Research Article


DOI :10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010   IUP :10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010    Full Text (PDF)

Children Rights in France

Mehmet Rıfat Tınç

Since the second half of the 19th century, French law has recognized the child as a legal person who has rapidly attained autonomy due to social changes. Due to child’s limited legal capacity, the French legal order, as in many other legal systems, treats him or her as an object of law needing protection, rather than as a complete legal subject. Recent changes in the family concept, such as the advancement of fundamental rights; the legal status of extramarital partnerships; the possibility of same-sex marriages; and the expansion of children’s rights in international agreements, have influenced the development of French juvenile law; the evolution of the child as a legal person; and his progression from a legal object to a legal subject in contemporary law. Even if childhood remains a legal concept that needs to be protected, children’s ability to operate their own rights increases and they become nearly a legal subject. In some cases, they can even acquire a full legal personality just like an adult. However, despite all the progress made so far, the child’s legal status has not been fully realized, nor have the existing children’s rights been fully implemented.

DOI :10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010   IUP :10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010    Full Text (PDF)

Fransa’da Çocuk Hakları

Mehmet Rıfat Tınç

Fransız hukukunda çocuk, XIX. yüzyıl (yy) ikinci yarısından bu yana, toplumsal değişimlerin de etkisiyle hızla gelişen ve özerkleşen bir hukuk kişisidir. Ancak çocuğun hukuki ehliyetsizliği kuralı nedeniyle, birçok sistemde olduğu gibi Fransız hukukunda da onu yetişkinlerin tersine tam olarak bir hukuk öznesi olmaktan çok, korumaya muhtaç bir hukuk nesnesi şeklinde ele almaktayız. Temel haklardaki ilerleme, evlilik dışı birlikteliklerin hukuki statü kazanması, eşcinsel evliliklerin mümkün hale gelmesi gibi birçok değişiklikle aile olgusunun yakın zamandaki evrimi ve çocuk haklarına dair uluslararası anlaşmaların artması, Fransız çocuk hukukunun gelişiminde ve çocuk hukuk kişisinin nesne olmaktan özne olmaya doğru geçmesinde etkili olmuşlarsa da, çağdaş hukukta çocuk halen korunması gereken bir nesne olduğundan hukuki ehliyeti kısıtlıdır. Fakat, kendi haklarını kendi başına işletme yetisi arttıkça çocuk da özne haline gelmekte, hatta bazı durumlarda aynı bir yetişkin gibi tam bir hukuk kişisi özelliği kazanabilmektedir. Yine de, bugüne kadar kaydedilmiş bütün gelişimlere rağmen birçok ülkede olduğu gibi Fransa’da da çocuğun ne hukuki statüsü tam olarak öznel bir yapıya kavuşmuştur ne de var olan hakları eksiksiz uygulanabilmektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


What must be a child legal statute in contemporary law? Should this limited legal personality apprehended as an “object” that naturally needs protection be considered a legal “subject” within the capacity to realize fully its legal existence? Answers given to this question in contemporary French law reveal that the minors’ legal personality is placed somewhere between these two edges: protection as an object of law and acceptance as a total legal subject. Historically, French law treated the child as a “familial object” from the middle ages to the 19th century. Following the industrial revolution, the emergence of a proletarian class and the rights of juveniles in society and civil law continue to expand, thanks to the profound conceptual and social changes in French Family Law. In addition, the rapid development of international law in the 20th century accelerated this movement and granted teenagers additional rights under public law. Children are protected by several international legal warranties, including those provided by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the European Social Charter, the Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (Lanzarote Convention), the European Convention on the Exercise of Children’s Rights, and most importantly, the Convention on the Rights of the Child. In addition, France’s membership in the European Union has given rise to directly invocable legal rights, such as the rights to free movement, to be heard, and to family reunification. Thanks to an effective judicial review in administrative, civil, and constitutional law as well as to a strong judicial dialogue between European and French jurisdictions established since the beginning, the objectivation of children’s legal statute has reached an important degree in its implementation today. However, this notable evolution remains limited, and the legal statute of minors in French law is still mostly characterized by the lack of directly invocable personal rights today. The child is largely apprehended by legal order as a matter of protection rather than a complete legal person fully capable of deploying his or her own rights. Submitted to parental authority, tutors, or other types of guardianship; children’s rights do not totally belong to them, their use is conditional, and their effects are restrained mostly by age limits. Even if this specific treatment of children’s legal personality is not discriminating and morally legitim, the permanent evolution of society, impressive progress of technologies, and undeniable acceleration of young people’s maturity (e.g., in the ecological field) necessitates a modification of contemporary legal thinking regarding children’s rights. Moreover, particularly in France, several deficiencies of domestic law exist, such as the lack of political rights for children; restrictions on their access to the labor market; limitations on their contractual rights, judicial and processual rights; their direct proceedings before a tribunal; and their right to be heard and to consent. Furthermore, the official statistics show the defects in the protection against sexual abuse. In addition, the national law has deficiencies in filiation rules discriminating against children of different types of parents and in the field of family violence, as illustrated by the European Court of Human Rights and the Social Rights Committee’s condemnations of France. Lastly, foreign children residing in France may be deprived of their social rights due to administrative irregularities in the status of their parents under French law, or they may be detained in inhumane conditions. The French immigration laws do not provide sufficient protection for unaccompanied minors. In conclusion, even if the child’s legal statute is still changing and children rights’ content and effectiveness are progressively growing in French domestic law thanks to internal evolution and international guarantees, the French legislator still has a long way to go to improve both the protection of these rights and the modification of handling child legal personality by national law. Children must be increasingly considered as a legal subject of law equal to an adult in terms of their fundamental rights.


