Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359   IUP :10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359    Tam Metin (PDF)

Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach

Özge Onay

This study systematically reframes problem representations within the UK’s counterterrorism policy by applying Carol Bacchi’s (2009) innovative ‘What is the Problem Represented to be?’ (WPR) approach to policy analysis, with a specific focus on the ‘CONTEST’ strategy and its pivotal component, Prevent. Through a retrospective analysis of policy documents and existing academic work, this article re-examines how the ‘problem’ is consistently constructed within policy frameworks, rather than presenting a novel argument. By tracing the genealogy of Islamophobia as represented in these policy texts, this study reveals the dominant portrayal of Islam and Muslims as underlying ‘problems’, highlighting the implications for governance practices that shape both policy and societal perceptions. The analysis identifies three recurrent problems in successive versions of CONTEST—namely, the perceived failures of Multiculturalism, surveillance deficiencies and concerns around Radicalisation—demonstrating how these framings reinforce the depiction of the so-called ‘Islamic terrorism’ and the Muslim ‘Other’ as central to security initiatives. By systematically reframing existing academic and policy discourse, this review underscores the influence of these representations on shaping security-oriented perceptions of Islam and Muslim communities in the UK. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Abbas, T. (2004). After 9/11: British South Asian Muslims, Islamophobia, multiculturalism, and the state. American Journal of Islam and Society, 21(3), 26-38. https://doi.org/l0.35632/ajis.v21i3.181 google scholar
  • Abbas, T. (Ed.). (2005). Muslim Britain: Communities under pressure. Zed Books google scholar
  • Abbas, T. (2007). Muslim minorities in Britain: Integration, multiculturalism and radicalism in the post-7/7 period. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 28(3), 287-300 google scholar
  • Abbas, T. (2019). Islamophobia and radicalisation: A vicious cYcle. Oxford UniversitY Press google scholar
  • Abbas, T., and Awan, I. (2015). Limits of UK counterterrorism policY and its implications for Islamophobia and far right extremism. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social DemocracY, 4(3), 16-29 google scholar
  • Abbas, T., Awan, I., & Marsden, J. (2023). Pushed to the edge: The consequences of the ‘prevent dutY’ in de-radicalising pre-crime thought among British Muslim universitY students. Race Ethnicity and Education, 26(6), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324. 2023.214582 google scholar
  • Act, E. (2010). EqualitY Act 2010. The StationerY Office. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/content google scholar
  • Act, I. (2016). Retrieved JanuarY 16, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/investigatorY-powers-bil google scholar
  • Akbari, A. H., & MacDonald, M. (2014). Immigration policY in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: An overview of recent trends. International Migration Review, 48(3), 801-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.1212 google scholar
  • Allen, F. (2014). Islamophobia in the UK: The role of British newspapers in shaping attitudes towards Islam and Muslims (Doctoral dissertation, UniversitY of Wales TrinitY Saint David (United Kingdom) google scholar
  • Allen, S. W. (2015). Having Change and Making Change: Muslim Moral Transformations in Post-Suharto Jakarta, Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation) google scholar
  • Allen, C. (2016). Still a challenge for us all? The RunnYmede Trust, Islamophobia and policY. In T. Modood, and N. Meer (Eds.), Religion, equalities, and inequalities (pp. 113-130). Palgrave Macmillan google scholar
  • Althusser, L. (1975). For Marx. Vintage google scholar
  • Araujo, C. L., do Carmo, E. A., & Fraga, R. G. (2023). The experiences of Young researchers in interdisciplinarY qualitative research based on critical discourse analYsis (CDA) using NVivo®. In International Conference on Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research (pp. 4354). Springer google scholar
  • Armstrong, K. (2005, JulY 11). The label of Catholic terror was never used for the IRA. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com google scholar
  • Asari, E. M., Halikiopoulou, D., & Mock, S. (2008). British National IdentitY and the Dilemmas of Multiculturalism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 14(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353711070187244 google scholar
