Journal of Transportation and Logistics

JTL

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162   IUP :10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162    Full Text (PDF)

Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications

Ayça Tümtürk

The Logistics Performance Index (LPI) published by the World Bank allows countries to monitor and compare logistics performance criteria such as customs procedures, infrastructure quality, and on-time delivery. It has been observed that Turkey’s ranking in this index has fluctuated over time. This study aims to examine the importance that Turkey places on its logistics performance. For this purpose, the internationally recognized measure LPI and its components have been used. Deductive content analysis was conducted on the periodic journal issues published by UTIKAD, a non-governmental organization. Root words representing the six components of the LPI were identified and analyzed in 24 journal issues published between 2018 and 2023, chosen because the previous LPI was released in 2018. The importance given to these components was evaluated based on the frequencies found. Additionally, a SOAR analysis was also performed based on the information in the analyzed journal issues. Recommendations were made on digitalization of customs procedures, infrastructure improvements, emphasis on service quality, the importance of on-time delivery, international shipment, and tracking and traceability. The study also concluded that LPI components should be emphasized more. Specifically, the infrastructure criterion needs more attention, according to findings from both the literature and content analysis. This study is the first to evaluate the importance of logistics performance through content analysis of association publications. The results provide strategic guidance for improving Turkey’s logistics performance.

Keywords: LPI, Deductive Content Analysis, SOAR Analysis
DOI :10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162   IUP :10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye’nin Lojistik Performansına Verdiği Önemin Değerlendirilmesi: Dernek Yayınları Üzerinde İçerik Analizi Uygulaması

Ayça Tümtürk

Dünya Bankası tarafından yayımlanan Lojistik Performans İndeksi (LPI), ülkelerin gümrük işlemleri, altyapı kalitesi ve zamanında teslimat gibi lojistik performans ölçütlerini izlemelerine ve diğer ülkelerle kıyaslamalarına olanak tanır. Türkiye’nin bu indeksteki sıralamasının zaman içinde dalgalandığı gözlemlenmektedir. Bu araştırma, Türkiye’nin lojistik performansına verdiği önemi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, uluslararası kabul görmüş bir ölçüt olan LPI ve onun bileşenleri kullanılmıştır. Bir sivil toplum kuruluşu olan ÜTİKAD’ın periyodik olarak yayımladığı dergi sayıları üzerinde tümdengelimci içerik analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. LPI’nın altı bileşeni için belirlenen kelime kökleri, bir önceki LPI’nın 2018’de yayımlanması nedeniyle seçilen 2018-2023 döneminde yayımlanan 24 dergi sayısında taranmıştır. Bulunan frekanslara göre bileşenlere verilen önem değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, taranan dergi sayılarında yer alan bilgiler ışığında SOAR analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gümrük işlemlerinin elektronik ortama aktarılması, altyapı geliştirmeleri, hizmet kalitesi vurgusu, zamanında teslimat önemi, uluslararası sevkiyat ve takip ve izlenebilirlik konularında öneriler sunulmuştur. Çalışma ayrıca LPI bileşenlerinin daha fazla vurgulanması gerektiği sonucuna varmıştır. Özellikle altyapı kriteri üzerinde daha fazla durulması gerektiği, literatürden ve içerik analizinden elde edilen bulgular arasındadır. Bu çalışma, dernek yayınları üzerinden içerik analizi uygulaması ile lojistik performansın önemini değerlendiren ilk çalışma niteliğindedir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, Türkiye’nin lojistik performansının iyileştirilmesi için stratejik yönlendirmeler sağlamaktadır. 

Keywords: LPI, Tümdengelimci içerik Analizi, SOAR Analizi

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The increase in global trade volume has led to an increasing emphasis on activities such as transportation, storage, on-time delivery, and customs clearance of final products. Since 2007, the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and its findings have become standard reference material in numerous studies and policy documents on international logistics. The LPI is a worldwide survey conducted by the World Bank. The increasing trend of this important indicator could be a sign that countries will become more attractive in international trade.

