Referanslar

• August, M. (2014). Challenging the rhetoric of stigmatization: The benefits of concentrated poverty in Toronto’s Regent Park. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(6): 1317-33. google scholar
• Aydın, S. (2015, February 8). Belediye Sulukule kültürüne göz dikti. Evrensel. Retrieved from https://www.evrensel.net/haber/104146/ belediye-sulukule-kulturune-goz-dikti google scholar
• Balci, H. (2009). Kentsel dönüşüm bağlamında Sulukule’yi anlamak: Roman kimliğinin analizi. (Master Thesis). Yildiz Technical University. Turkey. google scholar
• Clark, E. (2005). The order and simplicity of gentrification: A political challenge. InR. Atkinson and G. Bridge (Eds.). Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. (p. 256-264). London: Routledge., google scholar
• Daglar, I. (2009, 19 March). New AKP gentry in Roma district. Hürriyet. Retrieved From http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/ new-akp-gentry-in-roma-district- 11239923. google scholar
• Duman Bay, B., and Polat, İ. (2023). Yerel yönetimlerin yeti kaybı, Birikim, February-March 2024, (418-419): 13-23. google scholar
• Ergun, N. (2004). Gentrification in Istanbul. Cities, 21(5): 391-405. google scholar
• Fatih belediye başkanı Turan. (2021, September 30). Sputnik. Retrieved from https://sputniknews.com.tr/20210930/ fatih- belediye- baskani- turan- suriyeli- ya- da- baska- memleketli- fatihte- herhangi- bir- ev- kiralayamaz- 1049384150.html google scholar
• Foggo, H. (2007). The Sulukule affair: Roma against expropriation. Roma Rights Quarterly, 4: 41-47. google scholar
• Gençdal, D. (2024, February 14). İmamoğlu duyurdu: 11. İdare Mahkemesi, Kanal İstanbul’un imar planını iptal etti. Medyascope.tv. Retrieved from https://medyascope.tv/2024/02/14/imamoglu-duyurdu-kanal-istanbul-imar-plani-iptal-edildi/ google scholar
• Hammel, D. J. (1999). Re-establishing the rent gap: An alternative view of capitalized land rent. Urban Studies, 36(8): 1283-1293. google scholar
• Harvey, D. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1-3): 101-131. google scholar
• Hastings, A., and Dean, J. (2003). Challenging images: tackling stigma through estate regeneration. Policy Polit., 31(2): 171-184. google scholar
• Horgan, M. (2018). Territorial stigmatization and territorial destigmatization: A cultural sociology of symbolic strategy in the gentrification of Parkdale (Toronto). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(3): 500-516., google scholar
• International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2019). Baseline assessment in Istanbul province, Annual Report. May-July 2019. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/IST_Baseline_Assessment_Phase5_ENG_29012020.pdf. google scholar
• Islam, T. (2009). Devlet eksenli soylulaşma ve yerel halk: Neslişah ve Hatice Sultan mahalleleri (Sulukule) örneği. (Doctoral Dissertation). Yıldız Technical University, Turkey. google scholar
• Islam, T., and Enlil, Z. (2010). 5366 sayılı yasa merkezli dönüşüm ve Sulukule örneği: Belediye’nin hedefleri ve yaşanan gerçeklik. InD. Özdemir (Eds.). Kentsel Dönüşümde Politika, Mevzuat, Uygulama: Avrupa Deneyimi, Istanbul Uygulamaları, (p. 317-334). Ankara: Nobel. google scholar
• Islam, T., and Sakizlioglu, B. (2015). The making of, and resistance to, state-led gentrification in Istanbul, Turkey. In L. Lees, H. B. Shin, and E. Lopez-Morales (Eds.). Global Gentrification: Uneven Developments and Displacements, (p.245-264). Bristol: Policy Press. google scholar
• Istanbul Buyuksehir Belediyesi (IBB) Stratejik Plan (2020-2024). Retrieved from January 10, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ibb.istanbul/Uploads/2020/2/iBB-STRATEJIK-PLAN-2020-2024.pdf. google scholar
