Proceedings for the First Symposium on Space Economy, Space Law and Space Sciences

EnglishTürkçe

BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/PB/SS46PS01.2022.001.001   IUP :10.26650/PB/SS46PS01.2022.001.001    Tam Metin (PDF)

Human Capital in Space Economy: An Integration of Resource-Based View and Resource Dependency Theories

Bora Yıldız

OECD defines the space economy as “the full range of activities and the use of resources that create value and benefits to human beings in the course of exploring, researching, understanding, managing, and utilising space”. Space economy has emerged as a concept whose importance is increasing day by day for many countries of the world. In recent years, the concept of space economy has particularly started to attract the attention of developing countries who have begun to allocate large budgets for this. One of the most important reasons underlying this is that space technologies accelerate technological developments in direct and indirect industries. The added value of the space economy on other sectors such as technology, production, geography, and medicine is huge. Moreover, progress in the space economy is undoubtedly closely related to human capital. In this context, it is vital for organisations to find, train, and employ innovative, creative, and proactive employees. Accordingly, this study aims to develop a holistic framework for the workforce of the space age by considering the resource-based view and resource dependency theories. This book chapter discusses human capital in the space economy, proactive personality, innovative workplace behaviors, and creativity. Also, various suggestions for businesses are discussed, considering the theoretical frameworks.


Anahtar Kelimeler: Creativity, Economy, Human Capital, Innovative behaviours, Proactive personality, Space

