Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/JECS2024-1441308 IUP :10.26650/JECS2024-1441308 Tam Metin (PDF)

Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools

The purpose of the study is to determine whether teachers are subjected to symbolic violence by administrators and, if they are, to disclose the practices of symbolic violence, the reasons behind it, and the reactions of teachers in the face of symbolic violence. The study was conducted using a single case-holistic design. The context of this study is a prestigious and well-established project high school located in one of the high-income districts of Istanbul. The participants of the research consisted of 14 project school teachers, all of whom were selected using the criterion sampling method. A semi-structured interview form, observation, and document analysis were employed in the study to collect data. The data were analyzed through thematic analysis. This study highlights three themes that are ‘incidents of symbolic violence’, ‘roots of symbolic violence at project schools’ and ‘reactions to symbolic violence’. The results demonstrate that teachers are exposed to symbolic violence, which is more visible and severe in the vertical hierarchy at school. Symbolic violence practices are exercised not only by administrators but also by the state, colleagues, and parents against teachers. Regarding the reasons for symbolic violence at project schools, administrators with high symbolic capital, pressure groups (parents/media), and pressure on success are prominent. Lastly, the study discloses that teachers mostly succumb when confronted with symbolic violence; however, some of them resist it and even choose to respond or remain unresponsive.

Anahtar Kelimeler: symbolic violence, habitus, capital, field, project school

Referanslar

Anderson, A. (2013). Teach for America and symbolic violence: A Bourdieuian analysis of education’s next quick-fix. The Urban Review, 45(5), 684-700. http://dx.doi.org/1 10.1007/s11256-013-0241-x google scholar
Apple, M. W. (2006). Eğitim ve iktidar [Education and power] (E. Bulut, Trans.). İstanbul: Kalkedon Publishing. google scholar
Bakioglu, A. (1996). Öğretmenlerin Kariyer Evreleri (Türkiye’de Resmi Lise Öğretmenleri Üzerinde Yapılan Bir Araştırma. M. Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi 2. Ulusal Eğitim Sempozyumu Bildirileri. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları. google scholar
Bhambra, G., & Shilliam, R. (2009). Silencing human rights: Critical engagements with a contested project. London: Macmillan. google scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage. google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Dinstinction:a social critique of the judgement of the taste [La distinction: critique sociale du jugement]. (R. Nice. Trans.). New York: Harvard University Press. google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/202060 google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: on the theory of action. Stanford University Press. google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990a). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (2014). Düşünümsel bir antropoloji için cevaplar [Answers for a reflective anthropology]. (N. Ökten, Trans.). İstanbul: Iletisim Publishing. google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2015). Masculine domination. Ankara: Baglam Publishing. google scholar
Bourdieu P. (2015a). Pratik nedenler. (H. U. Tanrıöver, Trans.). Ankara: Kesit Publishing. google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2017). Ayrım: Beğeni yargısının toplumsal eleştirisi, (D. Fırat & G. Berkkurt, Trans.). Ankara: Heretik Press. google scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Whitehouse, J. C. (2013). The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities. In Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education (RLE Edu L) (pp. 32-46). London: Routledge. google scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. google scholar
Cirit, H.,0 & Gunday, R. (2019). Ortaöğretim özel program ve proje uygulayan eğitim kurumları’nın arka planı ve proje okul uygulamaları. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 143-151. google scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). New York: Sage. google scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). London: Sage. google scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. google scholar
Denzin, N. K.,& Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In the Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 29-71). London: Sage. google scholar
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L., E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553-560. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0148- 2963(00)00195-8 google scholar
Genc, G. A. (2021) Proje okullarında algılanan örgütsel destek, okul etkililiği ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi (Publicaiton (Giresun ili örneği) (No. 690646) [Master’s Thesis, Giresun University]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. google scholar
Goldstein, R. A. (2006). Symbolic and institutional violence and critical educational spaces: In the name of education. Journal of Peace Education, 2(1), 33- 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1740020042000334082 google scholar
Jourdain, A., & Naulin, S. (2016). Pierre Bourdieu’nün kuramı ve sosyolojik kullanımı. (Ö. Elitez, Trans.). İstanbul: Iletisim Publishing. google scholar
Ministry of National Education Regulation of Educational Institutions Implementing Special Programs and Projects, T. R. Official Gazette, Issue: 29818 (2016a). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr google scholar
Murphy, M. (2013). Social theory and educational research. Understanding Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu and Derrida. London: Routledge. google scholar
Neuman, W. L. (2012). Toplumsal araştırma yontemleri: Nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar I-II. cilt (5th Ed.). Ankara: Yayın Odası. google scholar
Nonaka I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press. google scholar
Olcer, H. (2019). Pierre Bourdieu sosyolojisinde simgesel şiddet sorunsalı ve biçimleri. Nosyon: Uluslararası Toplum ve Kültür Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2, 34-49. google scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative research and assessment methods]. (M. Bütün and S.B. Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. google scholar
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381-388. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1049732317697102 google scholar
Sargeant, J. (2012). Qualitative research part II: participants, analysis, and quality assurance. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(1), 1-3. google scholar
Swartz, D. L. (2015). Kültür ve iktidar: Pierre Bourdieu’nün sosyolojisi [Culture and power: the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu]. (E. Gen, Trans.). İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. google scholar
Topcu, G., & Yaslioglu, M. M. (2022). Sembolik (simgesel) şiddeti eleştirel yönetim perspektifinde değerlendirmek ve mücadele etmek mümkün mü? İktisat İşletme ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 1 (1), 117-128. google scholar
Wieviorka, M. (2009). Violence: A new approach. London: Sage. google scholar
Yildiz, S., Korumaz, M., & Balyer, A. (2021). Symbolic violence teachers experience at schools. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 63, 165-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0101 google scholar
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and method (4th Ed.). London: Sage. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın

DIŞA AKTAR

APA

Konal Memiş, T., & Korumaz, M. (2024). Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(0), -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

AMA

Konal Memiş T, Korumaz M. Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2024;0(0):-. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

ABNT

Konal Memiş, T.; Korumaz, M. Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 0, p. -, 2024.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Konal Memiş, Tuğba, and Mithat Korumaz. 2024. “Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 0: -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

Chicago: Humanities Style

Konal Memiş, Tuğba, and Mithat Korumaz. “Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 0 (Nov. 2024): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

Harvard: Australian Style

Konal Memiş, T & Korumaz, M 2024, 'Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. -, viewed 14 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Konal Memiş, T. and Korumaz, M. (2024) ‘Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(0), pp. -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308 (14 Nov. 2024).

MLA

Konal Memiş, Tuğba, and Mithat Korumaz. “Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 0, 2024, pp. -. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

Vancouver

Konal Memiş T, Korumaz M. Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 14 Nov. 2024 [cited 14 Nov. 2024];0(0):-. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308 doi: 10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

ISNAD

Konal Memiş, Tuğba - Korumaz, Mithat. “Analyzing Symbolic Violence Phenomenon in Project Schools”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/0 (Nov. 2024): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1441308

ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ

Gönderim	22.02.2024
Kabul	25.07.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma	10.09.2024

LİSANS

Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Journal of Economy Culture and Society