The irregular fluctuations in Turkey’s score in the Logistics Performance Index have sparked the question of "What is Turkey’s importance given to its logistics performance?". To answer this question, the sources were examined first. In the preliminary research phase, the frequency of LPI components in these sources was analyzed, assuming that this frequency could represent the importance of this topic in Turkey. The online sources reached during the preliminary research can be divided into three categories. These are public, private sector, and civil society organizations. 

Public sources include reports on the improvement of customs services such as those found on the websites of the General Directorate of Customs, the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, and the Ministry of Development, as well as plans such as the 11th Development Plan. Public sources either cover only a certain part of the logistics field, not the entire logistics field, or they cover other fields, not just the logistics field.

Private sector sources include reports from companies with a large logistics sector share, especially those operating internationally. Since many of these reports belong to multinational companies, the data in the reports may not only be related to Turkey. Additionally, a significant portion of private sector businesses may not be able to influence customs procedures or infrastructure investments alone.

The last type of source comes from civil society organizations, also known as the third sector. These sources are publications by associations such as Tüsiad, Loder, and Utikad. In this study, 24 journal issues published periodically since 2018 by Utikad, a non-governmental organization operating in logistics, were used as sources.

After examining data from online sources, content analysis was chosen. In content analysis, category selection can be made with either an inductive or a deductive approach. In the inductive approach, categories are selected or determined before the collected literature is analyzed. In the deductive approach, categories are developed based on generalizations obtained from the collected literature (Goel, et al., 2019). The current study employs deductive content analysis. 

During the word selection phase, efforts were made to identify terms representing the six categories of the Logistics Performance Index. The World Bank’s survey and LPI resources were utilized as primary references for examining these categories (Çemberci et al., 2015; Gergin and Baki, 2015; Soliani, 2018). Following the categorization of survey questions, keywords from these questions were extracted for content analysis. To ensure reliability, two academics specializing in logistics reviewed the selected keywords.

The ’Full Reader Search’ function of Adobe Acrobat Reader Software was employed to determine frequencies. However, each root word discovered was carefully assessed for relevance. If deemed pertinent and not an advertisement, it was considered for frequency analysis. Consequently, frequency numbers for sub-criteria in the journal issues were established, and frequency tables were organized by year.

The selected association journal releases four issues annually. Consequently, a total of 24 journal issues were reviewed spanning the years 2018 to 2023, each containing four issues. SOAR analysis was conducted on the six components of the LPI, taking into account the frequencies and articles within the examined journals.

This study highlights the importance of improving Turkey’s LPI to attract foreign investment and boost national income. Greater emphasis on all LPI components, particularly infrastructure (including air infrastructure), can significantly enhance Turkey’s logistics performance. This research, focusing on publications from a single source, offers valuable insights. Future studies could benefit from including data from the private and public sectors, alongside in-depth interviews, to provide a more comprehensive picture of the importance placed on the LPI in Turkey. By addressing the identified areas for improvement and conducting more in-depth research, Turkey can solidify its position in the global logistics landscape. 


