Kuramsal Makale


DOI :10.26650/JECS433409   IUP :10.26650/JECS433409    Tam Metin (PDF)

Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve

Tuğba Özbölük

Bu makale akışkan modern zamanlarda tüketimde meydana gelen değişimi akışkan tüketim kavramı bağlamında incelemektedir. Makalede tüketim kavramı katı ve akışkan olmak üzere iki boyutta analiz edilmiştir. Esneklik, uyumluluk ve akıcılık gibi değerlerle karakterize edilen akışkan tüketim, daha geçici ve erişime dayalı bir tüketim biçimini yansıtmaktadır. Tüketim nesneleriyle kurulan ilişkilerin daha geçici ve durumsal olduğu akışkan modern dünyada tüketicilerin önem atfettiği şeyler de daha çok nesnelerin kullanım değeri olmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, bu makalenin temel tezi tüketiciler için ürünlere sahip olmaktan ziyade onlara diledikleri zaman erişebilmelerini sağlayan geçici bir kullanım hakkı edinmenin daha önemli olduğu fikri etrafında oluşmaktadır. Tüketicilerin mal ve hizmetleri sahiplenmekten ziyade, ihtiyaç duydukları an onlara erişmeyi istemeleri, erişimin giderek mülkiyetten daha önemli hale geldiğini göstermektedir. Bu açıdan akışkan tüketimin tüketici davranışında mülkiyetin önemi ve nesnelere yönelik bağlılığın doğası gibi temel taşların çoğunu değiştireceği düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca akışkan tüketim, akışkan modern koşullarda tüketici kimliğinin kavramsallaştırılması açısından da bazı çıkarımlara sahiptir. Bu nedenle bu çalışma akışkan modernitede tüketim ve kimlik ilişkisini de yeniden değerlendirmektedir. Çalışmada tüketicilerin akışkan tüketimle birlikte araçsal benlik ya da ağ tabanlı benlik gibi daha akışkan kimlikler geliştirdikleri ileri sürülmektedir. 
DOI :10.26650/JECS433409   IUP :10.26650/JECS433409    Tam Metin (PDF)

Escape from Burdens of Ownership to Freedom of Access: A Conceptual Framework for Liquid Consumption

Tuğba Özbölük

This paper examines the changes in consumption in the context of liquid consumption in liquid modern times. In the paper, the notion of consumption is analyzed in two dimensions as solid and liquid. Liquid consumption, characterized with values such as flexibility, adaptability and fluidity, represents a more ephemeral and access-based consumption pattern. In the liquid modern world, where relations with consumption objects are more ephemeral and situational, consumers give more emphasis on the use value of objects. Thus, the main argument of the paper shapes around the idea that it becomes more important for consumers to have a temporary use that allows them to have access to the products without owning them. As consumers prefer accessing rather than owning the objects, access gradually becomes more important than ownership. In this respect, liquid consumption is considered to change most of the cornerstones of consumer behavior such as the importance of ownership and the nature of attachment to the objects. In addition, liquid consumption has also implications for conceptualization of consumer identity under liquid conditions. Thus, the paper revisits identity and consumption relation in liquid modernity. The paper suggests that consumers develop liquid identities such as instrumental self or networked-self with liquid consumption. 

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Conditions which were valid in solid modernity like consuming more as a means for becoming superior to others, and possessing more as a means to conspicuous consumption are gradually disappearing in liquid modern times. Today consumption has become more communal, collaborative and depends more on accessing goods and services. The idea of having possessions has left its place to access with liquid consumption. In liquid consumption instead of buying or possessing, consumers pay for their access to things as accessing to goods and services becomes more common than owning them. Access which plays an important part in the everyday life of consumers, is a kind of consumption in which an increasing number of consumers prefer to temporarily use the products and services for a certain period instead of purchasing them. Although access becomes widespread all over the world, liquid consumption has received relatively little attention from researchers. Therefore, the liquid consumption concept will be more understandable as the research in this area increases in quality and quantity.

