Research Article


DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017    Full Text (PDF)

Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Ahsen FındıkMünteha DinçEmre Taştemür

Çalışmanın konusunu Uşak Müzesinde yer alan dört adet kapı tipli mezar steli oluşturmaktadır. Kapı tipli mezar stelleri, özellikle toplumun orta sınıfı arasında görülen, Antik Dönem’de ölen kişinin anısının yaşaması ve sürdürülmesi endişesi ile zamana meydan okuyan, kalıcı bir anıt yaptıramayan kişilerin/aile üyelerinin daha ekonomik boyutlarda bir kapı betimi ve sütun, alınlık gibi ek mimari unsurların da betimleme aracılığıyla gösterildiği stel tipidir. Kapı tipli steller üzerindeki betimlemelerin oldukça çeşitlilik gösterdiği görülmektedir. Bu çeşitlilik, bölgeler arasındaki kültürel temas ve etnik grupların kendilerine ilgi çekici gelen seçimleri sonucunda oluşturulmuştur. Frig bölgesinde yaşayan halkların dönemin modası olan kapı tipli mezar steli ile Roma İmparatorluğu’na aidiyet bağlamında kimliklerini görünür bir şekilde ifade etmenin ve sergilemenin bir yolunu buldukları söylenebilir. Söz konusu steller, Roma Dönemi Frigyası’nda yaşayan insanların sosyal ve ekonomik durumları hakkında bilgi vermeleri ve bölgeye özgü ölü gömme geleneklerine ışık tutmaları sebebiyle de önemlidir. 

Uşak Müzesi envanterine kayıtlı olan steller yukarıda sayılan sebeplerden dolayı bilim dünyası için oldukça önemli eserlerdir. Bu stellerin buluntu yerleri kesin olarak bilinmemekle birlikte satın alma yolu ile müzeye teslim edildikleri görülmektedir. İncelenen steller hem stilistik hem de ikonografik açıdan kendi bağlamları içinde farklı bölgelerden benzer stil ve ikonografiye sahip stel örnekleri ile karşılaştırılarak bir tipoloji içerisine dâhil edilmişlerdir. Özellikle çalışmada yer verilen Kat. No. 3 ve Kat. No. 4’teki stellerin tipolojik değerlendirmesinde yararlanılan geçmiş yıllardaki çalışmaların, stellerin belirli bir tipolojiye göre sınıflandırılmasında yetersiz kaldığı anlaşılmıştır. Bu sebeple kapı tipli steller üzerinde yapılacak çalışmalarda bu stellerin eski sınıflandırmalara dahil edilmesinin yerine yerel bir tipolojiye dâhil edilmelerinin daha doğru olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmada stellerin sembolik anlamlarının incelenmesi çalışmanın asıl amaçlarından biridir. Stellerin üzerinde tanıtılmak ve hatırlatılmak istenen kişinin ya da kentin sanatsal, siyasi ve inanç bağlamında sembolik dilinin anlaşılması önem taşımaktadır. Çalışma kapsamındaki stellerin ikonografisi ile ölen kişinin mensup olduğu topluluk, sosyal çevre ve kentin değerlendirilmesi de amaçlanmaktadır.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017    Full Text (PDF)

Evaluation of the Symbolic Meaning of the Depictions on the Four Door-Type Grave Stelae at the Uşak Museum

