Journal of Economy Culture and Society

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0016   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0016    Tam Metin (PDF)

Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi

İbrahim Sirkeci, Deniz Eroğlu Utku, Mustafa Murat Yüceşahin

Göç ve göçmenlerin gittikleri ülkelere etkileri bugün hemen hemen tüm ülkelerin öncelikli gündemlerini oluşturmaktadır. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nin Meksikalı göçmenlere yönelik hak kısıtlamaları, İngiltere’nin Brexit kararının arkasındaki anti-göçmen propagandalar, Avrupa ülkelerinin yeni duvarlarla göçü engelleme çabaları, giderek artan yabancı düşmanlığını yansıtmaktadır. Bu türden bir yaklaşım göç edilen ülkeye ve orada elde edilecek çıkarlara fazlaca vurgu yaparken işin ekonomik yönlerine odaklanır. Bu anlayışta haklar da metalaşmaya açıktır ve ‘diğerlerini’ dışlayıcı bir seçicilik söz konusudur. Bu ‘neoliberal paradoks’a yol açar. Böylelikle, neo-liberalizmde göç, göç alan ülkelerin halledilmesi gereken bir ‘sorunu’ olarak görünür. Ancak ‘Çatışma Modeli’ çerçevesinde çatışmaların kökeninde üç temel alandaki eşitsizlikler yatar: 3 KA (‘Katılım Açığı’; ‘Kalkınma Açığı’ ve ‘Kitle Açığı’). 3KA bireyin insani güvensizlik algısı edinmesinin temel nedenlerini oluşturur. Bu çalışmada istatistiki olarak 3KA’nın uluslararası göç akımlarına etkisini gösterdik. Göçmen karşıtı söylemlere yol açabilen yaklaşımlardan uzaklaşarak, bu çalışmada göçün temel nedenleri ampirik ve kuramsal olarak tartışılmaktadır. 
Anahtar Kelimeler: Uluslararası göç, hareketlilik, çatışma kuramı, katılım, kalkınma ve kitle açığı
DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0016   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0016    Tam Metin (PDF)

An Appraisal of the Conflict Model of Migration with Reference to Democratic, Development and Demographic Deficits

İbrahim Sirkeci, Deniz Eroğlu Utku, Mustafa Murat Yüceşahin

Migration and the impact of immigrants in receiving countries have been a key concern in many countries. The USA’s restrictions on rights of Mexican immigrants, the role of anti-immigration propaganda behind the Brexit decision in the UK, European countries efforts to curb migration by raising walls are reflections of increasing xenophobia. Such understanding places a lot of emphasis on the destination and benefits in the destination while also focusing mostly on economic aspects. The rights are also open for commodification and applied in a selective fashion while excluding most of ‘others’. Such restrictive approach towards the rights of ‘others’ is leading to what is called ‘neo-liberal paradox’ and immigration in this context formulated as a problem to be ‘curbed’. However, in the Conflict Model of Migration, the root causes of conflict lies with inequalities, deficits in three areas: The 3Ds (Democratic Deficit, Development Deficit and Demographic Deficit). The 3Ds are in the roots of individuals’ perception of human insecurity. In this study, we statistically show the impact of 3Ds on international migration flows. By distancing itself from perspectives paving way to anti-immigration sentiments, this study focuses on empirical and theoretical exploration of drivers of migration.
Anahtar Kelimeler: International migration, mobility, conflict theory, democratic, developmental, demographic deficits

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Migration and the impact of immigrants in receiving countries have been a key concern in many countries. The USA’s restrictions on rights of Mexican immigrants, the role of anti-immigration propaganda behind the Brexit decision in the UK, European countries efforts to curb migration by erecting walls are reflections of increasing xenophobia. The rise in the anti-immigration sentiment is also fuelled by neo-liberal policies and understanding of migration. Such understanding places a lot of emphasis on the destination and benefits in the destination while also focusing mostly on economic aspects. The rights are also open for commodification and applied in a selective fashion while excluding most of ‘others’. Such restrictive approach towards the rights of ‘others’ is leading to what is called ‘neo-liberal paradox’ and immigration in this context formulated as a problem to be ‘curbed’. 