  • Awan, I., Spiller, K. and Whiting, A. (2018). Terrorism in the classroom: SecuritY, surveillance, and public dutY to act. Springe google scholar
  • Bacchi, C. (2000). PolicY as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630005000549 google scholar
  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson Higher Education google scholar
  • Bacchi, C. L. (1990). Same difference: Feminism and sexual difference. Allen & Unwin google scholar
  • Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. SAGE google scholar
  • Bacchi, C. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10. 4236/ojps.2012.2100 google scholar
  • Bacchi, C. L. (2021). Introducing WPR: A work in progress. SAGE google scholar
  • Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policY analYsis: A guide to practice. Springe google scholar
  • Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policY? Texts, trajectories, and toolboxes. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 13(2), 10-17 google scholar
  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Politics and policymaking in education: Explorations in sociology. Routledge google scholar
  • Beilharz, P. (1987). Reading politics: Social theory and social policy. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 23(3), 388-406 google scholar
  • Bernstein, R. J. (2011). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. University of Pennsylvania Press google scholar
  • Bjprgo, T. (2022). Counter-terrorism strategies: Successes and challenges. Routledge google scholar
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE google scholar
  • Brown, W. (2012). Civilisational delusions: Secularism, tolerance, equality. Theory & Event, 15(2), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2012.002 google scholar
  • Burr, V. (2006). An introduction to social constructionism. Routledge google scholar
  • Busher, J., ChoudhurY, T., Thomas, P., & Harris, G. (2017). What the Prevent dutY means for schools and colleges in England: An analYsis of educationalists’ experiences google scholar
  • Choudhury, T., & Fenwick, H. (2011). The impact of counter-terrorism measures on Muslim communities (Research Report 72). EqualitY and Human Rights Commission. Durham University google scholar
  • Cohen, B., & Tufail, W. (2017). Prevent and the normalisation of Islamophobia. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 4(2), 167-190 google scholar
  • Edge, J. (2011). The reflexive teacher educator in TESOL: Roots and wings. Routledge google scholar
  • Eseverri-MaYer, C. (2024). The Fight Against Islamophobia in Madrid, Paris and London. A Comparative and Qualitative Analysis on Muslim Activism in Three Cities. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 8(2), 169-199 google scholar
  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge google scholar
  • Fenwick, H., & Fenwick, D. (2020). Prevent, free speech, ‘extremism’ and counter-terror interventions: exploring narratives about chilling expression in schools. Public Law, 2020 google scholar
  • Fiske, J. (1998). Surveilling the citY: whiteness, blackness, and democratic totalitarianism. Theory, Culture & Society, 15(2), 67-88 google scholar
  • Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books google scholar
  • Foucault, M. (1978). Nietzsche, genealogY, historY. İn Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 139-164). Cornell UniversitY Press google scholar
  • Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. UniversitY of Chicago Press google scholar
  • Freedman, R., & Hirsh, D. (Eds.). (2024). Responses to October 7: Law and SocietY. TaYlor and Francis google scholar
  • Gabriel, S. P., Gomez, E. T., & Rocha, Z. (2012). Between policY and realitY: multiculturalism, the second generation, and the third space in Britain. Asia-Europe Journal 10, 267-285 google scholar
  • Gardham, D. (2024, January 10). UK’s counter-terror chief warns of ‘unprecedented’ rise in terrorism threat since Israel-Gaza war started. Sky News. https://www.skynews.com google scholar
  • Garner, S., and Selod, S. (2015). The racialization of MusLims: EmpiricaL studies of IsLamophobia. Critical Sociology, 41 (i), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/089692051453160 google scholar
  • GiLLborn, D. (2008). Racism and education: Coincidence or conspiracy? RoutLedge google scholar
  • Goodwin, N. (1996). GovernmentaLity in the QueensLand Department of Education: PoLicies and the management of schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 17(1), 65-74 google scholar
  • Grant, C. (2021). Uniting or Dividing the PubLic? A PoststructuraL Investigation into whether Theresa MaY’s ‘EviL IdeoLogy Speech FoLLowing the London Bridge Attack, Constituted PubLic Discourse. A PoststructuraL Investigation into whether Theresa MaY’s ‘EviL IdeoLogY’ Speech Following the London Bridge Attack, Constituted PubLic Discourse (September 15, 2021) google scholar
