Research Article


DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528    Full Text (PDF)

The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research

Şükrü BalcıHüsamettin Akar

Political participation is a concept that can be evaluated in many ways, from voting at the ballot box to supporting or influencing the actions and choices of government officials, or the interest of the citizen in politics. With the development of communication technologies, significant changes have started to occur in people’s political participation. In this research, the political participation styles of university students on social media during the 2019 Turkish local elections were determined. The research examines the relationship between political participation and political attitudes, as well as between political activity and social media usage. Field research was the principal form of data collection: 283 participants took part in face-to-face surveys. As a result of the research, it was determined that the participants saw internet, social media, and television more effective in the political decision process during local elections. As the level of interest of university students in the country’s problems increases, there is an increase in the participation in politics and understanding the important political problems faced by the country. There is a not so significant relationship between party loyalty and government and internal political efficacy. It is noteworthy that internal political efficacy, party loyalty, interest in country’s problems, interest in political campaigns, and social media effectiveness in political decisions positively predict the political participation score in social media.

DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528    Full Text (PDF)

2019 Yerel Seçiminde Sosyal Medyadaki Siyasal Katılım Üzerinde, Siyasal Tutumlar, Siyasal Etkinlik ve Sosyal Medya Kullanım Örüntülerinin Rolü: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Öğrencileri Araştırması

Şükrü BalcıHüsamettin Akar

Siyasal katılım, bir seçmenin sandık başında oy kullanmasından, hükûmet yetkilisinin icraatını desteklemek veya etkilemek ya da vatandaşın siyasete duyduğu ilgiye kadar geniş bir yelpazede değerlendirilebilen bir kavramdır. Siyasal katılım hayatın her anında siyasal otoriteyi etkilemek adına yürütülen eylemler olurken; iletişim teknolojilerinin gelişimi ile birlikte insanların siyasal katılım biçimlerinde değişim ve dönüşüm yaşanmaya başlamıştır. Bu araştırma, üniversite öğrencilerinin 2019 Yerel Seçimleri sürecinde sosyal medyada siyasal katılım biçimlerini belirlemek; siyasal katılım ile siyasal tutumlar, siyasal etkinlik ve sosyal medya kullanım örüntüleri arasındaki ilişkiyi mercek altına almak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Alan araştırmasının kullanıldığı çalışmada veriler, 283 katılımcıdan yüz yüze anket tekniğiyle toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda katılımcıların yerel seçimlerdeki siyasal karar süreçlerinde internet, sosyal medya ve televizyonu daha etkili gördüğü tespit edilmiştir. Üniversite öğrencilerinin ülke sorunlarına ilgi düzeyi arttıkça, politikaya katılmak için kendisini nitelikli bulma ve ülkenin karşı karşıya kaldığı önemli siyasi sorunları iyi anlama düzeylerinde bir artış yaşanmaktadır. Parti bağlılığı ile hükümet etkinliği ve iç siyasal etkinlik arasında zayıf düzeyde anlamlı ilişki bulunmaktadır. İç siyasal etkinlik, parti bağlılığı, ülke sorunlarına ilgi, siyasal kampanyalara ilgi ve siyasal kararlarda sosyal medya etkisinin sosyal medyada siyasal katılım puanını pozitif yönde anlamlı biçimde yordadığı dikkat çekmektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Significant debates have been held for more than a decade on the impact of social media and the internet on political participation. Studies have shown that social media has become one of the most important platforms for online users to discuss politics and cause them to participate in politics away from the internet. In this research, the relationship between Turkish university students’ use of social media in relation to both online and offline political participation is examined. Social media usage patterns of the university students were examined during the local election period. Those who answered the research questions spent approximately 75 minutes with social media, out of which 73.9%did it every day. WhatsApp, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter are the most preferred forms of social media.

