Public and Private International Law Bulletin

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106   IUP :10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106    Tam Metin (PDF)

ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Fatih Burak Uzun

Verinin değerinin ortaya çıkarılabilmesi, ancak yüksek miktarda işlem gücü kullanılması ile mümkün olabilir. Söz konusu yüksek işlem gücünün temini için en elverişli yol, bulut bilişim hizmetleridir. Bulut bilişim hizmetleri, tüm dünyada hükümetler tarafından çeşitli müdahalelerle karşılaşmaktadır. Bu müdahalelerin en önemlileri, verilerin ya da veri işleme sistemlerinin lokalizasyonuna (ülke sınırları içerisinde tutulmasının zorunlu kılınması) ilişkin olanlardır. Bulut bilişim hizmetlerinin neredeyse her zaman uluslararası ölçekte sunulduğu göz önüne alındığında; bulut bilişim hizmetlerinin söz konusu müdahalelerden korunmasına ilişkin olarak, 1960’lı yıllarda imzalanmış olan ve yabancı yatırımların korunmasını hedefleyen, ICSID Konvansiyonu’nun kullanılıp kullanılamayacağı konusunun incelenmesi ihtiyacı doğmuştur. ICSID Konvansiyonu, yatırımcılar ve devletler arasındaki yatırımlara ilişkin uyuşmazlıkların çözümlenmesi için tarafsız tahkim heyetleri oluşturulmasına imkân vermektedir. ICSID tahkim heyetlerinin bir uyuşmazlık üzerinde yetki sahibi olabilmesinin en önemli koşullarından birisi, ilgili uyuşmazlığın bir yatırıma ilişkin olmasıdır. Buna rağmen ICSID Konvansiyonu, yatırım terimine ilişkin herhangi bir tanım içermemektedir. Doktrinde ve içtihatlarda yatırım teriminin tanımlanması için temel olarak iki ana görüş bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan ilki, terimin tanımlanması görevinin taraflara ait olduğunu savunan görüştür. İkinci görüş ise; tarafların yatırım teriminin tanımını birlikte belirlemesi ile yatırım teşkil eden ekonomik aktivitenin belirli objektif kriterleri karşılayabilmesi koşullarının birlikte sağlanmasını aramaktadır. Bulut bilişim hizmetleri, her iki görüşe göre de gereken koşulları sağlayabilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Bulut programlama, Veri, Bölgeselleştirme, Yatırım, ICSID
DOI :10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106   IUP :10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106    Tam Metin (PDF)

Cloud Computing as an Investment Under the ICSID Convention

Fatih Burak Uzun

Extracting data’s value can only be possible by using a high amount of processing power. The most eligible way of procuring such amount of processing power is using cloud computing services. Cloud computing services face several interventions by governments around the globe. The most notable interventions relate to the localization of data and data processing facility. Since cloud computing services nearly always provided internationally, there is a need to explore the possibility of protecting cloud computing services from those interventions by using a legal tool from the 1960s namely the ICSID Convention which allows forming arbitrational tribunals to solve investment disputes between investors and states. One of the conditions for ICSID tribunals to have jurisdiction over disputes is that the dispute at hand must be related to an investment. However, the ICSID Convention does not contain a definition of the investment term. Mainly, there are two different approaches among the case law and legal doctrine for defining the investment term. The first approach is leaving the duty of defining the term to the parties. The second approach requires simultaneous fulfilment of the parties’ consent and certain objective criteria. Cloud computing services can meet the required criteria under those approaches.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Cloud computing, Data, Localization, Investment, ICSID

PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Bamman D, O’Connor B and Smith N, ‘Censorship and Deletion Practices in Chinese Social Media’ (2012) 17 First Monday <http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3943> accessed 11 September 2017 google scholar
  • Bennett SC, ‘The Right to Be Forgotten: Reconciling EU and US Perspectives’ (2012) 30 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 161 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/berkjintlw30&div=7&g_ sent=1&collection=journals> google scholar
  • Block FL, The Origins of International Economic Disorder: A Study of United States International Monetary Policy from World War II to the Present (University of California Press 1977) google scholar
  • Broches A, ‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes: Some Observations on Jurisdiction’ (1966) 5 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 263 <http://heinonline.org/ HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cjtl5&div=18&start_page=263&collection=journals&set_as_ cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults> accessed 2 December 2018 google scholar
  • Chander A and Lê UP, ‘Data Nationalism’ (2015) 64 Emory Law Journal 679 <https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2577947> accessed 7 July 2017 google scholar
  • Cimpanu C, ‘Attempting to Ban YouTube, Turkey Restricts Several Google Services’ (softpedia) <http://news.softpedia.com/news/Attempting-to-Ban-YouTube-Turkey-Restricts-Several- Google-Services-143894.shtml> accessed 11 September 2017 google scholar
  • Coskuntuncel A, ‘Privatization of Governance, Delegated Censorship, and Hegemony in the Digital Era’ (2016) 0 Journalism Studies 1 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1197045> accessed 11 September 2017 google scholar
  • ‘Data Centre Risk Index’ (Cushman & Wakefield 2016) <https://verne-global-lackey.s3.amazonaws. com/uploads%2F2017%2F1%2Fb5e0a0da-5ad2-01b3-1eb8-8f782f22a534%2FC%26W_ Data_Centre+Risk_Index_Report_2016.pdf> accessed 12 June 2017 google scholar
  • dejiaccessnow, ‘Status of Net Neutrality Around the World’ (CARTO) <https://dejiaccessnow.carto. com/viz/4f239c60-356f-11e5-b01c-0e853d047bba/embed_map> accessed 23 September 2017 google scholar
  • Dekastros M, ‘Portfolio Investment: Reconceptualising the Notion of Investment under the ICSID Convention’ (2013) 14 Journal of World Investment & Trade 286 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/ Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit14&collection=journals&id=294&startid=&endid=327> accessed 1 October 2018 google scholar
  • Dolzer R and Schreuer C, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012) <https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=lang_en%7Clang_tr&id=qS0UDAA AQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Principles+of+international+investment+law&ots=EXyClkM pWD&sig=NuamsO2khRBJhNchL-TBfeciqn8&redir_esc=y> google scholar
  • Dugan C and others, Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2011) <https://books. google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=lang_en%7Clang_tr&id=xfkEAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg= PP1&dq=Investor-state+arbitration&ots=f9zZK0Ji-q&sig=OA0kC78MRcYe7PkjCkgLlt5LSQ& redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Investor-state%20arbitration&f=false> google scholar
  • Economides N, ‘“Net Neutrality,” Non-Discrimination and Digital Distribution of Content Through the Internet’ (2008) 4 I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 209 www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/Economides_Net_Neutrality.pdf> accessed 20 September 2017 google scholar
  • Engfeldt HJ, ‘Should ICSID Go Gangnam Style in Light of Non-Traditional Foreign Investments Including Those Spurred on by Social Media - Applying an Industry-Specific Lens to the Salini Test to Determine Article 25 Jurisdiction’ (2014) 32 Berkeley Journal of International Law 44<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/berkjintlw32&div=5&g_sent=1&casa_ token=3ZU6h80dAsMAAAAA:8IgqwV6X6gLasG-htwsm0AogPNoJZaswXK3eQVZpB5g13ZwOC- 1oSGDerJCzN2D-WjZQ_W3sjw&collection=journals#> accessed 27 December 2017 google scholar
  • Gaillard E, ‘Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice’ <http://www.shearman.com/~/media/Files/NewsInsights/Publications/2009/01/ Identify-or-define-Reflections-on-the-evolution-__/Files/View-full-text-Identify-or-define-Reflections- on__/FileAttachment/IA2009IdentifyordefineReflectiononevolutionconce__.pdf> accessed 23 September 2017 google scholar
  • García M, ‘The Path Towards Defining “Investment” in ICSID Investor-State Arbitrations: The Open-Ended Approach’ (2018) 18 Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 27 <https:// digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol18/iss1/2> accessed 2 July 2018 google scholar
  • Given JP, ‘Malaysia Historical Salvors Sdn., Bhd. v. Malaysia: An End to the Liberal Definition of Investment in ICSID Arbitrations’ (2009) 31 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 467 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ loyint31&div=22&start_page=467&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_ tab=srchresults> accessed 2 September 2018 google scholar
  • Grabowski A, ‘The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini Comment’ (2014) 15 Chicago Journal of International Law 287 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/ Page?handle=hein.journals/cjil15&collection=journals&id=291&startid=&endid=313> accessed 17 January 2018 google scholar