PDF View

References

  • Akandere, G. (2021). Kuşak Yol Ülkelerinin Lojistik ve Çevresel Performansının Analizi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(4), 1893-1915. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.927509 google scholar
  • Alkan, G. ve Merdivenci, F. (2021). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Açısından Lojistik Performans Endeksine Göre Seçilen Ülkelerin Entropi Temeline Dayalı Edas Yöntemi ile Değerlendirmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 12(2), 627-41. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.900118 google scholar
  • Altıntaş, F. F. (2021a). Lojistik Performans Endeksi Kapsamında Lojistik Girdi Bileşenlerinin Lojistik Çıktı Bileşenlerine Olan Etkisi: Yol Analizi ile Bir Uygulama. Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 6(2), 128-138. google scholar
  • Altıntaş, F. F. (2021b). Estimation of Relations Between Logistics Performance Components by Artificial Neural Networks. Euroasia Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 8(3), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.38064/eurssh.212 google scholar
  • Altıntaş, F. F. (2022a). Lojistik Performans Endeksi Kapsamında Ülkelerin K-Ortalamalar Kümeleme Analizi Ile İncelenmesi. Journal of Yasar University, 17(68), 878-891. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.955205 google scholar
  • Altıntaş, F. F. (2022b). G7 Ülkelerinin Lojistik Etkinlik ve Verimlilik Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi. Verimlilik Dergisi, 1, 78-93. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.734258 google scholar
  • Arvis, J. F., Saslavsky, D., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Busch, C., Raj, A., ve Naula, T. (2016). Connecting to compete 2016. Trade Logistics in The Global Economy—The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. google scholar
  • Arvis, J. F., Ojala, L., Wiederer C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva K., ve Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to Compete 2018. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy - The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. google scholar
  • Arvis, J. F., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Ulybina W. ve Wiederer C. (2023). Connecting to Compete 2023. Trade Logistics in an Uncertain Global Economy - The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators Developing Trade Consultants. Washington, DC: World Bank. google scholar
  • Bayraktutan, Y., Tüylüoğlu, Ş. Ve Özbilgin, M. (2012). Lojistik Sektöründe Yoğunlaşma Analizi ve Lojistik Gelişmişlik Endeksi: Kocaeli Örneği. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 61-71. google scholar
  • Burmaoğlu, S. (2012). Ulusal İnovasyon Göstergeleri ile Ulusal Lojistik Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: AB Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış, 12(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2012219534 google scholar
  • Cansız, Ö. F. ve Ünsalan, K. (2020). Yapay Zekâ ve İstatistiksel Yöntemler ile Küresel Ticarette Rekabet Ölçütü Olan Lojistik Performans İndeksine (LPI) Etken Parametrelerin Ülke Bazlı İncelenmesi ve Tahmin Modellerinin Geliştirilmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Müh. Bil. Dergisi, 32(2), 571-82. https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.706406 google scholar
  • Cengiz, H. ve Çetinceli, K. (2020). Türkiye ve BRICS Ülkelerinin Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Gelişmişlik Endeksleri ile Lojistik Performans Endekslerinin Karşılaştırılması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(38), 165-85. google scholar
  • Çavuşoğlu, D. ve Denktaş Şakar, G. (2013). İntermodal Limanlar ve Pazarlama İletişimi: Liman Web Sitelerinin İçerik Analizi. Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 37-55. google scholar
  • Çekerol, G. S. ve Kurnaz, N. (2011). Küresel Kriz Ekseninde Lojistik Sektörü ve Rekabet Analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25, 47-59. google scholar
  • Çemberci, M., Civelek, M. E. ve Canbolat, N. (2015). The Moderator Effect of Global Competitiveness Index on Dimensions of Logistics Performance Index. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1514-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.453 google scholar
  • Çitil, M. (2022). Yeşil Lojistik ve Lojistik Performans ile Yönetişim Kalitesi Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Bir İnceleme. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(24), 322-52. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1133548 google scholar
  • Darlington, Y. ve Scott, D. (2002). Qualitative Research in Practice Stories from the Field. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3111(02)00100-0 google scholar
  • Demirbilek, A., Öz, S. ve Fidan, Y. (2018). Lojistik Performans Endeksi ve Havayolu Kargo Taşımacılığı İlişkisi: 2007-2016 Türkiye Örneği. Ekonomi, İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi, 2(1), 1-24. google scholar
  • DTÖ. (2023). World Trade Report 2023: Re-Globalization for a Secure, Inclusive and Sustainable Future. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/ english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_e.htm (10.04.2024) google scholar
  • Gergin, R. E. ve Baki, B. (2015). Türkiye’deki Bölgelerin Lojistik Performanslarının Bütünleştirilmiş AHS ve TOPSIS Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6, 115-35. google scholar
  • Goel, A., Ganesh, L. S. ve Arshinder, K. (2019). Deductive Content Analysis of Research on Sustainable Construction in India: Current Progress And Future Directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 142-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.314 google scholar
  • Göçer, A., Özpeynirci, Ö. ve Semiz, M. (2022). Logistics Performance Index-Driven Policy Development: An Application to Turkey. Transport Policy, 124, 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.03.007 google scholar
  • Guner, S. ve Coskun, E. (2012). Comparison of Impacts of Economic and Social Factors on Countries’ Logistics Performances: A Study with 26 OECD Countries. Research in Logistics & Production, 2(4), 329-43. google scholar
  • Jhawar, A., Garg, S. K. ve Khera, S. H. (2014). Analysis of the Skilled Workforce Effect on the Logistics Performance Index—Case Study from India. Logistics Research, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-014-0117-9 google scholar
  • Jhawar, A. ve Garg, S. K. (2018). Modelling of Critical Factors for Improving Logistics Performance of India Using Inter-pretive Structural Modeling. International Journal of Applied Management Sciences and Engineering (IJAMSE), 5(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAMSE.2018010103 google scholar
