Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JECS403224   IUP :10.26650/JECS403224    Tam Metin (PDF)

Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma

Adnan BoyacıYakup Öz

Öğrencileri okul terkine iten nedenlerin belirlenmesi ve bunlara yönelik önlemlerin alınması eğitim sistemlerindeki öncelikli sorun alanlarından biridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı okul terkinin nedenlerini sosyal sermaye bağlamında incelemektir. Bu doğrultuda herhangi bir örgün lisede eğitim görürken okulu bırakarak açık liseye kayıt yaptırmış öğrencilerle yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla veriler toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizi sonucunda öğrencinin içinde bulunduğu aile, okul ve topluluk olarak üç alanda kurduğu sosyal ağlar, bu ağlar içinde yer alan kişiler arası güven ve bu ağlarda benimsenen norm ve değerlerden oluşan sosyal sermayenin okul terki sürecinde nasıl bir rol oynadığı incelenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda bulgular aile, okul ve topluluk sermayesi olarak üç başlık altında sunulmuştur. Buna göre özellikle ailenin okula katılımı, okulun aileye katılımı, öğrenci-öğretmen ilişkileri gibi konularda yaşanan sorunların ve okul içi ve dışındaki arkadaş gruplarının olumsuz etkisi gibi sosyal sermaye bağlantılı nedenlerin öğrencinin okul terki sürecinde ön plana çıktığı ifade edilebilir. Bunun sonucunda boylamsal çalışmaların yapılarak okul terki risk gruplarının belirlenmesi, ailenin okula katılımında rehberlik hizmetinin daha işlevsel hale getirilmesi ve özellikle okul terki riskinin yüksek olduğu eğitim kurumlarında akran sosyal sermayesinin olumsuz sonuçlarını en aza indirmek için özellikle akademik personelin öğrenciler ile etkileşimlerinde azalan güveni yeniden sağlayarak öğrencilerin beklentilerini daha kolay anlayabilecekleri yakın sosyal ağlar kurmaları önerilmiştir. 
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sosyal sermayeokul terkiortaöğretimlise
DOI :10.26650/JECS403224   IUP :10.26650/JECS403224    Tam Metin (PDF)

Dropout in Secondary Education and Social Capital: A Qualitative Study

Adnan BoyacıYakup Öz

Identification of the factors leading to school dropout, and measures to prevent it, are among the most pressing problems of education systems. The purpose of this study is to examine the causes of school dropout in the context of social capital. To this end, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with students who dropped out of a formal high school and then enrolled in an open high school. In the study, how the social network formed by the student in three areas (family, school, and community), the trust among people in these networks, and the norms and values adopted in these networks play a role in the dropout process were examined. The findings are presented under three themes: family, school, and community social capital. Problems in family participation in school, the school’s effort to partner with families, teacher-student interactions, and the negative effects of the groups inside and outside the school are identified as emerging factors related social capital in the student’s dropout process. As a result, carrying out longitudinal studies to determine groups at high risk for dropping out, improving school counseling and guidance departments in order to promote school-family partnership, and strengthening the bonds between teachers and students by reestablishing trust to eliminate the negative results of peer social capital in at-risk schools were suggested. 

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Education is one of the critical factors boosting the development of nations in the current knowledge economy era. Many projects and programs are held by national and supranational organizations to increase matriculation and enrollment rates and length of education. However, school dropout is one of the major challenges that education systems face with. Many factors lead students to drop out. One of them is the outcomes of interpersonal relations that students experience in their families, in schools, and in their communities.

This study aimed to find out the causes of school dropout in the context of social capital. The qualitative descriptive design was adopted for the methodology. An interview form consisting of semi-structured questions was created based on the literature and the opinions of field experts. The data were collected through the interviews with 24 dropout students in Eskişehir, Turkey. These students were selected in accordance with the criterion and snowball sampling methods. It was observed that the vast majority of participants left vocational schools, had low academic achievement, absenteeism problems, and friends who also hadn’t completed high school and/or repeated a grade during secondary education. The thematic analysis method was used during data analysis. To that end, codes, categories, and themes were created. All the voice records and other documents were kept for an audit trail.

