Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005   IUP :10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005    Full Text (PDF)

The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems

Hüseyin Akif Karaca

The CISG is a treaty that aims to unify substantial law in international sales contracts. It regulates its own application sphere. According to these regulation, the CISG is applied to international sales contracts between parties whose business places are in different contracting states. In addition to this method of application, CISG can be applied to international sales contracts between parties in which at least one of the parties’ business place is not in a contracting state, through the reference of the forums’ conflict of laws rules to the law of a contracting state. The contracting states could make a reservation to the application of the CISG through this second method. The parties could also prevent the application of the CISG totally or partially based on the party autonomy that is provided to them by the CISG. This could be done through an explicit provision in the contract or through choice of the law of a non-contracting state. In this article, interpretation of the CISG provisions that regulates the application of the CISG through the conflict of laws rules of the forum and the effect of the reservation of the states to this kind of application, which has been subject to extensive doctrinal discussion, is analysed in detail. Prevantion of the CISG’s application based on the party autonomy provided to contracting parties by the CISG is also analysed in detail.

DOI :10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005   IUP :10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005    Full Text (PDF)

CISG’in Milletlerarası Uygulama Alanı, İrade Serbestîsi ve Bazı Yorum Meseleleri

Hüseyin Akif Karaca

Uluslararası satım sözleşmeleri alanında maddi hukukun yeknesaklaştırılması yönünde bir antlaşma olan CISG kendi uygulama alanını düzenlemektedir. Bu düzenlemelere göre işyerleri farklı akit ülkelerde olan taraflar arasındaki satım sözleşmelerinde CISG uygulanacaktır. Bu uygulama yöntemine ek olarak, taraflardan en az birinin işyeri akit ülkede değilse CISG forumun kanunlar ihtilafı kurallarının akit ülke hukukuna atıf yapması yoluyla uygulanabilecektir. Akit ülkelere CISG’in bu ikinci yöntem yoluyla uygulanabilmesine çekince koyma yetkisi tanınmıştır. CISG’in uygulanması aynı zamanda uluslararası satım sözleşmesinin taraflarına tanınan irade serbestîsi kapsamında tarafların anlaşması yoluyla bütünüyle veya kısmen engellenebilecektir. Bu engelleme sözleşmeye açık hüküm koyma yoluyla olabileceği gibi CISG’e taraf olmayan bir ülke hukukunun seçilmesi yoluyla da olabilir. Makalemizde, özellikle doktrinde yoğun tartışmalara konu olmuş forumun kanunlar ihtilafı kurallarının atfıyla CISG’in dolaylı uygulanmasının ve bu tür uygulamaya konulabilecek çekince hükmünün yorumu ayrıntılı bir şekilde incelenmektedir. CISG’in taraflara tanınan irade serbestîsi kapsamında uygulanmasının engellenmesi de makale kapsamında ayrıntılı incelenmektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The CISG is an international treaty that creates uniform rules for international sales of goods. It has been ratified and applied by 89 states including Turkey, who represent all legal systems in the world. In this article, international application sphere of the CISG is analysed. In order to achieve this, some interpretation problems regarding indirect application of the CISG according to the Article 1 and the Article 95 reservation to indirect application is analysed in detail. The party autonomy principle situated in Article 6 is also analysed in detail. In terms of the CISG, a sales of goods contract is international when business places of the parties are in different countries. This should be understood either from the contract or from the negotiation stage of the contract. The CISG regulates its’ application sphere in Article 1. It applies to international sales of goods either when the business places of the parties are in different contracting states or when at least one of the parties’ business place is not in a contracting state and the conflict of laws rules of the forum refers to the law of a contracting state. The first type of application is named as direct application and the second type of application is named as indirect application since it applies through the conflict of laws rules of the forum. It should be mentioned that either direct application of the CISG or indirect application of the CISG and the effect of Article 95 reservation to indirect application can come into place in the courts of a contracting state. Since, it is the obligation of a contracting state under international law due to being party to the treaty. The courts of a noncontracting state can apply the CISG when their conflict of laws rules refer to the law of a contracting state. In this case, the CISG is applied as part of the law of that contracting state. The indirect application of the CISG had created concern to some contracting states that it would expand too much the application of the CISG. Therefore, a right to make a reservation to the indirect application is provided to the contracting states in Article 95. The reservation states do not obliged to apply the CISG under international law through indirect application. Although due to the increasing number of contracting states, the CISG has been applied through direct application and indirect application is very rare, Article 95 reservation has caused much doctrinal debate. As it is rightly explained in the CISG AC Opinion No 15, indirect application of the CISG comes into place due to the reference of the forum’s conflict of laws rules to the law of a contracting state. The CISG is applied since reference condition is met, it is not applied as part of the law of that state to whom reference is made. It is submitted that there is no need for a treaty provision that can be interpreted as latter type, since that kind of application is requirement of coflict of laws system of any country. Although Article 95 reservation removes obligation of a reservation state to apply the CISG through indirect application under international law, if coflict of laws rules of reservation state refer to the law of a contracting state, the CISG is applied as part of the law of that country. In this case, the CISG is applied as in the courts of the country that is not party to the CISG. In the courts of a non-reservation contracting state if the conflict rules of the forum refers to the law of a reservation state the CISG should be applied, since reservation does not remove the contracting status of that state. In the courts of a non-contracting states, if the forum’s conflict of laws rules refer to a contracting state’s law that makes reservation, the CISG should not be applied and domestic sales law of that country should be applied. Since, the judge should apply the foreign law as the judge of that country and the application conditions of the CISG is not met in that country. Article 6 of the CISG provides a right to the parties based on party autonomy principle. According to this article, parties to a sales contract can prevent the application of the CISG to their contract even the application conditions situated in Article 1 are met. This could be made either through a clear provision in their sales contract that states the CISG will not be applied to contract between them. They could also made this through choosing the law of a country who is not party to the CISG. The parties to a sales contract can also prevent the application of the CISG partially. This could be made also through clear provision or choosing the law of a third country who is not party to the CISG for that part of the contract. They can also regulate that subjects in the sales contract between them. Since the CISG provisions are not mandatory and primarily the provisions of the sales contract should be applied. The parties to the sales contract can also choose the CISG to be applied to their contract when the application conditions are not met. However, this is not a choice of law in state courts. Since the CISG on itself is not law of a state. This kind of choice can be regarded as incorporation and the CISG is applied as contract provisions. Therefore, the provisions of the CISG can be applied if they are not against the mandatory provisions of the applicable law.


