Research Article


DOI :10.26650/YTA2023-1326639   IUP :10.26650/YTA2023-1326639    Full Text (PDF)

Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic

Nuri Sağlam

After the declaration of the Second Constitutional Monarchy, the great disasters Türkiye experienced one after the other in the face of Christian Europe led to long-term increasingly heated debates in the Turkish press, especially around the concepts of religion and civilization. The focus of all these civilizational debates involved constant comparisons and contrasts between Islam and Christianity and discourses on how to establish a principal consubstantiality between Islam and Protestantism. Therefore, this article outlines the discourses of certain intellectuals, namely Ziya Gökalp and Celal Nuri İleri, who referred only to Protestant European societies as a criterion of contemporary civilization, stating that a Lutheran reform should be made in Islam. The following sections present a few examples of the theological and practical fatwas of certain Islamic scholars who used religion as a political tool or a tool of social pressure for their own personal comfort, justifying all these reformist discourses. Finally, the article mentions the unique place of Mehmet Akif, who undoubtedly holds a distinguished position in the heart of the Muslim Turkish nation with regard to Islamic modernism. In connection to this, the work also mentions how certain discourses of Western liberal intellectuals who distorted some of Akif’s statements about the concept of civilization and declared him to be an “enemy of civilization” lacked any rational basis, not only in terms of semantics but also syntactics.

DOI :10.26650/YTA2023-1326639   IUP :10.26650/YTA2023-1326639    Full Text (PDF)

İkinci Meşrutiyetten Cumhuriyete Türk Basınında Muasır Medeniyet Tartışmaları, İslâm Modernizmi ve Mehmet Âkif

Nuri Sağlam

İkinci Meşrutiyetin ilanından sonraki süreçte Hristiyan Avrupa karşısında ardı ardına yaşadığımız büyük felaketler, Türk basınında özellikle “din” ve “medeniyet” kavramları etrafında gittikçe hararetlenen uzun soluklu tartışmalara yol açtı. Bütün bu medeniyet tartışmalarının ağırlık noktasını hem sürekli bir İslâmlık-Hristiyanlık mukayesesi yahut karşıtlığı hem de İslâmlıkla Protestanlık arasında ilkesel bir özdeşlik kurma söylemleri oluşturmaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu makalede, öncelikle başta Ziya Gökalp ve Celal Nuri İleri olmak üzere muasır medeniyet ölçütü olarak salt Protestan Avrupa toplumlarını referans alan kimi aydınların İslâmda “Lutheryen” bir reform yapılması gerektiği yönündeki söylemleri ana hatlarıyla özetlenmektedir. Makalenin devamında dini bizatihi kendi şahsî konforları için siyasî bir âlet yahut toplumsal baskı aracı olarak kullanagelen bazı İslâm ulemasının bütün bu reformist söylemlere haklı bir gerekçe oluşturan itikadî ve amelî fetvalarından birkaç örnek verilmektedir. Son olarak Müslüman Türk milleti nezdinde hiç kuşkusuz mümtaz bir mevkie sahip olan Mehmet Âkif’in “İslâm modernizmi” içindeki özgün yerine ve bu münasebetle de kimi Batıcı liberal aydınların yine Âkif’in “medeniyet” kavramıyla ilgili bazı ifadelerini çarpıtarak onu “medeniyet düşmanı” ilan eden söylemlerinin sadece semantik değil sentaktik açıdan da herhangi bir rasyonel dayanağı bulunmadığına dikkat çekilmektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The Ottoman intellectuals who had gained some superficial information about Western civilization up to the Tanzimat, generally through various embassy reports and books, had the opportunity to get to know Western civilization more closely during the modernization that followed the Tanzimat. In this process, they realized that Western civilization had developed in a way that could not be compared to Ottoman civilization. They believed that, in order to reach the level of progress of European societies, very radical reforms should first be made in political and social life.

