Referanslar

• Abu Bakar, N., Mamat, I., &Mudassir, I. (2017). Influence of parental education on academic performance of secondary school students in Kuala Terengganu. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(8), 296–304. google scholar
• Al Şensoy, S., & Sağsöz, A. (2015). Relation between pupils academic achievement and pyhsical conditions of classrooms. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 16(3), 87–104. google scholar
• Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182–192. google scholar
• Aşıcı, M., Baysal, N., & Şahenk-Erkan, S. (2012). A comparison of the reading comprehension questions in PISA 2009 and national level determination exam in Turkey. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(2), 210–217. google scholar
• Atılgan, H. (2018). Transition among education levels in Turkey: Past-present and a recommended model. Ege Journal of Education, 19(1), 1–18. google scholar
• Aykaç, N., & Atar, E. (2014).Geçmişten günümüze ilköğretimden ortaöğretime geçiş sisteminin değerlendirilmesi. In A. Akdoğan Bulut İnsan ve A. Yavuz Akengin (eds.). Cumhuriyet'in Kuruluşundan Günümüze Eğitimde Kademeler Arası Geçiş ve Yeni Modeller Uluslararası Kongresi (p. 83–104). Antalya: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. google scholar
• Barry, J. (2006). The effect of socio-economic status on academic achievement.(Unpublished master dissertation). Wichita State University, USA. google scholar
• Berberoğlu, G., & Kalender, İ. (2005). Investigation of student achievement across years, school types and regions: SSE and PISA analyses. Educational Sciences and Practice, 4(7), 21–35. google scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1977). Class, codes and control, vol. 3: Towards a theory of educational transmissions (2nd edition). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. google scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes and control, vol. 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language (1st edition). London: Routledge. google scholar
• Bertocchi, G., & Spagat, M. (2004). The evolution of modern educational systems: Technical vs. general education, distributional conflict, and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 73, 559–582. google scholar
• Bhat, M., Joshi, J., & Wani, I. (2016). Effect of socio-economic status on academic performance of secondary school students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 2349–2394. google scholar
• Bölükbaş, S. (2018). The role of social policies and tracking in the academic resilience of poor children in Turkey. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara. [In Turkish] google scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm google scholar
• Caro, D. H., McDonald, J. T., & Willms, J. D. (2009). Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(3), 558–590. google scholar
• Cengiz, G., Titrek, O., & Akgun, Ö. E. (2007). The effects of the factors related to schools on the preference of students in secondary education. International Journal of Human Sciences, 4(1), 1–22. google scholar
• Ceylan, E. (2009). Differences between low- and high-performing schools in scientific literacy based on PISA 2006 results in Turkey. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 4(2), 55–75. google scholar
• Coleman, J., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private schools: The impacts of communities. New York: Basic Books. google scholar
• Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools. Sociology of Education, 55(2-3), 65–76. google scholar
• Çobanoğlu, F., & Badavan, Y. (2017). The key of successful schools: the correlates of school effectiveness. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 26, 114–134. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. google scholar
• Çelik, Z., Boz, N., Arkan, Z., & Toklucu, D. K. (2017). TEOG yerleştirme sistemi: Güçlükler ve öneriler. Ankara: Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı. google scholar
• Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (2010). The schooled society: An introduction to the sociology of education (2 edition). Ont: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Demirtaş, Z. (2010).The relationship in high schools between school culture and student achievement. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute,7(13), 208– 223. google scholar
• ERG (2009). Herkes için kaliteli eğitim. İstanbul: ERG. http://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/dosyalar/faaliyet/2009.pdf. google scholar
• Ferreira, F. H. G., Gignoux, J., & Aran, M. (2010). Inequality of economic opportunity in Turkey: An assessment using asset indicators and women’s background variables. (Working Paper Number 3.) Ankara: State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey and World Bank Welfare and Social Policy Analytical Work Program. google scholar
• Figlio, D.N., & Stone, J.A. (1997). School choice and student performance: Are private schools really better? (Discussion Paper 1141-97.) Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison. google scholar
• Filho, D. B. F., Paranhos, R., da Rocha, E. C., Batista, M., da Silva Jr., J. A., Santos, M. L. W. D., & Marino, J. G. (2013). When is statistical significance not significant? Brazilian Political Science Review, 7(1), 31–55. google scholar
• Goldhaber, D. D. (1996). Public and private high schools: Is school choice and answer to the productivity problem?.Economics of Education Review, 15(3), 93–109. google scholar
• Gooding, Y. (2001). The relationship between parental educational level and academic success of college freshmen.(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Iowa. google scholar
• Gümüş, S., & Atalmış, E. H. (2012). Achievement gaps between different school types and regions in Turkey: Have they changed over time? Mevlana International Journal of Education, 2(2), 48–64. google scholar
• Gür, B., Çelik, Z., & Coşkun, İ. (2013). Türkiye’deortaöğretimingeleceği: Hiyerarşi mi eşitlik mi? (Analiz no. 69). Ankara: SETA Vakfı. google scholar
• Gür, B. S., Çelik, Z., Bozgeyikli, H., & Yurdakul, S. (2018). Eğitime bakış 2018: İzleme ve değerlendirme raporu. Ankara: Eğitim-Bir-Sen Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi. google scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., & Woessmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal 116, 63–76. google scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., Schwerdt, G., Woessman, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). General education, vocational education, and labor-market outcomes over the life-cycle. The Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 48–87. google scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. google scholar
• Kaplan, R. M., Chambers, D. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2014). Big data and large sample size: A cautionary note on the potential for bias. Clinical and Translational Science, 7(4), 342–346. google scholar
• Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151–160. google scholar
• Lazenby, H. (2016). What is equality of opportunity in education?.Theory and Research in Education, 14(1), 65–76. google scholar
• Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multi-level analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651–698. google scholar