In this study, we draw attention to the roots of migration in the origin, not in the destination in contrast to the neoliberal approaches. Cohen and Sirkeci’s (2011) ‘Conflict Model of Migration’ aims at a holistic approach to migration and examines the factors affecting migration decision making. The root causes of conflict is formulated as reflection of conflict resulting from inequalities, deficits in three areas: The 3Ds (Democratic Deficit, Development Deficit and Demographic Deficit). The 3Ds are in the roots of individuals perception of human insecurity. We statistically show the impact of 3Ds on international migration flows. Thus this study contributes to migration studies by offering empirical analysis of macro level influences on international migration with reference to the Conflict Model.

In this system, nation-states need to establish new walls, adopt strict border controls by focusing on the concepts of ‘security’ and ‘interest’. What is more, by defining some as ‘others’ –and producing several similar arbitrary concepts, such as economic migrant, refugee, and asylum seeker, these countries try to curb migration and want to select migrants. These classifications of migrants also pave the way for discriminatory practices. Despite the fact that motivations behind migration are categorically the same, this approach favours some migrants over others.

By creating dichotomous migration categories, focusing on destination countries and their economic prosperity and largely overlooking the conflicts triggering migration, neo-liberal approaches, perhaps unintentionally, pave the way for othering and discriminatory discourses. Consequently migration is considered as a ‘problem of receiving countries’. Then governance of migration focuses on efforts in border security and control. At the end, such focus on secure borders leads to human rights abuses, crime and vulnerability. In such a picture, migration is often associated with ‘crisis’ ‘problem’ ‘threat’ with a focus on the destination. The conflicts in the countries of origin are largely overlooked. Therefore such approaches fail to capture the whole picture as well as missing the dynamic nature of mobility. 