Accordingly, this paper evaluates liquid consumption in terms of the changes in consumer behavior in liquid modern times. The study consists of four chapters not including the introduction and conclusion sections. The introduction section associates the liquid consumption with liquid modernity. It is argued that with liquid modernity, the consumer becomes the individual who avoids developing permanent and solid social ties that require responsibility. The consumer seeks happiness in a constantly changing liquid culture where solidity gave its place to flexibility, and certainty gave its place to relativity and uncertainty. It is also argued that consumers develop more ephemeral relations with consumption objects rather than attaching them. Developing ephemeral relationships with objects makes it possible to constantly access and consume new objects in liquid consumption. Thus, the search for status of the consumer can no longer be achieved by having a product or a brand, but rather with more ephemeral and situational experiences. This means, consumers identify themselves with their temporary consumption experiences rather than their possessions.

Following the introduction, the first chapter focuses on the theoretical background of liquid consumption by examining Bauman’s liquid modernity theory in terms of instrumentality, individuality, risk and uncertainty, and fragmentation of social life and identity. The second chapter offers a broader understanding of liquid consumption by redefining the notion of consumption in liquid modern times. The chapter argues that immateriality of consumption, and more access-based and ephemeral relationships with objects all provide a basis for liquid consumption. The transition from ownership to access, and the spread of access all over the world shows that consumers attach more importance to accessing things than having possessions. Moreover, liquid consumption is also characterized with immateriality that is a feature of the digital environment in which consumer can freely move from one identity to another. The chapter also argues that immaterial experiences gradually become more important for consumers than consuming material goods.

The third chapter introduces dimensions of consumption as liquid and solid. In this chapter, solid consumption and liquid consumption is compared in the product and consumption practices level. The chapter argues that in liquid modern world that is dominated with ephemerality and flexibility, a more liquid/fluid form of consumption has emerged. This liquid form of consumption represents a consumption orientation around values of flexibility, mobility and detachment which provides an alternative to solid consumption that is enduring, ownership based and materialist.

The fourth chapter revisits identity and consumption relation in liquid modernity. Liquid consumption has also some implications for researching consumer identity. However, consumer identity under liquid conditions has not been adequately researched. Therefore, this chapter attempts to answer how consumer identity is transformed with liquid consumption in liquid modern conditions. The chapter argues that in liquid modern times, consumer identity has become more liquid as the objects that consumers value are not long-lasting and constantly changing. This makes attachment to possessions more problematic with liquid identity projects. Thus, contrary to ownership where solid relationships are developed with possessions, access becomes a more temporary form of consumption that provides flexibility and adaptability to liquid consumer identity.