Therefore, they engaged in voluminous long-term activities aimed at simultaneously changing both the political regime and the social mentality. Their primary goal was to break the domination over individual and social life by various interest groups who were profiting from the current conditions in both political and social life and who constantly abused Islam for their own interests. To do this, the government system first needed to be secularized, separating religion from the state.

Hence, one can say a religious project was underway in the minds of Ottoman intellectuals and statesmen during the modernization period, no matter to which school of thought they belonged. Still, to think that this project was more of a civilization project rather than a purely absolute religious project would be more accurate. In addition, the main basis of civilization involves religion, and both concepts have been used for a long time to convey practically the same meanings. Taking this situation into account would make seeing the consolidation of any reformist thought toward the institutional or religious structure of Islam more accurate through Islamic references as a necessary condition for a new civilization conception rather than as a policy for  gaining political legitimacy. As Menapirzade Nuri and Ahmet Midhat Efendi in particular emphasized, this was because those who claimed Islam as also being opposed to civilization had based their claim on the semantic similarity between the words civilization and progress and on those who were against the concept of progress. Moreover, some ignorant scholars were found to try to portray this claim as a religious ruling. In addition, Western Orientalists who claimed that Islam prevented progress were encountered. Finally, Western states also used the concept of civilization as an exploitative political instrument and used the discourse of bringing civilization to the entire Islamic geography. Many compelling internal and external factors similar to these also occurred.

Therefore, despite their different worldviews, Ottoman intellectuals who admired the Europe’s level of development had to consider the concepts of civilization and progress alongside the religion of Islam as a result of all these political and social reasons. In other words, they had to undertake the defense of Islam against both ignorant Islamic scholars as well as Orientalists who claimed Islam to prevent progress. According to Engelhardt, however, the main goal of this process of social change that was conceptualized through such terms as Westernizing, Europeanizing, contemporizing, and modernizing, was to bring Muslim Ottoman society closer to the Christian European society in all aspects. To do this, both the government and society first needed to be saved from the domination of religion as it had in Europe and be given a secular structure.

As a matter of fact, the environment of relative freedom created by the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the great disasters Türkiye experienced against Western states in the following period led to the emergence of extremely radical discourses around the issues of religion, civilization, and European civilization. Western intellectuals’ contemporary civilizational conceptualizations had initially envisaged a Lutheran reform in Islam that caused intense long-lasting debates in the Turkish press.

Hence, this article will first summarize the discourses of certain Ottoman intellectuals, namely Ziya Gökalp and Celal Nuri İleri, who referred to Protestant European societies only as a criterion of contemporary civilization and stated that a Lutheran reform should take place in Islam. Then the study demonstrates a few examples of the fatwas of some Islamic scholars who had used religion as a means of political or social pressure for their personal comfort, which resultantly justified all these reformist discourses. The article’s second section will touch upon Mehmet Akif’s original place in  Islamic modernism. The final section will attempt to draw attention to the lack of any rational basis in the discourses that had declared Akif to be an enemy of civilization by distorting some of his statements on the concept of civilization, not only in terms of semantics but also in terms of syntax.