Referanslar

  • Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359-1378. google scholar
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. google scholar
  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650. google scholar
  • Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. (2006). Organisational economics: Understanding the relationship between organisations and economic analysis. The SAGE handbook of organisation studies, 111-148. google scholar
  • Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625-641. google scholar
  • Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organisational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118. google scholar
  • Buil, I., Marhnez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement, and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 64-75. google scholar
  • Caniels, M. C., De Stobbeleir, K., & De Clippeleer, I. (2014). The antecedents of creativity revisited: A process perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 96-110. google scholar
  • Chen, A. S. Y., & Hou, Y. H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13. google scholar
  • Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 532. google scholar
  • Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 63-75. google scholar
  • Crawford, I. A. (2016). The long-term scientific benefits of a space economy. Space Policy, 37, 58-61. google scholar
  • Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. Stanford’s Organization Theory Renaissance, 1970-2000. google scholar
  • Dayan, M., Zacca, R., & Di Benedetto, A. (2013). An exploratory study of entrepreneurial creativity: Its antecedents and mediators in the context of UAE firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(3), 223-240. google scholar
  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Synthesising and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666-1698. google scholar
  • Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections at work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organisational scholarship (pp. 263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. google scholar
  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realising your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY. google scholar
  • Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader-member exchange and affective organisational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organisational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085-1103. google scholar
  • Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J. (1992). The elusive definition of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(3), 186-198. google scholar
  • Foss, N. J., & Robertson, P. L. (2000). Introduction: Resources, technology and strategy. In Resources, Technology and Strategy: Explorations in the resource-based perspective (pp. 1-10). Routledge. google scholar
  • Fuller Jr, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329-345. google scholar
  • Fuller Jr, J. B., Hester, K., & Cox, S. S. (2010). Proactive personality and job performance: Exploring job autonomy as a moderator. Journal of Managerial Issues, 35-51. google scholar
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. google scholar
  • Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469-502. google scholar
  • Henker, N., Sonnentag, S., & Unger, D. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee creativity: the mediating role of promotion focus and creative process engagement. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 235-247. google scholar
  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427. google scholar
  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon and Schuster. google scholar
  • Khan, M. J., Aslam, N., & Riaz, M. N. (2012). Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 17-22. google scholar
  • Kickul, J., & Gundry, L. (2002). Prospecting for strategic advantage: The proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(2), 85-97. google scholar
  • Kim, S. J., & Park, M. (2015). Leadership, knowledge sharing, and creativity: the key factors in nurses’ innovative behaviors. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(12), 615-621. google scholar
  • Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organisations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1-20. google scholar
  • Lipsey, R. G., Steiner, P. O., Purvis, D. D., & Courant, P. N. (1990). Economics, Harper and Row, New York. google scholar
  • Massingham, P. R., & Tam, L. (2015). The relationship between human capital, value creation and employee reward. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 390-418. google scholar
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualisation of organisational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89. google scholar
  • Müceldili, B., Turan, H., & Erdil, O. (2013). The influence of authentic leadership on creativity and innovativeness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 673-681. google scholar
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organisational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. google scholar
  • Nasifoglu Elidemir, S., Ozturen, A., & Bayighomog, S. W. (2020). Innovative behaviors, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3295. google scholar
  • Neihart, M. (1998). Creativity, the arts, and madness. Roeper Review, 21(1), 47-50. google scholar
  • Newman, A., Schwarz, G., Cooper, B., & Sendjaya, S. (2017). How servant leadership influences organisational citizenship behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 49-62. google scholar
  • OECD. (1995). Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Manual on the Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to S&T - Canberra Manual, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065581-en. google scholar
  • OECD. (2011). The Space Economy at a Glance 2011, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264111790-en google scholar
  • OECD. (2012). OECD Handbooks on measuring the space economy, OECD Publishing, https://read.oecd-ilibrary. org/economics/oecd-handbook-on-measuring-the-space-economy_9789264169166-en#page4 google scholar
  • OECD. (2020). Measuring the economic impact of the space sector: Key indicators and options to improve data. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/space-forum/measuring-economic-impact-space-sector.pdf google scholar
  • Olander, H., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Heilmann, P (2015). Human resources-strength and weakness in protection of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), 742-762. google scholar
  • Pfeffer, J. (1976). Beyond management and the worker: The institutional function of management. Academy of Management Review, 1(2), 36-46. google scholar
  • Prahalad,C. K.,& Hamel, G.(1997). Thecorecompetenceofthecorporation. In StrategischeUnternehmungsplanung/ Strategische Unternehmungsführung (pp. 969-987). Physica, Heidelberg. google scholar
  • Prieto, L. C. (2010). Proactive personality and entrepreneurial leadership: exploring the moderating role of organisational identification and political skill. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 16(2), 107. google scholar
  • Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organisational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 714-731. google scholar
  • Schermuly, C. C., Meyer, B., & Dammer, L. (2013). Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 132-142. google scholar
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. google scholar
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 3-10. google scholar
  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845-874. google scholar
  • Song, C., & Lee, C. H. (2020). The effect of service workers’ proactive personality on their psychological withdrawal behaviors: a moderating effect of servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(5), 653-667. google scholar
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56(4), 360-362. google scholar
  • Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management journal, 48(3), 450-463. google scholar
  • Taghipour, A., & Dezfuli, Z. K. (2013). Innovative behaviors: Mediate mechanism of job attitudes. Procedia -Social & Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1617-1621. google scholar
  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. google scholar
  • Usman, M., Ghani, U., Islam, Z. U., Gul, H., & Mahmood, K. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and innovative work behaviors: workplace thriving as a mediator. Journal of Public Affairs, e2321, 1-11. google scholar
  • Vinarski-Peretz, H., Binyamin, G., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Subjective relational experiences and employee innovative behaviors in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 290-304. google scholar
  • Wang, Y. L. (2013). R&D employees’ innovative behaviors in Taiwan: HRM and managerial coaching as moderators. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(4), 491-515. google scholar
  • W ang, Z., Zhang, J., Thomas, C. L., Yu, J., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organisational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101, 90-103. google scholar
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. google scholar
  • W est, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organisational Strategies. Chichester: John Wiley Sons, Ltd, 309-334. google scholar
  • Y ang, J., Liu, H., & Gu, J. (2017). A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity: The roles of self-efficacy and power distance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(5), 610-629. google scholar
  • Y ildiz, B., Uzun, S., & Coşkun, S. S. (2017). Drivers of innovative behaviors: The moderator roles of perceived organisational support and psychological empowerment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6, 341-360. google scholar
  • Y oundt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 335-361. google scholar
  • Y in, X., & Shanley, M. (2008). Industry determinants of the “merger versus alliance” decision. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 473-491. google scholar
  • Y uan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.