This study critically approaches neo-liberal stereotypes that define the migration as a problem and examines human mobility with a focus on the country of origin. In the light of ‘Conflict and Culture of Migration Model’ (Cohen and Sirkeci 2011), we aim at understanding the macro level indicators of migration. According to the ‘Conflict and Culture of Migration Model’ migration is a function of conflicts therefore all categorizations of migration are arbitrary. These categorizations often hide the importance of the beginning of migration processes. Perceived level of human insecurity is the key driver for human migration and of central importance in the Conflict Model of Migration. In this regard, we investigate the role of conflicts leading to insecurity in relation to the 3Ds. 3Ds corresponds democratic, development and demographic deficits. 3Ds pave the way for the emergence of an environment of human insecurity in the origin countries. Due to the demographic, development, democratic deficits that people in the countries of origin face, migration pressures rise. These deficits individually or cumulatively affect the conditions in the origin countries and create concerns for those living there. We show statistically that there are correlations between these 3Ds and international migration.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Alfred, C. (2018, 8 Ocak). Year in review: The refugee crisis in 2017. Erişim: https://www.newsdeeply.com/refugees/articles/2017/12/28/year-in-review-the-refugee-crisis-in-2017 google scholar
  • Alvarado, S. E. ve Massey, D. S. (2010). Search of peace: Structural adjustment, violence, and international migration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 630 (1): 137-161. google scholar
  • Ayoob, M. (1983). Security in the Third World: The worm about to turn? International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 60 (1): 41-51. google scholar
  • BBCNews. (2016, 31 Ağustos). Drug dealers, criminals, rapists’: What Trump thinks of Mexicans. Erişim: http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-37230916/drug-dealers-criminals-rapists-what-trump-thinks-of-mexicans. google scholar
  • Bellon, T. ve Copley, C. (2018,10 Ocak). In aging Germany, refugees seen as tomorrow’s skilled workers. Erişim: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-germany-training-anal/in-aging-germany-refugees-seenas-tomorrows-skilled-workers-idUSKCN0RA1E920150910. google scholar
  • Bilton, T., Bonnett, K., Jones, P., Lawson, T., Skinner, D., Stanworth, M. ve Webster, A. (2009). Sosyoloji, (Çev.) İnal, K., Kartal, Y., Özkale, N., Toraman, K., Özkan, Y. ve Güngen, A. R., Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara. google scholar
  • Bloch, A. (2006). Emigration from Zimbabwe: Migrant perspectives. Social Policy & Administration, 40 (1): 67-87. google scholar
  • BM (Birleşmiş Milletler) (2018, 14 Şubat). 1994 Human Development Report. from Erişim: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/255/hdr_1994_en_complete_nostats.pdf. google scholar
  • Booth, K. (1991). Security and emancipation. Review of International Studies, 17 (4): 313-326. google scholar
  • Brauch, H. G. (2011). “Concepts of security threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks”. İçinde Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security. H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, C. Mesjasz, J. Grin, P. Kameri-Mbote, B. Chourou, P. Dunay ve J. Birkmann (ed.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 61-106. google scholar
  • Castles, S. (2004). Why migration policies fail. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27 (2): 205-227. google scholar
  • Castles, S. (2011). Migration, crisis, and the global labour market. Globalizations, 8 (3): 311-324. google scholar
  • Chimienti, M. ve Solomos, J. (2011). Social movements of irregular migrants, recognition, and citizenship. Globalizations, 8 (3): 343-360. google scholar
  • Civelek, K. (2016). “Bölüm 7: Çatışma ve göç kültürü modeli bağlamında bir roman okuması: Le Clézio’nun göçmen yıldızı. İçinde: A. Tilbe ve S. Bosnalı (der.) Göç üzerine yazın ve kültür incelemeleri, Londra: Transnational Press London, sf. 87-99. google scholar
  • Cohen, J. H. ve Sirkeci, İ. (2011). Cultures of migration: The Global Nature of Contemporary Mobility: University of Texas Press: USA. google scholar
  • Cohen, J. H. ve Sirkeci, İ. (2016). “Migration and insecurity: Rethinking mobility in the neoliberal age”. İçinde After the crisis, anthropological thought, neoliberalism and the aftermath. London: Routledge, 96-113. google scholar
  • Crowley, J. (2001). The political participation of ethnic minorities. International Political Science Review, 22(1): 99-121. google scholar
  • Crépeau, F., Nakache, D. ve Atak, I. (2007). International migration: Security concerns and human rights standards. Transcultural Psychiatry, 44 (3): 311-337. google scholar
  • Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class struggle in ındustrial society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Demirgil, H. (2017). “Parametrik olmayan (non-parametric) hipotez testleri”. Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.) SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri içinde (s. 85-112). 8. Baskı. Ankara: Dinamik Akademi. google scholar
  • Duménil, G. ve Lévy, D. (2011). The crisis of neoliberalism: Harvard University Press: USA. google scholar
  • Dünya Bankası (2018, 30 Nisan). Data: GDP per capita, PPP (current international). Erişim: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD. google scholar
  • Eastmond, M. ve Ascher, H. (2011). In the best interest of the child? The politics of vulnerability and negotiations for asylum in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37 (8): 1185-1200. google scholar
  • Eroğlu Utku, D. (2018). “Eleştirel güvenlik: “Tehdit” eden göçmenden “referenas objesine” göç ve güvenlik ilişkisi. N. Özkural ve S. Turan (Ed.) uluslararası ilişkilerde güvenlik kuramları ve sorunlarına çağdaş yaklaşımlar içinde (s. 97-135). Londra: Transnational Press London. google scholar
  • Express.co.uk. (2018, 19 Şubat). EU Loophole Could See 77 Million Turks Head to Britain. Warn Farage and Johnson. Erişim: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/661387/Migrant-crisis-Nigel-Farage-Turkey-EU-visafree-travel. google scholar
  • Faist T ve Özveren E. (2017). Transnational social spaces: agents, networks and institutions. Oxon: Routledge. google scholar
  • Friebel, G. ve Guriev, S. (2006). Smuggling humans: A theory of debt-financed migration. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 (6): 1085-1111. google scholar
  • Gordon, J. (2005). Suburban sweatshops: Harvard University Press.USA. google scholar
  • GWP (Gallup World Poll) (2018, 30 Nisan). Research and solve global major ıssues. Erişim: http://analytics.gallup.com/213704/world-poll.aspx google scholar
  • Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610 (1): 21-44. google scholar
  • Hollifield, J. F. (2004). The emerging migration state. International Migration Review, 38 (3): 885-912. google scholar
  • ILO (2018, 3 Mart). The cost of migration: what low-skilled migrant workers from pakistan pay to work in saudi arabia and the united arab emirates. Erişim: http://www.ilo.org/islamabad/whatwedo/publications/WCMS_514127/lang--en/index.htm. google scholar
  • IOM THE UN Migration Agency, (2018, 10 Mayıs) The world’s congested human migration routes in 5 maps, Erişim: http://weblog.iom.int/world’s-congested-human-migration-routes-5-maps. google scholar
  • Jenkins J. C., Taylor, C. L., Abbott, M., Maher T. V. ve Peterson, L. (2013, 1 Ekim). The world handbook of political ındicators IV. The Ohio State University, Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Columbus: Ohio State. Erişim: https://sociology.osu.edu/worldhandbook. google scholar
  • Khattab, N., Johnston, R., Sirkeci, I., ve Modood, T. (2010). The impact of spatial segregation on the employment outcomes amongst Bangladeshi men and women in England and Wales. Sociological Research Online, 15(1): 1-13. google scholar
  • Knox, P. ve Pinch, S. (2010). Urban Social geography: an introduction. Sixth edition, Prentice Hall, London. google scholar
  • Koser, K. (2000). Asylum policies, trafficking and vulnerability. International Migration, 38 (3): 91-111. google scholar
  • Koser, K. (2008). Why migrant smuggling pays. International Migration, 46 (2): 3-26. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, N. ve Utku Eroğlu, D. (2017). Anti-immigration vs anti-eu: analysis of brexit decision of the UK. Paper presented at the The Migration Conference 2017, Harokopio Universitesi, Atina, 23-26 Ağustos. google scholar
  • Lahav, G. ve Messina, A. M. (2005). The limits of a European immigration policy: Elite opinion and agendas within the European Parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(4), 851-875. google scholar
  • Massey, D. S. (2016). Göç kuramlarında kayıp halka. Göç Dergisi, 3 (2): 143-165. google scholar
  • McNevin, A. (2006). Political belonging in a neoliberal era: The struggle of the sans-papiers. Citizenship Studies, 10 (2): 135-151. google scholar
  • MPI (The Migration Policy Institute) (2013, 1 Ekim). Migration Data Hub. Erişim: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/migration-data-hub?qt-data_hub_tabs=1#datahub-tabs. google scholar
  • Murdock, H. (2018, 26 Şubat). From Syria to Europe: The price they pay. Erişim: http://www.voanews.com/a/syriaeurope-refugees-cost-price/3072200.html google scholar
  • Ong, A., (2006), Neoliberalism as exception: mutations in citizenship and sovereignty, London :Duke University Press. google scholar
  • O’neill, M. (2010). Asylum, migration and community, Bristol: Policy Press. google scholar
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development) (2018, 10 Mart). OECD income distribution database (idd): gini, poverty, income, methods and concepts. Erişim: http://www.oecd.org/social/incomedistribution-database.htm google scholar
  • OECD (2018, 19 Mart). Measuring and reporting intellectual capital-experience, issues and prospects. Erişim: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/1948014.pdf google scholar
