Freight Transport: Evidence from China”. MethodsX, 8, 101200. google scholar
  • Ivanov, D., (2020). “Predicting the Impacts of Epidemic Outbreaks on Global Supply Chains: A Simulation-Based Analysis on the Coronavirus Outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) Case”. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev. 136, google scholar
  • Jhawar, A., Garg, S.K. & Khera, S.N. (2014). “Analysis of the Skilled Work Force Effect on the Logistics Performance Index—Case Study From India”. Logist. Res. 7, 117. google scholar
  • Kamaruddin, N. H., Yahaya, N., Abdullah, S., & Ghani, N. F. A. (2019). “Sustainable Logistics Performance Index Model for Small and Medium Enterprises”. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(2), 13-21. google scholar
  • Kunz, N. & Reiner, G. (2012). “A Meta-Analysis of Humanitarian Logistics Research”. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 116-147. google scholar
  • Kwon, O.K., (2020). “How is the COVID-19 Pandemic Affecting Global Supply Chains, Logistics, and Transportation?” J. Int. Logistics Trade 18 (3), 107-111. google scholar
  • Lei, F., Wei, G., & Chen, X. (2021). “Model-Based Evaluation For Online Shopping Platform With Probabilistic Double Hierarchy Linguistic CODAS Method”. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(9), 5339-5358. google scholar
  • Lin, C., & Ho, Y. (2016). “The impact of Logistics Performance Index (LPI) on Supply Chain Performance”. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(3), 683-700.Logistic Performance Index (LPI). https://lpi.worldbank.org/ (Erişim tarihi: 1 Haziran 2023). google scholar
  • Martı, L., R. Puertas, & L. Garcia. 2014. “The Importance of the Logistics Performance Index in International Trade”. Applied Economics 46 (24): 2982-2992. google scholar
  • McKibbin, W. J., & R. Fernando. 2020. “The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios.” SSRN Electronic Journal. 3547729. google scholar
  • Mesic, A., Miskic, S., Stevic, Z., & Mastilo, Z. (2022). “Hybrid MCDM Solutions for Evaluation of the Logistics Performance Index of the Western Balkan Countries”. ECONOMICS-Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 10(1). google scholar
  • Miskic S, Stevic Z., Tadic S., Alkhayyat A. and Krstic M. (2023). “Assessment of the LPI of the EU Countries Using MCDM Model With an Emphasis on the Importance of Criteria”. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research. Vol. 11, No. 3. google scholar
  • Moon, H. C., Lee, S. Y., & Park, D. (2017). “The Impact of Logistics Performance on Economic Growth”. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(1), 23-28. google scholar
  • Oğuz, S., Alkan, G. & Yılmaz, B. (2019). “Seçilmiş Asya Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının TOPSİS Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi”. Ibad Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Özel Sayı, 497-507. google scholar
  • Özdağoğlu, A., Ulutaş, A., & Keleş, M. K. (2022). “Lojistik Değerlendirme Ölçütlerine Göre Ülke Sıralamaları: Farklı Yöntemlerin Sıralama Üzerindeki Etkisi”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 512-541. google scholar
  • Pala, O. (2023). “MEREC-Corr ve Saw Temelli Lojistik Performans Değerlendirme”. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(25), 117-135. google scholar
  • Rezaei, J., van Roekel, W. S., & Tavasszy, L. (2018). “Measuring the Relative Importance of the Logistics Performance Index Indicators Using Best Worst Method”. Transport Policy, 68, 158-169. google scholar
  • Rezapour, S. (2017). “A Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Measuring Green Logistics Performance Using LPI”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 940-951. google scholar
  • Shanmugasundar, G. Sapkota, G. Cep, R. Kalita, K. (2022). “Application of MEREC in Multi-Criteria Selection of Optimal Spray-Painting Robot”. Processes, 10, 1172. google scholar
  • Singh, S., Kumar, R., Panchal, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2021). “Impact of COVID-19 on Logistics Systems and Disruptions in Food Supply Chain”. International Journal of Production Research, 59(7), 1993-2008. google scholar
  • Stojanovic, I. & Puska, A. (2021). “Logistics Performances of Gulf Cooperation Council’s Countries in Global Supply Chains”. Decis. Mak. 4(1),174-193. google scholar
  • Subramanya, K., & Kermanshachi, S. (2021). “Impact of COVID-19 On Transportation Industry: Comparative Analysis of Road, Air, and Rail Transportation Modes”. International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021. google scholar
  • Tanrıkulu, A. B. ve Odabaş, M. S. (2021). “COVID-19 Pandemisinin Lojistik Sistemler Üzerine Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(4), 214-216. google scholar
  • Tanrıverdi, G., Ecer, F., & Durak, M. Ş. (2022). Exploring factors affecting airport selection during the COVID-19 pandemic from air cargo carriers’ perspective through the triangular fuzzy Dombi-Bonferroni BWM methodology. Journal of Air Transport Management, 105, 102302. google scholar
  • Torkayesh, A. E., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2021). Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102975. google scholar
  • Toslak, M., Aktürk, B., & Ulutaş, A. (2022). “MEREC ve WEDBA Yöntemleri ile Bir Lojistik Firmasının Yıllara Göre Performansının Değerlendirilmesi”. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (33), 363-372. google scholar
  • Türkoğlu, M., Duran, G. (2023). “G20 Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının CRITIC Tabanlı GİA ve WASPAS Uygulaması ile Değerlendirilmesi”. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 50-72. google scholar
  • Ulutaş, A. & Karaköy, Ç. (2019). “G-20 Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performans İndeksinin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Modeli İle Ölçümü”. S.C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 20, Sayı 2. google scholar
  • Yu, M. M., & Hsiao, B. (2016). “Measuring the Technology Gap and Logistics Performance oflndividual Countries by Using A Meta-DEA-AR Model”. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(1), 98-120. google scholar
  • Yurdakul, E. M. (2020). “Türkiye’de Lojistik Sektörü ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin VAR Analizi ile İncelenmesi”. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 20(40), 174-185. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