PDF View

References

  • Meclis-i Mebusan Zabıt Ceridesi (MMZC) google scholar
  • Akşam google scholar
  • Beyânülhak google scholar
  • Cumhuriyet google scholar
  • Edebiyat-ı Umumiye Mecmuası google scholar
  • Haber google scholar
  • Hafta google scholar
  • Hâkimiyet-i Milliye google scholar
  • Hikmet google scholar
  • İbret google scholar
  • İctihad google scholar
  • İkdam google scholar
  • İnsâniyet google scholar
  • İslâm Mecmuası google scholar
  • La Pensée Turque google scholar
  • Memleket google scholar
  • Müşterek Gazete google scholar
  • Resimli Gazete google scholar
  • Sebîlürreşad google scholar
  • Sırât-ı Müstakim google scholar
  • Son Telgraf google scholar
  • Şehbal google scholar
  • Takvîm-i Vakayi google scholar
  • Tan google scholar
  • Tanin google scholar
  • Tercümân-ı Hakikat google scholar
  • Tesisat google scholar
  • Türk Yurdu google scholar
  • Vakit google scholar
  • Vatan google scholar
  • Yeni Felsefe Mecmuası google scholar
  • Yeni Mecmua google scholar
  • Abdullah Cevdet [Karlıdağ]: “Fas Hükûmet-i İslâmiyyesinin İnkırazı”, İctihad, nr. 5, Nisan 1905, s. 70. google scholar
  • Abdullah Cevdet [Karlıdağ]: “Mutmain Değilim”, İctihad, nr. 52, 31 Kânunisani 1328, s. 1176-1177. google scholar
  • Ağaoğlu Ahmed: “Bir Medeniyet Nasıl Alınır?”, Akşam, nr. 1972, 2 Nisan 1340/1924-27 Şaban 1343, s. 1. google scholar
  • Ağaoğlu Ahmed: “Garplılaşmak Mecburiyeti”, Vatan, nr. 151, 16 Muharrem 1342-29 Ağustos 1329/1923, s. 1. google scholar
  • Ağaoğlu Ahmed: “Üç Medeniyet”, Türk Yurdu, Y. 10, nr. 1, 15 Mart 1339, s. 14-22. google scholar
  • Ahmed Emin [Yalman]: “Garplılaşmak Bahsi”, Müşterek Gazete, nr. 5, 10 Eylül 1339- 28 Muharrem 1341, s. 1. google scholar
  • Ahmed Emin [Yalman]: “Garplılaşmak Ne Demektir?”, Vatan, nr. 156, 21 Muharrem 1342-3 Eylül 1339, s. 1 google scholar
  • Ahmed Emin: “İlk Adım”, Vatan, nr. 64, 15 Şevval 1341-31 Mayıs 1329, s. 1. google scholar
  • Ahmet Hikmet [Müftüoğlu]: “Garp Medeniyetçiliği”, Resimli Gazete, nr. 38, 24 Mayıs 1340, s. 2-3. google scholar
  • Ahmet Midhat: Terakki, Kırkanbar Matbaası, İstanbul, 1306, s. 6-7. google scholar
  • Ahmet Muhtar: “Çare-i Halas”, İkdam, nr. 5719, 12 Safer 1331-7 Kânunisani 1328, s. 3-4. google scholar
  • Ahmet Muhtar: “Ya Garplılaşırız Ya Mahvoluruz”, İkdam, nr. 5716, 9 Safer 1331-4 Kânunisani 1328, s. 3-4. google scholar
  • Akçura, Yusuf: Üç Tarz-ı Siyaset, TTK Yayınları, Ankara, 1976. google scholar
  • Ali Ferruh: Teşhîr-i Ebâtıl, Mihran Matbaası, İstanbul, 1306. google scholar
  • Alimcan el-İdrisî, “Musa Carullah Bigiyef”, Türk Yurdu, Y. 4, C. 8, nr. 11, 30 Temmuz 1331, s. 2696-2703. google scholar
  • Antalya Mebusu Hamdi: “İnnema’t-tâatü fi’l-ma’rûf”, Tesisat, nr. 124, 27 Zilkade 1329- 5 Teşrinisani 1327/18 Teşrinisani 1911. google scholar
  • Ataullah Bayezidof, Reddi-i Renan-İslâmiyet ve Fünûn, çev. Madam Gülnar DeleberofAhmet Cevdet, Dersaadet, 1308. google scholar
  • Aydın, Mehmet S.: “Fazlur Rahman ve İslâm Modernizmi”, İslamî Araştırmalar, C. 4, S. 4, Ekim 1990, s. 273-274. google scholar