Ahsen FındıkMünteha DinçEmre Taştemür

The subject of this study is four door-type grave stelae located in the Uşak Museum. Door-type grave stelae are a type of stelae particularly seen among the middle class of society in antiquity. They reflect the concern to preserve and perpetuate the memory of the deceased through more affordable means, especially for those individuals or family members who could not commission a permanent monument defying time. Instead, they conveyed this intent through the depictions of doors and additional architectural elements such as columns and pediments. The depictions on the door-type stelae show considerable diversity. This diversity in depictions is the result of cultural contact between regions and the choices made by ethnic groups based on what they find appealing. It can be said that the peoples living in the Phrygian region found a way to visibly express and display their identities in relation to their affiliation with the Roman Empire through the door-type grave stelae, which were fashionable at the time. These stelae are also important because they provide information about the social and economic status of the people living in Roman Phrygia and shed light on the burial traditions specific to the region. The stelae registered in the inventory of the Uşak Museum are highly significant works for the academic world due to the above-mentioned reasons. Although the exact spots of these stelae are not known, it is observed that they were acquired by the museum through purchase. The stelae in question have been included in a typology by comparing them—both stylistically and iconographically—with examples of stelae from different regions that share similar styles and iconography within their respective contexts. In particular, it has been understood that previous studies used in the evaluation of the stelae in Cat. No. 3 and Cat. No. 4 included in this study were insufficient in classifying the stelae according to a specific typology. For this reason, it has been determined that it is more accurate to include door-type stelae in a local typology rather than in old classifications when conducting research on them. Furthermore, examining the symbolic meanings of the stelae is one of the main objectives of this study. It is important to understand the symbolic language of the person or city that the stelae aim to introduce and remind within the artistic, political, and religious contexts. In addition, the study aims to evaluate the community, social environment, and city to which the deceased belonged through the iconography of the stelae included in the scope of the research.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Burial practices were central to ancient Roman life. The hope of being remembered and the need to honor the deceased was a common goal of Roman society. When Roman funerary monuments are examined in a broad context, new archaeological studies on death focus on human remains, burial rituals, and memory. The door-type grave stelae evaluated within the scope of the study are material culture objects of different sizes and shapes, including depictions of the deceased and inscriptions describing the deceased, as well as indicating the grave of the deceased. Through the definitions of material culture and objects, which are frequently used in the study, the depictions on the stelae are defined not by their primary designations and functions, such as tools, but as pure objects that are stripped of any meaning and functionality. The depictions of these material culture objects vary. Before defining these depictions, it is necessary to understand the symbolic language used in the depiction of various figures and objects. Only in this way is it possible to assess the status, belief, and character of the owner of a grave stele within society. So, this study focuses on four door-type grave stelae from the Uşak Museum. Although the exact provenance of stelae is unknown, they were acquired by the museum through purchase. These stelae provide valuable information about the social and economic status of individuals living in the Phrygian region, as mentioned here, and shed light on the burial customs of the period. The goal of the study is to include these stelae within a typological framework, establish their dates, and analyze their symbolic meanings through stylistic and iconographic comparison, both within their immediate context and with examples from other regions. 

Under the heading of typology, the stelae in Cat. No. 1-4 are included in a typology by comparing them with their own contexts and examples of stelae with similar styles in different regions (Fig. 1-Fig. 4). In the typological evaluation of the stelae, it is concluded that the previous studies are insufficient to include them in a specific typology and that they should be included in a local typology with the studies to be carried out on the newly reached or to be reached stelae. The stelae in Cat. No. 1 and 2, which share a similar typology, are classified as Aizanitis Type 5a/Type C, Aizanoi 6a/Type IIa, or Tip C Altıntaş. The stele in Cat. No. 3 is classified as a "Door Stele with Niches," following Lochman’s classification due to its unique features. The stele in Cat. No. 4 is categorized as Aizanitis Type 5/Type C, Aizanoi Type 6b/Type IIb, due to its sima on the pediment and the door frame. Similar examples have been assigned to Type VI B with double doors by Jes.

The stylistic and typological diversity of these stelae may be attributed to the cultural contact between regions and the attractive choices of ethnic groups. The development of new patterns to emphasize ethnic identity is reflected in the stelae’s diverse designs. Local populations and migrant groups interact to shape this type of development in cities across Asia Minor. In addition, this situation can be defined by the fact that the door-type grave stelae were widely seen, especially in the Roman Imperial Period, and that society found ways to express their identities in the context of belonging to the Roman Empire, enabling their identities to be visibly displayed. Although the precise origin of these door-type funerary stelae remains uncertain, it is likely that they, which became a fashion of the period, were adopted by the Romanizing contemporary provincial society during the construction of their identity. 

Under the heading of Iconography and Decorations, the symbolic meanings of the depictions on the stele within the funerary iconography are examined. The depictions reveal that they can have both decorative and symbolic meanings. A full interpretation is only possible when the entire iconographic composition is analyzed, allowing for a deeper understanding of the cultural and economic conditions in which these stelae were produced.