İnce, Ö., Çetiner, B., & Ecer, F. (2023). Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 8(2), 112-147. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958


AMA

İnce Ö, Çetiner B, Ecer F. Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach. Journal of Transportation and Logistics. 2023;8(2):112-147. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958


ABNT

İnce, Ö.; Çetiner, B.; Ecer, F. Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, [Publisher Location], v. 8, n. 2, p. 112-147, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

İnce, Önder, and Betül Çetiner and Fatih Ecer. 2023. “Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics 8, no. 2: 112-147. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958


Chicago: Humanities Style

İnce, Önder, and Betül Çetiner and Fatih Ecer. Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics 8, no. 2 (May. 2024): 112-147. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958


Harvard: Australian Style

İnce, Ö & Çetiner, B & Ecer, F 2023, 'Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach', Journal of Transportation and Logistics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112-147, viewed 5 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958


Harvard: Author-Date Style

İnce, Ö. and Çetiner, B. and Ecer, F. (2023) ‘Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach’, Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 8(2), pp. 112-147. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958 (5 May. 2024).


MLA

İnce, Önder, and Betül Çetiner and Fatih Ecer. Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics, vol. 8, no. 2, 2023, pp. 112-147. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958


Vancouver

İnce Ö, Çetiner B, Ecer F. Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach. Journal of Transportation and Logistics [Internet]. 5 May. 2024 [cited 5 May. 2024];8(2):112-147. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958 doi: 10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958


ISNAD

İnce, Önder - Çetiner, Betül - Ecer, Fatih. Benchmarking of Logistics Performances in G20 Countries Before and During COVID-19 Periods: A MEREC and CODAS Integrated Approach”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 8/2 (May. 2024): 112-147. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1317958



TIMELINE


Submitted21.06.2023
Accepted31.10.2023
Published Online18.01.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.