References

• ‘18 Mart 2016 Tarihli Türkiye – AB Zirvesi Bildirisi’ <https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/18_mart_2016_turkiye_ab_zirvesi_bildirisi_.pdf> accessed 17 August 2018 google scholar
• Acer Y, Kaya İ ve Mahir G, Küresel ve Bölgesel Perspektiften Türkiye’nin İltica Stratejisi (Usak 2010) google scholar
• Batır K, ‘Avrupa Birliği’nin Geri Kabul Anlaşmaları: Türkiye İle AB Arasında İmzalanan Geri Kabul Anlaşması Çerçevesinde Hukuki Bir Değerlendirme’ (2017) 15 Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 585 google scholar
• Borchelt G, ‘The Safe Third Coutry Practice in the European Union: A Misguided Approach to Asylum Law and a Violation of International Human Rights Standarts’ (2002) 33 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 473 google scholar
• Bozkurt K, ‘Geri Kabul ve Vize Serbestisi Anlaşması’ [2016] TBB Dergisi 387 google scholar
• Collinson S, ‘Visa Requirements, Carrier Sanctions, “Safe Third Coutries” and “Readmission”: The Development of an Asylum “Buffer Zone” in Europe’ (1996) 21 Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 76 google scholar
• Costello C, ‘The Asylum Procedures Directive and the Proliferation of Safe Country Practices: Deterrence, Deflection and the Dismantling of International Protection?’ (2005) 7 European Journal of Migration and Law 35 google scholar
• Çelikel A ve Öztekin Gelgel G, Yabancılar Hukuku (23rd edn, Beta 2017) google scholar
• Çiçekli B, Uluslararası Hukukta Mülteciler ve Sığınmacılar (Seçkin 2009) google scholar
• ——, Yabancılar ve Mülteci Hukuku (6th edn, Seçkin 2016) google scholar
• Doğan V, Türk Yabancılar Hukuku (2nd edn, Savaş 2017) google scholar
• Ekinci MU, ‘Türkiye-AB Geri Kabul Anlaşması ve Vize Diyaloğu – Rapor’ (Siyaset Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı, 2016) http://file.setav.org/Files/Pdf/20160521180027_turkiye-abgeri-kabul-anlasmasi-ve-vize-diyalogu-pdf.pdf google scholar
• European Comission, ‘COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIl- On the State of Play of the Common Fisheries Policy and Consultation on the Fishing Opportunities for 2019’ (2018) <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-85-EN-F1-1.PDF google scholar
• Gil-Bazo M-T, ‘The Pratice of Mediterranean States in the Context of the European Union’s Justice and Home Affairs External Dimension. The Safe Third Country Concept Revisited’ (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law 571 google scholar
• ——, ‘The Safe Third Country Concept in International Agreements on Refugee Protection - Assessing State Practice’ (2015) 33 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 42 google scholar
• Gkliati M, ‘The EU-Turkey Deal and the Safe Third Country Concept Before the Greek Asylum Appeals Committees’ (2017) 3 Movements Journal 213 google scholar
• Goodwin-Gill GS and McAdam J, Refugee in International Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2007) google scholar
• Göçmen İ, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Işığında Avrupa Birliği ve Göç Hukuku (Seçkin 2015) google scholar
• ——, ‘Türkiye Ile Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Geri Kabul Anlaşmasının Hukuki Yönden Analizi’ (2015) 13 Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 21 google scholar
• Hailbronner K, ‘Legal Requirements for the EU-Turkey Refugee Agreement: A Reply to J. google scholar
• Hathaway’ (Verfassungblog, 2016) <https://verfassungsblog.de/legal-requirements-for-the-euturkey-refugee-agreement-a-reply-to-j-hathaway/> accessed 25 August 2018 google scholar
• Hathaway JC, The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (5th edn, Cambridge University Press 2015) google scholar
