Journal of Economy Culture and Society

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0003   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0003    Tam Metin (PDF)

Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci

Serhat Aydın, Emin Can Duyan

Bu araştırmanın konusu, sosyal mübadele teorisi kapsamında internet üzerinden ücretsiz konaklama üzerine kurulu Couchsurfing (CS) oluşumudur. Araştırmanın amacı ise CS üzerinden insanların neden evlerini tanımadıkları bir insanla paylaştığını keşfetmek ve sosyal mübadele teorisi kapsamında değerlendirmektir. Bu doğrultuda, Eskişehir’de CS üyesi ve misafir ağırlamış yedi katılımcı ile görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında CS deneyimi, beklenti, amaç, kurulan ilişki, güven ve karşılıklılık kavramları bağlamında sorgulanmıştır. Bu araştırmada, katılımcıların CS deneyim süreci keşfedilmiştir. CS’nin sosyal mübadele teorisine farklı bir bakış açısı kazandırabileceği tespit edilmiştir. CS deneyimi, sosyal mübadele teorisi kapsamında bir süreç olarak model önerisiyle açıklanmıştır. Bu modele göre CS aracılığıyla insanlar üç aşamada karşılaşmaktadır. İlk karşılaşma tarafların internet üzerinden etkileşimini açıklamaktadır. İkinci karşılaşma ise yüz yüze etkileşimi ve son karşılaşma ise CS deneyimi sonrası iletişimi açıklamaktadır. Ek olarak, katılımcılar için güven, araştırmada öne çıkan bir kavram olmuştur. Bunun nedeni ise ilk karşılaşmanın internet üzerinden gerçekleşmesidir. Sosyal mübadele teorisi kapsamında ise öne çıkan kavram karşılıklılıktır. Bu bağlamda, ileride yapılacak araştırmalar güven ve karşılıklılık değişkenleri üzerinden kurgulanabilir. Ayrıca CS araştırmaları katılımcı gözlem ve alan notları yoluyla geliştirilebilir. İleride yapılacak araştırmalara öneriler sunulmuştur. 
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sosyal Mübadele Teorisi, Couchsurfing, Eskişehir
DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0003   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0003    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Postmodern Unexpected Guest: The Couchsurfing Experience Process

Serhat Aydın, Emin Can Duyan

The subject of this research is the formation of Couchsurfing (CS) based on free accommodation on the internet within the context of social change theory. The aim of the research is to discover why people share their homes with people through CS and to evaluate them in accordance with social change theory. In this context, seven participants were interviewed in Eskişehir with CS members and hosted guests. As part of the research, the concepts of the CS experience, expectations, purpose, established relationships, trust and reciprocity were questioned. In this study, the CS experience process of the participants was learned and it was determined that CS might provide a different perspective in social change theory. The CS experience is explained with a model proposal as a process within social change theory. According to this model proposal, people move through three phases in CS. The first phase is the internet interaction. The second phase is the face-to-face interaction and the last phase is the communication following the CS experience. Trust for participants is a prominent topic in research in this area. This is due to the fact that the first interaction is caried out over the internet. In the context of social exchange theory, the prominent concept is reciprocity. Future research can be structured on the variables trust and reciprocity. In addition, CS research can be developed through participatory observation and colecting field notes. Lastly, research suggestions are presented. 
Anahtar Kelimeler: Social Exchange Theory, Couchsurfing, Eskisehir

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Couchsurfing (CS) is a suitable field for research in both tourism and social psychology. CS reveals social change, relationships and interactions within the cross-cultural context (Chen, 2017). CS is associated with voluntary or intimate tourism concepts in tourism (Bialski, 2006). This is because the development of CS has focused more on social relations than on any material return. The basis of CS is made up of travel and accommodation. CS literature generally relates to online confidence, confidence in the initial phase between the host and the guest, technological infrastructure and demographic characteristics of CS users (Luo and Zhang, 2016).

