Referanslar

• Adıgüzel Mercangöz, B., Yıldırım, B. F., & Kuzu Yıldırım, S. (2020). Time period based COPRAS-G method: application on the Logistics Performance Index. LogForum, 16(2), 239-250. google scholar
• Akbulut, E. A., Ulutaş, A., Yürüyen, A. A., & Balalan, S. (2024). Hibrit bir ÇKKV modeli ile G20 ülkelerinin lojistik performansının ölçülmesi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 12(1), 1-21. google scholar
• Alinezhad, A., & Khalili, J. (2019). New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM) (Vol. 277). Cham: Springer. google scholar
• Arıkan Kargı, V. S. (2022). Evaluation of Logistics Performance of The OECD Member Countries with Integrated Entropy and Waspas Method. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 29(4), 801-811. google scholar
• Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T. M., & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31-43. google scholar
• Arvis, J. F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to Compete 2018: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986 /29971. google scholar
• Bugarcic, F. Z., Skvarciany, V., & Stanisic, N. (2020). Logistics performance index in international trade: Case of Central and Eastern European and Western Balkans countries. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 452-459. google scholar
• Çakır, S. (2017). Measuring logistics performance of OECD countries via fuzzy linear regression. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(3-4), 177-186. google scholar
• Çalık, A., Erdebilli, B., & Özdemir, Y. S. (2023). Novel Integrated Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Logistics Performance Index. Transportation Research Record, 03611981221113314. google scholar
• Chen, C. H. (2021). A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach based on ANP-entropy TOPSIS for building materials supplier selection. Entropy, 23(12), 1597. google scholar
• Dabachi, U. M., Mahmood, S., Ahmad, A. U., Ismail, S., Farouq, I. S., Jakada, A. H., & Kabiru, K. (2020). Energy consumption, energy price, energy intensity environmental degradation, and economic growth nexus in African OPEC countries: evidence from simultaneous equations models. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(1), 403-409. google scholar
• Devlin, J., & Yee, P. (2005). Trade logistics in developing countries: The case of the Middle East and North Africa. World Economy, 28(3), 435-456. google scholar
• Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega, 112, 102690. google scholar
• Ftiti, Z., Guesmi, K., Teulon, F., & Chouachi, S. (2016). Relationship between crude oil prices and economic growth in selected OPEC countries. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 32(1), 11-22. google scholar
• Gök Kısa, A. C. & Ayçin, E. (2019). OECD Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının SWARA Tabanlı EDAS Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1), 301-325. google scholar
• Hajduk, S. (2021). Multi-criteria analysis in the decision-making approach for the linear ordering of urban transport based on TOPSIS technique. Energies, 15(1), 274. google scholar
• Iorember, P. T., Gbaka, S., Jelilov, G., Alymkulova, N., & Usman, O. (2022). Impact of international trade, energy consumption and income on environmental degradation in Africa’s OPEC member countries. African Development Review, 34(2), 175-187. google scholar
• Isik, O., Aydin, Y., & Kosaroglu, S. M. (2020). The assessment of the logistics Performance Index of CEE Countries with the New Combination of SV and MABAC Methods. LogForum, 16(4), 549-559. google scholar
• Kale, M. V., & Tilki, İ. (2024). Dünya Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi: 2023 Yılı Dünya Bankası Raporu ile Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(80), 13-30. google scholar
• Karaköy, Ç., & Ölmez, U. (2019). Balkan ülkelerinde lojistik performans endeksi değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimlerde Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar Sempozyumu, 178-180. google scholar
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2017). Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(3), 1627-1638. google scholar
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451. google scholar
• Marti, L., Martin, J. C., & Puertas, R. (2017). A DEA-logistics performance index. Journal ofapplied economics, 20(1), 169-192. google scholar
• Mercangoz, B. A., Yildirim, B. F., & Yildirim, S. K. (2020). Time period based COPRAS-G method: application on the Logistics Performance Index. LogForum, 16(2). google scholar
• Mesic, A., Miskic, S., Stevic, Z., & Mastilo, Z. (2022). Hybrid MCDM Solutions for evaluation of the logistics performance index of the Western Balkan countries. Economics, 10(1), 13-34. google scholar
• Miskic, S., Stevic, Z., Tadic, S., Alkhayyat, A., & Krstic, M. (2023). Assessment of the LPI of the EU countries using MCDM model with an emphasis on the importance of criteria. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 11(3), 258-279. google scholar
• Nazlioglu, S., Payne, J. E., Lee, J., Rayos-Velazquez, M., & Karul, C. (2021). Convergence in OPEC carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from new panel stationarity tests with factors and breaks. Economic Modelling, 100, 105498. google scholar
• Oğuz, S. (2023). Evaluation of Customs, Infrastructure and Logistics Services with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Comparative Analysis for the Top 10 Countries in the Logistics Performance Index. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 10(4), 167-178. google scholar
• Onifade, S. T., Alola, A. A., Erdoğan, S., & Acet, H. (2021). Environmental aspect of energy transition and urbanization in the OPEC member states. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 17158-17169. google scholar
• Onoh, J. O., Nwachukwu, T., & Mbanasor, C. A. (2018). Economic growth in OPEC member states: Oil export earnings versus non-oil export earnings. Journal of Developing Country Studies, ISSN, 2225-0565. google scholar
• OPEC. (2010). OPEC Long-Term Strategy Report. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from: https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/publications/346.htm (16.03.2023) google scholar
• Ostic, D., Twum, A. K., Agyemang, A. O., & Boahen, H. A. (2022). Assessing the impact of oil and gas trading, foreign direct investment inflows, and economic growth on carbon emission for OPEC member countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 43089-43101. google scholar
• Pehlivan, P., Aslan, A. I., David, S., & Bacalum, S. (2024). Determination of Logistics Performance of G20 Countries Using Quantitative Decision-Making Techniques. Sustainability, 16(5), 1852. google scholar
• Rashidi, K., & Cullinane, K. (2019). Evaluating the sustainability of national logistics performance using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transport Policy, 74, 35-46. google scholar
• Rezaei, J., van Roekel, W. S., & Tavasszy, L. (2018). Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transport policy, 68, 158-169. google scholar
• Stojanovic, I., & Puska, A. (2021). Logistics performances of gulf cooperation council’s countries in global supply chains. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 174-193. google scholar
• Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77-87. google scholar
• Ulutaş, A., & Karaköy, Ç. (2019a). An analysis of the logistics performance index ofEU countries with an integrated MCDM model. Economics and Business Review, 5(4), 49-69. google scholar
• Ulutaş, A., & Karaköy, Ç. (2019b). G-20 Ülkelerinin lojistik performans endeksinin çok kriterli karar verme modeli ile ölçümü. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 71-84. google scholar
• Ulutaş, A., & Karaköy, Ç. (2021). Evaluation of LPI values of transition economies countries with a grey MCDM model. In Handbook of research on applied AI for international business and marketing applications (pp. 499-511). IGI Global. google scholar
• World Bank (WB). (2023). LPI 2018 Report. Retrieved from: https://lpi.worldbank.org/ (04.04.2023) google scholar
• Yalçin, B., & Ayvaz, B. (2020). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ile Lojistik Performansın Değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(38), 117-138. google scholar
• Yildirim, B. F., & Adiguzel Mercangoz, B. (2020). Evaluating the logistics performance of OECD countries by using fuzzy AHP and ARAS-G. Eurasian Economic Review, 10(1), 27-45. google scholar

Atıflar