Under the heading Figures and Portraits, the symbolic expressions of the figures and portraits, especially in Cat. No. 3 and 4 are discussed. The decoration of the stelae with portraits of the deceased is important for understanding how the people of the period represented themselves.

Under the heading Objects of Daily Use and Gender Roles, the depiction of daily use objects on the stele in Cat. No. 1-4 and the symbolic gender roles they represent are analyzed. In the analysis of this symbolic language, it is evident that the role model of women as wife-mother figures during the Roman Imperial Period was adopted in provincial funerary art through the depictions of spindles and spinners, baskets, mirrors, and combs, which are weaving tools. Similarly, objects like open diptychs, money pouches, and falx vinitoria serve as symbolic expressions of a man’s status as an educated citizen, professional, and landowner.

Under the heading Herbal Decorations, the symbolic meaning of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) and acanthus (Acanthus mollis L.) depicted on the stelae (Cat. No. 1 and 3) is analyzed. The grapevine, often associated with the gods in ancient cultures such as Egyptian, Greek, and Roman, helps reveal how people related to nature in antiquity. Acanthus (Acanthus mollis L.) is a plant that expresses the idea of rebirth, appearing to be dead in summer but beginning to grow again in early fall. It is also associated with maidenhood, representing uncultivated soil, wisdom, and the struggle for life.

Under the heading of Animal Depictions, the lion figures on the stelae (Cat. No. 1-3) are examined, along with bird depictions, including a bird resting on a basket. Lion depictions are associated with power in various ancient cultures, symbolizing the desire for unrivaled dominance, much like the lion’s status in the animal kingdom. The depictions of male and female lions hunting on a bull’s head on the stelae in Cat. No. 1-2 in the study symbolize the death of the bull figure and the departure of the deceased to the afterlife. The creation of a new life in the afterlife with the death of the bull is also compatible with the belief in Mithraism, the official religion of Rome. It is believed that the god Mithra sacrifices the head of the cosmic bull sent to him to create life, and a vine plant grows from the blood that irrigates the soil, allowing living beings and life to come into existence. It is understood from this myth that the bull figure actually has a common symbolic expression with the vine plant. Bird depictions may represent the deceased’s fondness for these animals, pastoral life, or the loyalty of the grave’s owner.

Under the heading of Epigraphic Evaluations, the inscriptions on the stelae are analyzed to understand how the owners of the grave stele expressed themselves through symbolic language. The inscriptions support the visual language used in the iconographic representations, adding further depth to the symbolic messages conveyed by the stelae.

Finally, the typological, iconographic, and epigraphic analysis of the four door-type grave stelae from the Uşak Museum reveals that they provide information about the social and economic status of the grave owners in the region. These stelae were evaluated, compared stylistically and iconographically with their own contexts and similar stele examples from different regions, and dated. The stelae in Cat. No. 1-4 appear to date between the 2nd-century AD and the first quarter of the 3rd-century AD. When the stelae in Cat. No. 1 and 2 are evaluated typologically with the comparison examples, it is seen that they are quite similar to the Aizanitis Type 5/5a or Type C Altintas types. Moreover, the fact that these two stelae have been accessed by the stonemasons who created the iconography of male and female lion hunts of these types indicates that various joint/collective works were carried out. In this case, the fact that they exhibit the characteristics of two types suggests that stonemasons working in the workshops in these regions, but who were traveling, may have made stelae specific to their own regions in different cities. Another possibility is that the grave owners used stelae produced in the workshops of Aizanitis or Altintas. Moreover, it is observed that the stelae in Cat. No. 3 and 4 are very difficult to include in a specific typology due to their unique characteristics. For this reason, it was concluded that the previous research was insufficient and that they should be included in a local typology with the studies to be carried out with the new stelae identified/to be identified.

Another important subject of the study is the analysis of the symbolic language of the iconography and decorations on the stelae, which show great variety. The grave stelae, which have both a visual language and a written language with the depiction of various figures and objects within the burial traditions of the dead, enable us to evaluate the community, social environment, city, artistic elements, and belief systems of the city. These descriptions were analyzed by supporting them with both symbolic and mythological expressions and inscriptions. As a result, the evaluations made in the studies of door-type grave stelae reveal that they should be assessed not only in terms of typology, iconography, or inscriptions but also as inseparable parts of a whole. The door-type grave stelae, along with their typology, iconography, and inscriptions, are presented to the scientific community by analyzing them as a whole and in support of each other.