Rosen et al., (2011) investigated participation activities in an online resource exchange community that explored the elements of belonging, commitment and trust. Adamic et al. (2011) tried to identify the relationship between friendship and trust through CS. Ayers-Greenidge (2012) identified the motivation and demographic characteristics of CS members in this qualitative study on Taiwanese CS members. Hellwig et al. (2014) focused on the question of why CS members make their homes available to foreigners. Geiger and Germelmann (2015) explored concepts of social interaction such as sharing, reception and reciprocity through CS. Based on the theory of interpersonal relations, Luo and Zhang (2016) aimed to explore the process of interpersonal trust building in CS, which includes both online and offline interactions. Liu et al. (2016) focused on discovering critical success factors to ensure CS’s sustainable development. Avcikurt et al. (2017) examined CS’s member behavior in the context of slow tourism. Schuckert et al., (2017) interview 14 people living in Austria to understand the motivations and behaviors of CSs and hosts, to learn more about travel experience in general, to understand hostguest relationship perception, and travel behavior. Geiger et al., (2018), explores reciprocity and expectations as well as obligations in the free choice of free accommodation sharing or social context shape preferences.

The aim of this research is to evaluate the Couchsurfing within social change theory. This research was designed as a qualitative research. In this context, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven participants who are members of CS in Eskişehir. The data was analyzed without using any qualitative data analysis program. Research participants were selected based on pre-defined criteria such as reference number, return rate, last online status, and hospitality number. The research question is to determine why people do not know why they host people in their homes. Social change theory explains the social and economic interactions between people. In this study, it is assumed that the social element of the theory is important. The reason for this is that CS is kept on the economic side and is based on free exchanges. Furthermore, there is a negative situation for the tourism sector through the emergence of a different social psychological point of view. The aim of this research, is to learn the motivations, experiences and relationships of the CS users with the guests. Because of human relations, this research was evaluated within social exchange theory. As a result of the research, CS experience was evaluated within social change theory and a model proposal explaining the process was presented. It was concluded that CS is similar in terms of the interaction of social change theory with the interaction of two people, but usually in terms of the interaction of any two people. It was stated that such applications are based on technology and it should be re-adapted to the theories depending upon past and social relations. In this context, instead of the concept of reciprocity, which is a key element in social change theory, the concept of partial reciprocity was proposed. In addition, the CS experience process is explained in a theoretical model. According to this model proposal, people encounter three stages through CS. The first step is the internet interaction. The second is the face-to-face interaction and the last step is the communication after the CS experience. In addition, trust for participants is a prominent concept for research. This is due to the fact that the first encounter is carried out over the internet. In the context of social exchange theory, the prominent concept is reciprocity. Future research can be structured on the variableso of trust and reciprocity. In addition, CS research can be developed through participatory observation and collection of field notes.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Adamic, L. A., Lauterbach, D., Teng, C. Y., & Ackerman, M. (2011, July). Rating friends without making enemies. In Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain. Erişim adresi: https:// aaai.org/Conferences/ICWSM/icwsm11.php google scholar
  • Avcıkurt, C., Özdemir, S. S., Ergen, F. D., & Güzel, S. Ö. (2017). Assessment of the touristic activities conducted by Couchsurfing participants in terms of their relevance to slow tourism criteria. assessment, 7(2). google scholar
  • Ayers-Greenidge, E. (2012). Free associations : An exploration of guests ’ experiences ın the couchsurfing exchange. Wright Institute. google scholar
  • Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 715–734. google scholar
  • Bialski, P. (2012). Technologies of hospitality: How planned encounters develop between strangers. Hospitality & Society, 1, 245–260. google scholar
  • Bialski, P. (2006). Emotional tourism. An interpretive study of online hospitality exchange systems as a new form of tourism. HospitalityGuide. Net. google scholar
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Blau, P. M. (1960). A theory of social integration. American Journal of Sociology, 65(6), 545–556. google scholar
  • Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14–21. google scholar
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London. google scholar
  • Chen, D. J. (2017). Gendered Couchsurfing: Women from Western Europe and East-Asia contesting de-sexualised cosmopolitanism. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(8), 1090–1106. google scholar
  • Chung, J., & Buhalis, D. (2009). Virtual travel community: Bridging travellers and locals. Tourism Informatics: Visual travel recommender systems, social communities, and user ınterface design. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 130–-144. google scholar
  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications Ltd, London. google scholar
