Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JECS417777   IUP :10.26650/JECS417777    Tam Metin (PDF)

İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü

Mehmet Ferhat Ozbek

Bu çalışma işyerinde arkadaşlıkların (denk durumdaki çalışanlarla arkadaşlık ve yöneticiyle arkadaşlık) iş güvencesizliği ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerinde negatif etkisinin olabileceği modelini kurmakta ve test etmektedir. Buna ilaveten, bu çalışmada yönetici ile arkadaşlık ile iş performansı arasındaki pozitif yönlü ilişkilerin çalışma etiği düşük olan çalışanlar için geçerli olabileceğini iddia etmiştir. Bu çalışma ayrıca yönetici ile arkadaşlık ile örgütsel sapma davranışı arasındaki negatif ilişkinin çalışma etiği düşük çalışanlar için geçerli olacağını iddia etmektedir. Hipotezleri test etmek için hizmet sektöründe çalışan 313 kişiden toplanan veriler kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre, denk durumdaki çalışanlarla arkadaşlık ve yöneticiyle arkadaşlık ile iş güvencesizliği ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar, çalışma etiğinin yöneticiyle arkadaşlık ve iş performansı ilişkisinde moderatör bir değişken olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma etiği düşük olan çalışanlarda, yöneticiyle arkadaşlık iş performansı ile pozitif yönlü bir ilişki içerisindedir. Sonuçlar, çalışma etiğinin yöneticiyle arkadaşlık ile örgütsel sapma arasındaki ilişkide moderatör bir değişken olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlara göre çalışma etiği düşük olan çalışanlar için, yöneticiyle arkadaşlık örgütsel sapma davranışı ile negatif yönlü bir ilişki içindedir. Beklenmedik bir şekilde, çalışma etiği yüksek olan çalışanlarda yöneticiyle arkadaşlık ile örgütsel sapma davranışı arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur. 
DOI :10.26650/JECS417777   IUP :10.26650/JECS417777    Tam Metin (PDF)

Do We Need Friendship in the Workplace? The Theory of Workplace Friendship and Employee Outcomes: The Role of Work Ethics

Mehmet Ferhat Ozbek

This study builds and tests the models that two types of workplace friendships (friendship with coworkers and friendship with the supervisor) may have a negative influence on employees’ job insecurity and turnover intention. Further, this study assumes that the positive association between workplace friendship with a supervisor and job performance is stronger for employees having a low work ethic than for those with a high work ethic. This study also assumes that the negative relationship between friendship with a supervisor and organizational deviance is stronger for employees who have a low work ethic but not for those with a high work ethic. To test these hypotheses, 313 data samples have been collected from service sector employees. According to the results, two types of workplace friendships (friendship with coworkers and friendship with a supervisor) are negatively related to job insecurity and turnover intention. The results also show that friendship with a supervisor was positively associated with job performance for employees having a low work ethic but not for those with a high work ethic. Furthermore, the results show that friendship with a supervisor was negatively associated with organizational deviance for employees having a low work ethic but not for those with a high work ethic. Surprisingly, the friendship with a supervisor is positively associated with organizational deviance for employees having a high work ethic.