  • Granados N, ‘The Net Neutrality Debate: Why There Is No Simple Solution’ (Forbes) www.forbes.com/sites/nelsongranados/2017/05/31/the-net-neutrality-debate-why-there-is-nosimple- solution/> accessed 23 September 2017 google scholar
  • Greenberg A and others, ‘The Cost of a Cloud: Research Problems in Data Center Networks’ (2009) 39 ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 68 <https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ research/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/p68-v39n1o-greenberg.pdf> accessed 21 September 2017 google scholar
  • Harb J-P, ‘Definition Of Investments Protected By International Treaties: An On-Going Hot Debate’ (2011) 26 Mealey’s International Arbitration Report 1 <http://www.jonesday.com/files/ Publication/c24e6d62-3269-4b32-b93d-992f1d5e2e77/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/ b4526438-d73b-4bd4-a780-8003fe19feaf/689472.pdf> accessed 21 January 2018 google scholar
  • Hayali A, Sarili S and Dinc Y, ‘Turkish Experience in Bank Shareholders and Top Managers Fraud: Imar Bank and Ihlas Finans Case’ (2012) 1 The Macrotheme Review 114 <http://macrotheme. com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/MR11Ayse.28184406.pdf> accessed 8 September 2017 google scholar
  • Höfer CN and Karagiannis G, ‘Cloud Computing Services: Taxonomy and Comparison’ (2011) 2 Journal of Internet Services and Applications 81 <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s13174-011-0027-x> accessed 6 February 2017 google scholar
  • Hussein D, ‘Contribution to the Host State Development: A Marginalised Criterion?’ (2015) 2 BCDR International Arbitration Review 289 <https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract. php?area=Journals&id=BCDR2015015> accessed 24 February 2018 google scholar
  • Jaeger PT and others, ‘Where Is the Cloud? Geography, Economics, Environment, and Jurisdiction in Cloud Computing’ (2009) 14 First Monday <http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/ view/2456/2171> accessed 23 September 2017 google scholar
  • Kastrenakes J, ‘The FCC Just Killed Net Neutrality’ (The Verge, 14 December 2017) <https://www.theverge. com/2017/12/14/16776154/fcc-net-neutrality-vote-results-rules-repealed> accessed 18 February 2018 google scholar
  • Lunden I, ‘PayPal to Halt Operations in Turkey after Losing License, Impacts “Hundreds of Thousands”’ (www.techcrunch.com, 31 June 2016) <https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/31/paypal-to-haltoperations- in-turkey-after-losing-license-impacts-hundreds-of-thousands/> accessed 9 July 2017 google scholar
  • Manciaux S, ‘The Notion of Investment: New Controversies’ (2008) 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 443 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit9&div=46&start_page=443&collection= journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab=srchresults> accessed 2 November 2018 google scholar
  • Martin A, ‘Definition of Investment: Could a Persistent Objector to the Salini Tests Be Found in ICSID Arbitral Practice Topics’ (2011) 11 Global Jurist [i] <http://heinonline.org/HOL/ Page?handle=hein.journals/globjur11&collection=journals&id=293&startid=&endid=313> accessed 12 August 2017 google scholar
  • McGarty C and others, ‘New Technologies, New Identities, and the Growth of Mass Opposition in the Arab Spring’ (2014) 35 Political Psychology 725 <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/pops.12060/abstract> accessed 13 September 2017 google scholar
  • Mell P and Grance T, ‘The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing’ (The National Institute of Standards and Technology 2011) Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-145 <http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/ nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf> accessed 12 February 2017 google scholar
  • Mishra N, ‘Data Localization Laws in a Digital World: Data Protection or Data Protectionism?’ [2016] The Public Sphere 136 <http://publicspherejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/06. data_protection.pdf> accessed 23 September 2017 google scholar
  • Mortenson JD, ‘The Meaning of “Investment”: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law’ (2010) 51 Harvard International Law Journal 257 <http://www.harvardilj.org/ wp-content/uploads/2010/09/HILJ_51-1_Mortenson.pdf> accessed 11 September 2017 google scholar
  • Mowbray M, ‘The Fog over the Grimpen Mire: Cloud Computing and the Law’ (2009) 6 SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology and Society 132 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein. journals/scripted6&div=11&g_sent=1&collection=journals> accessed 8 August 2017 google scholar
  • ‘Net Neutrality’ (EDRi 2013) Issue 8 <https://edri.org/files/EDRi_NetNeutrality.pdf> accessed 21 April 2017 google scholar
  • ‘Net Neutrality: The Perspective of Telcos and Cable Companies’ <https://inform.tmforum.org/ features-and-analysis/2016/06/net-neutrality-the-perspective-of-telcos-and-cable-companies/> accessed 23 September 2017 google scholar
  • Omurgonulsen M and Omurgonulsen U, ‘Critical Thinking about Creative Accounting in the Face of a Recent Scandal in the Turkish Banking Sector’ (2009) 20 Critical Perspectives on Accounting 651 <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235408000245> accessed 11 September 2017 google scholar
  • Rotella P, ‘Is Data The New Oil?’ (Forbes, 4 February 2012) <https://www.forbes.com/sites/ perryrotella/2012/04/02/is-data-the-new-oil/> accessed 11 September 2017 google scholar
  • Schefer KN, International Investment Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Second Edition (Second Edition, Edward Elgar Publishing 2016) google scholar
  • Schreuer CH, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (First Edition, Cambridge University Press 2001) google scholar