The conclusion section evaluates liquid consumption by offering a deeper understanding of consumer object relationships in liquid modernity. In this section, it is pointed out that liquid consumption has dramatically altered the consumer behavior. In last decade consumers who were identifying themselves with the consumption objects they own, now express their identity through accessing, sharing or collaborating with almost no possessions. This means, what we experience is becoming more important than what we have in defining ourselves in a world where ownership is no longer the ultimate expression of consumer desire. This may also implicate that there may be an increase in the consumption of access-based goods and services in the near future.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Algesheimer, R.A., Dholakia, U.M. & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs, Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 19-34. google scholar
  • Arnould, E. J. & Thompson C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (March), 868-882. google scholar
  • Arvidsson, A. & Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand public: Louis Vuitton on twitter. Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (5), 727-748. google scholar
  • Bardhi, F. & Eckhardt, G. M. (2017). Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3). http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/17014/ google scholar
  • Bardhi, F. & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 39, 881- 898. google scholar
  • Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M. & Arnould, E. J. (2012). Liquid relationship to possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 510-529. google scholar
  • Bauman (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
  • Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
  • Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
  • Bauman, Z. (2011). Akışkan modern dünyadan 44 mektup (Çev. P.Siral). İstanbul: Habitus. google scholar
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity, London: Sage Publications. Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611 (May), 126-140. google scholar
  • Belk, R. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 477-500. google scholar
  • Belk, R. (2014a). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1595-1600. google scholar
  • Belk, R. (2014b). Digital consumption and the extended self. Journal of Marketing Management, 30 (11-12), 1101-1118. google scholar
  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168. google scholar
  • Binkley S. (2008). Liquid consumption. Cultural Studies, 22 (5), 599-623. google scholar
  • Bocock, R. (1993). Consumption, London: Routledge google scholar
  • Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Collins. google scholar
  • Carter, T. J. & Gilovich, T. (2012). I am what I do, not what I have: The differential centrality of experiential and material purchases to the self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (6), 1304-317. google scholar
  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (Second ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. google scholar
  • Chen, Y. (2009). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits, Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (April), 925-940. google scholar
  • Cheshire, L., Walters, P. & Rosenblatt, T. (2010). The politics of housing consumption: Renters as flawed consumers on a master planned estate. Urban Studies, 47 (12), 2597–2614 google scholar
  • Cova, B. (1997). Community and consumption: towards a definition of the linking value of product or services. European Journal of Marketing, 31 (3/4), 297-316. google scholar
  • Denegri-Knott, J., R. D. Watkins & J. Wood (2013). Transforming digital virtual goods into meaningful possessions, In M. Wolesworth, and J. Denegri-Knott (Eds.), Digital virtual consumption, (pp. 76-91) New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Duman, Z. (2017). Zygmunt Bauman’ın sosyolojik tahayyülünde özgürlüğün modern sürümü olarak akışkanlığın ve tüketimciliğin inşası. YDÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 (2), 127-147. google scholar
  • Eckhardt, G. M. & Bardhi, F. (2016). The relationship between access practices and economic systems, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1 (2), 210-225. google scholar
  • Edbring, E. G., M. Lehner & Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5-15. google scholar
  • Elliott, R. & Wattanasuwan, K. (1998). Brands as symbolic resources for the construction of identity. International Journal of Advertising, 17, 131-144. google scholar
  • Ferguson, H. (1992). Watching the world go round: atrium culture and the psychology of shopping, In R. Shields (Ed.), Lifestyle shopping: The subject of consumption (pp. 21-39) London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Fırat, A.F. & Venkatesh, A. (1993). Postmodernity: The age of marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 227-49. google scholar
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. California: Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Gill, R. & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture and Society, 25 (7-8), 1-30. google scholar
  • Grimshorn, C. & Jordan M. (2015). Qwnership- a challenged consumer ideal- A study of two collaborative consumption practices: Clothes swapping and clothing libraries. (Master Thesis, Lund University, School of Economics and Management). Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=5468892&fileOId=5468905 google scholar
  • Gümüş, B. ve Gegez, E. (2017). Değişen tüketici kültüründe yeni trend: Ortak tüketim. Pazarlama ve Pazar Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20, 155-177. google scholar
  • Haythornthwaite, C. A. & Wellman, B. (Ed.) (2002). The internet in everyday life, Oxford, UK: Blackwell. google scholar
  • İlhan, S. (2013). Akışkan toplumda kimlik inşası: Geçişken, eklektik, ben odaklı kimlikler. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23 (2), 233-246. google scholar
  • Kaplan, A.M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53 (1), 59-68. google scholar
  • Karaduman, S. (2010). Modernizmden postmodernizme kimliğin yapısal dönüşümü. Journal of Yasar University, 17 (5), 2886- 2899. google scholar
  • Lamberton, C.P. & Rose, R.L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(7), 109-125. google scholar
  • Laroche, M., J. Bergeron & Goutaland, C. (2001). A three-dimensional scale of intangibility. Journal of Service Research, 4 (1), 26-38. google scholar