Findings are presented under three main themes: family, school, and community social capital. In each theme, there are some factors that challenged student engagement with school and education system and led to dropout. In the context of family social capital, these factors are low educational expectations of the family from student’s education; issues of trust in student-family relations; and the problems of parental participation at school. In school social capital, low expectations of school academic personnel on student’s educational outcomes, the negative effects of peer social groups leading to deviant behaviors and low academic achievement, issues with student-teacher relations, and low efforts on the part of schools to establish close relations with the family to support student educational outcomes are some of the critical problems. Lastly, in community social capital, low educational expectations of the community and the negative effects of social networks between the student and his/her friends outside the school are some of the emerging factors.

According to the results of the study, some proposals were made. First of all, it is observed that most of the participants are disadvantaged in social capital, considering their similar individual characteristics in their current social networks. These networks are generally composed of individuals who left school, had absenteeism and disciplinary problems, had to repeat grades and suffered low academic success. In schools, students are mainly in social networks consisting of low-achieving, grade-repeating, and misbehaving students. In their families, they generally have siblings who dropped out of school or parents whose education level stops before upper secondary education. In communities, students have more powerful social networks with friends out of school.

One of the causes of disadvantaged students finding themselves in similarly disadvantaged social networks could be the high school placement system in Turkey (TEOG). The system separates high-achieving students from low-achieving ones. Students with a similar level of academic success are grouped together in schools. Inevitably, students are placed into similar social networks by demographics, achievement, and aspirations. In this study, most of the students are enrolled in vocational high schools.

Considering these disadvantaged social networks, longitudinal and large-scale researches helping to reveal the groups most at risk for dropping out should be conducted by the relevant authorities in the districts of Eskişehir. Then the all authorities, in collaboration with universities, municipalities, and national education district directorates, should take the indicated necessary actions to decrease dropout rates and raise awareness of negative repercussions of dropping out in high-risk districts.

