Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JECS402676   IUP :10.26650/JECS402676    Tam Metin (PDF)

Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi

Nurcan Atalan Helıcke

Türkiye buğdayın yabani atalarının ekilip biçilmeye başlandığı bir coğrafyada yer alır ve önemli bir buğday genetik çeşitlilik merkezidir. Küresel olarak bitki genetik çeşitlilik merkezlerinde çeşitliliğin azaldığı, geleneksel (atalık) türlerin modern türlerin hakimiyeti altında gitgide kaybolduğu ve bunun gıda güvenliği ve iklim değişikliğine karşı adaptasyon sürecinde etkileri üzerine kaygılar vardır. Geleneksel (atalık) buğday çeşitlerini pazara ulaştırmaya yönelik proje ve politikalar bu kaynakların korunması yanında geçimlik kaynaklarının korunmasını ve gıda güvenliğine erişimi de sağlar. Fakat geleneksel çeşitlerin pazarlanması için üreticilerin kollektif eylemi gereklidir. Türkiye’de alan çalışmasında derlenen bilgilere dayanan bu makale, geleneksel iki buğday çeşidi, siyez (Triticum monococcum) ve zeron/zerunun (T. Aestivum) korunması ve geliştirilmesini incelemektedir. Üreticilerin geleneksel buğdayların satışı için daimi ve güvenceli pazarlara erişiminde dışsal kalkınma müdahaleleri kadar üreticilerin kendi aralarında ve dış aktörlerle ilişkileri ve bağlayıcı, birleştirici ve köprü kuran sosyal sermayeleri gereklidir. Üreticilerin geçmiş kollektif eylem deneyimleri ve tarımsal biyolojik çeşitliliğin korunması için tohum ağları gibi pazar-dışı çözümleri de pazar odaklı çözümlerin uzun süreçte etkin olabilmesi için gereklidir. Ulusal yasal düzenlemeler ve sosyo-ekonomik politikalar da üreticilerin karar alma süreçlerini etkilediği için geleneksel buğday çeşitlerini pazara ulaştıran çözümlerin sürdürülebilirliği sürecinde ele alınan başlıklardan olmalıdır. 
DOI :10.26650/JECS402676   IUP :10.26650/JECS402676    Tam Metin (PDF)

Markets and Collective Action: A Case Study of Traditional Wheat Varieties in Turkey

Nurcan Atalan Helıcke

Turkey one of the centers of origin and genetic diversity for wheat. There are concerns about a global decline in crop genetic diversity in centers of agricultural diversity, the replacement of traditional varieties with modern varieties and implications for food security and climate change resilience. Market-oriented solutions can help conserve traditional wheat varieties, secure livelihoods and promote food security. However, overcoming marketing challenges of traditional varieties require collective action of small farmers. Based on fieldwork in Turkey, this article examines the conservation and development outcomes for two traditional wheat varieties, einkorn (Triticum monococcum) and a local bread wheat variety zeron/zerun (Triticum aestivum). While external development interventions are critical to secure guaranteed markets for farmers, bonding, bridging and linking social capital between farmers and external actors sustain collective action in the long term. Previous collective action of farmers and non-market solutions for agricultural biodiversity conservation, particularly seed exchange networks, also are critical for the effectiveness of market-oriented solutions. The national context, legal changes as well as socio-economic policies, also affects the decisions of farmers to cultivate the traditional varieties, and thus, should be included in the sustainability of market-oriented solutions for traditional wheat variety conservation. 

PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Açık Toplum Vakfı (2010). 100 konuda Avrupa Birliği’nin günlük hayatımıza etkileri (The impact of European Union on our daily lives in 100 questions) Retrieved from http://aciktoplumvakfi.org.tr/pdf/100_konuda_avrupa_birligi-nin_gunluk_hayatimiza_etkileri.pdf google scholar
  • Adger, W.N. (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic geography, vol. 79, no. 4, 387-404 google scholar
  • Adhikari, K.P. (2008) Bridging, linking, and bonding social capital in collective action. Collective Action and Property Rights CAPRi , 1-23. google scholar
  • Agrawal, A. (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development 29, (10), 1649-1672. google scholar
  • Anadolu Ajansı(2015, 9 Aralık). Kastamonu’da siyez bugdayi paneli. Retrieved from http://www.haberler.com/siyez-bugdayi-paneli-7952454-haberi/ google scholar
  • Atalan-Helicke, N. (2015) Seed exchange networks and food system resilience in the United States. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5, (4), 636-649. google scholar
  • Atalan-Helicke, N. (2018) “You can never give up siyez if you taste it once:” Local Taste, Global Markets and Conservation of Ancient Wheat Einkorn. Gastronomica 18, (2), 35-45. google scholar
  • Atalan-Helicke, N. & Mansfield, B. (2012) Seed governance at the intersection of multiple global and nation-state priorities: modernizing seeds in Turkey. Global Environmental Politics 12, (4), 125-146. google scholar
  • Atasoy, Y. (2013) Supermarket expansion in Turkey: Shifting relations of food provisioning. Journal of Agrarian Change 13,(4), 547-570. google scholar
  • Bellon, M.R. (2004) Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation. World Development 32, (1), 159-172. google scholar
  • Bioversity International, (2006) Emmer in Turkey: An ancient cereal maintained by mountain farmers. Building the Market Chain. Retrieved from https://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/_migrated/uploads/tx_news/Emmer_in_Turkey_1272.pdf google scholar
  • Brookfield, H.C. (2001) Exploring agrodiversity NY: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Bourdier, P (1986) The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology Education (pp.47-58) Westport: Greenwood Press. google scholar
  • BTC (2003) Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Project Community Investment Plan, Final March 2003. Retrieved from https://www.commdev.org/files/2273_file_CDP_BTC_Pipeline_Georgia_Azerbaijan_Turkey_2003_.pdf google scholar
  • Coleman, J.S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120. google scholar
  • Crespo, J., D. Réquier-Desjardins, and J. Vicente (2014) Why can collective action fail in Local Agri-food Systems? A social network analysis of cheese producers in Aculco, Mexico. Food Policy, 46, 165-177. google scholar
  • Devaux, A., D. Horton, C. Velasco, G. Thiele, G. López, T. Bernet, I. Reinoso, and M. Ordinola, (2009) Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes. Food Policy, 34, (1), 31-38. google scholar
  • EC (2004) Development of Organic Agriculture and Legal Alignment with the EU. TR0402.07. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/fiche-projet/turkey/2004/tr-0402.07-organic-agriculture.pdf google scholar
  • FAO (2015) Wheat Landraces in Farmers’ Fields in Turkey: National Survey, Collection, and Conservation, 2009-2014, by M. Kan, M. Küçükçongar, M. Keser, A. Morgounov, H. Muminjanov, F.Özdemir, C.Qualset. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5316e.pdf. google scholar
  • Flanigan, S. & Sutherland, L (2016) Buying Access to Social Capital? From Collaboration to Service Provision in an Agricultural Co-operative. Sociologia Ruralis, 56, (4), 471-490. google scholar
  • Foreign Policy (2016) Inside the Syrian Dust Bowl. 5 September 2016. google scholar
  • Giuliani, A. (2007) Developing markets for agrobiodiversity: Securing livelihoods in dryland areas London and New York: Earthscan. google scholar
  • Giuliani, A., A. Karagöz, and N. Zencirci (2009) Emmer (Triticum dicoccon) production and market potential in marginal mountainous areas of Turkey. Mountain Research and Development, 29, (3), 220-229. google scholar
  • Gökgöl, M. (1939) Türkiye’nin Buğdayları. Istanbul: Tom.II. Isakson, S.R. (2011) Market provisioning and the conservation of crop biodiversity: An analysis of peasant livelihoods and maize diversity in the Guatemalan highlands. World Development, 39,(8), 1444-1459. google scholar
  • Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2013) Illerin ve bolgelerin sosyoekonomik gelismişlik sıralaması araştırması (Socioeconomic survey of cities and regions). Report by Turkey Ministry of Development Retrieved from: http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/2_turkiye_ab_iliskileri/2_2_adaylik_sureci/2_2_8_diger/tckb_sege_2013.pdf google scholar
  • Karagöz, A. (1996) Agronomic Practices and Socioeconomic Aspects of Emmer and Einkorn Cultivation in Turkey. In S. Padulosi, S. K. Hammer, and J. Heller (Eds.) Hulled Wheat: Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats (pp. 172–77). Rome: IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute). google scholar
  • Karagöz, A. and N. Zencirci (2005) Variation in wheat (Triticum spp.) landraces from different altitudes of three regions of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52, (6), 775-785. google scholar