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


There are important missing pieces in our understanding of the effect of workplace friendship. To move our knowledge further, we need to grasp how workplace friendship effects important employee outcomes. To achieve this goal, this study focuses on the extending our knowledge about the effect of workplace friendship on four employee outcomes (job insecurity, turnover intention, job performance, and organizational deviance) using organizational social capital perspective and social exchange theory. Specifically, the current study investigates the negative influence of two types of workplace friendships (friendship with coworkers and friendship with a supervisor) on employees’ job insecurity and turnover intention. The current study also argues that the positive association between workplace friendship with a supervisor and job performance is stronger for employees having a low work ethic than for those with a high work ethic. In addition, this study also assumes that the negative relationship between friendship with a supervisor and organizational deviance is stronger for employees who have a low work ethic but not for those with a high work ethic. I propose that when a supervisor builds a friendship with employees or supports coworkers to develop a strong friendship amongst themselves, employees can feel secure in the workplace. In response to this positive situation (job security), an employee will not intend to quit the organization, will display high performance and will show less organizational deviance. If a supervisor develops a friendship with his/her employees or supports coworkers’ friendship, employees feel happy, relaxed and secure. Thus, the supervisor expects that the employees who are feeling secure in their jobs will behave according to management’s expectations (not quitting the organization, displaying high-performance and low deviance) as a requirement of reciprocity within this positive working environment. To test hypotheses, 313 data samples have been collected from service sector employees. The employees’ mean age was 29.4 years (s.d.= 4.6). 51% of them were male. The employees’ average job tenure was 4.81 years. 34% of the employees had a high school education, 26% of them had a junior technical college education and 40% of them had a college degree. 58% of the participants were working in the marketing and sales department. Other employees were working in the finance, accounting, and the human resource management departments.

