Research Article


DOI :10.26650/mcd2022-1260670   IUP :10.26650/mcd2022-1260670    Full Text (PDF)

Reservation in Turkish Tax Law

Gamze GümüşkayaEbru Aksu Selçok

The purpose of this study on reservation regarding tax declaration in Turkish Tax Law is to examine the reflections of the concept of reservation in both administrative and judicial procedures by considering the reasons for its emergence, functions, purposes and legal characteristics in tax law. No comprehensive study was determined to have occurred on this subject in the literature on tax law despite its very wide and important role in practice. The study discusses the status, scope and application methods of the reservation and its relationship with some fundamental rights of the taxpayer regarding the different legal disciplines and tax law. The article examines the significant and sometimes contradictory judicial decisions with regards to fundamental rights and freedoms, especially the individual application decisions of Turkish Constitutional Court, and presents our views and opinions. The rules regarding the definition and scope of the concept have been criticized for being scattered in Turkish tax law legislation, as well as some issues that should have been determined by law having actually been determined in a directive non-binding to tax law. The study concludes the problems and contradictions that have emerged in practice related to the subject to have mainly been caused by the lack of adequate and foreseeable legal regulations regarding reservation pertaining to current situations and makes some suggestions to eliminate these problems and deficiencies. 

DOI :10.26650/mcd2022-1260670   IUP :10.26650/mcd2022-1260670    Full Text (PDF)