PDF View

References

  • Albayrak, Yusuf. “Göbekli Tepe’den Hayvan Tasvirleri.” Külliye 4 (EyLüL 2023): 81-111. Erişim 15 Mayıs 2024. https://doi.org/10.48139/ aybukulliye.1267083 google scholar
  • Anthony, Rich. A Dictionary of Roman and Greek Antiquities. Londra: Longmans, 1890. google scholar
  • BuckLer, WiLLiam Hepburn ve WiLLiam Moir CaLder. MAMA VI: Monuments and Documents From Phrygia and Caria. 6. CiLt. Manchester: Manchester Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1939. google scholar
  • Cameron, ArchibaLd. "“ΘΡΕΠΤΟΣ and ReLated Terms in the Inscriptions of Asia Minör.” Anatolian Studies Presented to William Hepburn Buckler. Ed. William Moir CaLder ve Josef Keil. Manchester: Manchester Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1939, 27-62. google scholar
  • Caneva, Giulia, ALessandro Lazzara ve Zohreh Hosseini. "PLant as Symbols of Power in the Achaemenid Iconography of Ancient Persian Monuments.” Plants 12 (Kasım 2023): 39-91. Erişim 10 Mayıs 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12233991. google scholar
  • Caneva, Giulia, Antonella Altieri, ALma Kumbaric ve FLavia BartoLi. "Plant Iconography and its Message: Realism and Symbolic Messages in the Bernini Fountain of the Four Rivers in Rome.” Rendicontri Lincei, Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 31 (Ağustos 2020): 1011-1026. Erişim 5 Mayıs 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00946-2 google scholar
  • Caneva, Giulia, Valentina Savo ve Alma Kumbaric. "Big Messages in Small Details: Nature in Roman Archaeology.” Economic Botany 68 (Mart 2014): 109-115. Erişim 15 Şubat 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-013-9256-1 google scholar
  • CarroLL, P. Maureen. "Ethnicity and Gender in Roman Funerary Commemoration: Case Studies from the Empire’s Frontiers.” Ed. Sarah TarLow ve Liv NiLsson Stutz. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial. Oxford: Oxford Üniversitesi YayınLarı, 2013, 559-579. Erişim 15 Şubat 2024. https://doi.org/l0.1080/00665983.2012.11020916 google scholar
  • CarroLL, Maureen. "Vox Tua Nempe Mea Est. DiaLogues with the dead in Roman Funerary Commemoration.” Accordia Research Papers 11 (Kasım 2008): 37-80. google scholar
  • CoLumeLLa, Lucius Junius Moderatus. De Re Rustica of Columella. Londra: Harvard Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1941, 427. Erişim 10 Şubat 2024. https://peneLope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/CoLumeLLa/de_Re_Rustica/4*.htmL#25. google scholar
  • Cutten, Henry J. L. "SteLae as VehicLes of Expression. A RegionaL Study of Gravestones From Inland Asia Minor During The First and EarLy Second Century AD.” Doktora tezi, Nottingham Üniversitesi, 2021. google scholar
  • Degen, JuLian Micheal. "Die Mykenische LöwendarsteLLung. Ein FallbeispeL für die Veranderung Politischer Symbolik Durch Kulturkon-takte.” Historia Scibere 7 (Mayıs 2015): 9- 31. Erişim 15 Şubat 2024. 10.15203/historia.scribere.7.442 google scholar
  • De Hoz, Maria-Paz. "Phrygian Traces in Greek Epigraphy of Roman Anatolia: Survival or Identity RevivaL?.” Monographs on Antiquity. 7. CiLt. Ed. Hugo Thoen ve L. B. Van Der Meer. Paris: Peeters, 2022: 369-386. Erişim 15 Şubat 2024. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2zx9 pwv.30 google scholar
  • Durugönül, Serra. Roma Devlet Kabartmalarında Propaganda ve Sanat. Ankara: Bilgin Kültür Sanat Yayınları, 2021. google scholar