  • Öner, N. A. Ş. ve Genç, D. (2015). Vulnerability leading to mobility: Syrians’ exodus from Turkey. Migration Letters, 12 (3): 251-262. google scholar
  • Palloni, A., Massey, D. S., Ceballos, M., Espinosa, K. ve Spittel, M. (2001). Social capital and international migration: A test using information on family networks. American Journal of Sociology, 106 (5): 1262-1298. google scholar
  • Pieke, F. N. ve Biao, X. (2009). Legality and labour: Chinese migration, neoliberalism and the state in the UK and China. Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 1(1): 11-45. google scholar
  • Putnam, R. D. (1999). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster. google scholar
  • Reher, D.S. (2004). The demographic transition revisited as a global process. Population, Space and Place, 10: 19-41. google scholar
  • Roskin, M. G. (2012). Countries and concepts: politics, geography, culture. 12. Baskı.Boston: Pearson. google scholar
  • Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M. ve Siara, B. (2008). Social networks, social support and social capital: The experiences of recent Polish migrants in London. Sociology, 42 (4): 672-690. google scholar
  • Samers, M. (2010). Migration. Oxon: Routledge. google scholar
  • Sassen, S. (1996). New employment regimes in cities: the impact on immigrant workers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 22 (4): 579-594. google scholar
  • Sassen-Koob, S. (1984). Notes on the incorporation of third world women into wage-labor through immigration and off-shore production. International Migration Review, 18 (4): 1144-1167. google scholar
  • Shear, M. D.ve Davis, J. H. (2018, 3 Mart). Trump moves to end daca and calls on congress to act. Erişim: http://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/05/us/politics/trump-daca-dreamers-immigration.html google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. (2003). Migration, ethnicity and conflict: the environment of insecurity and turkish kurdish international migration. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Sheffield: University of Sheffield. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, I. (2005). War in Iraq: Environment of insecurity and international migration. International Migration, 43(4), 197-214. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. (2006). The environment of insecurity in turkey and the emigration of turkish kurds to germany. New York: Edwin Mellen Press. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. (2007). Human insecurity and streams of conflict for a re-conceptualization of international migration. Population Review, 46 (2): 32-50. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. (2009). Transnational mobility and conflict. Migration Letters, 6 (1): 3-14. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ., Cohen, J. H. ve Yazgan, P. (2016). Conflict, insecurity and mobility. Londra: Transnational Press London. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. (2017). Turkey’s refugees, Syrians and refugees from Turkey: A country of insecurity. Migration Letters, 14 (1): 127-144. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. (2012). Transnasyonal mobilite ve çatışma. Migration Letters, 9 (4): 353-363. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. ve Esipova, N. (2013). Turkish migration in Europe and desire to migrate to and from Turkey. Border Crossing: International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3 (1): 1-13. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. ve Cohen, J. H. (2015, 7 Mayıs). Not migrants and ımmigration, but mobility and movement. Erişim: http://citiesofmigration.ca/ezine_stories/not-migrants-andimmigration-but-mobility-and-movement. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. ve Cohen, J. H. (2016). Cultures of migration and conflict in contemporary human mobility in Turkey. European Review, 24 (3): 381-396. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ., Cohen, J. H. ve Can, N. (2012). “Internal mobility of foreign-born in Turkey”. İçinde Minority Internal migration in europe. (N. Finney ve G. Catney, G. (eds.). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 175-193. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ., Cohen, J. H. ve Yazgan, P. (2012). Turkish culture of migration: Flows between Turkey and Germany, socio-economic development and conflict. Migration Letters, 9 (1): 33-46. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. ve Martin, P. L. (2014). Sources of irregularity and managing migration: The case of Turkey”. Border Crossing: International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4 (1-2): 1-16. google scholar
  • Sirkeci, İ. (2018). Göçün 3 KA’sı. İçinde Dünyaya ve türkiye’ye sosyolojik bakış: başkent üniversitesi fen edebiyat fakültesi sosyoloji bölümü paneller dizisi I-II. (Uğuzman T, Fırıncı Orman T, Coşkun Ç, Karan O, Özüz E). Başkent Üniversitesi Geliştirme Vakfı İktisadi İşletmesi. Ankara. google scholar
  • Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: migrants and postnational membership in europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Stewart, E. (2005). Exploring the vulnerability of asylum seekers in the UK. Population, Space and Place, 11 (6): 499-512. google scholar
  • Stratton, J. (2009). Uncertain lives: migration, the border and neoliberalism in Australia. Social Identities, 15 (5): 677-692. google scholar
  • Statistics Times (2018), List of Countries by Projected GDP per capita, http://statisticstimes.com/economy/countries-by-projected-gdp-capita.php, Erişim: 06.06.2018. google scholar
  • Thejournal.ie. (2017). Catalan leader says he isn’t in belgium to claim asylum, but rather for safety purposes and freedom. Erişim: http://www.thejournal.ie/catalonia-leader-seeks-asylum-in-3672114-Oct2017/, 14.10.2014. google scholar
  • Tilbe, A. (2016). “Bölüm 1: Göç kültürü ve çatışma modeli bağlamında Latife Tekin’in sevgili arsız ölümüne bir bakış”. İçinde Göç üzerine yazın ve kültür incelemeleri. A. Tilbe ve S. Bosnalı (Der.). Londra: Transnational Press London, 1-20. google scholar
  • Tilbe, A. (2017). “Bölüm 1: Göç kültürü ve çatışma modeli bağlamında Mathias Enard’ın hırsızlar sokağı. İçinde Göç konferansı 2017 seçilmiş bildiriler. A . T ilbe, S . B osnalı v e Y. Toplaoğlu ( Der.). Londra: Transnational Press London, 7-26. google scholar
  • Tilbe, A. , K. Civelek (2018) Çatışma ve göç kültürü modeli bağlamında göç romanı okuması: Yüksel Pazarkaya’nın savrulanlar’ı. Göç Dergisi, 5 (1), 77-106. google scholar
  • Tilford, S. (2015). Britain, immigration and Brexit. CER Bulletin, 30: 64-162. google scholar
  • United Nations (2018, 25 Nisan), ‘244 million international migrants living abroad worldwide Erişim: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/international-migrants.html. google scholar
  • Unutulmaz, O., Sirkeci, İ. ve Eroğlu Utku, D. (2017). “Conclusion”. İçinde Turkey’s Syrians: Today and tomorrow. D. Eroğlu Utku, O. Unutulmaz ve Sirkeci, İ. (Der.) Londra: Transnational Press London, 237-242. google scholar
  • Utku, Eroğlu D., (2018), “Eleştirel güvenlik: “Tehdit” eden göçmenden “Referenas Objesine” göç ve güvenlik ilişkisi”. İçinde Uluslararası ilişkilerde güvenlik kuramları ve sorunlarına çağdaş yaklaşımlar S. Turan ve N. Özkural Köroğlu. (Der.). Londra: Transnational Press London. google scholar
  • UNDP (2018, 6 Haziran) Küresel insani gelişme raporu engelleri aşmak: göç ve insani gelişme, Erişim: http://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2009/10/05/human-development-reportchallenges-common-migration-misconceptions.html google scholar
  • Van Hear, N. (2006). “I went as far as my money would take me: conflict, forced migration and class”. İçinde Forced migration and global processes: a view from forced migration studies. F. Crepeau, D. Nakache, M. Collyer, N. Goetz, A. Hansen, R. Modi, A. Nadig, S. Spoljar-Vrzina ve M. Willigen (ed.). Oxford: Lexington Books, 125-158. google scholar
  • Varsanyi, M. W. (2008). Rescaling the “alien,” rescaling personhood: Neoliberalism, immigration, and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98 (4): 877-896. google scholar
  • Wise, R. D., Covarrubias, H. M. ve Puentes, R. (2010). Reframing the debate on migration, development and human rights: fundamental elements. International Network on Migration and Development, 19: 430-443. google scholar
  • Yazgan, P., Utku Eroğlu, D. ve Sirkeci, İ. (2015). Syrian crisis and migration. Migration Letters, 12 (3): 181-192. google scholar
  • Yüceşahin, M. M. ve Sirkeci, İ. (2017a). Demographic gaps between Syrian and the European populations: What do they suggest? Border Crossing: International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7 (2): 207-230. google scholar
  • Yüceşahin, M. M. ve Sirkeci, İ. (2017b). “Chapter ten: Demographic gaps between Syrian and the European populations: What do they suggest?”. In Turkey’s Syrians: Today and tomorrow. D. Eroğlu Utku, K. O. Unutulmaz, İ. Sirkeci (eds.). London: Transnational Press London, 187-211. google scholar
  • Yüceşahin, M. M. ve Tulga, A. Y. (2017). Demographic and social change in the Middle East and North Africa: Processes, spatial patterns, and outcomes. Population Horizons, 14 (2): AOP. DOI 10.1515/pophzn-2017-0003. google scholar
  • Yüceşahin, M.M. (2009). Türkiye’nin demografik geçiş sürecine coğrafi bir yaklaşım, Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 7 (1): 1-25. google scholar
  • Yüceşahin, M.M., KC, S. (2015). Demographic and human capital heterogeneity in selected provinces of Turkey: A scenario analysis using multi-dimensional population projection model. Economics and Sociology, 8 (3): 215-244. google scholar
  • Zeyneloğlu, S. ve Sirkeci, İ. (2014). Türkiye’de Almanlar ve Almancılar, Göç Dergisi, 1 (1): 77-118. google scholar
  • Zimmerman, C., Kiss, L. ve Hossain, M. (2011). Migration and health: A framework for 21st century policy-making. PLOS Medicine, 8 (5): e1001034. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Sirkeci, İ., Eroğlu Utku, D., & Yüceşahin, M. (0001). Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(59), 157-184. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016