• Kaban, E. (2011). Kentsel dönüşüm ve Istanbul’un ilk kentsel dönüşüm uygulama projesi: Sulukule örneği. (Master Thesis). Istanbul University, Turkey. google scholar
• Kallin, H. and Slater, T. (2014). Activating territorial stigma: Gentrifying marginality on Edinburgh’s periphery. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(6): 1351-1368. google scholar
• Kailin, H. (2017). Opening the reputational gap. In P. Kirkness & A. Tije-Dra (Eds.), Negative Neghborhood Reputation and Place Attachment. The Production and Contestation of Territorial Stigma. (p.102-118). Abongdon: Routledge. google scholar
• Karaman, O., and Islam, T. (2012). On the dual nature of intra-urban borders: The case of a Romani neighborhood in Istanbul. Cities, 29(4): 234-243. google scholar
• Kavas, A., Avşar, İ., Kadkoy, O. and Bilgiç, E.B. (2019). İstanbul’da Suriyeliler ve savaş sonrası gettoları. Haziran 2019. TEPAV Report. Retrieved from https://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/mce/2019/haberler/tepav_istanbulda_suriyeliler_ve_savas_sonrasi_suriye_gettolari.pdf google scholar
• Kocabas, A. and Gibson, M. (2011). Planned gentrification in Istanbul: The Sulukule renewal area (2005-2010). International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 6(4): 420-446. google scholar
• Lees, L., Shin, H. B., and Lopez-Morales, E. (2015). Conclusion: Global gentrifications. In L. Lees, H. B. Shin, and E. Lopez-Morales (Eds). Global Gentrifications: Uneven Development and Displacement. (p.441-452). Bristol: Policy Press. google scholar
• Letsch, C. (2023). Territorial stigmatization: Urban renewal and displacement in a central İstanbul neighborhood. Transcript Publishing. google scholar
• Megakent’te suçun yüksek olduğu 6 ilçe! (2020, February 13). Haberturk. Retrieved from google scholar
• http://www.haberturk.com/megakent-te-sucun-yuksek-oldugu-6-ilce-caliskan-kadina-siddette-bircok-avrupa-kenti-daha-kotu-2582819 google scholar
• Mösgen, A., Rosol, M., and Schipper, S. (2019). State-led gentrification in previously ‘un-gentrifiable’ areas: Examples from Vancouver, Canada and Frankfurt, Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 419-433. google scholar
• Mustafa Demir’den istifa açıklaması. (2009, March 19). Hürriyet. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/ mustafa-demirden-sulukule-aciklamasi-11240332. google scholar
• Ozcan, C. (2015). The effects of gentrification on cultural identity: A case study in Istanbul, Sulukule. (Master Thesis). Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Sweden. google scholar
• Ozet, İ. (2020). Fatih Başakşehir: Muhafazakar mahallede iktidar ve dönüşen habitus. İstanbul: İletişim. google scholar
• Paton, K., McCall, V., and Mooney, G. (2017). Place revisited: Class, stigma and urban restructuring in the case of Glasgow’s Commonwealth games. The Sociological Review, 65(4): 578-594. google scholar
• Paton, K. (2018). Beyond legacy: Backstage stigmatization and ‘trickle-up’ politics of urban regeneration. The Sociological Review, 66(4): 919-934. google scholar
• Pattison, J. (2023). “You don’t go there”: Spatial strategies of stigma negotiation in a post-industrial town. Antipode, 55(4): 1213-1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12930 google scholar
• Penbecioglu, M. (2013). Urban Development Projects and the Construction of Neoliberal Urban Hegemony: The Case of Izmir. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 30(1): 165-189. google scholar
• Sahinkaya, C., Duran-Diaz, P., and Bendzko, T. (2018). Urban regeneration in the context of two different planning approaches: A case study of Sulukule (Istanbul, Turkey) and Haidhausen (Munich, Germany). In: FIG Congress 2018, Istanbul, Turkey, 6-11 May 2018. google scholar