  • Schreuer CH, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (Second Edition, Cambridge University Press 2009) google scholar
  • ‘The High Costs of GDPR Compliance’ (Dark Reading) <https://www.darkreading.com/endpoint/ the-high-costs-of-gdpr-compliance/a/d-id/1329263> accessed 23 September 2017 google scholar
  • ‘The ICSID Caseload – Statistics’ (International Centre for Settelement of Investment Disputes) Issue 2017-2 <https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/resources/ICSID%20Web%20 Stats%202017-2%20(English)%20Final.pdf> accessed 9 September 2017 google scholar
  • Tian GY, ‘Current Issues of Cross-Border Personal Data Protection in the Context of Cloud Computing and Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Join or Withdraw’ (2016) 34 Wisconsin International Law Journal 367 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein. journals/wisint34&div=16&start_page=367&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_ tab=srchresults> accessed 2 November 2018 google scholar
  • ‘Transparency Report: Search Removals Under European Privacy Law’ (Google) <https:// transparencyreport.google.com/eu-privacy/overview> accessed 27 August 2016 google scholar
  • ‘UNCTAD Investment Policy Hub’ <http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA> accessed 28 August 2017 google scholar
  • Waibel M, ‘Opening Pandora’s Box: Sovereign Bonds in International Arbitration’ (2007) 101 American Journal of International Law 711 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein. journals/ajil101&div=53&start_page=711&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_ tab=srchresults> accessed 2 November 2018 google scholar
  • Webber M, ‘The GDPR’s Impact on the Cloud Service Provider as a Processor’ (2016) 16 Privacy & Data Protection Journal <http://www.fieldfisher.com/media/3993765/the-gdprs-impact-on-the-cloudservice- provider-as-a-processor-mark-webber-privacy-data-protection.pdf> accessed 13 August 2017 google scholar
  • Youm KH and Park A, ‘The “Right to Be Forgotten” in European Union Law: Data Protection Balanced with Free Speech?’ (2016) 93 Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 273 <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077699016628824> accessed 17 June 2017 google scholar
  • Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic, (formerly Giovanna a Beccara and Others v The Argentine Republic), Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [2011] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/07/5 google scholar
  • Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic, (formerly Giovanna a Beccara and Others v The Argentine Republic), Dissenting Opinion, Georges Abi-Saab [2011] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/07/05 google scholar
  • Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S. v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Award [2009] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/03/29 google scholar
  • Biwater Gauff Ltd v United Republic of Tanzania, Award [2008] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/05/22 google scholar
  • Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka, AS v The Slovak Republic, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction [1999] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/97/04 google scholar
  • CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Republic of Argentina, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic [2007] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/01/08 google scholar
  • Consortium RFCC v Kingdom of Morocco, Decision on Jurisdiction [2001] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/00/06 google scholar
  • Consorzio Groupement LESI-DIPENTA v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, Award [2005] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/03/08 google scholar
  • Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, LP v Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction [2004] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/01/03 google scholar
  • Fedax N V v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction [1999] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/96/03 google scholar
  • Generation Ukraine, Inc v Ukraine, Award [2003] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/00/09 google scholar
  • Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja González [2014] European Court of Justice C-131/12 google scholar
  • Helnan International Hotels A/S v The Arab Republic of Egypt, Decision of the Tribunal on Objection to Jurisdiction [2006] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB 05/19 google scholar
  • Ioannis Kardassopoulos v The Republic of Georgia, Decision on Jurisdiction [2007] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/05/18 google scholar
  • Jan de Nul NV Dredging International NV v Arab Republic of Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction [2006] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/04/13 google scholar
  • Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, Award on Jurisdiction [2004] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/03/11 google scholar
  • KT Asia Investment Group BV v Republic of Kazakhstan, Award [2013] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/09/8 google scholar
  • Lanco International Inc v The Argentine Republic, Preliminary Decision: Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal [1998] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/97/6 google scholar