• ——, ‘Three Legal Requirements for the EU-Turkey Deal : An Interview with JAMES HATHAWAY’ (Verfassungblog, 2016) 9 <https://verfassungsblog.de/three-legal-requirementsfor-the-eu-turkey-deal-an-interview-with-james-hathaway/> accessed 26 August 2018 google scholar
• Hurwitz A, The Collective Responsibility of States to Protect Refugees (Oxford University Press 2009) google scholar
• Lambert H, ‘“Safe Third Country” in the European Union: An Evolving Concept in International Law and Implications for the UK’ (2012) 26 Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law 318 google scholar
• Legomsky SH, ‘Secondary Refugee Movements and the Return of Asylum Seekers to Third Countries: The Meaning of Effective Protection’ (2003) 15 International Journal of Refugee Law 567 google scholar
• Moreno-Lax V, ‘The Legality of the “Safe Third Country” Notion Contested: Insights from the Law of Treaties’ in Guy S Goodwin-Gill and P Weckel (eds), Migration & Refugee Protection in the 21st Century: Legal Aspects (Martinus Nijhoff 2015) google scholar
• Özcan M, Avrupa Birliği Sığınma Hukuku (Usak 2005) google scholar
• Özkan I, ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi ve Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı Kararları Işığında Avrupa Birliği’nin Göç ve Sığınma Politikası’ [2011] Ankara Barosu Dergisi 165 google scholar
• ——, Göç - İltica ve Sığınma Hukuku (2nd edn, Seçkin 2017) google scholar
• Öztürk NÖ, Mültecinin Hukuki Statüsünün Belirlenmesi (Seçkin 2015) google scholar
• Peers S and Roman E, ‘The EU, Turkey and the Refugee Crisis: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?’ (2016) http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-eu-turkey-and-refugee-crisis-what.html accessed 27 August 2018 google scholar
• Roman E, Baird T and Radcliffe T, ‘Statewatch Analysis: Why Turkey Is Not a “Safe Country”’ (2016) http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-283-why-turkey-is-not-a-safe-country.pdf accessed 27 August 2018 google scholar
• Thym D, ‘Why the EU-Turkey Deal Can Be Legal and a Step in the Right Direction’ (2016) http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/why-the-eu-turkey-deal-can-be-legal-and-a-step-in-the-rightdirection/ accessed 27 August 2018 google scholar
• Ulusoy O, ‘Turkey as a Safe Third Country?’ (University of Oxford Faculty of Law, 2016) https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2016/03/turkey-safe-third> accessed 26 August 2018 google scholar
• UN General Assembly, ‘Note on International Protection’ (1993) google scholar
• UNHCR, ‘Position on Conventions Recently Concluded In Europe (Dublin and Schengen)’ (2016) http://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/43662e942/unhcr-position-conventions-recentlyconcluded-europe-dublin-schengen-conventions.html accessed 16 July 2018 google scholar
• UNHCR Executive Committee, ‘EXCOM No. 15 Refugees Without an Asylum Country’ (1979) http://www.unhcr.org/excom/exconc/3ae68c960/refugees-asylum-country.html > accessed 16 July 2018 google scholar
• UNHCR Türkiye and Türk İçişleri Bakanlığı, ‘İltica ve Göç Mevzuatı’ (2005) http://www.goc.gov.tr/files/files/iltica_goc.pdf> accessed 17 July 2018 google scholar
• UNHCR, ‘ExCom Conclusion No 58 (XL), “Problem of Refugees and Asylum Seekers Who Move in an Irregular Manner From a Country in Which They Had Already Found Protection”’ (1989) http://www.unhcr.org/4aa77aa09.pdf> accessed 27 August 2018 google scholar
• Wouters CW, International Legal Standards for the Protection From Refoulement (Intersentia 2009) google scholar
• Zimmermann A, Dörschner J and Machts F (eds), The 1951 Convention Relationg to the Status of Refugees and Its 1967 Protocol – A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011) google scholar

Citations