Research Article


DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522    Full Text (PDF)

Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area

İbrahim Üngör

The district of İslâhiye is located in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Region, at the eastern foothills of the Amanos Mountains. This region, which is highly significant in terms of natural resources and strategically important, has hosted different cultures since ancient times. Settlements that began in the Paleolithic Age intensified after the Chalcolithic Age. This density continued throughout the Bronze Age, Iron Age, Middle Ages, and up to the present day. Some of the roads and passes that connect Syria and Anatolia, and are of great importance, pass through this region.

The Çerçili Necropolis, which is the subject of this study, was first identified during surface surveys in 2009. The necropolis area was created by carving into the rocky slope at the eastern foothills of the Amanos Mountains, at the western end of the Çerçili district, located 5 km west of the İslâhiye district. The necropolis site contains chamber tombs with arcosolia, cult niches, and a levelled area within the burial area, which is believed to be a cult space, measuring 24 square meters. The investigation of the Çerçili Necropolis, as part of the surface surveys, aims to contribute to the research on the Roman period, burial typologies, and funeral traditions in the region.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522    Full Text (PDF)

Çerçili Nekropolü Oda Mezarları ve Kült Alanı

İbrahim Üngör

İslâhiye ilçesi, Akdeniz Bölgesi’nin doğusunda, Amanos Dağları’nın doğu eteklerinde yer almaktadır. Doğal kaynaklar ve stratejik açıdan oldukça önemli bir konumda bulunan bölge, tarihin en eski dönemlerinden itibaren farklı kültürlere ev sahipliği yapmıştır. Paleolitik Çağ’da başlayan yerleşimler, Kalkolitik Çağ’dan sonra yoğunlaşmıştır. Bu yoğunluk Tunç Çağ, Demir Çağ, Orta Çağ boyunca ve günümüze kadar devam etmiştir. Suriye ve Anadolu’yu birbirine bağlayan ve son derece önemli olan yollar ve geçitlerin bazıları da bu bölgededir. 

Bu çalışmaya konu olan Çerçili Nekropolü ilk kez 2009 yılı yüzey araştırmaları sırasında tespit edilmiştir. Nekropol alanı, İslâhiye ilçesinin 5 km batısında yer alan Çerçili mahallesinin batı ucunda, Amanos Dağları’nın doğu eteklerinde bulunan kayalık yamaca oyularak oluşturulmuştur. Nekropol sahasında arcosoliumlu oda mezarlar, kült nişleri ve mezar sahasının içinde kült alanı olabileceği düşünülen 24 m2 genişlikte düzleştirilmiş bir alan bulunmaktadır. Yüzey araştırmaları kapsamında incelenen Çerçili Nekropolü ile bölgenin Roma dönemi, mezar tipolojileri ve ölü gömme gelenekleri araştırmalarına katkı verilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


İslahiye and its surrounding areas are one of the regions of Anatolia with a large amount of historical and archaeological studies. Nevertheless, there remains a little research related to Roman artifacts and no comprehensive studies that cover the Roman period. In 2009 we conducted surface surveys and khamosorion-style graves were discovered in the area called Leçe, located in the northern part of İslahiye. These findings were published in 2016. The tombs are dated to the 5th or 6th centuries AD. The existence of a very complex network of Roman roads has also been identified in the same place. In 2021 our surveys concluded that the road network extends to Örtülü Castle, the Beyler district of İslahiye and Nikopolis Castle in the center of the district. Also, a settlement at the foot of the Amanos Mountains and a necropolis consisting of a Tepeobası rock chamber tomb and various khamosorion tombs were identified and the related studies were published by our team in 2016. In addition, many archaeological sites of various types that date to the Roman Period have been identified. All these discoveries indicate an active Roman presence in the region and, therefore, demonstrate a need to increase the number of surveys and studies in this area. More detailed studies in 2021 were conducted in the framed chamber tombs and the area used for burial rituals by using surveys. This was a site that our team had previously been aware of when conducting the surveys. It is located on the western end of the Çerçili district about 5 km west of the town of İslahiye at the eastern base of the Amanos Mountains. It is also located about 1 km north of the Tepeobası Necropolis and it is close to the mound where the settlement from the Roman period was discovered. The chamber tombs, sacrificial niches and the area for burial rituals were made by carving out rock blocks from the southern slope of this large rocky area. The sacrificial niche is located at the western of the necropolis site. It is understood that there are two sacrificial niches here. The first niche was made by carving a rock block 1 meter above ground level. The front side of the niche faces south. The lower part of the niche has been destroyed due to road construction. The width of the base is 1,20 m and the height is 0,90 m. The second sacrificial niche is located on the north side of the same rock block. The front side of this niche faces east. An important place that we have also identified at this site is the area used for burial rituals. This area is 6x4 meters and it is in front of the entrance of Rock Chamber Tomb 5 just east of the sacrificial niches. During our examination, it was understood that this place was created specifically to facilitate the final rituals necessary before the burial of the dead. In addition, one of the important sets of tomb structures we have identified in this area is 21 rock tombs. When naming these tombs, it was necessary to use some abbreviations, starting from the west. The Çerçili Necropolis Area West is abbreviated as ÇB. The tombs located eastward from the Çerçili Necropolis Site are referred to as Çerçili Middle West, abbreviated as ÇOB, indicating the tombs located between Çerçili West and East. The necropolises to the north of this area are referred to as ÇOB-N, and the tombs located to the north and at a higher elevation of this site are referred to as Çerçili North, abbreviated as ÇK. The tomb located in the easternmost part is abbreviated as Çerçili East or ÇD. Most of them are chamber tombs with arcosolium and klinai. Some of them are quite well preserved, while some are scarcely intact, and some are almost destroyed. Chamber tombs were created by carving out blocks of rock. In most of the graves, the entrance is narrow but long. All these entrances, however, are in a Dromos-style shape with openings on the top. The length of the dromos entrances, which are more clearly visible in the western chamber tombs, is about 2 meters. The main entrance doors of the rooms have dimensions ranging from 0,80-1 m wide and 0,60-1 m high. The width of the burial chambers varies between 6 m2 and 20 m2 . There are 3 arcosolium carved on the east, west and north walls of the rooms. An aesthetic connection is formed within the architecture of the arcosolium in the form of an inverted triangle. The entrances of some of the burial chambers are completely closed. It was seen that they were covered with soil and olive tree saplings were planted over them. It is understood that some of the rooms have been used as storage by the villagers in the district.