PDF View

References

  • Aries Ph., L’enfant et la vie familiale sous l’Ancien Regime, 1973, Seuil, coll. “Point”. google scholar
  • Bonfils Philippe, Gouttenoire Adeline, Droit des mineurs, Paris, 2021, Dalloz, 3e ed. google scholar
  • Chagnollaud D., Code junior. Les droits et obligations des moins de 18 ans, 2017, Dalloz, 9e ed. google scholar
  • Dekeuwer-Defossez F., Choain C. (dir.), L’autorite parentale en question, 2003, LEDRAP, PU du Septentrion. google scholar
  • Dekeuwer-Defossez Françoise, Les droits de l’enfant, 2018, PUF, coll. Que sais-je ? google scholar
  • Ghevontian M., Constitution etjustice penale des mineurs: recherche sur l’identification d’un cadre commun aux systemes français, espagnol et nord-americain, 2017, Üniversite Aix-Marseille. google scholar
  • Hatry S., Le principe constitutionnel d’autonomie de la justice penale des mineurs, th. Bordeaux, 2016. google scholar
  • Hedon C., Delemar E., Sante mentale des enfants: le droit au bien-etre, Rapport annuel de la Defenseure des droits, 2021. google scholar
  • Hedon C., Pour une protection effective des droits des personnes Roms, Rapport de la Defenseure des droits, 2021. google scholar
  • Martineau-Bourgninaud V, Le PACS, 20 ans apres, Paris, Dalloz, 2020, Themes et Commentaires. google scholar
  • Raymond G., Droit de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, 2006, Litec, 5e ed., n° 38. google scholar
  • Rapport du Defenseur des droits au comite des droits de l’enfant des Nations Unies, 2020. google scholar
  • Reglier A.-C. et Siffrein-Blanc C., L’interet de l’enfant, Mythe ou realite ? 2018, Institut Universitaire Varenne, coll. “Colloques et essais”. google scholar
  • Rubellin-Devichi J., Franck R. (Dir.), L’enfant et les conventions internationales, 1996, PUL. google scholar
  • Terre F., Fenouillet D., Goldie-Genicon C., Droit civil. La famille, Paris, Dalloz, 2018, 9e ed., Precis. google scholar
  • Youf D., Penser les droits de l’enfant, Paris, 2002, PUF. google scholar
  • Altunkaya M., “Türk Özel Hukukunda Evlilik Dışı Doğan Çocukların Hukuki Durumu”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 9, Sayı 1, Yıl 2001, sf. 389-434. google scholar
  • Andrieu C., “L’interruption volontaire de grossesse de la mineur : une liberte en question”, Rev. de la recherche juridique. Droit prospectif (RRJ), 2005/4, sf. 20197-2108. google scholar
  • Benhamou Y., “Aperçu critique du projet de Convention europeenne sur l’exercice des droits des enfants”, Gaz Pal, 1995, no 1, doctr. 5. google scholar
  • Benmimoune S., “Incidences de la loi du 2 août 2021 relative â la bioethique sur l’etat civil : deux pas en avant, un pas en arriere”, Actualite Juridique des Collectivites Territoriales, 2022, no 5, sf. 259. google scholar
  • Binbir Ü., Arastaman G., “Eğitim Hakkı: Bir Sistematik Derleme Çalışması”, Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Yıl 11, Cilt 18, Eğitim Birimleri Özel Sayı. google scholar
  • Binet J.-R., “Suspicion de mariages blancs ou gris : comment prouver le defaut d’intention matrimoniale ?”, Dr. fam., n° 5, Mayıs 2019, comm. 92. google scholar
  • Bompard T., “Education des enfants handicapes : droit-creance et carence de l’Etat”, RD publ. 2010, no 1, sf. 197. google scholar
  • Bonfils P., Gallardo E., “Vers un nouveau droit penal des mineurs”, Actes du colloque sur le nouveau droit penal des mineurs, Faculte de droit et de science politique d’Aix-Marseille Universite, 1er avril 2021 kapsamındaki çalışmaların yayınlandığı Dr. fam. dergisi özel sayısı, Mart 2019, sayı 3. google scholar
  • Bonfils Ph., Gouttenoire A., “Panorama de droit des mineurs”, D., 2019, sf. 1732. google scholar
  • Brunetti-Pons C., “L’interet superieur de l’enfant: une definition possible?”, RLDC, 2011, sf. 4405. google scholar
  • Calais-Auloy M.-T., “Pour une definition claire de l’institution familiale”, Les petites affiches 24 Mart 2000, sayı 60, sf. 4. google scholar
  • Casey J., “L’enfant et la banque”, Droit et Patrimoine, 2000, n° 87, Dossier sur le patrimoine de l’enfant, sf. 76-81; Frederique Julienne, “La banque, les parents et le mineur”, RRJ, 2012, sf. 1461. google scholar
  • Cecile Roche D., “Le secret medical chez les patients mineurs”, Journal du droit des jeunes, vol. 313, no 3, 2012, sf. 25-29. google scholar