  • Baha: “Gençler Cemiyet-i Hristiyaniyyesi”, Tanin, nr. 552, 19 Ramazan 1342-23 Nisan 1340, s. 2. google scholar
  • Berkes, Niyazi: Türkiye’de Çağdaşlaşma, 19. Baskı, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2013. google scholar
  • Berktay, Halil: Özgürlük Dersleri, Kitap Yayınları, İstanbul, 2010. google scholar
  • Berktay, Halil: Weimar Türkiyesi, Kitap Yayınları, İstanbul, 2009. google scholar
  • Bir Doktor Muallim, “Yunanistan ve Medeniyet Rehberliği.” Vakit, nr. 573, 2 Ramazan 1337-1 Haziran 1335/1919, s. 1. google scholar
  • Celal Nuri [İleri]: “İslâmda Vücub-ı Teceddüd-2”, İctihad, nr. 40, 15 Kanunisani 1327, s. 983-989. google scholar
  • Celal Nuri [İleri]: “İslâmda Vücûb-ı Teceddüd-3”, İctihad, nr. 41, 15 Şubat 1327, s. 1000-1004. google scholar
  • Celal Nuri [İleri]: “İslâmiyet Mâni-i Terakki midir?”, Edebiyat-ı Umumiye Mecmuası, nr. 88, 29 Zilhicce 1336-5 Teşrinievvel 1918, s. 1037. google scholar
  • Celal Nuri [İleri]: İttihâd-ı İslâm, Yeni Osmanlı Matbaası, İstanbul, 1331. google scholar
  • Çantay, Hasan Basri: Âkifnâme (Mehmed Âkif), Ahmed Sait Matbaası, İstanbul, 1966. google scholar
  • Demirtaş [Ziya Gökalp]: “Yeni Hayat ve Yeni Kıymetler”, Genç Kalemler, nr. 8, 10 Ağustos 1327, s. 138-141. google scholar
  • Eagleton, Terry: Edebiyat Olayı, çev. B. Yüce, Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2012. google scholar
  • Enver Behnan [Şapolyo]: “Medenî Türkçülük”, Cumhuriyet, nr. 169, 26 Teşrinievvel 1340-27 Rebiulevvel 1343, s. 3. google scholar
  • Giridî Ahmed Sâkî: Celâl Nuri Bey ve Cezrî Fikirleri, Kitaphane-i Sûdî, İstanbul, 1335- 1338. google scholar
  • Halil Halid: Hilâl ve Salîb Münâzaası, Mısır, 1325. google scholar
  • Hamdullah Suphi [Tanrıöver]: “Başlangıç”, Türk Yurdu, Y. 10, nr. 1, 15 Mart 1339, s. 1-2. google scholar
  • Hamdullah Suphi [Tanrıöver]: “Türk Ocağı Memlekette Ne Yaptı?”, Akşam, nr. 2172, 28 Teşrinievvel 1340-29 Rebiulevvel 1341, s. 1. google scholar
  • Hâşim Nâhid: Türkiye İçin Necat ve İtila Yoları, Şems Matbaası, İstanbul, 1331. google scholar
  • İskilipli Âtıf: “Nazar-ı Şerîatta Kuvve-i Berriyye ve Bahriyyenin Derece-i Ehemmiyet ve Vücûbu”, Sırât-ı Müstakim, nr. 109, 2 Şevval 1328-23 Eylül 1336, s. 77. google scholar
  • İskilipli Mehmed Âtıf: Frenk Mukallitliği ve Şapka, Matbaa-i Kader, İstanbul, 1340. google scholar
  • İsmail Gasprinski: Avrupa Medeniyetine Bir Nazar-ı Muvazene, Matbaa-i Ebüzziya, İstanbul, 1302. google scholar
  • K.: “Garp Medeniyeti”, Haber, nr. 25, 21 Eylül 1339-9 Safer 1342, s. 1. google scholar
  • Kara, İsmail: Din ile Modernleşme Arasında Çağdaş Türk Düşüncesinin Meseleleri, 3. Baskı, Dergâh Yayınları, İstanbul, 2012. google scholar
  • Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl: Edebiyat Mahkemeleri, 4. Baskı, Büyük Doğu Yayınları, İstanbul, 2020. google scholar
  • Letourneau, Charles: “Umumiyet İtibariyle Din-1”, Yeni Felsefe Mecmuası, nr. 4, 30 Eylül 1911, s. 26-30. google scholar
  • Mardin, Şerif: Türkiye’de Din ve Siyaset, 2. Baskı, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 1992. google scholar