Similar examples of these types of chamber tombs and areas used for burial rituals are found in Pirin/Perre in Adıyaman, Besni Yukarı Söğütlü, Gaziantep Doliche/ Dülük, the Zeugma/Belkıs tombs in the districts of Oğuzeli, Yavuzeli and Araban. The framed necropolis, which we think was created to reflect aspects of the local pagan belief, cannot be dated later than the 1st or 2nd centuries AD. We believe that the chamber tombs and the site used for burial rituals discussed in this study will form a very important foundation for further studies of Roman period artifacts in the region. 


PDF View

References

  • Akçay, Tuna. “Olba Mezarlık Alanları.” Seleucia 2 (2012): 67-104. google scholar
  • Akçay, Tuna. “Olba’daki Tapınak Cepheli Kaya Mezarı.” Seleucia IV (2014): 79-94. google scholar
  • Akçay, Tuna. Arkeolojik Veriler Işığında Antik Çağ’da Kurban Ritüeli. İstanbul: Selenge Yayınları, 2021. google scholar
  • Akçay, Tuna. Olba’da Ölü Kültü. Ankara: Bilgin Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, 2018. google scholar
  • Alkım, Uluğ Bahadır. “Sam’al ile Asitawandawa Arasındaki Yol: Amanus Bölgesi’nin Tarihî Coğrafyasına Dair Araştırmalar.” Belleten XXIV 93-96 (1960): 349-396. google scholar
  • Aydın, Ayşe. “Silifke Müzesi’nden Figürlü bir duvar Nişi Bloğu.” Olba XX (2012): 407-426. google scholar
  • Baldıran, Asuman ve Erdener Pehlivan. “Arcosoliumlu Mezarlar Üzerine Değerlendirme: Lykaonia’dan İki Örnek.” AVRASYA Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi 10 (2022): 153-168. google scholar
  • Civelek, Aynur. “Roma Cenaze Törenleri ve Gömme Gelenekleri.” Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi 124 (2007): 71-80. google scholar
  • Çelgin, Ahmet Vedat. “Termessos Kenti Nekropolleri.” Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1990. google scholar
  • Çevik, Nevzat. “Lykıa, Pısıdıa, Pamphylıa Kavşağında Termessos’un Uç Kalesi: Neapolis,” Cedrus VI (2018): 435-451. google scholar
  • Çevik, Nevzat. Lykia Kitabı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 2021. google scholar
  • Doğanay, Osman. İsaura Bölgesi Kaya Mezarları ve Ölü Gömme Gelenekler. Konya, Çizgi Kitabevi Yayınları, 2009. google scholar
  • Er, Yasemin ve Bilal Söğüt. “Dağlık Kilikya’da Olba-Diocaesarea Nekropolleri’ndeki Kaya Mezarları.” Türk Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi 5 (2005): 95-110. google scholar
  • Ergeç, Rirat. Nekropolen und Graber in der südlichen Kommagene. Asia Minor Studien 47. Bonn:Habelt Verlag, 2003. google scholar
  • Erten, Emel. “Mersin, Silifke, Olba Yüzey Araştırması-2003.” 22. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları, 2005, 11-22. google scholar
  • Gee, Regina. “Form Corpse to Ancestor: The Role of Tombside Dining in the Transformation of the Body in Ancient Rome.” The Materiality of Death: Bodies, Burials, Beliefs. Ed. Fredrik Fahlander ve Terje Oestigaard. Oxford: Archaeopress Archaeology Yayınevi, 2008, 59-68. google scholar
  • Katherine, Dunbabin. The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality. Cambridge: Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2003. google scholar
  • Kortanoğlu, Rıfat Eser. “Hellenistik ve Roma Dönemlerinde Dağlık Phrygia Bölgesi Kaya Mezarları.” Doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2006. google scholar
  • Kurtz, Donna Carol ve John Boardman. Greek Burial Comtoms. Londra: Thames and Hudson, 1971. google scholar
  • Lindsay, Hugh. “Eating with the Dead: The Roman Funerary Banquet.” Meals in a Social Context: Aspects of the Communal Meal in the Hellenistic and Roman World. Ed. Inge Nielsen ve Hanne Sigismund Nielsen. Aarhus: Aarhus Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1998, 67-80. google scholar
  • Machatschek, Alois. Die Nekropolen und Grabmaler im Gebiet von Elaiussa Sebaste und Korykos im Rauhen Kilikien. Köln: Böhlau, 1967. google scholar
  • Orthmann, Winfried. “Burial Customs of the 3rd Millennium B.C. in the Euphrates Valley”. Le Moyen-Euphrate, Zone de Contactset d’echanges. Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg, 10-12Mars 1977. Ed. Jean-Claude Margueron. Strasburg: Üniversite des Sciences Humaines de Strasbourg, 1980, 97-105. google scholar