Türk Vergi Hukukunda İhtirazi Kayıt

Gamze GümüşkayaEbru Aksu Selçok

“Türk Vergi Hukukunda İhtirazi Kayıt” konusuna ilişkin bu çalışmayla, ihtirazi kayıt kurumunun vergi hukukunda ortaya çıkış nedenleri, işlevleri ve hukuki niteliği ele alınarak gerek idari aşamaya gerekse yargı aşamasına yansımalarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. İhtirazi kayıt kurumunun uygulamada oldukça geniş ve önemli bir yeri olmasına karşın, vergi hukuku yazınında bu konuda kapsamlı bir çalışmanın bulunmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada, ihtirazi kaydın farklı hukuk disiplinlerindeki ve vergi hukukundaki yeri, kapsamı, uygulanma yöntemleri ve vergi yükümlüsünün bazı temel hakları ile ilişkisi ele alınmıştır. İhtirazi kayıt uygulamasına ilişkin olarak verilmiş önemli ve zaman zaman çelişkili yargı kararları ve konunun temel hak ve özgürlüklere ilişkin boyutunu irdeleyen T.C. Anayasa Mahkemesi kararları incelenerek değerlendirme ve görüşlerimize yer verilmiştir. İhtirazi kaydın tanımına ve kapsamına ilişkin kurallara vergi hukuku mevzuatında dağınık şekilde yer verilmesi ve yasada saptanması gereken bazı hususların vergi hukukunun bağlayıcı bir kaynağı olmayan bir yönergede belirlenmesi eleştirilmiştir. Konuya ilişkin uygulamada ortaya çıkan aksaklık ve çelişkilerin temel olarak, mevcut durumda ihtirazi kayda ilişkin yeterli ve öngörülebilir yasal düzenlemelerin eksikliğinden kaynaklandığı sonucuna varılmış ve bu aksaklık ve eksikliklerin giderilmesine yönelik bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Although the concept of reservation appears in a variety of legal disciplines, we have attempted to reveal in our research how reservation has obtained a distinct meaning in tax law. As is known in Turkish tax law, the tax receivable accrues directly upon the taxpayer’s declaration, with no additional examination being performed by the administration in principle. This principle is also known as the principle of trust regarding taxpayers’ declarations. As a result of this principle of trust, taxpayers are also not permitted to file a lawsuit against their declaration, as specified in Paragraph 2 of Article 378 of the Tax Procedure Law No. 2131 . Reservation has emerged as an exception to the rule and is applied particularly to transactions in which taxpayers are unsure about the taxation process, where contradictory judicial decisions have occurred regarding the basic elements of tax, and where the legal regulations are unclear. Taxpayers make a reservation regarding their tax declaration in order to alleviate the uncertainty in their situation and avoid losing their right to object and right to act. However, the reservation right has a broad scope of practice and has been unable to find any estimated basis in legal regulations, with existing rules being inadequate for addressing the issue. In addition to contradictory judicial decisions regarding the right to make a reservation regarding a tax declaration, numerous conflicts are found to have been brought before the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey through individual applications regarding taxpayer rights. During our research regarding the legal basis of reservation in tax law, we determined some limited regulations in the Tax Procedure Law No. 213 and Administrative Judicial Procedure Law No. 2577. The directive on tax administration is a document that explains how the administration shall implement tax laws and contains the most comprehensive definition of the concept of reservation, referring to an administrative unit expressed as an evaluation desk. As a result of our research, we understand the evaluation desk to have the authority and responsibility for evaluating declarations with a reservation. However, the issues to be evaluated and the period of the evaluation are not specified in the directive. By determining these issues in detail and including them in a tax act rather than a directive, we believe a new dimension can be added to the reservation process. However, the more serious issue currently stand is that these rules are contained in a directive, which cannot be specified as a binding source of tax law. Some of the issues this study examines include the legal nature, scope, and conditions of reservation of the taxpayer. Moreover, the study analyses the relationship between the right to declare a tax reservation and certain fundamental taxpayer rights. As mentioned above, the concept of reservation has obtained a sui generis meaning in tax law. This right can only be exercised in the context of declared taxes. Applying reservation to undeclared taxes results in no consequences similar to declared taxes, of which this study provides the details. In fact, despite the fact that this method is also used to refund a paid amount in undeclared taxes, the reservation would not have an authentic impact because the refund will already be made in line with the provision established in favour of the taxpayer. The most contradictory area regarding reservations has emerged for the question of whether declared reservations submitted after the legal period of declaration grant the right to file a lawsuit. The problem has been partially resolved through the decisions the Turkish Constitutional Court has made on individual applications regarding declared tax reservations submitted after the legal deadline. We are of the opinion that declared reservations submitted after the legal period should also provide the taxpayer with the right to act due to the right to access the court, especially in the presence of reasons that lead the taxpayer to file a lawsuit against the administration. Considering that no legal prohibition is found regarding suing for a declaration adjustment provided after the legal period, we believe legal remedies must be made accessible to taxpayers. Different interpretations are observed to be present in both judicial decisions and the literature regarding whether the taxpayers can declare reservations in the repentance process, which is regulated in Article 371 of Tax Procedure Law. Given the nature and purpose of the institution, we are of the opinion that taxpayers are aware of and regret the consequences of their acts and wish to benefit from the repentance institution in order to avoid further penalties by reporting their acts on their own. In this context, the study concludes the principle of non-self-contradiction, which prohibits taxpayers from filing a lawsuit against their own declarations, also applies to the declarations made within the scope of repentance. Thus, submitting these declarations with reservations that reserve the right to file a lawsuit would be inappropriate. A precedent dispute was brought to the Turkish Constitutional Court through an individual application (Milli Reasürans, Application no: 2016/70, 01.07.2020), and the court made its interpretation in this direction, concluding that no violation of property rights had occurred. Our study aims to look into solutions to issues related to reservation in tax law. As stated, reservation creates a buffer zone for taxpayers against the powerful tax administration by allowing them to reserve the right to object to their declarations and file a lawsuit if necessary. In this sense, reservation is an institution that upholds the principles of the rights to legal remedies and to a judicial review of administrative acts. The current regulations governing the right to make a reservation do not provide adequate assurances in terms of either tax compliance or the basic elements of tax-related transactions within the principle of legality. Although the existence of the reservation institution has been acknowledged by the courts and the administration, this institution requires a detailed regulation, even if taxpayers are assumed to have sufficient information about the reservation’s application. To ensure adequate predictability and to avoid infringing on taxpayers’ rights, how and when a reservation can be brought forward should be clarified. The principles of administrative legality and the of tax legality require a legal basis in this regard. Judicial decisions that dismiss an action regarding tax assessments based on declared adjustments, including reservations submitted after the deadline, violate taxpayers’ rights to property and to a fair trial. The Turkish Constitutional Court’s individual application decisions (i.e., Arbay Petrol decision [Application no: 2015/15104, 04.07.2019], Onur Oral decision [Application no: 2019/15602, 22.02.2022] and Emin Akyol decision [Application no: 2019/4696, 18.01.2023]) ruled that preventing taxpayers from effectively raising an objection regarding tax assessments based on their adjusted declarations imposes an excessive burden on the taxpayers. Even if these decisions are significant in some ways in terms of resolving the problem, tax courts still remain to make rulings that are contrary to the principles of taxation and taxpayer rights. Moreover, as stated by the Turkish Constitutional Court in its decision with regards to the individual application of Teslime Aydoğan (Application no: 2015/4255, 09.06.2020, §§.53-54), failure to resolve a contradiction regarding judicial decisions on a particular issue after a reasonable period of time violates taxpayers’ right to a fair trial. As demonstrated in our study, the right to make a reservation regarding tax declaration is directly related to the fundamental rights of the rule of law, such as the rights to access the court and to property. Hence, clarifying the process of the reservation in clear predictable legal provisions is crucial for preventing contradictory and illegal practices. 