  • Mehmed Âkif [Ersoy]: “Hasbıhal: Koleraya Dair”, Sırât-ı Müstakim, C. 5, Aded: 115, 4 Teşrinisani 1326-17 Zilkade 1328, s. 178-179. google scholar
  • Mehmed Âkif [Ersoy]: “Hasbıhal”, Sırât-ı Müstakim, C. 5, Aded: 107, 17 Ramazan 1328-9 Eylül 1326, s. 37-38. google scholar
  • Mehmed Âkif [Ersoy]: “Hasbihal”, Sırât-ı Müstakim, nr. 95, 22 Cemaziyelahir 1328-17 Haziran 1326, s. 290. google scholar
  • Mehmed Âkif [Ersoy]: “Hutbe ve Mevâiz: Üçüncü Mev’iza”, Sebîlürreşad, C. 2-9, Aded: 50-232, 14 Rebiulevvel 1331-7 Şubat 1338, s. 406. google scholar
  • Mehmed Âkif [Ersoy]: “Mev’iza”, Sebîlürreşad, 48/230, 29 Safer 1331-24 Kânunisani 1328, s. 373-376. google scholar
  • Mehmed Âkif [Ersoy]: Safahat, haz. M. Ertuğrul Düzdağ, Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, İstanbul, 1990. google scholar
  • Mehmed Emin [Yurdakul]: “Vilson’a”, Memleket, nr. 102, 23 Şaban 1337-21 Mayıs 1335/1919, s. 1. google scholar
  • Mehmed Emin [Yurdakul]: Ey Türk Uyan, Türk Yurdu Yayınları, İstanbul, 1330. google scholar
  • Mehmed Fahreddin: “Nisâiyyûndan Cevad Sami Beye Açık Mektup”, Sebîlürreşad, nr. 202, 4 Şaban 1330-5 Temmuz 1328, s. 385. google scholar
  • Musa Carullah: “Şerîat-i İslâmiyeye Benim Nazarım”, İslâm Mecmuası, Y. 1, S. 1, 16 Rebiulevvel 1332-30 Kânunisani 1329, s. 10-13. google scholar
  • Musa Kâzım: “Medeniyet-i Sahîha ve Diyânet-i Sahîha”, Tercümân-ı Hakikat, nr. 991/6191, 4 Rebiulevvel 1316/11 Temmuz 1314, s. 3. google scholar
  • Mustafa Râkım: “Avrupa Medeniyetinin İç Yüzü”, Sebîlürreşad, nr. 288, 21 Rebiulahir 1332-6 Mart 1330, s. 37. google scholar
  • Mustafa Sabri (Tokat Mebusu): “Hilâf-ı Kanun Verilen Emirlere İtaat Lazım mıdır?”, Tesisat, nr. 122, 25 Zilkade 1329-3 Teşrinisani 1327/16 Teşrinisani 1911, s. 1-2. google scholar
  • Müessisler: “Hakikat Karşısında”, Yeni Felsefe Mecmuası, nr. 7, 15 Teşrinisani 1911, s. 1-2. google scholar
  • Müftî Fahreddin: “El-hakku bi’l-ittibâi ehakk: Hak, ittibâa ehakktır”, Hikmet, nr. 31, 14 Zilkade 1328/4 Teşrinisani 1326, s. 2-4. google scholar
  • Namık Kemal: “İstikbal”, İbret, nr. 1, 7 Rebiulevvel 1289-1 Haziran 1288, s. 1-2. google scholar
  • Namık Kemal: “Medeniyet”, İbret, nr. 84, 2 Zilkade 1289-20 Kânunievvel 1288, s. 1-2. google scholar
  • Namık Kemal: Renan Müdafaanamesi, Mahmut Bey Matbaası, İstanbul, 1326. google scholar
  • Nilüfer: “Medeniyet Nedir?”, Şehbal, nr. 31, 15 Kânunievvel 1326, s. 139. google scholar
  • Nordau, Max: Medeniyet Yalanları, çev. A. Selahaddin, Tefeyyüz Matbaası, İstanbul,1328. google scholar
  • Nuri [Menapirzade]: “Medeniyet”, İbret, nr. 8, 18 Rebiulahir 1289-13 Haziran 1288, s. 1-2. google scholar
  • Okay, Orhan: “Beşir Fuad”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA), C. 6, İstanbul, 1992, s. 5-6. google scholar
  • Okay, Orhan: Batı Medeniyeti Karşısında Ahmed Midhat Efendi, MEB Yayınları, İstanbul, 1989. google scholar
  • Ömer Seyfeddin: “Hars-Medeniyet-Temeddün”, İslâm Mecmuası, Y. 2, S. 27, 28 Cemaziyelahir 1333-20 Nisan 1331, s. 632-636. google scholar
  • Ömer Seyfeddin: “Tasfiye ve Islah”, Tanin, nr. 1941, 6 Mayıs 1330, s. 4. google scholar