  • Kahraman, A. ve Kazançoğlu, İ. (2019). Understanding Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Toward Natural-Claimed Products: A Qualitative Research in Personal Care Products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1218-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2312 google scholar
  • Kahveci, Ş. (2022). Ekonomik ve Kurumsal Faktörlerin KEİ Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performansına Etkisi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 35, 97-112. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1039093 google scholar
  • Kara, M., Tayfur, L. ve Basık, H. (2009). Küresel Ticarette Lojistik Üslerin Önemi ve Türkiye. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(11), 69-84. google scholar
  • Kaya Samut, P. (2023). OECD Ülkelerinin Yeşil Lojistik Performansı ile Enerji, Sağlık Ekonomisi ve Çevre İlişkisinin Analizi. Verimlilik Dergisi, 67-82. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1112577 google scholar
  • Keskingöz, H. ve Matyar Tanır, Y. (2022). Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının Konjonktürel Yaklaşımla Değerlendirilmesi. KSÜSBD, 19 (özel sayı), 73-88. google scholar
  • Kılınç, E., Fidan, O. ve Mutlu, H. M. (2019). Türkiye, Çin ve Rusya Federasyonu’nun Lojistik Performans Endeksine Göre Karşılaştırılması. International Journal of Economic Studies, 5(2), 17-34. google scholar
  • Larson, P. D. (2021). Relationships Between Logistics Performance and Aspects of Sustainability: A Cross-Country Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020623 google scholar
  • Lau, K. H. (2011). Benchmarking Green Logistics Performance with a Composite Index. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(6), 873-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771111180743 google scholar
  • Magazzino, C., Alola, A. A. ve Schneider, N. (2021). The Trilemma of Innovation, Logistics Performance, and Environmen-tal Quality In 25 Topmost Logistics Countries: A Quantile Regression Evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129050 google scholar
  • Manavgat, G., ve Demirci, A. (2021). Lojistik Performans Endeksi Tutarlılığının Sıralı Lojistik Regresyon Modeliyle İncelenmesi. Journal of Yasar University, 16(64), 1856-71. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.934418 google scholar
  • Marti, L., Puertas, R. ve Garrfa, L. (2014). The Importance of the Logistics Performance Index in International Trade. Applied Economics, 46(24), 2982-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.916394 google scholar
  • Oğuz, S., Alkan, G. ve Yılmaz, B. (2019). Seçilmiş Asya Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının TOPSİS Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 497-507. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.613421 google scholar
  • Ojala, L. ve Çelebi, D. (2015). The World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and drivers of logistics performance. Prepared for the Roundtable on Logistics Development Strategies and their Performance Measurements. In Proceeding of MAC-EMM, OECD, 3-30. google scholar
  • Orhan, M. (2019). Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının Entropi Ağırlıklı Edas Yöntemiyle Karşılaştırılması. European Journal of Science and Technology, 1222-38. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.657693 google scholar
  • Pan, W. T., Jiang, B., Wang, Y., Cai, Y. ve Ji, X. (2022). Comparison and Suggestions of Logistics Performance Index of Main Countries of Belt and Road Strategy Based on Bootstrap DEA Model. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2159578 google scholar
  • Pınar, A. ve Diken, A. (2020). Lojistik Performans Endeksi Kapsamında Lojistik Üslerin Türkiye Ekonomisine Etkisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(39), 1384-1406. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.758630 google scholar
  • Rezaei, J., Roekel, W. S. ve Tavasszy, L. (2018). Measuring the Relative Importance of the Logistics Performance Index Indicators Using Best Worst Method. Transport Policy, 68, 158-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.007 google scholar
  • Roy, J. (2011). Logistics and the Competitiveness of Canadian Supply Chains. Global Value Chains: Impacts and Implications. Trade Policy Research, 313-33. google scholar
  • Soliani, R. D. (2018). Evaluation of the Brazilian Logistic Performance in the LPI Index. European International Journal of Science and Technology, 7(8), 35-48. google scholar
  • Sofyalıoğlu, Ç. ve Kartal, B. (2013). Türkiye ve Avrasya Ekonomik Topluluğu Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performans İndekslerinin Karşılaştırılması ve Bazı Çıkarımlar. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 524-31. https://doi.org/10.36880/C04.00766 google scholar
  • Türkoğlu, M. ve Duran, G. (2023). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Bölgesel Kapsamlı Ekonomik Ortaklık (RCEP) Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi. 15(1), 45-69 https://doi.org/10.55827/ebd.1247297 google scholar
  • Ulutaş, A. ve Karaköy, Ç. (2019). G-20 Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performans Endeksinin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Modeli ile Ölçümü. S.C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 71-84. google scholar
  • UTİKAD. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.utikad.org.tr/UTIKAD-Dergileri (14.03.2023) google scholar
  • World Bank. (2023). Logistics Performance Index. Retrieved from https://lpi.worldbank.org (16.06.2023) google scholar
  • Yıldız, A., Aydoğan, K. ve Kartum, G. (2020). Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Lojistik Performans Endeksindeki Konumunun Kümeleme Analizi ile google scholar
  • Araştırılması. Turkish Studies-Social Sciences, 15(3), 1659-79. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.41640. google scholar
  • Yu, M. M. ve Hsiao, B. (2016). Measuring the Technology Gap and Logistics Performance of Individual Countries by Using a Meta-DEA-AR Model. Maritime Policy and Management, 43(1), 98-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1037372 google scholar
  • Yücel, D. ve Göncü, K. K. (2023). Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Avrupa Geçiş Ekonomilerinin Lojistik Performans Endeksi Kullanılarak Değerlendirilmesi. Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 12(1), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.47934/tife.12.01.02 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Tümtürk, A. (2024). Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 9(2), 280-297. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162