PDF View

References

  • Atamer Y, Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerine İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) Uyarınca Satıcının Yükümlülükleri ve Sözleşmeye Aykırılığın Sonuçları (Beta 2005). google scholar
  • Balkar Bozkurt S, “Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerinin Maddi Kurallar İçeren Konvansiyonlarla Düzenlenmesi Bağlamında Bir Yeknesaklaştırma Başarısı: 11 Nisan 1980 Tarihli Uluslararası Mal Satımına İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Konvansiyonu (Viyana Konvansiyonu)” (2017) 2017/2 Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 295-324 google scholar
  • Balkar S, Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerine Uygulanacak Hukuk ve Maddi Uluslararası Özel Hukuk Kuralları (Galatasaray Üniversitesi SBE, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2002) google scholar
  • Çalışkan Y, Uluslararası Satım Hukukunda Kanunlar İhtilafı Meseleleri (Beta 2014). google scholar
  • Çelikel A and Erdem B, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (15th edn, Beta 2017). google scholar
  • CISG AC Opinion No. 16, Exclusion of the CISG under Article 6, Rapporteur: Doctor Lisa Spagnolo, Monash University, Australia. Adopted by the CISG Advisory Council following its 19th Meeting, in Pretoria, South Africa on 30 May 2014. google scholar
  • CISG-AC Opinion No. 15, Reservations under Articles 95 and 96 CISG, Rapporteur: Professor Doctor Ulrich G. Schroter, University of Mannheim, Germany. Adopted by the CISG Advisory Council following its 18th Meeting, in Beijing, China on 21 and 22 October 2013. google scholar
  • Coetzee J, “The Interplay between Incoterms and the CISG” (2013) 32 Journal of Law & Commerce 1-22. Fawcett J, Harris J and Bridge M, International Sale of Goods in the Conflict of Laws (OUP 2012). Ferrari F, “PIL and CISG: Friends or Foes” (2013) 31 Journal of Law & Commerce 45-108. google scholar
  • Ferrari F, “Remarks on the UNCITRAL Digest’s Comments on Article 6 CISG” (2005) 25 Journal of Law & Commerce 13-37. google scholar
  • Ferrari F,“Overwiev of Case Law on the CISG’s International Sphere of Application and Its Applicability Requirements (Articles 1(1)(A) and (B))” (2002) International Business Law Journal 961-975. google scholar
  • Gül İ, “Freedom of Contract, Party Autonomy and Its Limit under CISG (2016) 6 Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 77-101. google scholar
  • Mistelis L, “CISG’in Uygulama Alanı: Yer, Zaman ve Kişi Bakımından”, in Yesim M. Atamer (eds), Milletlerarası Satım Hukuku (2nd edn, On İki Levha 2012). google scholar
  • Özdemir FÖ, “Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması’nın Birinci Madde Hükmünün İncelenmesi” in Günseli Öztekin Gelgel, and Faruk Kerem Giray (eds), Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Çerçevesinde Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin BM Sözleşmesinin Uygulama Alanı (Beta 2014). google scholar
  • Özdemir Kocasakal H, “Viyana Konvansiyonu’nun Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bakımından Uygulama Alanı”, 2013 (1) GÜHFD Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması’nın Türk Borçlar Kanunu Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi Sempozyumu Özel Sayısı 19-52. google scholar
  • Schlechtriem P and Butler P, UN Law on International Sales (Springer 2009). google scholar
  • Schlechtriem P, “Requirements of Application and Sphere of Application of the CISG” 2005 (36) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 781-794. google scholar
  • Schroeter U, “Freedom of Contract: Comparisons between Provisions of the CISG Article 6 and Counterpart Provisions of the PECL” (2002) 6 Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration 257-266. google scholar
  • Schwenzer I and Hahem P, “Uygulama Alanı ve Genel Hükümler”, Ingeborg Schwenzer, Pınar Çağlayan Aksoy (ed.), Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (Viyana Satım Sözleşmesi) Şerhi (XII Levha, 2015). google scholar