  • Rıza Nüzhet: “Hristiyanlık: Mazisi, Âtisi”, Yeni Felsefe Mecmuası, nr. 6, 1 Teşrinisani 1911, s. 21-27. google scholar
  • Sabiha Zekeriya [Sertel]: “Türk Ocakları Ne Olmalıdır?”, Vatan, nr. 378, 24 Ramazan 1342-28 Nisan 1340, s. 3 google scholar
  • Sadri Edhem: “Genç Hristiyanlar Cemiyeti”, Son Telgraf, nr. 92, 16 Eylül 1340-16 Safer 1343, s. 1. google scholar
  • Safa, Peyami: Türk İnkılâbına Bakışlar, Ötüken Yayınları, İstanbul, 1990. google scholar
  • Sağlam, Nuri: “Yahya Kemal’in Külliyatına Girmemiş Bazı Makaleleri”, Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, S. 53, Bahar 2023, s. 139-158. google scholar
  • Selim Sırrı [Tarcan]: “Dinde Teceddüde Doğru Bir Hareket Lazımdır”, Cumhuriyet, nr. 511, 10 Teşrinievvel 1341-31 Rebiulevvel 1344, s. 2. google scholar
  • Selim Sırrı [Tarcan]: “Dinde Teceddüde Doğru Bir Hareket Lazımdır”, Cumhuriyet, nr. 511, 10 Teşrinievvel 1341-31 Rebiulevvel 1344, s. 2. google scholar
  • Seyyah: “Medeniyet Meşalesi”, Vakit, nr. 1251, 23 Ramazan 1339-1 Haziran 1337/1921, s. 3. google scholar
  • Süleyman Nazif: “İmana Tasallut”, Son Telgraf, nr. 141, 5 Teşrinisani 1340-7 Rebiulahir 1343, s. 3. google scholar
  • Ş. Tarık: “Bir Muvahhid ile Mülhid Arasında-2”, İslâm Mecmuası, nr. 61, 1334, s. 1156- 1158. google scholar
  • Şemseddin Sami: “Medeniyet-1”, Hafta, C. 1, nr. 9, 19 Zilkade 1298, s. 130. google scholar
  • Şükûfe Nihal [Başar]: “Bana Göre Mehmet Akif”, Tan, nr. 1228, 31 İlkkânun 1938, s. 5. google scholar
  • Tahrir Heyeti: “Yeni Hayat”, Yeni Felsefe Mecmuası, nr. 17, 15 Nisan 1912, s. 1-5. google scholar
  • Türkiye ve Tanzimat: Devlet-i Osmaniyyenin Tarih-i Islahatı 1826-1882, ed. Engelhardt, çev. A. Reşad, Kanaat Kütüphanesi, İstanbul,1328. google scholar
  • Ülken, Hilmi Ziya: Türkiye’de Çağdaş Düşünce Tarihi, 2. Baskı, Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları, İstanbul, 2014. google scholar
  • Yako Şaun: “Hervé’ye Bir Selam”, İnsâniyet, nr. 2, 20 Şaban 1327-12 Ağustos 1326, s. 11-12. google scholar
  • ZIA GUEUK ALP: “L’Etat Islamique peut-il être un Etat moderne? I, La Pensée Turque, nr. 5, 16 Février 1917, s. 137-142. google scholar
  • ZIA GUEUK ALP: “L’Etat Islamique peut-il être un Etat moderne? II, La Pensée Turque, nr. 6, 1er Mars 1917, s. 169-175. google scholar
  • ZIA GUEUK ALP: “L’Etat Islamique peut-il être un Etat moderne? II, La Pensée Turque, nr. 8, 1er Avril 1917, s. 251-256. google scholar
  • Ziya Gökalp: “İçtimaiyat: Türkleşmek, İslâmlaşmak, Muasırlaşmak-1”, Türk Yurdu, C. 3, nr. 35, İstanbul, 1329i, s. 336. google scholar
  • Ziya Gökalp: “Medeniyetimiz-2”, Yeni Mecmua, nr. 69/3, 1 Şubat 1339/1923, s. 24-36. google scholar
  • Ziya Gökalp: “Türkçülük Nedir?-3”, Yeni Mecmua, S. 29, 24 Kânunievvel 1918, s. 41- 44. google scholar
  • Ziya Gökalp: Türkçülüğün Esasları, Matbuat ve İstihbarat Matbaası, Ankara, 1339. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Sağlam, N. (2024). Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic. Recent Period Turkish Studies, 0(44), 123-151. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639