  • Cocquempot-Caulier N., “Enfants artistes, diversite des dons, egalite des protections”, Journal du droit des jeunes, vol. 307, no. 7, 2011, sf. 13-18. google scholar
  • Couard J., “Reforme des conditions d’acquisition de la nationalite française â Mayotte”, Dr. fam., n° 4, Nisan 2019, alerte 25. google scholar
  • Courbe P. , “L’application directe de la Convention des Nations Unies sur les droits de l’enfant”, D., 2006, sf. 1487. google scholar
  • Cournil C., Perruso C., “Le climat s’installe â Strasbourg. Les enseignements des premieres requetes portees devant la Cour europeenne des droits de l’Homme”, L’Observateur de Bruxelles, 2021/2, n° 124, sf. 24. google scholar
  • Delpech X., “Consecration du droit des mineurs de creer une association, li Dalloz Sirey, 2011, n° 31, sf. 2110. google scholar
  • Delpech X., “Droit pour les mineurs d’adherer â une association”, AJ Contrats d’affaires, 2017, n° 3, sf. 101. google scholar
  • Desolneux M., “Inquietudes autour de l’acces â la nationalite française des enfants nes â Mayotte”, Revue Juridique Personnes et Famille (RJPF), 2018, n° 9, sf. 5-6. google scholar
  • Desrayaud A., “Le pere dans le Code civil, un magistrat domestique”, Napoleonica La Revue, 2012/2, n° 14, sf. 3-24. google scholar
  • Donnier M., “L’interet de l’enfant”, D., 1959., chron. 179. google scholar
  • Dupont M., “43. L’autorite parentale et les biens de l’enfant”, Droit â l’usage des psychologues. En 50 notions, Dupont Melanie (Dir.), Dunod, 2019, sf. 361-363. google scholar
  • Fouquet O., “Le Conseil constitutionnel et la justice penale des mineurs”, Nouveaux cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, 2011, sayı 33. google scholar
  • Fronton P., “Le travail de l’enfant de moins de seize ans artiste-interprete, derogatoire â l’interdiction faite au mineur de travailler”, 2017, Jurisart, n° 50, sf. 26-29. google scholar
  • Fulchiron H. , “La constitutionnalisation de l’interet superieur de l’enfant”, D., 2019, sf. 709. google scholar
  • Gouttenoire A., “Châtiments corporels : la France doit-elle legiferer ?”, La lettre juridique, Mart 2015, Lexbase. google scholar
  • Gouttenoire A., “L’interet superieur de l’enfant au coeur des systemes”, in B. Bonnet (dir.), 2016, LGDJ, sf. 1209. google scholar
  • Gouttenoire A., “Le benefice des prestations familiales reserves â certains enfants etrangers”, AJ fam., 2012, 183. google scholar
  • Gouttenoire A., “Les droits de l’enfant”, Revue internationale de droit compare, 2014, no 66/2, sf. 565-580. google scholar
  • Grelley P., “Contrepoint — Le droit des peres”, Informations sociales, vol. 176, n° 2, 2013, sf. 2323. google scholar
  • Hamon H., “L’adolescence â l’epreuve de la Convention internationale des droits de l’enfant et du: neo-liberalisme(s)”, JDJ, dec. 2012, n° 320, sf. 20. google scholar
  • Hamadi H., “Le statut europeen de l’enfant”, in Le droit et les droits de l’enfant, Revue Champs Libres, 2007, n° 6, L’Harmattan, sf. 161. google scholar
  • Hauser J., “Le printemps des mineurs ; Note sous Loi numero 2011-893 du 28 juillet 2011 sur le droit d’association des mineurs”, RTD Civ., 2011, n° 4, 745. google scholar
  • Herzog-Evans M., “Droit de correction parental: La France persiste et signe”, Actualite Juridique Droit Penal, 2015, n° 12, sf. 605-607. google scholar
  • Isola A., “La Convention europeenne sur l’exercice des droits de l’enfant”, in J. Rubellin-Devichi et Franck R. (dir), L’enfant et les conventions internationales, PUL, 1996, sf. 83. google scholar
  • Jarrion J., Cung I., “Huitieme condamnation de la France en matiere de retention d’enfants mineurs google scholar
  • : la CEDH cristallise sa position”, La Revue des droits de l’homme, https://doi.org/10.4000/ revdh.14529 google scholar
  • Karen F., “Proteger l’enfant ouvrier. La loi du 19 mai 1874, une «legislation intermediaire” ?”, Revue historique, 2017/2 (n° 682), sf. 327-358. google scholar
  • Laborde J.-P., “La nationalite de l’enfant”, in Le droit et les droits de l’enfant, Revue Champs Libres, no 6, L’Harmattan, 2007. google scholar
  • Lamarche M., “Interet superieur de l’enfant. De l’admission des effets d’une convention de mere porteuse â la destruction du droit français de la filiation”. Dr. fam. 2009. google scholar
  • Lazerges C., “Le Conseil constitutionnel, garant de la specificite de la justice des mineurs”, Les Cahiers de la Justice, 2011/3, n° 3, sf. 91-105. google scholar