  • Kruijssen, F., M. Keizer, and A. Giuliani, A. (2009) Collective action for small-scale producers of agricultural biodiversity products. Food Policy, 34, (1), 46-52. google scholar
  • Kuzmanovic, D. (2010) Project culture and Turkish civil society. Turkish Studies, 11, (3), 429-444. google scholar
  • Markelova, H. and E. Mwangi (2010) Collective action for smallholder market access: evidence and implications for Africa. Review of policy research 27, (5), 621-640. google scholar
  • McDonell, E. (2015) Miracle Foods: Quinoa, Curative Metaphors, and the Depoliticization of Global Hunger Politics. Gastronomica: The Journal of Critical Food Studies, 15, (4), 70-85. google scholar
  • Meng, E., J. Taylor, and S. Brush (1998) Implications for the conservation of wheat landraces in Turkey from a household model of varietal choice. In Farmers Gene Banks and Crop Breeding: Economic Analyses of Diversity in Wheat Maize and Rice (pp. 127-142). Springer Netherlands. google scholar
  • Michelini, J.J. (2013) Small farmers and social capital in development projects: Lessons from failures in Argentina’s rural periphery. Journal of Rural Studies, 30, 99-109. google scholar
  • Ostrom, E and T. K. Ahn (2008) The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. In G. T. Svendsen and G. L. H. Svendsen (eds.( Handbook on Social Capital: The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics (pp. 17-34), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar. google scholar
  • Özbek, N. (2003) Kemalist Rejim ve Popülizmin Sınırları: Büyük Buhran ve Buğday Alım Politikaları, 1932-1937. Toplum ve Bilim XX, (96), 219-240. google scholar
  • Parker-Gibson, N. (2015) Quinoa: Catalyst or Catastrophe? Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 16, (2), 113-122. google scholar
  • Pautasso, M., G. Aistara, A. Barnaud, S. Caillon, P. … and T. Döring (2013) Seed exchange networks for agrobiodiversity conservation. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development 33, (1), 151-175. google scholar
  • Putnam, R.D. (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of democracy, 6, (1), 65-78. google scholar
  • Slow Food (2003) Slow Food Presidia: How to create a Presidium, build relationships with producers and organize activities. By Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity and Terra Madre. Retrieved from https://www.slowfoodusa.org/files/files/handbook-presidia.pdf google scholar
  • Slow Food (2017) Siyez Wheat Bulgur, Turkey. By Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity. Retrieved from: http://www.fondazioneslowfood.com/en/slow-food-presidia/siyez-wheat-bulgur/ google scholar
  • TMO (2014) Turkish Grains Board Wheat Purchase List, 2013-2014 season price list. Retrieved from: http://www.tdag-ticbor.org.tr/tr/tmo_2013-2014_Alim_Baremi google scholar
  • TMO (2016) Mission and Duties of Turkish Grains Board. Retrieved from http://www.tmo.gov.tr/Main.aspx?ID=370 google scholar
  • TUIK (2015) Turkiye Tarim ve Orman Alanlari (Turkey Forest and Agricultural Land) 1988-2015. By Turkish Statistical Institute. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=53 google scholar
  • USDA (2015) Turkey Grain and Feed Annual, by Kubilay Karabina, Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network TR 5016. google scholar
  • ZMO (1970) Yabancı Menşeli Buğday Tohumluklarının Durumu (The Status of Non-native Wheat Seeds). By Chamber of Agriculture Engineers. Ankara. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Atalan Helıcke, N. (2019). Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(59), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676


AMA

Atalan Helıcke N. Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2019;0(59):13-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676


ABNT

Atalan Helıcke, N. Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 59, p. 13-30, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Atalan Helıcke, Nurcan,. 2019. “Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 59: 13-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676


Chicago: Humanities Style

Atalan Helıcke, Nurcan,. Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 59 (Sep. 2024): 13-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676


Harvard: Australian Style

Atalan Helıcke, N 2019, 'Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 59, pp. 13-30, viewed 29 Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Atalan Helıcke, N. (2019) ‘Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(59), pp. 13-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676 (29 Sep. 2024).


MLA

Atalan Helıcke, Nurcan,. Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 59, 2019, pp. 13-30. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676


Vancouver

Atalan Helıcke N. Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 29 Sep. 2024 [cited 29 Sep. 2024];0(59):13-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676 doi: 10.26650/JECS402676


ISNAD

Atalan Helıcke, Nurcan. Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/59 (Sep. 2024): 13-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS402676



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim06.03.2018
Kabul21.06.2018
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma03.07.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.