Employees filled out the scales workplace friendships, turnover intention, job insecurity, work ethic,and organizational deviance. The supervisor working with the employee only filled out the job performance scale. I used workplace friendship scale as independent variable. The two-factor model, which specified the friendship with coworkers and the friendship with a supervisor as unique constructs, fit the data well. I used 4-items job insecurity and 2 items turnover intention scale as dependent variables in this study. I also used job performance scale as one of the dependent variable. This scale was evaluated across 5 items. Further, I used 12-items organizational deviance scale as other dependent variable. I used 17 items work ethic scale as moderator variable. I also used age, education, tenure, gender, and income as control variables. According to the results, friendship with coworkers and friendship with a supervisor are negatively associated to job insecurity and turnover intention. The results also show that friendship with a supervisor was positively associated with job performance for employees having a low work ethic but not for those with a high work ethic. Furthermore, the results show that friendship with a supervisor was negatively associated with organizational deviance for employees having a low work ethic but not for those with a high work ethic. Unexpectedly, the friendship with a supervisor is positively associated with organizational deviance for employees having a high work ethic. This study revealed that workplace friendships decrease job insecurity and turnover intention. The current study also found that positive association between friendship with a supervisor and job performance is stronger for employees having a low work ethic but not for employees with a high work ethic. Further, results show that the negative association between friendship with a supervisor and organizational deviance is stronger for employees having a low work ethic but not for those with a high work ethic. In short, the benefit of workplace friendship for an employee is less job insecurity and the benefits of workplace friendships for an organization are less turnover intention, high job performance, and less organizational deviance.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. google scholar
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London, UK: Sage. google scholar
  • Ali, A. J., & Al-Owaihan, A. (2008). Islamic work ethic: A critical review. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 5–19. google scholar
  • Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. London, UK: Routledge. google scholar
  • Aries, E. J., & Johnson, F. L. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9(12), 1183–1196. google scholar
  • Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95. google scholar
  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. google scholar
  • Berlew, D. E., & Hall, D. T. (1966). The socialization of managers: Effects of expectations on performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11(2), 207–223. google scholar
  • Berman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter Jr, M. N. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217–230. google scholar
  • Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1447–1460. google scholar
  • Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410–424. google scholar
  • Bordia, P., Hunt, E., Paulsen, N., Tourish, D., & DiFonzo, N. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 345–365. google scholar
  • Borg, I., & Elizur, D. (1992). Job insecurity: Correlates, moderators and measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 13(2), 13–26. google scholar
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. google scholar
  • Brustein, D. (2018). What you haven’t considered about the dark side of friendships at work. google scholar
  • Retrived from https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrahbrustein/2018/05/13/what-you-havent-considered-about-the-dark-side-of-friendships-at-work/#7650cfc2dba0 google scholar
  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365. google scholar
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. google scholar
  • Chung, S., Lount Jr, R. B., Park, H. M., & Park, E. S. (2018). Friends with performance benefits: A meta-analysis on the relationship between friendship and group performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 63–79. google scholar
  • Colarelli, S. M. (1984). Methods of communication and mediating processes in realistic job previews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), 633–642. google scholar
  • Colbert, A. E., Bono, J. E., & Purvanova, R. K. (2016). Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1199–1223. google scholar
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. google scholar
  • Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25–36. google scholar
  • Demir, M., & Davidson, I. (2013). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between friendship and happiness: Perceived responses to capitalization attempts, feelings of mattering, and satisfaction of basic psychological needs in same-sex best friendships as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 525–550. google scholar
  • Demir, M., Jaafar, J., Bilyk, N., & Mohd Ariff, M. R. (2012). Social skills, friendship and happiness: A cross-cultural investigation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152(3), 379–385. google scholar
  • Demir, M., & Weitekamp, L. A. (2007). I am so happy cause today I found my friend: Friendship and personality as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(2), 181–211. google scholar
  • Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223. google scholar
  • Dess, G. G., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 446–456. google scholar
  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. google scholar
  • Galperin, B. L., & Burke, R. J. (2006). Uncovering the relationship between workaholism and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: An exploratory study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 331–347. google scholar
  • Gönç-Şavran, T. (2018). Sosyal sermaye ve sağlık arasındaki ilişki: Ampirik çalışmalar ne gösteriyor? Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 57, 53–91. google scholar
  • Greco, S., Holmes, M., & McKenzie, J. (2015). Friendship and happiness from a sociological perspective. In M. Demir (Ed.), Friendship and happiness (pp. 19–35). Dordrecht, NL: Springer. google scholar
  • Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 438–448. google scholar
  • Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259–286. google scholar
  • Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Lovas, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–793. google scholar
  • Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1999). Friendships and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions In Psychological Science, 8(3), 76–79. google scholar
  • Hayati, K., & Caniago, I. (2012). Islamic work ethic: The role of intrinsic motivation, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 1102–1106. google scholar
  • Herman, H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195–211. google scholar
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. google scholar
  • Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384. google scholar
  • Jiang, L., & Lavaysse, L. M. (2018). Cognitive and affective job insecurity: A meta-analysis and a primary study. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2307–2342. google scholar
  • Kraimer, M. L., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). The role of job security in understanding the relationship between employees’ perceptions of temporary workers and employees’ performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 389–398. google scholar
  • Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104–111. google scholar
  • Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538–555. google scholar
  • Li, C. (2017). Does friendship make employees better citizens? (Master thesis, The John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Canada). google scholar
  • Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 41–52. google scholar
  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. google scholar
  • Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Fu, P. P., & Mao, Y. (2013). Ethical leadership and job performance in China: The roles of workplace friendships and traditionality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 564–584. google scholar
  • Litzky, B. E., Eddleston, K. A., & Kidder, D. L. (2006). The good, the bad, and the misguided: How managers inadvertently encourage deviant behaviors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 91–103. google scholar
  • Marcoulides, G. A., & Heck, R. H. (1993). Organizational culture and performance: Proposing and testing a model. Organization Science, 4(2), 209–225. google scholar
  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194. google scholar
  • Mawritz, M. B., Greenbaum, R. L., Butts, M. M., & Graham, K. A. (2017). I just can’t control myself: A self-regulation perspective on the abuse of deviant employees. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1482–1503. google scholar
  • Mayo, E. (2004). The human problems of an industrial civilization. London, UK: Routledge. google scholar
  • McClelland, D. (1988). Human motivation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Meriac, J. P., & Gorman, C. A. (2017). Work ethic and work outcomes in an expanded criterion domain. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(3), 273-282. google scholar
  • Methot, J. R., Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Christian, J. S. (2016). Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personnel Psychology, 69(2), 311–355. google scholar
  • Merrens, M. R., & Garrett, J. B. (1975). The Protestant Ethic Scale as a predictor of repetitive work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 125–127. google scholar
  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2002). Work ethic. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/work%20ethic google scholar
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. google scholar
  • Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 493–522. google scholar
  • Morrison, R. (2004). Informal relationships in the workplace: Associations with job satisfaction, organisational commitment and turnover intentions. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33, 114–128. google scholar
  • Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, F., & Locander, W. B. (2006). Effects of ethical climate and supervisory trust on salesperson’s job attitudes and intentions to quit. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(1), 19–26. google scholar
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266. google scholar
  • Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2016). Studying the links between organizational culture, innovation, and performance in Spanish companies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(1), 30–41. google scholar
  • Nielsen, I. K., Jex, S. M., & Adams, G. A. (2000). Development and validation of scores on a two-dimensional workplace friendship scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(4), 628–643. google scholar
  • Ntayi, J. M. (2005). Work ethic, locus of control and salesforce task performance. Journal of African Business, 6(1–2), 155–176. google scholar
  • Pastoriza, D., Arino, M. A., & Ricart, J. E. (2008). Ethical managerial behaviour as an antecedent of organizational social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 329–341. google scholar
  • Pillemer, J., & Rothbard, N. (2018). Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 635-660. google scholar
  • Rawlins, W. K., & Jerrome, D. (1994). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics and the life course. Ageing and Society, 14(1), 133–133. google scholar
  • Riordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (1995). The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(2), 141–154. google scholar
  • Riordan, C. M. (2013). We all need friends at work. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/07/we-all-need-friends-at-work google scholar
  • Shaw, J. D., Delery, J. E., Jenkins, G. D., & Gupta, N. (1998). An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 511–525. google scholar
  • Sias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 273–299. google scholar
  • Song, S. H. (2006). Workplace friendship and employees’ productivity: LMX theory and the case of the Seoul city government. International Review of Public Administration, 11(1), 47–58. google scholar
  • Song, S. H., & Olshfski, D. (2008). Friends at work: A comparative study of work attitudes in Seoul city government and New Jersey state government. Administration & Society, 40(2), 147–169. google scholar
  • Staw, B. M. (1980). The consequences of turnover. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1(4), 253–273. google scholar
  • Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Näswall, K. (2002). No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), 242–264. google scholar
  • Taylor, F. W. (1914). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper. google scholar
  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. google scholar
  • Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes, and the formation of an industry network. Organizational Science, 8(2), 109–125. google scholar
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R., & Hartnell, C. A. (2009). Organizational justice, voluntary learning behavior, and job performance: A test of the mediating effects of identification and leader-member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(8), 1103–1126. google scholar
  • Wasti, S. A. (2003). Organizational commitment, turnover intentions and the influence of cultural values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 303–321. google scholar
  • Watson, G. W., & Papamarcos, S. D. (2002). Social capital and organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(4), 537–552. google scholar
  • Wright, T. A., & Bonett, D. G. (2007). Job satisfaction and psychological well-being as nonadditive predictors of workplace turnover. Journal of Management, 33(2), 141–160. google scholar
  • Zaleznik, A. (1997). Real work. Harvard Business Review, November-December, 53–62. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Ozbek, M. (2018). İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(58), 153-176. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777


AMA

Ozbek M. İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2018;0(58):153-176. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777


ABNT

Ozbek, M. İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 58, p. 153-176, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ozbek, Mehmet Ferhat,. 2018. “İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 58: 153-176. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ozbek, Mehmet Ferhat,. İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 58 (Apr. 2025): 153-176. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777


Harvard: Australian Style

Ozbek, M 2018, 'İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 58, pp. 153-176, viewed 28 Apr. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ozbek, M. (2018) ‘İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(58), pp. 153-176. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777 (28 Apr. 2025).


MLA

Ozbek, Mehmet Ferhat,. İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 58, 2018, pp. 153-176. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777


Vancouver

Ozbek M. İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 28 Apr. 2025 [cited 28 Apr. 2025];0(58):153-176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777 doi: 10.26650/JECS417777


ISNAD

Ozbek, Mehmet Ferhat. İşyerinde Arkadaşlığa İhtiyaç Var mı? İşyerinde Arkadaşlık ve Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Sonuçlarının Teorisi: Çalışma Etiğinin Rolü”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/58 (Apr. 2025): 153-176. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS417777



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim22.04.2018
Kabul26.09.2018

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.