PDF View

References

  • Adalet Bakanlığı Hukuk Sözlüğü: https://sozluk.adalet.gov.tr/Harf/I?Sayfa=2 google scholar
  • Açımuz, B. (2018). İdarenin Esnek Hukuk İşlemlerinin Yargısal Denetime Konu Edilmesi: Fransız Hukuku Odaklı İnceleme. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24(2), 530-568. google scholar
  • Ateşağaoğlu, E. (2010). Vergi Usul Kanunu’nun 371. Maddesinde Yer Alan Pişmanlık ve Islah Kurumu Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Vergi Dünyası, 183-199. google scholar
  • Ateşağaoğlu, E., & Yılmaz, R. (2020). Beyana Çağrı Mektubu Uygulamasına Yönelik Sorunsallar. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 1-20. google scholar
  • Candan, T. (2021, Eylül 21). Vergi Usul Kanununun 371’inci Maddesinde Düzenlenen Pişmanlık ve Islah Müessesesi Hakkında: www.turgutcandan.com adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Develioğlu, F. (1982). Osmanlıca-Türkçe Ansiklopedik Lügat. Ankara: Aydın Yayınları. google scholar
  • Doğrusöz, A. B. (2016). Ihtirazi Kaydı Sınırlama Çabaları. Mart 17, 2022 tarihinde https://www.dunya.com/kose-yazisi/ihtirazi-kaydi-sinirlama-cabalari/341768, adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Duran, L. (1982). Idare Hukuku Ders Notları. İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası. google scholar
  • Erdem, J. G. (2013). Ölçülülük İlkesinin İdarenin Takdir Yetkisinin Kullanımındaki Yeri. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 971-1006. google scholar
  • Ergin, H., & Ertan, E. (tarih yok). İşçi Tarafından Yapılan ve Çekince (İhtirazi Kayıt) İçeren Fesih Bildiriminin (İstifa) Geçerliliği Sorunu. Sicil Iş Hukuku Dergisi(42), 184-194. google scholar
  • Erkut, C. (1990). Iptal Davasının Konusunu Oluşturma Bakımından idari işlemin Kimliği. Ankara: Danıştay Matbaası. google scholar
  • Fahran, F. (2012). Türk Vergi Hukukunda İhtirazi Kayıtla Beyan Verilmesi ve Yargı Aşaması. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Giritli, İ., Bilgen, P., Akgüner, T., & Berk, K. (2012). İdare Hukuku (5. Bası b.). İstanbul. google scholar
  • Göker, C., & Yılmazoğlu, Y. E. (2017). Süresinden Sonra İhtirazi Kayıtla Verilen Düzeltme Beyannamesi Nedeniyle Tahakkuk Eden Verginin İdari Davaya Konu Edilebilirliği, Mahkemeye Erişim Hakkı ve Mülkiyet Hakkının Korunmasında Devletin Pozitif Yükümlülükleri Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme. Ankara Barosu Degisi, 75(3), 83-99. google scholar
  • Gözler, K. (2020). Anayasa Hukukunun Genel TeorisiII (2. Bası b.). Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Gözübüyük, Ş., & Tan, T. (2016). idare Hukuku:Idari Yargılama Hukuku (8.Bası b., Cilt 2). Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Gümüşkaya, G. (2010). Mülkiyet Hakkına Vergisel Müdahaleler Bakımından Insan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesine Kişisel Başvuru. İstanbul: On İki Levha. google scholar
  • Gümüşkaya, G. (2020). Vergi Yükümlüsünün Hakları Bakımından Çelişkili Yargı Kararları. Prof. Dr. Süheyl Donay’aArmağan (s. 170). içinde İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Günday, M. (2022). Idari Yargılama Hukuku. Ankara: Turhan Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Güneş, G. (2014). Verginin Yasallığı (4. bası b.). İstanbul: On İki levha. google scholar
  • İnceoğlu, S. (2013). Insan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı (4. Bası b.). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kağıtçıoğlu, M. (2012). İdari İşlemin İcrailiği. Türkiye Barolar Birliği, 5(103), 267-284. google scholar
  • Kalabalık, H. (2019). Idare Hukuku Dersleri (4. Bası b.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kaneti, S., Ekmekçi, E., Güneş, G., & Kaşıkcı, M. (2022). Vergi Hukuku. İstanbul: Filiz. google scholar
  • Karakoç, Y. (2020). Vergi Ceza Hukukuna İlişkin Tespit ve Öneriler. E. P. v.d içinde, Prof. Dr. Nami ÇAĞAN Anısına Armağan (s. 365). Ankara: Atılım Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kavak, A. (2007). Türk Vergi Hukukunda Pişmanlık ve Islah (Cilt 72). İstanbul: İSMMMO. google scholar
  • Kavak, A. (2007). Türk Vergi Hukukunda Pişmanlık ve Islah (Cilt 72). İstanbul: İSMMMO. google scholar
  • Kızılot, Ş., & Kızılot, Z. (2008). Vergi Ihtilafları ve Çözüm Yolları (13. Bası b.). Ankara: Yaklaşım. google scholar
  • Köküsarı, İ. (2015). Anayasa Hukukunda GüvenlikIlkesi. Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Mutluer, M. K., & Kuzeyli, N. N. (2019). Vergi Ceza Hukuku. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Öncel, M., Kumrulu, A., Çağan, N., & Göker, C. (2021). Vergi Hukuku. Ankara: Turhan Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özbalcı, Y. (2008). Vergi Usul Kanunu Yorum ve Açıklamaları. Ankara: Oluş. google scholar
  • Özman, M. A. (1970). Milletlerarası Anlaşmalarda Çekinceler. Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası. google scholar
  • Sarıcaoğlu, E. (2017). Düzeltme Beyannamelerine İhtirazi Kayıt Konulabilme Sorunu. Mali Çözüm Dergisi(144), 89-107. google scholar
  • Şin, S. (2019). Vergi Hukukunda Beyanname Verme Ödevi ve İhtirazi Kayıtla Beyan Usulü. Izmir YMMO, 68-78. google scholar
  • Taylar, Y. (2021). Özel Esaslara İlişkin Uygulama ve Yargı Kararları Perspektifinden Vergi Hukukunda Hukuka Aykırı Bir İşlemden Hukuka Uygun Bir Tarhiyat Çıkıp Çıkmayacağı Sorunu. Inönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 774-790. google scholar
  • Tekbaş, A. (2010). Vergi Kanunlarının Tabi Olduğu Anayasal İlkeler. Dokuz Eylül Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(Özel Sayı), 123-181. google scholar
  • Türk Dil Kurumu Internet Sitesi. (2020, Nisan 20). https://www.tdk.gov.tr/ google scholar
  • Yaltı, B. (2006). Vergi Yükümlüsünün Hakları. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları. google scholar
  • Yerlikaya, G. K. (2005). Ihtirazi Kayıtla Beyan ve Yargı Yolu. İstanbul: Kazancı. google scholar
  • Yılmazoğlu, Y. E. (2021). Idari Yargıda Hak Eksenli Dönüşüm- Vergi Uyuşmazlığından Doğan Idari Davalarda Mülkiyet Hakkının Korunması. İstanbul: On İki Levha. google scholar
  • Yönerge. (2021, Ağustos 17). Kaysis Resmi İnternet Sitesi: https://kms.kaysis.gov.tr/?mevzuatAd=vergi%20 daireleri%20i%C5%9Flem%20y%C3%B6nergesi&turs=19&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Gümüşkaya, G., & Aksu Selçok, E. (2023). Reservation in Turkish Tax Law. Journal of Public Finance Studies, 0(69), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670