AMA

Sirkeci İ, Eroğlu Utku D, Yüceşahin M. Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 0001;0(59):157-184. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016


ABNT

Sirkeci, İ.; Eroğlu Utku, D.; Yüceşahin, M. Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 59, p. 157-184, 0001.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sirkeci, İbrahim, and Deniz Eroğlu Utku and Mustafa Murat Yüceşahin. 0001. “Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 59: 157-184. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sirkeci, İbrahim, and Deniz Eroğlu Utku and Mustafa Murat Yüceşahin. “Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 59 (Nov. 2024): 157-184. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016


Harvard: Australian Style

Sirkeci, İ & Eroğlu Utku, D & Yüceşahin, M 0001, 'Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 59, pp. 157-184, viewed 24 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sirkeci, İ. and Eroğlu Utku, D. and Yüceşahin, M. (0001) ‘Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(59), pp. 157-184. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016 (24 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Sirkeci, İbrahim, and Deniz Eroğlu Utku and Mustafa Murat Yüceşahin. “Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 59, 0001, pp. 157-184. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016


Vancouver

Sirkeci İ, Eroğlu Utku D, Yüceşahin M. Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 24 Nov. 2024 [cited 24 Nov. 2024];0(59):157-184. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016 doi: 10.26650/JECS2019-0016


ISNAD

Sirkeci, İbrahim - Eroğlu Utku, Deniz - Yüceşahin, Mustafa Murat. “Göç Çatışma Modelinin Katılım, Kalkınma ve Kitle Açıkları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirmesi”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/59 (Nov. 2024): 157-184. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0016



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim22.11.2018
Kabul21.12.2018

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.