• Ma, X., & Klinger, D. A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modelling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 25, 41–55. MEB (2016). PISA 2015 ulusal raporu. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. google scholar
• MEB (2018a). 2018 Liselere Geçiş Sistemi (LGS): Merkezi sınavla yerleşen öğrencilerin performansı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. google scholar
• MEB (2018b). Milli Eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2017-2018. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. google scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 53–63. google scholar
• Müller, W.,& Shavit, Y. (1998). The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process: A comparative study of qualifications and occupations in thirteen countries. In Shavit, Y., & Müller, W. (eds.) From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–47. google scholar
• Mwiti, M. A. (2012). Influence of school characteristics on students’ academic performance in secondary schools ın Tigania central division, Meru Kenya. A research project report for the award of a Master of Arts degree in project planning and management, University of Nairobi. google scholar
• NCES (2012). Improving the measurement of socioeconomic status for the national assessment of educational progress: A theoretical foundation. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Expert Panel Report. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/researchcenter/Socioeconomic_Factors.pdf google scholar
• Neuman, S., & Ziderman, A. (1991). Vocational schooling, occupational matching, and labor market earnings in Israel. The Journal of Human Resources, 26(2), 256–281. google scholar
• OECD (2004). How student performance varies between schools and the role that socio-economic background plays in this. Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
• OECD (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
• Ozer, M. (2018). The 2023 Education Vision and new goals in vocational and technical education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 425–435. google scholar
• Ozer, M. (2019a). Reconsidering the fundamental problems of vocational education and training in Turkey and proposed solutions for restructuring. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 39(2), 1–19. google scholar
• Ozer, M. (2019b). Background of problems in vocational education and training and its road map to solution in Turkey’s Education Vision 2023. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 9(1), 1–11. google scholar
• Ozer, M., & Suna, H. E. (2019). Future of vocational and technical education in Turkey: Solid steps taken after Education Vision 2023. Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(20), 165–192. google scholar
• Ozer, M. (2020). What PISA tells us about performance of education systems. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 217–228. google scholar
• Ozer, M., & Perc, M. (2020). Dreams and realities of school tracking and vocational education. Palgrave Communications, 6, 34. google scholar
• Ozer, M., & Suna, H. E. (2020). The linkage between vocational education and labor market in Turkey: Employability and skill mismatch. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(2), 558–569. google scholar
• Önder, E., & Güçlü, N. (2014). Solution proposals intended to reduce success difference among primary schools. Journal of Educational Sciences,40, 109–132. google scholar
• ÖSYM (2018). 2018 Yükseköğretim Kurumları Sınavı değerlendirme raporu. Ankara: ÖSYM. google scholar
• Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 11(98), 1–15. google scholar
• Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2010). School socio-economic composition and student outcomes in Australia: Implications for educational policy. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 72–85. google scholar
• Reichelt, M., Collischon, M., & Eberl, A. (2019). School tracking and its role in social reproduction: Reinforcing educational inheritance and the direct effects of social origin. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1–26. google scholar
• Saracaloğlu, A. S., Yakar, A., & Altay, B. (2014). Türkiye'de ortaokula geçiş sürecinde yaşanan sorunlar ve özel dershaneler: Öğrenci-öğretmen-veli görüşleri (Muğla ve Aydın örnekleri). In A. Akdoğanbulut İnsan, & A. Yavuz Akengin (eds.), Cumhuriyet'in Kuruluşundan Günümüze Eğitimde Kademeler Arası Geçiş ve Yeni Modeller Uluslararası Kongresi (pp. 347–386). Antalya: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. google scholar
• Scott, L.A., Rock, D.A., Pollack, J.M., & Ingels, S.J. (1994). Two years later: Cognitive gains and school transitions of NELS:88 eighth graders. U.S. Department of Education-National Center for Education Statistics, Statistical Analysis Report. google scholar
• Schreiber, B., Stage, F.K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E.A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337. google scholar
• Singh, K. (2014). Right to education and equality of educational opportunities. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 16(2), 5–19. google scholar
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., & Ozer, M. (2020). Changes in literacy of students in Turkey by years and school types: Performance of students in PISA applications. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(1), 76-97. google scholar
• Sutton, A., & Soderstrom, I. (1999). Predicting elementary and secondary school achievement with school-related and demographic factors. Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 330–338. google scholar
• Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics& educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703–729. google scholar
• Şirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta‐analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. google scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. google scholar
• TED (2010). Ortaöğretime ve yükseköğretime geçiş sistemi. Ankara: TED Publishing. google scholar
• Thiele, T., Singleton, A., Pope, D., & Stanistreet, D. (2015). Predicting students’ academic performance based on school and socio-demographic characteristics. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1424–1446. google scholar
• Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21(6), 459–468. google scholar
• Waters, S., Cooper, S., Kuncel, N., Sackett, P. R., & Arneson, J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the relationship between the SAT and freshman GPA: An analysis of data from 41 colleges and universities (College Board Research Report Sy 2009-1). New York, NY: College Board. google scholar
• White, K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481. google scholar
• Woessmann, L. (2009). International evidence on school tracking: A review. CESifo DICE Report, 26–34. google scholar
• World Bank (2013). Promoting excellence in Turkey’s schools (Sy 77722; ss. 1–45). Washington, DC: The World Bank. google scholar
• Yılmaz Fındık, L., & Kavak, Y. (2013). Assessing the PISA 2009 achievement of disadvantaged students in Turkey. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice,19(2), 249–273. google scholar
• Yudd Moscoso, R. (2000). The effects of school characteristics on student academic performance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA. google scholar
• Zimmer, R. (2003). A new twist in the educational tracking debate. Economics of Education Review, 22(3), 307–315. google scholar

Atıflar