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. google scholar
  • Çetin, A. ve Şentürk, M. (2016). Bilgi paylaşma davranışının planlı davranış teorisi ve sosyal mübadele teorisi bağlamında incelenmesi: Dermatologlar üzerine ampirik bir araştırma. Ege Academic Review, 16(2). google scholar
  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362. google scholar
  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 31–41. google scholar
  • Geiger, A., & Germelmann, C. C. (2015). “Thank me for hosting:” the role of reciprocity in sharing. ACR North American Advances. google scholar
  • Geiger, A., Horbel, C., & Germelmann, C. C. (2018). “Give and take”: How notions of sharing and context determine free peer-to-peer accommodation decisions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(1), 5–15. google scholar
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 161–178. google scholar
  • Hellwing, K., Morhart, F., Kocher, B., & Zisiadis, G. (2014). Share your life and get more of yourself. Experience sharing in Couchsurfing. ACR North American Advances. google scholar
  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606. google scholar
  • Lambe, C. J., Wittmann, C. M., & Spekman, R. E. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business-tobusiness relational exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(3), 1–36. google scholar
  • Liu, Y., Nie, L., & Li, L. (2016). Homogeneity, trust, and reciprocity: Three keys to the sustainable hospitality exchange of couchsurfing. Tourism Analysis, 21(2–3), 145–157. google scholar
  • Luo, Q., & Zhang, H. (2016). Building interpersonal trust in a travel-related virtual community: A case study on a Guangzhou Couchsurfing community. Tourism Management, 54, 107–121. google scholar
  • Molz, J. G. (2012). CouchSurfing and network hospitality:’It’s not just about the furniture’. Hospitality & Society, 1(3), 215–225. google scholar
  • Molz, J. (2007). Cosmopolitans on the couch. Mobilizing hospitality: The ethics of social relations in a mobile world, 78–99. google scholar
  • Nunkoo, R., Smith, S. L., & Ramkissoon, H. (2013). Residents’ attitudes to tourism: A longitudinal study of 140 articles from 1984 to 2010. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(1), 5–-25. google scholar
  • Panayeva, S. (2016). Understanding tourist motivation of members of the Couchsurfing hospitality exchange club. International Student Conference in Tourism Research, 23rd-24th of May 2016. google scholar
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri(M. Bütün ve S. Beşir Demir, Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. google scholar
  • Rosen, D., Lafontaine, P. R., & Hendrickson, B. (2011). CouchSurfing: Belonging and trust in a globally cooperative online social network. New Media & Society, 13(6), 981–998. google scholar
  • Schuckert, M., Peters, M., & Pilz, G. (2017). The co-creation of host–guest relationships via couchsurfing: A qualitative study. Tourism Recreation Research, 1–15. google scholar
  • Searle, M. S. (1991). Propositions for testing social exchange theory in the context of ceasing leisure participation. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 279–294. google scholar
  • Swift, M. L., & Virick, M. (2013). Perceived support, knowledge tacitness, and provider knowledge sharing. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 717–742. google scholar
  • Takahashi, N. (2000). The emergence of generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1105–1134. google scholar
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. google scholar
  • Okumuş A. veÖztürk, E. (2014). Pazarlama teorileri. (Ed.). İstanbul: MediaCat Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Erişim adresi: http://www.couchsurfing.com/about/about-us/ (Erişim tarihi: 20.09.2018) google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Aydın, S., & Duyan, E. (2019). Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(60), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003


AMA

Aydın S, Duyan E. Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2019;0(60):227-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003


ABNT

Aydın, S.; Duyan, E. Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 60, p. 227-243, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aydın, Serhat, and Emin Can Duyan. 2019. “Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 60: 227-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aydın, Serhat, and Emin Can Duyan. “Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 60 (Nov. 2024): 227-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003


Harvard: Australian Style

Aydın, S & Duyan, E 2019, 'Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 60, pp. 227-243, viewed 22 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aydın, S. and Duyan, E. (2019) ‘Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(60), pp. 227-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003 (22 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Aydın, Serhat, and Emin Can Duyan. “Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 60, 2019, pp. 227-243. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003


Vancouver

Aydın S, Duyan E. Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 22 Nov. 2024 [cited 22 Nov. 2024];0(60):227-243. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003 doi: 10.26650/JECS2019-0003


ISNAD

Aydın, Serhat - Duyan, Emin Can. “Post-modern Tanrı Misafiri: Couchsurfing Deneyim Süreci”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/60 (Nov. 2024): 227-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0003



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim22.01.2019
Kabul02.06.2019
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma20.11.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.