  • Schwenzer I and Kee C, “International Sales Law-The Actual Practice”, (2011) 29 Penn State International Law Review 425-447. google scholar
  • Tarman ZD, “Türk Satım Hukukunda Yeni Bir Dönem: Viyana Satım Antlaşmasının Milletlerarası Satım Sözleşmelerine Etkisi”, İpek Yolu Canlanıyor: Türk-Çin Hukuk Zirvesi Konferans Bildiri Kitabı (Adalet 2013). google scholar
  • Tiryakioğlu B, Taşınır Mallara İlişkin Milletlerarası Unsurlu Satım Akitlerine Uygulanacak Hukuk (AÜHF Yayınları 1996). google scholar
  • Tiryakioğlu B, “11 Nisan 1980 tarihli Milletlerarası Mal Satımlarına İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi ve Sözleşmenin Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Kuralları ile İlişkisi” (1991) AÜHFD 191-205. google scholar
  • Toker AG, Uluslararası Taşınır Mal Satımına İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesinin (Viyana Sözleşmesi) Uygulama Alanı (Seçkin 2005). google scholar
  • Wethmar Lemmer M, “Applying the CISG via the Rules of Private International Law: Articles 1(1)(b) and 95 of the CISG-Analysing CISG Advisory Council Opinion 15” (2016) 15 De Jure 58-73. google scholar
  • Winship P, “The Scope of the Vienna Convention on International Sales Contracts” in Galston&Smit ed., International Sales: The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (Matthew Bender 1984). google scholar
  • Viscasillas PP, “Applicable Law, the CISG, and the Future Convention on International Commercial Contracts” (2013) 58 Villanova Law Review 733-759. google scholar
  • Zeytin Z, “Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması’nın (CISG) Uygulama Alanına İlişkin Bir İnceleme” (2008) 24(3) Banka Hukuku Dergisi 217-264. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Karaca, H. (2019). The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 39(1), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005


AMA

Karaca H. The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems. Public and Private International Law Bulletin. 2019;39(1):189-215. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005


ABNT

Karaca, H. The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, [Publisher Location], v. 39, n. 1, p. 189-215, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Karaca, Hüseyin Akif,. 2019. “The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39, no. 1: 189-215. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005


Chicago: Humanities Style

Karaca, Hüseyin Akif,. The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39, no. 1 (May. 2024): 189-215. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005


Harvard: Australian Style

Karaca, H 2019, 'The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems', Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 189-215, viewed 10 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Karaca, H. (2019) ‘The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems’, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 39(1), pp. 189-215. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005 (10 May. 2024).


MLA

Karaca, Hüseyin Akif,. The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 1, 2019, pp. 189-215. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005


Vancouver

Karaca H. The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems. Public and Private International Law Bulletin [Internet]. 10 May. 2024 [cited 10 May. 2024];39(1):189-215. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005 doi: 10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005


ISNAD

Karaca, Hüseyin Akif. The CISG’s Internatıonal Sphere of Applıcation, Party Autonomy and Some Interpretation Problems”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39/1 (May. 2024): 189-215. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.1.0005



TIMELINE


Submitted15.02.2019
Last Revision13.05.2019
Accepted13.05.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.