AMA

Sağlam N. Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic. Recent Period Turkish Studies. 2024;0(44):123-151. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639


ABNT

Sağlam, N. Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic. Recent Period Turkish Studies, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 44, p. 123-151, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sağlam, Nuri,. 2024. “Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic.” Recent Period Turkish Studies 0, no. 44: 123-151. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sağlam, Nuri,. Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic.” Recent Period Turkish Studies 0, no. 44 (Dec. 2024): 123-151. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639


Harvard: Australian Style

Sağlam, N 2024, 'Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic', Recent Period Turkish Studies, vol. 0, no. 44, pp. 123-151, viewed 22 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sağlam, N. (2024) ‘Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic’, Recent Period Turkish Studies, 0(44), pp. 123-151. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639 (22 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Sağlam, Nuri,. Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic.” Recent Period Turkish Studies, vol. 0, no. 44, 2024, pp. 123-151. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639


Vancouver

Sağlam N. Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic. Recent Period Turkish Studies [Internet]. 22 Dec. 2024 [cited 22 Dec. 2024];0(44):123-151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639 doi: 10.26650/YTA2023-1326639


ISNAD

Sağlam, Nuri. Contemporary Civilization Debates, Islamic Modernism and Mehmet Akif in the Turkish Press from the Second Constitutional Era to the Republic”. Recent Period Turkish Studies 0/44 (Dec. 2024): 123-151. https://doi.org/10.26650/YTA2023-1326639



TIMELINE


Submitted12.07.2023
Accepted15.08.2023
Published Online05.01.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.