The research also collected data on the political attitudes of university students. Results revealed that university students in the sample had a mid-level commitment to a particular party. Among the participants, both men and women have close values in terms of party loyalty level. The results show that Turkish men are more interested in the country’s problems than Turkish women. It is remarkable that university students’ interest in political campaigns and issues is at a medium level. Also, university students whose opinions were consulted in the research and in the political decision processes in local elections; they see internet, social media, and television more effectively.

Apparently, Internal Political Efficacy is a particular area of concern for the students. As the level of interest of university students to the problems of the country increases, there is an increase in understanding the important political problems faced by the country and political participation. The political efficacy levels of the men and women in the sample are close to each other.

The relatively low level of political participation of the university students participating in the research on social media is an important finding of this study. The students discuss their preference regarding a political candidate or party among other political discussion using instant chat. Although there is no significant relationship between socio-demographic variables such as gender and age and political participation in social media, each of the variables such as party loyalty, interest in country’s problems, dealing with political campaigns and issues, and the level of effectiveness of social media in political decisions are positive determinants of political participation in social media. There is an increase in the level of political participation in social media, as the level of party loyalty, interest in country’s issues, dealing with political campaigns and issues, and the level of effectiveness of social media in political decisions increases. In other words, while university students in the sample think more that they find themselves qualified to participate in politics; they express more that they understand the important political problems faced by the country. The increase in daily social media usage time can trigger political participation in social media. As Kenski and Stroud (2006) found that Internet access and online exposure to presidential campaign information increase political participation.

This research was designed to reveal the relationship between the level of political participation in social media and social media usage patterns, as well as political attitudes and political activity during the 2019 Turkish local elections on a sample selected from among university students. Future research could increase sample size. In addition, the effectiveness of variables such as trust in the media and the political system and political participation can also be subject to further research. What is the relationship between news media usage frequency and political participation can be another research topic?