  • Lebreton G., “Le droit de l’enfant au respect de son “interet superieur”. Critique republicaine de la derive individualiste du droit civil français”, Cahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux, 2003, no 2, sf. 77. google scholar
  • Lebrun P. -B., Laran S., « 7. L’autorite parentale », in Le droit en action sociale, Lebrun Pierre-Brice, Laran Sandrine (Dir.), Paris, Dunod, « Maxi Fiches », 2016, sf. 71-82. google scholar
  • Mallevaey B., “La parole de l’enfant en justice”, Recherches familiales, vol. 9, no 1, 2012, sf. 117129. google scholar
  • Montoux D., “Mineurs. Majeurs proteges. Mariage des mineurs”, JCl. Notariale fasc. 260, 2015. google scholar
  • Nicolas-Maguin M.-F., “Droit de la filiation et procreation medicalisee : une coexistence difficile”, Droit et cultures, 2006, no 51, sf. 123-132. google scholar
  • Pelletier C., “Le patrimoine du mineur est-il protege depuis la reforme de l’administration legale ?”, Gaz Pal, 2017, no 21, sf. 73; Herve Lecuyer, “Le patrimoine du mineur”, Gaz Pal, 2003, no 80, sf. 2. google scholar
  • Pouly C., “Etranger : contentieux de l’entree et du sejour. Contentieux du franchissement des frontieres”, in Repertoire de contentieux administratif, Encyc. Dalloz, 2021, §349 ve devamı. google scholar
  • Reglier A.-C., Siffrein-Blanc C., L’interet de l’enfant: mythe ou realite, Institut universitaire de Varenne, 2018, sf. 145. google scholar
  • Roux J., “La reconnaissance par le Conseil constitutionnel du principe fondamental reconnu par les lois de la Republique relatif â la justice des mineurs”, RD publ. 2002, n° 6, sf. 1731. google scholar
  • Simon D., “Droit de sejour: les tribulations d’une Chinoise et de sa fille au Royaume-Uni”, Europe 2004 Decembre comm. n° 401, sf 14-16. google scholar
  • Slama S., “Droit â la scolarisation des enfants handicapes, procedure de refere-liberte et prise en compte des moyens dont dispose l’administration”, La Revue des droits de l’homme [http:// journals.openedition.org/revdh/3591], Actualites Droits-Libertes, 23 Kasım 2017’de yayınlanmış, 6 Temmuz 2022’de okunmuştur. google scholar
  • Sudre F., “La vaccination infantile obligatoire n’enfreint pas la Convention”, JCP G., 2021, n° 16, sf. 777. google scholar
  • Taquet F., “Les nouvelles dispositions relatives â l’interruption volontaire de grossesse et â la contraception”, Gaz Pal, 16 Şubat 2002, sayı 47, sf. 5. google scholar
  • Taquet F., “Les nouvelles dispositions relatives â la contraception d’urgence”, Gaz Pal, 13 Mart 2001, sayı 72, sf. 2. google scholar
  • Thuan G., “La place du mineur dans la Convention europeenne des droits de l’Homme”, XIeme Assises nationales des avocats d’enfants, Seminaire du 21 novembre 2008, ENA, Journal du droit des jeunes, vol. 286, no 6, 2009, sf. 8-19. google scholar
  • Tınç M., “Ankara Anlaşması ve Schengen Anlaşması : Türk vatandaşlarının vizesiz dolaşım hakkı”, Türkiye Adalet Akademsi Dergisi, n°19, 5. yıl, Ekim 2014, sf. 207-241 ; “L’Europe du Repli ou google scholar
  • Rondo alla Turca ? Une autre analyse de l’arret Demirkan”, RDUE, 3/2014, sf. 441-473. google scholar
  • Turpin D., “L’enfant dans tous ses droits”, LPA, 1990, n° 5, sf. 17. google scholar
  • Vauville F., “La pratique de l’emancipation judiciaire”, D., 1990. google scholar
  • Vigarello G., « 4. L’intolerable de la maltraitance infantile. Genese de la loi sur la protection des enfants maltraites et moralement abandonnes en France », inLes constructions de l’intolerable, Paris, La Decouverte, « Recherches », 2005, sf. 111-127. google scholar
  • Voss B., Tercero F., “Le cadre juridique europeen en matiere de regroupement familial”, L’Observatoire de Bruxelles, 2019, no 118, Dossier special, sf. 30. google scholar
  • Youf D., “Çocuğun Hukuki Statüsü Hakkında”, Le Debat, 1999/4, sayı 106, sf. 67-82’den çeviri, Durmuş B., Çocuk ve Medeniyet Dergisi, 2019/2, sf. 67. google scholar
  • Zani M., “La promotion des droits de l’enfant â la lumiere de la Convention europeenne sur l’exercice des droits des enfants”, Journal du droit des jeunes, 2007/7, n° 267, sf. 21-29. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Tınç, M.R. (2023). Children Rights in France. Istanbul Law Review, 81(2), 589-620. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010