  • Haggerty, K. D. (2006). Tear down the walls: On demoLishing the panopticon. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorising surveillance(pp. 37-59).. Willan Hilal, M. (2022). Innocent until proven Muslim: Islamophobia, the war on terror, and the Muslim experience since 9/11.BroadLeaf Books Home Office. (2023, JuLY 18). Counter-terrorism strategY (CONTEST) 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/pubLications/counter-terrorism-strategY-contest-202 google scholar
  • Home Office. (2018, October 8). The Home Office reopened funds to heLp communities tackLe hate crime. Retrieved from https://www. gov.uk/government/news/home-office-reopens-fund-to-heLp-communities-tackLe-hate-crim google scholar
  • Home Office. (2018). Home Secretary announces new counter-terrorism strategy. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/home-secretary-announces-new-counter-terrorism-strategy google scholar
  • Jenson, J. (1988). The Limits of ‘and the’ discourse: French women as marginaL workers. In The feminisation of the labour force: Paradoxes and promises (pp. 155-172). RoutLedge google scholar
  • Johnson, J. D. (2007). Analysis of the sources of Islamic extremism (DoctoraL dissertation, Fort Leavenworth, KS: US ArmY Command and GeneraL Staff CoLLege) google scholar
  • Goodhart, D. (2004). Too diverse? Prospect Magazine, 95(30), 7-10 google scholar
  • Action Against Hate. (2018, October). The UK Government’s pLan for tackLing hate crime: Two Years on. Retrieved from https://www.gov. uk/government/pubLications/hate-crime-action-pLan-2016 google scholar
  • Heath-KeLLY, C. (2013). Counter-terrorism and the counterfactuaL: Producing the ‘radicaLisation’discourse and the UK PREVENT strategY. The British journaL of poLitics and internationaL reLations, 15(3), 394-415 google scholar
  • IqbaL, K., & Abbas, T. (Eds.). (2024). EthnicitY, ReLigion and MusLim Education in a Changing WorLd: Navigating ContemporarY Perspectives on MuLticuLturaL SchooLing in the UK. TaYLor and Francis google scholar
  • Jackson, L. B. (2017). Islamophobia in Britain: Making of a Muslim enemy. Springer google scholar
  • Jackson, R. (2006). ReLigion, poLitics and terrorism: A criticaL anaLYsis of narratives of ‘IsLamic terrorism’. Centre for InternationaL PoLitics Working Paper Series, 21. UniversitY of Manchester google scholar
  • Kassimeris, G., and L. Jackson (2012). British MusLims and discourses of dYsfunction: communitY cohesion and counterterrorism in the West MidLands. CriticaL Studies on Terrorism, 5(2), 179-196 google scholar
  • Khan, F. (2015). Negotiating British-MusLim identitY: HYbriditY, excLusion and resistance. UniversitY of LiverpooL (United Kingdom) Kretsedemas, P. (2012). The Limits of control: Neo-LiberaL poliCY priorities and the US non-immigrant flow. International Migration, 50(Si), e1-e18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00722. google scholar
  • Knudsen, R. A., & Betts, P. (2016). RadicaLisation and the changing nature of terrorism. Terrorism and PoLiticaL VioLence, 28(6), 981-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2016.115404 google scholar
  • Law, I., SaYYid, S., & Easat-Daas, A. (2019). A New Counter-IsLamophobia Kit. Countering IsLamophobia in Europe, 323-360 google scholar
  • Lea, S. (2016). The Immigration Act 2016 in pLain EngLish. Rights Info. https://www.rightsinfo.org google scholar
  • Lowe, D., & Bennett, R. (Eds.). (2021). Prevent StrategY: HeLping the VuLnerabLe Being Drawn Towards Terrorism Or Another LaYer of State SurveiLLance?. RoutLedge google scholar
  • Luke, A. (1995). Chapter 1: Text and discourse in education: An introduction to criticaL discourse anaLYsis. Review of Research in Education, 21(1), 3-48 google scholar
  • Lui, R. (2006). The International government of refugees. İn W. Larner and W. WaLters (Eds.), Global governmentality: Governing inter-national space (2nd ed., pp. XX-XX). RoutLedge google scholar
  • Lynch, O. (2013). British MusLim Youth: RadicaLisation, terrorism, and the construction of the ‘other’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 6(2),241-261 google scholar
  • Lyon, D. (1994). The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. UniversitY of Minnesota Press google scholar
  • MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. McGraw-HiLL Education (UK) google scholar
  • May, T. (2011). Prevent strategy. Hansard, 529 google scholar
  • McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (1993). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power, and the subject. U of Minnesota Press google scholar
  • Mirza, H. S. (2006). Transcendence över diversitY: Black women in the academY. Policy Futures in Education, 4(2), 101-113 google scholar