  • Önal, Mehmet, Güler Mahserici, Osman Özgan, Tülay Devecioğlu ve Ramazan Hançerkıran. Gaziantep İlçeleri Taşınmaz Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıkları. Gaziantep: Gaziantep İl Özel İdaresi Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  • Özdizbay, Aşkım. “Perge Batı Nekropolisi’nden Bir Mezar Yapısı.” Anadolu Araştırmaları XVI (2002): 483-508. google scholar
  • Polat, Tamsü Rahşan. “Karabacak Köyü Kaya Mezarları.” Cedrus 6 (2018): 347-358. google scholar
  • Ramsay, William Mitchell. “A Study of Phrygian Art, part II.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies X (1889): 147-189. google scholar
  • Rosenbaum, Elisabeth Alföldi. Anamur Nekropolü. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 1971. google scholar
  • Saller, P. Richard. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge: Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları,1994. google scholar
  • Söğüt, Bilal. “Dağlık Kilikya Bölgesi Mezar Nişleri.” Olba VII Özel Sayı (2003): 239-260. google scholar
  • Toynbee, Jocelyn Mary Catherine. Death and Burial in the Roman World. New York: Ithaca, 1971. google scholar
  • Ünal, Ahmet ve Serdar Girginer. Kilikya-Çukurova İlk Çağlardan Osmanlılar Dönemi’ne Kadar Kilikya’da Tarihi Coğrafya, Tarih ve Arkeoloji. İstanbul: Homer Kitapevi, 2007. google scholar
  • Üngör, İbrahim. “Amanos Dağları Eteklerinde Bir Roma Yerleşmesi ve Tepeobası Nekropol Alanları.” Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7/12 (2015): 2-30. google scholar
  • Üngör, İbrahim. “Gaziantep/İslahiye Leçe Bölgesi Oygu Tekne Mezarları.” Belgü 2 (2016): 73-88. google scholar
  • Üngör, İbrahim, Merve Özyiğit, Beyazıt Söylemez ve Rıdvan Torun. “Gaziantep İli ve İlçeleri Demir Çağları Yüzey Araştırmaları.” 38. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları, 2023, 299-315. google scholar
  • Walther Ruge. “Kilikia.” RE XI I (1921): 385-389. google scholar
  • Yaman, Hüseyin. “Death in Zeugma: A Survey Of The Tombs”. Anadolu/Anatolia 45 (2019): 125168. google scholar
  • Zeyrek, Turgut Hacı. “Yukarı Söğütlü Nekropollerinden Kaya Mezarları.” Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6(2) (2007):117-144. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Üngör, İ. (2024). Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area. Art-Sanat, 0(21), 745-770. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522


AMA

Üngör İ. Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area. Art-Sanat. 2024;0(21):745-770. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522


ABNT

Üngör, İ. Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 21, p. 745-770, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Üngör, İbrahim,. 2024. “Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 21: 745-770. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522


Chicago: Humanities Style

Üngör, İbrahim,. Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 21 (May. 2024): 745-770. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522


Harvard: Australian Style

Üngör, İ 2024, 'Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 21, pp. 745-770, viewed 6 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Üngör, İ. (2024) ‘Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area’, Art-Sanat, 0(21), pp. 745-770. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522 (6 May. 2024).


MLA

Üngör, İbrahim,. Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 21, 2024, pp. 745-770. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522


Vancouver

Üngör İ. Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 6 May. 2024 [cited 6 May. 2024];0(21):745-770. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522 doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522


ISNAD

Üngör, İbrahim. Chamber Tombs of Çerçili Necropolis and the Cult Area”. Art-Sanat 0/21 (May. 2024): 745-770. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2024.21.1213522



TIMELINE


Submitted02.12.2022
Accepted24.01.2024
Published Online31.01.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.