Referanslar

• Bruening, B. (2018). Depictive Secondary Predicates and Small Clause Approaches to Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 49(3), 537-559. google scholar
• Carrier, J. & Randall, H. (1992). Argument Structure & Syntactic Structure of Resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2), 173-234. The MIT Press. google scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. google scholar
• Cormack, A. & Smith, N. (1999). Why are depictives different from resultatives? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics. google scholar
• Dowty, D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. google scholar
• Hong, Soo-Min. (2005). “Exceptional” Case-Marking and Resultative Constructions. PhD Dissertation. University of Maryland. google scholar
• Hornstein, N. (1999). Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry, 30 (1), 69-96. google scholar
• Hornstein, N. (2001). Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford, Blackwell. google scholar
• Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. (1987). Predication and Pro. Language, 63(1), 23-52. google scholar
• Hornstein, N., Nunes, J. & Grohmann K. (2005). Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Kayne, R. (1985). Principles of particle constructions. In J. Gueron, H-G. Obenauer and J-Y. Pollock (Eds.), Grammatical Representations, 101-140. Dordrecht: Foris. google scholar
• Kural, M. (1993). Scrambling and mixed positions. North East Linguistics Society, 22(1), Article 18. google scholar
• Kuram, K. (2020). Locatives as small clause predicates in Turkish. Diyalektolog 23, 117-138. google scholar
• Larson, R. (1988). On Double Object Constructions. LI 19(3), 335-391. The MIT Press. google scholar
• Meral, H. M. (2005). Resultatives in Turkish. In N. Lavidas, E. Nouchoutidou and M. Sionti. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Athens Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics. google scholar
• Müller, S. (2002). Complex Predicates. CSLI Publications. google scholar
• Gürkan, D. Ö. (2021). Depictive secondary predicates in Turkish. Onomazein 51, 1-16. google scholar
• Özsoy, S. (2001). On ‘small’ clauses, other ‘bare’ verbal complements and feature checking in Turkish. In E. Erguvanli-Taylan (Ed.) The Verb in Turkish, 213-237. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. google scholar
• Saito, M. (2001). Movement and Theta Roles: A Case Study with Resultatives. The Second Tokyo Conference on Psycho-linguistics. google scholar
• Schroeder, C. (2000). Almanca ve Türkçe’de İkincil Yüklemler. In A. S. Özsoy and E. Erguvanlı-Taylan (Eds.), Proceedings of 15th National conference in Turkish linguistics, 79-92. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press. google scholar
• Schroeder, C. (2008). Adverbial modification and secondary predicates in Turkish: a typological perspective. In C. Schroeder et al. (Eds.) Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond, 339-358. Oldenburg: BIS Verlag. google scholar
• Schultze-Berndt, E. & Himmelmann, N. (2004). Depictive Secondary Predicates in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Linguistic Typology 9(2), 341-350. google scholar
• Stowell, T. (1983). Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2, 285-312. google scholar
• Winkler, S. (1997). Focus and Secondary Predication. Mouton de Gruyter. Berlin. New York. google scholar

Atıflar