Secondly, the power of peer groups leading students to act together in school and community is evident. Even students think that school is valuable, because of the friends they make there. However, most of the time, these peer networks produce delinquent behaviors leading to low academic achievement, discipline problems and finally, dropping out. Hence, teachers should create more trust in their interactions with the students to facilitate the identification of student needs and expectations. This would also be helpful for sustaining a positive and healthy school climate by maintaining close relations between family and school. Hence, at-risk schools in particular should take more and effective actions to enhance family participation in schools. In this regard, counseling and guidance services should be optimized to promote student engagement and the school-family partnership.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Anne Çocuk Eğitim Vakfı. (2006). Türkiye’de ilköğretim okullarında okulu terk ve izlenmesi ile önlenmesine yönelik politikalar. İstanbul: Yazar. google scholar
  • Aküzüm, C., Yavaş, T., Tan, Ç. ve Uçar, M. B. (2015). İlköğretim kurumu öğrencilerinin devamsızlık ve okul terki nedenleri. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2015(22), 167–192. google scholar
  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of education, 87–107. google scholar
  • Anguiano, R. P. V. (2004). Families and schools: The effect of parental involvement on high school completion. Journal of Family Issues, 25(1), 61–85. google scholar
  • Ardahan, F. ve Ezici, M. (2015). İlköğretim sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyal sermaye profili, sosyal sermaye ve başarı durumunun çeşitli demografik değişkenlere göre değerlendirilmesi: Antalya örneği. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(1), 16–36. google scholar
  • Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 309–320. google scholar
  • Audet, J., & d’Amboise, G. (2001). The multi-site study: An innovative research methodology. The Qualitative Report, 6(2), 1–18. google scholar
  • Barnard, W. M. (2004). Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(1), 39–62. google scholar
  • Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M. D., Abbott, R. D., Hill, K. G., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 568–582. google scholar
  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education. London, UK: Pearson. google scholar
  • Boggess, S. (1998). Family structure, economic status, and educational attainment. Journal of Population Economics, 11(2), 205–222. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Information (International Social Science Council), 24(2), 195–220. google scholar
  • Bowditch, C. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 40(4), 493–509. google scholar
  • Bozanoğlu, İ. (2005). Bilişsel davranışçı yaklaşıma dayalı grup rehberliğinin güdülenme, benlik saygısı, başarı ve sınav kaygısı düzeylerine etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 17–42. google scholar
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. google scholar
  • Bryk, A. S., & Thum, Y. M. (1989). The effects of high school organization on dropping out: An exploratory investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 353–383. google scholar
  • Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar
  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). Springer New York. google scholar
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Free riders and zealots: The role of social networks. Sociological Theory, 6(1), 52–57. google scholar
  • Crane, J. (1991). The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. American Journal of Sociology, 96(5), 1226–1259. google scholar
  • Crowder, K., & South, S. J. (2003). Neighborhood distress and school dropout: The variable significance of community context. Social Science Research, 32(4), 659–698. google scholar
  • Çelik, Ç. (2014). Sosyal sermaye, ebeveyn ağları ve okul başarısı. Cogito, 76, 265–289. google scholar
  • Dewey, J. (2013). The school and society and the child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Dunham, R., & Wilson, G. (2007). Race, within-family social capital, and school dropout: An analysis of Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. Sociological Spectrum, 27(2), 207–221. google scholar
  • Ensminger, M. E., & Slusarcick, A. L. (1992). Paths to high school graduation or dropout: A longitudinal study of a first-grade cohort. Sociology of Education, 95–113. google scholar
  • Ensminger, M. E., Lamkin, R. P., & Jacobson, N. (1996). School leaving: A longitudinal perspective including neighborhood effects. Child Development, 67(5), 2400–2416. google scholar
  • Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701–. google scholar
  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142. google scholar
  • Fischer, M. J., & Kmec, J. A. (2004). Neighborhood socioeconomic conditions as moderators of family resource transmission: High school completion among at-risk youth. Sociological Perspectives, 47(4), 507–527. google scholar
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. google scholar
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press Paperbacks. google scholar
  • Fukuyama, F. (1999). Social capital and civil society. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/wp0074.pdf google scholar
  • Ginther, D. K., & Pollak, R. A. (2004). Family structure and children’s educational outcomes: Blended families, stylized facts, and descriptive regressions. Demography, 41(4), 671–696. google scholar
  • Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 676–719. google scholar
  • Haveman, R., Wolfe, B., & Spaulding, J. (1991). Childhood events and circumstances influencing high school completion. Demography, 28(1), 133–157. google scholar
  • Israel, G. D., & Beaulieu, L. J. (2004). Laying the foundation for employment: The role of social capital in educational achievement. The Review of Regional Studies, 34(3), 260–287. google scholar
  • Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110. google scholar
  • Jimerson, S., Egeland, B., Sroufe, L. A., & Carlson, B. (2000). A prospective longitudinal study of high school dropouts examining multiple predictors across development. Journal of School Psychology, 38(6), 525–549. google scholar
  • Karacabey, M. F., & Boyacı, A. (2018). Okulu terkeden ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin okulu terk etme nedenleri ve sosyo-ekonomik profilleri: Şanlıurfa örneği. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 24(2), 247–293. google scholar
  • Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. google scholar
  • Lamborn, S., Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, 11–39. google scholar
  • Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 467–487. google scholar
  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (1993). Research in education: A conceptual understanding. New York, NY: Haprer Collins. google scholar