AMA

Tümtürk A. Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications. Journal of Transportation and Logistics. 2024;9(2):280-297. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162


ABNT

Tümtürk, A. Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, [Publisher Location], v. 9, n. 2, p. 280-297, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Tümtürk, Ayça,. 2024. “Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics 9, no. 2: 280-297. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162


Chicago: Humanities Style

Tümtürk, Ayça,. “Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics 9, no. 2 (Dec. 2024): 280-297. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162


Harvard: Australian Style

Tümtürk, A 2024, 'Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications', Journal of Transportation and Logistics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 280-297, viewed 22 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Tümtürk, A. (2024) ‘Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications’, Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 9(2), pp. 280-297. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162 (22 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Tümtürk, Ayça,. “Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications.” Journal of Transportation and Logistics, vol. 9, no. 2, 2024, pp. 280-297. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162


Vancouver

Tümtürk A. Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications. Journal of Transportation and Logistics [Internet]. 22 Dec. 2024 [cited 22 Dec. 2024];9(2):280-297. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162 doi: 10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162


ISNAD

Tümtürk, Ayça. “Assessing The Importance Attributed by Turkey to Logistics Performance: Application Of Content Analysis on Association Publications”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 9/2 (Dec. 2024): 280-297. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1495162



TIMELINE


Submitted03.06.2024
Accepted22.09.2024
Published Online26.09.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.