  • Modood, T., Dobbernack, J. and Meer, N. (2010). Tolerance and cultural diversitY discourses in Britain. Ethnicities, 10 (4), 464-488 google scholar
  • Monaghan, J., & Molnar, A. (2016). Radicalisation theories, policing practices, and “the future of terrorism?”. Critical studies on terrorism, 9(3), 393-413 google scholar
  • Mourad, Z. (2022). Neoliberalism and Islamophobia: The Politics of Naming Muslims. In Neoliberalism and Islamophobia: Schooling and Religion for MinoritY Muslim Youth (pp. 23-57). Cham: Springer International Publishing google scholar
  • NaYel, A. A. (2017). Alternative performativitY of Muslimness: The intersection of race, gender, religion, and migration. Springer google scholar
  • NiewolnY, K., & Wilson, A. (2005). Economic knowledge production of the Growing New Farmers Consortium, 2000-2005: A critical discourse analYsis of adult agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 11(3), 207-225 google scholar
  • Norris, M. (2015). Contesting identitY and preventing belonging? An analYsis of British counter-terrorism policY since the Terrorism Act 2000 and the selective use of the terrorism label bY the British Government. CORE. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/ 46520102.pd google scholar
  • Olssen, M., Codd, J. A., & O'Neill, A.-M. (2004). Education policy: Globalisation, citizenship, and democracy. Sage google scholar
  • O’Toole, T., Meer, N., DeHanas, D. N., Jones, S. H., and Modood, T. (2016). Governing through prevent? Regulation and contested practice in State-Muslim engagement. SociologY, 50(1), 160-177 google scholar
  • Pagden, A. (Ed.). (1987). The languages of political theorY in earlY-modern Europe (Vol. 4). Cambridge UniversitY Press google scholar
  • Panjwani, F. (2018, April 30). Interview with Shamil Shams for DW. Available online: https://www.dw.com/en/muslim-radicalization-in-britain-countering-the-extremists-rationale/a-43592644) (Accessed: MaY 3, 2020) google scholar
  • Parekh, B. (1990). The Rushdie affair: Research agenda for political philosophY. Political Studies, 38(4), 695-709 google scholar
  • Phillips, S. D. (1996). Discourse, identitY, and voice: Feminist contributions to policY studies. In B. K. Smith (Ed.). Policy studies in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 242-265). UniversitY of Toronto Press google scholar
  • Pollock, A., & Berge, E. (2018). How to do a sYstematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 13(2), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/174749301774379 google scholar
  • Prevent DutY. (2023). Prevent duty guidance: England and Wales (2023). Prevent DutY google scholar
  • Rehman, J. (2007). Islam," War on Terror" and the future of Muslim minorities in the United Kingdom: dilemmas of multiculturalism. Human Rights QuarterlY, 29(4), 831-878 google scholar
  • Qureshi, A. (2015). PREVENT: Creating ‘radicals’ to strengthen anti-Muslim narratives. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8(1), 181-191. https:// doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2015.100593 google scholar
  • Qurashi, F. (2018). The Prevent strategY and the UK ‘war on terror’: embedding surveillance infrastructure in Muslim communities. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), pp. 1-13 google scholar
  • Rashid, N. (2013). Veiled threats: Producing the Muslim woman in public and policY discourse in the UK. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 6(2), 219-240 google scholar
  • RoY, O. (2017). Jihad and death: The global appeal of Islamic State. Oxford UniversitY Press google scholar
  • RunnYmede Trust. (2017). Islamophobia: Still a challenge for us all. RunnYmede Trust google scholar
  • SaYYid, S. (2014). A measure of Islamophobia. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 2(1), 10-25 google scholar
  • Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policY. In A. OrtonY (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 137-163). Cambridge UniversitY Press google scholar
  • Shapiro, M. J. (1992). Reading the postmodern polity: Political theory as textual practice. UniversitY of Minnesota Press google scholar
  • Sian, K. (2017). Born radicals? Prevent, positivism, and ‘race-thinking’. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1-8 google scholar
  • Slaven, M. (2022). The Windrush Scandal and the individualisation of postcolonial immigration control in Britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(16), 49-71 google scholar
  • Social MobilitY Commission. (2017). Young Muslims in the UK face enormous social mobility barriers. Social MobilitY Commission google scholar
  • Spektorowski, A. (2024). Anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and Anti-Zionism: Discrimination and Political Construction. Religions, 15(1), 74 google scholar