• Sakizlioğlu, B. (2014). Living under the threat of displacement. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr, 105: 206-220. google scholar
• Sakizlioglu, B. and Uitermark, J. (2014). The symbolic politics of gentrification: The restructuring of stigmatized neighbourhoods in Amsterdam and Istanbul. Environment and Planning A, 46(6): 1369-1385. google scholar
• Saracoglu, C., and Belanger, D. (2019). Loss and xenophobia in the city: Contextualizing anti-Syrian sentiments in Izmir, Turkey. Patterns of Prejudice, 53 (4): 363-383 google scholar
• Schultz Larsen, T., and Delica, K. (2019). The production of territorial stigmatisation, City, 23(4-5): 540-563. google scholar
• Schultz Larsen, T., and Delica, K. (2021). Territorial destigmatisation in an era of policy schizophrenia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(3), 423-441. google scholar
• Simon, P. (2008). Gentrification of old neighborhoods and social integration in Europe. In Yuri Kazepov (Eds.). Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion, (p. 210-232). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
• Slater, T. (2017). Territorial stigmatization: Symbolic defamation and the contemporary metropolis. In J. Hannigan and G. Richards (Eds.). The Handbook ofNew Urban Studies (p.110-125). London: SAGE. google scholar
• Slater, T. (2018). The invention of the ‘sink estate’: Consequential categorization and the UK housing crisis. The Sociological Review, 66(4): 877-897. google scholar
• Sisson, A. (2021). Territory and territorial stigmatization: on the production, consequences and contestation of spatial disrepute. Progress in Human Geography, 45(4): 659-681. google scholar
• STOP girişimi: Kentsel toplumsal muhalefette farklı bir deneyim. (2009, June 2009). Mimarizm. Retrieved from https://www.mimarizm.com/ makale/stop- girisimi- kentsel- toplumsal- muhalefette- farkli- bir- deneyim_114062 google scholar
• Sulukule Gunlugu. (2013). Blog. Retrieved from http://sulukulegunlugu.blogspot.com.tr/. google scholar
• Tuna, K., Satıroglu, A., and Çaglayandereli, M. (2006). Neslişah mahallesi toplumsal yapı araştırması. In A. Kara, B. Kara, and H. Suver (Eds.). Bir Çingene Yolculuğu, (p.154-180). Istanbul: Fatih Municipality Publications. google scholar
• Turkun, A. (2015). Kentsel dönüşümü yeniden düşünmek: Mevcut uygulamalar ve hâkim söylem üzerinden bir değerlendirme In B. Duman and İ. Coşkun (Eds.). Neden Nasıl ve Kim İçin Kentsel Dönüşüm, (p.285-332). Istanbul: Litera google scholar
• Tyler, I. (2013) Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books. google scholar
• Uitermark, J. (2014). Integration and control: The governing of urban marginality in Western Europe, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1418-1436. google scholar
• Uysal, U. E. (2012). An urban social movement challenging urban regeneration: The case of Sulukule, Istanbul. Cities, 29(1): 12-22. google scholar
• Vural, G. (2016, January 25). Ranzalı kent: Sulukule [Bunkbed City: Sulukule]. Nokta. Retrieved from google scholar
• http://www.kuzeyormanlari.org/2016/02/02/ranzali-kent-sulukule/. google scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91(1): 66-77. google scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
• Wacquant, L., Slater, T., and Pereria, V. B. (2014). Territorial stigmatization in action. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(6): 1270-1280. google scholar
• Yardimci, Ö. (2020), State stigmatization in urban Turkey: Managing the “insurgent squatter dwellers in Dikmen Valley, Antipode, 52(5): 1519-1538. google scholar
• Yilmaz, E. (2009). Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşüm uygulamalarında süreç ve aktörler: Sulukule örneği. (Master Thesis). Mimar Sinan Guzel Sanatlar University, Turkey. google scholar

Atıflar