AMA

Gümüşkaya G, Aksu Selçok E. Reservation in Turkish Tax Law. Journal of Public Finance Studies. 2023;0(69):99-128. https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670


ABNT

Gümüşkaya, G.; Aksu Selçok, E. Reservation in Turkish Tax Law. Journal of Public Finance Studies, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 69, p. 99-128, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Gümüşkaya, Gamze, and Ebru Aksu Selçok. 2023. “Reservation in Turkish Tax Law.” Journal of Public Finance Studies 0, no. 69: 99-128. https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670


Chicago: Humanities Style

Gümüşkaya, Gamze, and Ebru Aksu Selçok. Reservation in Turkish Tax Law.” Journal of Public Finance Studies 0, no. 69 (Jul. 2024): 99-128. https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670


Harvard: Australian Style

Gümüşkaya, G & Aksu Selçok, E 2023, 'Reservation in Turkish Tax Law', Journal of Public Finance Studies, vol. 0, no. 69, pp. 99-128, viewed 24 Jul. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Gümüşkaya, G. and Aksu Selçok, E. (2023) ‘Reservation in Turkish Tax Law’, Journal of Public Finance Studies, 0(69), pp. 99-128. https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670 (24 Jul. 2024).


MLA

Gümüşkaya, Gamze, and Ebru Aksu Selçok. Reservation in Turkish Tax Law.” Journal of Public Finance Studies, vol. 0, no. 69, 2023, pp. 99-128. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670


Vancouver

Gümüşkaya G, Aksu Selçok E. Reservation in Turkish Tax Law. Journal of Public Finance Studies [Internet]. 24 Jul. 2024 [cited 24 Jul. 2024];0(69):99-128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670 doi: 10.26650/mcd2022-1260670


ISNAD

Gümüşkaya, Gamze - Aksu Selçok, Ebru. Reservation in Turkish Tax Law”. Journal of Public Finance Studies 0/69 (Jul. 2024): 99-128. https://doi.org/10.26650/mcd2022-1260670



TIMELINE


Submitted06.03.2023
Accepted04.04.2023
Published Online22.05.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.