  • McMillen, M. M., Kaufman, P., & Whitener, S. D. (1994). Drop-out rates in the United States: 1993. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. google scholar
  • McNeal Jr, R. B. (1997). Are students being pulled out of high school? The effect of adolescent employment on dropping out. Sociology of Education, 206–220. google scholar
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). Ortaöğretimde sınıf tekrarı, okul terk sebepleri ve örgün eğitim dışında kalan çocuklar politika önerileri raporu. Erişim adresi: http://www.meb.gov.tr/earged/unicef/S%C4%B1n%C4%B1f%20Tekrar%C4%B1,%20Okul%20Terki%20Politika%20Raporu.pdf google scholar
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2017a). Ulusal eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2016-2017. Erişim adresi: http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_09/08151328_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2016_2017.pdf google scholar
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2017b). MEB Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı (SGB) 2017 yılı performans programı. Erişim adresi: https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_01/30154029_2017_YYlY_Performans_ProgramY.pdf google scholar
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from” case study research in education”. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. google scholar
  • Nahapiet, S., & Ghoshal, A. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. google scholar
  • OECD. (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris, FR: Author.Publications. google scholar
  • Ou, S. R. (2008). Do GED recipients differ from graduates and school dropouts? Findings from an inner-city cohort. Urban Education, 43(1), 83–117. google scholar
  • Özdemir, S., Erkan, S., Karip, E., Sezgin, F. ve Şirin, H. (2010). İlköğretim okulu öğrencilerinin okulu terk etme nedenleri ve çözüm önerileri. Erişim adresi: gef-egitimbilimleri-egitimyonetimi.gazi.edu.tr/posts/download?id=31921 google scholar
  • Özer, A., Gençtanırım, D. ve Ergene, T. (2011). Türk lise öğrencilerinde okul terkinin yordanması: Aracı ve etkileşim değişkenleri ile bir model testi. Education in Science, 36(161), 302–317. google scholar
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications. google scholar
  • Pong, S. L., & Ju, D. B. (2000). The effects of change in family structure and income on dropping out of middle and high school. Journal of Family Issues, 21(2), 147–169. google scholar
  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24. google scholar
  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community. The American Prospect, 4(13), 35–42. google scholar
  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–684. google scholar
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics (pp. 223–234)., New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Ream, R. K., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Student engagement, peer social capital, and school dropout among Mexican American and non-Latino white students. Sociology of Education, 81(2), 109–139. google scholar
  • Rumberger, R. W., & Lim, S. A. (2008). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research. California Dropout Research Project, 15, 1–3. google scholar
  • Somers, C. L., Owens, D., & Piliawsky, M. (2009). A study of high school dropout prevention and at-risk ninth graders’ role models and motivations for school completion. Education, 130(2), 348–357. google scholar
  • South, S. J., Haynie, D. L., & Bose, S. (2005). Residential mobility and the onset of adolescent sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 499–514. google scholar
  • Stearns, E., & Glennie, E. J. (2006). When and why dropouts leave high school. Youth & Society, 38(1), 29–57. google scholar
  • Şimşek, H. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinde okulu bırakma eğilimi ve nedenleri. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 27–47. google scholar
  • Taş, A., Selvitopu, A., Bora, V. ve Demirkaya, Y. (2013). Meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin okul terk nedenleri. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1551–1566. google scholar
  • Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. IL: University of Chicago Press Chicago. google scholar
  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. google scholar
  • Vartanian, T. P., & Gleason, P. M. (1999). Do neighborhood conditions affect high school dropout and college graduation rates? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(1), 21–41. google scholar
  • Wang, J., & Goldschmidt, P. (1999). Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 101–111. google scholar
  • Wehlage, G. G. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis. google scholar
  • White, S. W., & Kelly, F. D. (2010). The school counselor’s role in school dropout prevention. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(2), 227–235. google scholar
  • Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (1993). Simplicity and complexity in the effects of parental structure on high school graduation. Demography, 30(4), 701–717. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Boyacı, A., & Öz, Y. (2018). Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(58), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224


AMA

Boyacı A, Öz Y. Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2018;0(58):67-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224


ABNT

Boyacı, A.; Öz, Y. Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 58, p. 67-89, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Boyacı, Adnan, and Yakup Öz. 2018. “Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 58: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224


Chicago: Humanities Style

Boyacı, Adnan, and Yakup Öz. Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 58 (Apr. 2025): 67-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224


Harvard: Australian Style

Boyacı, A & Öz, Y 2018, 'Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 58, pp. 67-89, viewed 28 Apr. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Boyacı, A. and Öz, Y. (2018) ‘Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(58), pp. 67-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224 (28 Apr. 2025).


MLA

Boyacı, Adnan, and Yakup Öz. Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 58, 2018, pp. 67-89. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224


Vancouver

Boyacı A, Öz Y. Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 28 Apr. 2025 [cited 28 Apr. 2025];0(58):67-89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224 doi: 10.26650/JECS403224


ISNAD

Boyacı, Adnan - Öz, Yakup. Ortaöğretimde Okul Terki ve Sosyal Sermaye: Nitel Bir Araştırma”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/58 (Apr. 2025): 67-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS403224



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim08.03.2018
Kabul26.09.2018

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.