  • Stein, T., & ShankleY, W. (2024). ‘Paperwork or no paperwork, we are guests in this countrY’: Mothering and belonging in the wake of the Windrush Scandal. Identities, 31(2), 141-160 google scholar
  • StrategY, P. (2011). HM government. The StationarY Office. Retrieved 10 October 2018 google scholar
  • Tippett, N., Houlston, C. and Smith, P. K. (2010). Prevention and response to identitY-based bullYing among local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales. London: EqualitY and Human Rights Commission google scholar
  • Torgerson, D. (1996). Power and insight in policy discourse: Postpositivism and problem definition. In Policy studies in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 266-298). Sage google scholar
  • UK Government. (2019). Security situation in Northern Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/securitY-situation-in-northern-irelan google scholar
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). An interdisciplinarY studY of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. In Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition (pp. 121-137). Erlbaum google scholar
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Discours de L’eLite et racisme. Cahiers De pmxematique, 17, 49-71 google scholar
  • Versi, M. (2017, September 10). The latest Prevent figures show whY the strategY needs an independent review. The Guardian google scholar
  • WaLker, C. (2014). Championing LocaL surveiLLance in counter-terrorism. In SurveiLLance, Counter-Terrorism and Comparative Constitu-tionaLism (pp. 22-41). RoutLedge google scholar
  • Watts, R. (1993). Government and modernitY: An essaY in thinking governmentaLitY. Arena Journal, 2, 103-118 google scholar
  • Werbner, P. (2005). The transLocation of cuLture: ‘community cohesion’ and the force of multiculturalism in history. The SocioLogicaL Review, 53(4), 745-768 google scholar
  • Women and Equalities Committee. (2019). Tackling inequalities faceD by Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities: Seventh Report of Session 2017-19. UK Parliament google scholar
  • Yeatman, A. (1990). Bureaucrats, technocrats, femocrats: Essays on the contemporary Australian state. ALLen and Unwin google scholar
  • Yegenoglu, M. (2012). Islam, Migrancy and Hospitality in Europe. Springer google scholar
  • YıLdız, Ü. (2021). An anti-racist reading of the notion of fundamentaL British vaLues. PRISM: Casting New Light on Learning, Theory anD Practice, 3(2), 91-107. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Onay, Ö. (2019). Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, 0(0), -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359


AMA

Onay Ö. Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi. 2019;0(0):-. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359


ABNT

Onay, Ö. Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 0, p. -, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Onay, Özge,. 2019. “Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach.” Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 0, no. 0: -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359


Chicago: Humanities Style

Onay, Özge,. Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach.” Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 0, no. 0 (Mar. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359


Harvard: Australian Style

Onay, Ö 2019, 'Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach', Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. -, viewed 10 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Onay, Ö. (2019) ‘Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach’, Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, 0(0), pp. -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359 (10 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Onay, Özge,. Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach.” Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 0, 2019, pp. -. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359


Vancouver

Onay Ö. Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi [Internet]. 10 Mar. 2025 [cited 10 Mar. 2025];0(0):-. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359 doi: 10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359


ISNAD

Onay, Özge. Security Measures or Islamophobic Policies? A Systematic Review Using the WPR Approach”. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 0/0 (Mar. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2024-1520359



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim22.07.2024
Kabul10.01.2025
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma07.02.2025

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.