  • LesiSpA and ASTALDI S.pA v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, Decision on jurisdiction [2006] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/05/3 google scholar
  • Malaysian Historical Salvors, SDN, BHD v The Government of Malaysia, Award on Jurisdiction [2007] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/05/10 google scholar
  • Malaysian Historical Salvors, SDN, BHD v The Government of Malaysia, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Mohamed Shahabuddeen [2009] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/05/10 google scholar
  • MCI Power Group LC and New Turbine, Inc v Republic of Ecuador, Award [2007] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/03/6 google scholar
  • Mr Patrick Mitchell, The Democratic Republic of Congo, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Award [2006] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/99/7 google scholar
  • Pantechniki SA Contractors & Engineers (Greece) v The Republic of Albania, Award [2009] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/07/21 google scholar
  • Philippe Gruslin v Malaysia, Award [2000] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/99/3 Phoenix Action, Ltd v The Czech Republic, Award [2009] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/06/5 google scholar
  • Quiborax SA, Non-Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplun v Plurinational State of Bolivia, Decision on Jurisdiction [2012] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/06/2 google scholar
  • Saba Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award [2010] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/07/20 google scholar
  • Saipem S.pA v The People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Decision on Jurisdiction and Recommendation on Provisional Measures [2007] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/05/07 google scholar
  • Salini Costruttori S.pA and Italstrade S.pA v Kingdom of Morocco, Decision on Jurisdiction [2001] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/00/4 google scholar
  • SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines, Decision of Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction [2004] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/02/6 google scholar
  • Tokios Tokelés v Ukraine, Decision on Jurisdiction [2004] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/02/18 google scholar
  • Toto Costruzioni Generali S.pA v The Republic of Lebanon, Decision on Jurisdiction [2009] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/07/12 google scholar
  • Victor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile, Award [2008] International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ARB/98/2 google scholar
  • Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Network Penetration Reporting and Contracting for Cloud Services (DFARS Case 2013– D018) google scholar
  • General Communique on Electronic Ledger google scholar
  • General Communique on Tax Procedure Law (Circular Number: 433) google scholar
  • Law on Payment and Securities Settlement Systems, Payment Services and Electronic Money Institutions google scholar
  • Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union google scholar
  • Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) google scholar
  • The Communique on Principles of Information Systems Management and Business Processes and Audition of Information Systems in the Institutions of Information Exchange, Clearing and Netting google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Uzun, F. (2018). ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 38(2), 519-545. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106


AMA

Uzun F. ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Public and Private International Law Bulletin. 2018;38(2):519-545. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106


ABNT

Uzun, F. ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, [Publisher Location], v. 38, n. 2, p. 519-545, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Uzun, Fatih Burak,. 2018. “ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin 38, no. 2: 519-545. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106


Chicago: Humanities Style

Uzun, Fatih Burak,. “ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin 38, no. 2 (Jun. 2025): 519-545. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106


Harvard: Australian Style

Uzun, F 2018, 'ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi', Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 519-545, viewed 6 Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Uzun, F. (2018) ‘ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi’, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 38(2), pp. 519-545. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106 (6 Jun. 2025).


MLA

Uzun, Fatih Burak,. “ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 2, 2018, pp. 519-545. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106


Vancouver

Uzun F. ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Public and Private International Law Bulletin [Internet]. 6 Jun. 2025 [cited 6 Jun. 2025];38(2):519-545. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106 doi: 10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106


ISNAD

Uzun, Fatih Burak. “ICSID Konvansiyonu Kapsamında Bulut Bilişimin Yatırım Olarak Değerlendirilmesi”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 38/2 (Jun. 2025): 519-545. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2018.38.2.0106



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim31.10.2018
Kabul11.12.2018

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ



İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.