  • Lawson, S. J., M. R. Gleim, R. Perren & J. Hwang (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69 (8), 2615-623. google scholar
  • Lillemose, J. (2006). Conceptual transformations of art: from dematerialization of the object to immateriality in networks. In J. Krysa (Ed.), Curating Immateriality: The work of the curator in the age of network systems, New York: Autonomedia, 113-35. google scholar
  • Magaudda, P. (2011). When materiality ‘bites back’: Digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization, Journal of Consumer Culture, 11 (1), 15-36. google scholar
  • Marcoux, J. S. (2009). Escaping the gift economy, Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (4), 671-85. google scholar
  • Matzler, K., Veider, V. & Kathan, W. (2015). Adapting to the sharing economy, MIT Sloan Management Review, 56 (2): 71- 77. google scholar
  • McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (June), 71–84. google scholar
  • McLuhan, M. & Powers, B. R. (2001). The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century (communication and society), Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 14(3), 193-207. google scholar
  • Molz, J.G. (2012). CouchSurfing and network hospitality: It’s not just about the furniture. Hospitality and Society, 1(3), 215–225. google scholar
  • Muniz, A.M. and O’Guinn, T.C. (2001). Brand community, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 412-432. google scholar
  • Osbourne, H. (2015). Generation rent: The housing ladder starts to collapse for those under 40. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/jul/22/pwc-report-generation-rent-to-grow-over-next-decade google scholar
  • Ozanne, L.K. & Ballantine, P.W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9(6), 485-498. google scholar
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Pine, B. J. & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The experience economy: Work is a theatre and every business a stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. google scholar
  • Poder, P. (2013). Relatively liquid interpersonal relationships in flexible work life. In A. Elliott (Ed.), The contemporary Bauman (pp. 136-153). London, UK: Routledge. google scholar
  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Rindfleisch, A., Burroughs, J. E. & Wong, N. (2009). The safety of objects: Materialism, existential insecurity, and brand connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (1), 1-16. google scholar
  • Ritzer, G. (2010). Sociological theory. New York: McGrawHill google scholar
  • Ritzer, G. & Rey, P. J. (2016). From ‘solid’ producers and consumers to ‘liquid’ prosumers. In M. Davis (Ed.), Liquid sociology: Metaphor in Zygmunt Bauman’s analysis of modernity (pp. 157-76) New York: Routledge google scholar
  • Rosen, D., Lafontaine, P.R., & Hendrickson, B. (2011). CouchSurfing: Belonging and trust in a globally cooperative online social network. New Media and Society, 13(6), 981–998. google scholar
  • Schau, H. J. (1998). Discourse of possessions: The metatheory of Russell W. Belk. Advances in Consumer Research, 37-44. google scholar
  • Schemberi, S., Merrilees, B., & Kristiansen, S. (2010). Brand consumption and narrative of the self. Psychology and Marketing, 27 (6), 623-638. google scholar
  • Schouten, J. H. & McAlexander, J. A. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (June), 43- 61. google scholar
  • Shaheen, S., Chan N., Bansal, A. & Cohen A. (2015). Shared mobility: Definitions, industry developments, and early understanding. Retrieved from http://innovativemobility.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SharedMobility_WhitePaper_FINAL.pdf google scholar
  • Shankar, A., & Fitchett, J. A. (2002). Having, being and consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 18, 501-516. google scholar
  • Shankar, A., Elliot, R., & Goulding, C. (2001). Understanding consumption: Contributions from a narrative perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 17, 429-453. google scholar
  • Turkle S. (1998). At heart of a cyberstudy, the human essence. The NY Times, https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/18/technology/at-heart-of-a-cyberstudy-the-human-essence.html google scholar
  • Weismann, J. (2012). Why don’t young Americans buy cars? The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-dont-young-americans-buy-cars/255001/ google scholar
  • Weiss, L. & Johar, G. V. (2016). Products as self-evaluation standards: When owned and unowned products have opposite effects on self-judgement. Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (6). google scholar
  • Zwick, D. & Bradshaw, A. (2016). Biopolitical marketing and social media brand communities. Theory, Culture and Society, 33 (5). google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Özbölük, T. (0001). Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(59), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409


AMA

Özbölük T. Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 0001;0(59):257-276. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409


ABNT

Özbölük, T. Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 59, p. 257-276, 0001.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Özbölük, Tuğba,. 0001. “Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 59: 257-276. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409


Chicago: Humanities Style

Özbölük, Tuğba,. Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 59 (Sep. 2024): 257-276. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409


Harvard: Australian Style

Özbölük, T 0001, 'Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 59, pp. 257-276, viewed 29 Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Özbölük, T. (0001) ‘Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(59), pp. 257-276. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409 (29 Sep. 2024).


MLA

Özbölük, Tuğba,. Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 59, 0001, pp. 257-276. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409


Vancouver

Özbölük T. Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 29 Sep. 2024 [cited 29 Sep. 2024];0(59):257-276. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409 doi: 10.26650/JECS433409


ISNAD

Özbölük, Tuğba. Sahipliğin Sıkıcılığından Erişimin Özgürlüğüne Kaçış: Akışkan Tüketime İlişkin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/59 (Sep. 2024): 257-276. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS433409



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim12.06.2018
Kabul23.08.2018

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.