AMA

Tınç M R. Children Rights in France. Istanbul Law Review. 2023;81(2):589-620. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010


ABNT

Tınç, M.R. Children Rights in France. Istanbul Law Review, [Publisher Location], v. 81, n. 2, p. 589-620, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Tınç, Mehmet Rıfat,. 2023. “Children Rights in France.” Istanbul Law Review 81, no. 2: 589-620. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010


Chicago: Humanities Style

Tınç, Mehmet Rıfat,. Children Rights in France.” Istanbul Law Review 81, no. 2 (May. 2024): 589-620. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010


Harvard: Australian Style

Tınç, MR 2023, 'Children Rights in France', Istanbul Law Review, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 589-620, viewed 12 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Tınç, M.R. (2023) ‘Children Rights in France’, Istanbul Law Review, 81(2), pp. 589-620. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010 (12 May. 2024).


MLA

Tınç, Mehmet Rıfat,. Children Rights in France.” Istanbul Law Review, vol. 81, no. 2, 2023, pp. 589-620. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010


Vancouver

Tınç MR. Children Rights in France. Istanbul Law Review [Internet]. 12 May. 2024 [cited 12 May. 2024];81(2):589-620. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010 doi: 10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010


ISNAD

Tınç, MehmetRıfat. Children Rights in France”. Istanbul Law Review 81/2 (May. 2024): 589-620. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2023.81.2.0010



TIMELINE


Submitted15.07.2022
Accepted22.09.2023
Published Online17.10.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.