PDF View

References

  • Ahmad, T., Alvi, A., & Ittefag M. (2019). The use of social media on political participation among university students: An analysis of survey results from rural Pakistan, Sage Open, 1-9. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244019864484 google scholar
  • Ainsworth, S. H. (2000). Modeling political efficacy and interest group membership. Political Behavior, 22(2), 89-108. google scholar
  • Amna, E., Munck, I. & Zetterberg, P. (2004). Meaningful participation? Political efficacy of adolescents in 24 countries. Retrieved from https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/e8a5f984-6738-4c7b-bebf-f2e385562b0f.pdf google scholar
  • Arslan, S., & Seçim, H. (2015). Bir siyasal iletişim aracı olarak Facebook’un seçmenlerin oy verme kararı üzerindeki etkileri: KKTC 2013 milletvekilliği erken genel seçimleri örneği. Folklor/Edebiyat, 21(84), 9-32. google scholar
  • Baker, K. L. (1973). Political participation, political efficacy, and socialization in Germany. Comparative Politics, 6(1), 73-98. google scholar
  • Balcı, Ş., & Bor, T. (2015). Siyasal bilgilenmede televizyonun önem düzeyi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir inceleme. Media Global Journal, 5(10), 47-70. google scholar
  • Balcı, Ş., & Gölcü, A. (2013). The role and impacts of social media in social movements: "Example of the Arab Spring". The Fourth Asian Conference on the Social Sciences, June 6-9 2013, Osaka Japan, pp. 269-281. google scholar
  • Balcı, Ş., & Sarıtaş, H. (2015). Facebook ve siyasal katılım: 2014 yerel seçimleri araştırması. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37, 511-535. google scholar
  • Balcı, Ş. (2016). Siyasal karar sürecinde iletişim araç ve yöntemlerinin etki düzeyleri: “7 Haziran 2015 genel seçimleri örneği”. In Ş. Balcı (Ed.), 7 Haziran'dan 1 Kasım'a Türkiye'de Siyasal İletişim Uygulamaları (pp. 71-108). İstanbul, Turkey: LiteraTürk Academia Yayınları. google scholar
  • Balcı, Ş., Damlapınar, Z., Pınarbaşı, T. E., & Astam, F. K. (2016). Siyasal bilgilenmede medyanın rolü ve etkinliği: Üniversite öğrencileri araştırması. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 53, 111-126. google scholar
  • Balcı, Ş., Tanacı, F., Dağlı, A. N., & Bayrak, E. (2019). 16 Nisan 2017 anayasa değişikliği referandumu sürecinde siyasal bilgilenme ve medya: Eğitim düzeyine göre bir karşılaştırma. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 6(1), 1-16. google scholar
  • Balcı, Ş., Bal, E. & Delal, Ö. (2019). Instagram kullanım alışkanlıkları ve motivasyonları ile narsisizm arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir inceleme: Selçuk Üniversitesi öğrencileri örneği. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 6(2), 955-974. google scholar
  • Best, S. J., & Kruger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183-216. google scholar
  • Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48. google scholar
  • Bolzendahl, C., & Coffe, H. (2013). Are “good” citizens “good” participants? Testing citizenship norms and political participation across 25 nations. Political Studies, 61(1), 45-65. google scholar
  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999-1023. google scholar
  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. England: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Chen, C., Bai, Y., & Wang, R. (2019). Online political efficacy and political participation: A mediation analysis based on the evidence from Taiwan. New Media & Society, 21(8), 1667-1696. google scholar
  • Claassen, R. L. (2008). Testing the reciprocal effects of campaign participation. Political Behavior, 30(3), 277-296. google scholar
  • Cohen, A., Vigoda, E., & Samorly, A. (2001). Analysis of the mediating effect of personal-psychological variables on the relationship between socioeconomic status and political participation: A structural equations framework. Political Psychology, 22(4), 727-757. google scholar
  • Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98-101. google scholar
  • Craig, S. C., & Maggiotto, M. A. (1982). Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology, 8(3), 85-109. google scholar
  • Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289-314. google scholar
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth Edition). Boston, USA: Pearson Press. google scholar
  • Çağlar, N., & Asığbulmuş, H. (2017). X ve Y kuşaklarının siyasal davranışında sosyal medyanın etkisi: Gaziosmanpaşa ilçesinde bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29, 85-112. google scholar
  • Dalton, R. J. (2014). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Los Angeles, USA: Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Damlapınar, Z., & Balcı, Ş. (2014). Siyasal iletişim sürecinde seçimler, adaylar, imajlar. İstanbul, Turkey: Literatürk Yayınları. google scholar
  • De Marco, S., Robles, J. M., & Antino, M. (2017). Reasons to participate: The role of political attitudes in digital activism. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 131-140. google scholar
  • Ellison, N., Lampe, C. & Steinfield, C. (2009). Social networking sites and society: Current trends and future possibilities. Interactions Magazine, 16(1), 6-9. google scholar
  • Erdoğan Demir, S. (2016). İnternetin politik katılıma etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 161-191. google scholar
  • Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891-913. google scholar
  • Finkel, S. E. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German panel. The Journal of Politics, 49(2), 441-464. google scholar
  • Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2006). The Internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 299-313. google scholar
  • Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., & Katz, J. E. (2017). We face, I tweet: How different social media influence political participation through collective and internal efficacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 320-336. google scholar
  • Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of relations between political trust and forms of political participation Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131-152. google scholar
  • Jennings, K. M., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Politics and the virtual event: An overview of the Hill-Thomas hearings. Political Communication, 11(3), 263-275. google scholar
  • Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Zúñiga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407-430. google scholar
  • Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The political significance of social media activity and social networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470-493. google scholar
  • Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173-192. google scholar
  • Kim, Y., & Chen, H. (2016). Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives. Telematics and Information, 33(2), 320-330. google scholar
  • McDonnell, J. (2019). Municipality size, political efficacy and political participation: A systematic review. Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930. 2019.1600510 google scholar
  • Moeller, J., Kühne, R., & De Vreese, C. (2018). Mobilizing youth in the 21st century: How digital media use fosters civic duty, information efficacy, and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 445-460. google scholar
  • Morrell, M. E. (2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4), 589-602. google scholar
  • Morrell, M. E. (2005). Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy. Political Behavior, 27(1), 49-69. google scholar
  • Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). News and political entertainment effects on democratic citizenship. In E. Scharrer (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media studies (pp. 463–483). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
  • Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2004). Political talk as a catalyst for online citizenship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 877-896. google scholar
  • Olkun, E. O., Yüksel, E., & Akdemir, G. Y. (2018). Sosyal medya ve siyasal katılım: 2017 referandumunda bir saha araştırması. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(60), 991-1000. google scholar
  • Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2012). Political attitudes and political participation: A panel study on socialization and self-selection effects among late adolescents. International Political Science Review, 33(1), 63-81. google scholar
  • Quintelier, E., & van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting Democracy: Political Participation and Political Attitudes. Exploring Causality Using Panel Data. Political Studies, 62(1), 153-171. google scholar
  • Pastrana-Valls, A. (2018). Values, attitudes and political participation in Mexico. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 673-709. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.3.3 google scholar
  • Reichert, F. (2016). How internal political efficacy translates political knowledge into political participation. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 221-241. google scholar
  • Sharoni, S. (2012). E-citizenship: Trust in government, political efficacy, and political participation in the internet era. Electronic Media & Politics, 1(8), 119-135. google scholar
  • Steinberg, A. (2014). Genç seçmenler ve web 2.0 ile politik katılım: Facebook genç vatandaşların seçime katılımını artırabilir mi? (A. E. Pilgir, Trans.). In B. Çoban (Ed.), Sosyal Medya Devrimi (pp. 154-171). İstanbul, Turkey: Su Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Tekindal, M. (2017). The position of the youth in political participation. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 17(39), 119-140. google scholar
  • Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175-185. google scholar
  • Wang, S.-I. (2007). Political use of the internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381-395. google scholar
  • Valentino, N. A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. W. (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31(3), 307-330. van Deth, J. W. (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica, 49(3), 349-367. google scholar
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 107-114. google scholar
  • Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., & Loader, B. (2015) Young people, social media and connective action: From organizational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 80-100. google scholar
  • Wei L., & Zhao, L. (2017). social media use, political efficacy, and political participation in China: The moderating role of need for orientation. In K. Xue & M. Yu (Eds.), New Media and Chinese Society. Communication, Culture and Change in Asia (pp. 55-73). Singapore: Springer. google scholar
  • Zhang, X., & Lin, W. Y. (2014). Political participation in an unlikely place: How individuals engage in politics through social networking sites in China. International Journal of Communication, 8, 21-42. google scholar
  • Zúñiga, H. G., Diehl, T., & Ardévol-Abreu, A. (2017). Internal, external, and government political efficacy: Effects on news use, discussion, and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(3), 574-596. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Balcı, Ş., & Akar, H. (2020). The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(59), 55-85. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528


AMA

Balcı Ş, Akar H. The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2020;0(59):55-85. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528


ABNT

Balcı, Ş.; Akar, H. The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 59, p. 55-85, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Balcı, Şükrü, and Hüsamettin Akar. 2020. “The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 59: 55-85. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528


Chicago: Humanities Style

Balcı, Şükrü, and Hüsamettin Akar. The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 59 (Apr. 2024): 55-85. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528


Harvard: Australian Style

Balcı, Ş & Akar, H 2020, 'The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 59, pp. 55-85, viewed 27 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Balcı, Ş. and Akar, H. (2020) ‘The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(59), pp. 55-85. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528 (27 Apr. 2024).


MLA

Balcı, Şükrü, and Hüsamettin Akar. The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 59, 2020, pp. 55-85. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528


Vancouver

Balcı Ş, Akar H. The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 27 Apr. 2024 [cited 27 Apr. 2024];0(59):55-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528 doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528


ISNAD

Balcı, Şükrü - Akar, Hüsamettin. The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/59 (Apr. 2024): 55-85. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528



TIMELINE


Submitted17.03.2020
Accepted17.11.2020
Published Online30.12.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.