  • Edmondson, Jonathan. "Public Dress and SociaL ControL in Late RepubLican and Early Imperial Rome.” Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture. Ed. Jonathan Edmondson ve ALison Keith. Toronto: Toronto Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2008, 21-46. google scholar
  • Erasmo, Mario. Reading Death in Ancient Rome. CoLumbus: Ohio State Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2008. google scholar
  • Erdinç, Zerrin. "Aizanoi Mezar Stellerinde Kadına Dair Semboller.” Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 69 (Temmuz 2021): 87-106. Erişim 10 Ağustos 2021. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.846611 google scholar
  • Erdinç, Zerrin. "Aizanitis Bölgesi Mezar Taşları.” Doktora Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, 2020. google scholar
  • Euripides. "Euripides III, Ion.” The Complete Greek Tragedies. Çev. RonaLd Frederick Willetts. 3. CiLt. Chicago: Chicago Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1954, 183-255. google scholar
  • Gezgin, Deniz. Hayvan Mitosları. İstanbul: Pinhan Yayınları, 2024. google scholar
  • Gezgin, Deniz. Bitki Mitosları. İstanbul: Pinhan Yayınları, 2021. google scholar
  • Graham, Emma Jayne ve VaLerie M. Hope. "Funerary Practices.” A Companion to Roman Italy. Ed. ALison E. CooLey. Londra: WiLey BLackweLL, 2016. Erişim 14 Şubat 2024. https://onLineLibrary.wiLey.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9781118993125.ch9 google scholar
  • GrimaL, Pierre. Mitoloji Sözlüğü: Yunan ve Roma. İstanbuL: SosyaL YayınLar, 1997. google scholar
  • HimmeLmann, NikoLaus. Über Hirten-Genre inder Antiken Kunst: Abhandlungen der Rheinisch-Westfalischen Akademie der Wissensc-haften 65. OpLaden: Westdeutscher VerLag, 1980. google scholar
  • Hope, VaLerie M. "Words and Picture: The Interpretation of Romanı-British Tombstones.” Britannia 28 (Kasım 1997), 257. Erişim 20 Mart 2024. https://doi.org/l0.2307/526768. google scholar
  • Hope, Thomas. Costume of The Ancients. 1. CiLt. Londra: Printed For WiLLiam MiLLer, 1812. google scholar
  • Jes, Kai. "Türgrabsteine in Aizanoi II: Fassadenmonumente mit Scheintür.” Istanbuler Mitteilungen. 51. CiLt (Tübingen: E. Wasmuth, 2001): 279-318. google scholar
  • Kampen, Natalie. Image and Status: Roman Working Women in Ostia. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1981. google scholar
  • KeLp, Ute. Grabdenkmal und Lokale Identitat: Ein Bild der Landschaft Phrygien in der Römischen Kaiserzeit: Asia Minor Studien 74. Bonn: HabeLt-VerLag, 2015. google scholar
  • KeLp, Ute. “Some Remarks on TumuLi of Late HeLLenistic and EarLy Roman Times in Phrygia andthe DeveLopment of ProvinciaL Art.” Ed. Ute KeLp ve OLiver Henry. Tumulus as Sema: Space, Politics, Culture and Religion in The First Millenium BC. BerLin: De Gruyter, 2016, 601-612. google scholar
  • KöhLer, CarL. A History of Costume. New York: G. Howard Watt, 1930. google scholar
  • Kretschmer, PauL. Griechischen Sprache. Göttingen: Dandenhoed und Rupredt, 1896. google scholar
  • Kurtz, Donna C. ve John Boardman. Greek Burial Customs: Aspect of Greek and Roman Life. New York: CorneLL Üniversitesi YayınLarı, 1971. google scholar
  • Levick, Barbara, Stephen MitcheLL, James Potter ve Marc WaeLkens. MAMA X: Monuments From The Upper Tembris Valley, Cotiaeum, Cadi, Synaus, Ancyra, and Tiberiopolis. 10. CiLt. Manchester: Manchester Üniversitesi YayınLarı, 1993. google scholar
  • Lochman, Thomas. Studienzu Kaiserzeitlichen Grab- und Votifreliefs aus Phrygien. BaseL: SkuLpturhaLLe, 2003. google scholar
  • Lochman, Thomas. “Deux ReLiefs AnatoLiens Au Musee Des Beaux-Arts De Budapest.” Bulletin du Musee Hongrois des Beaux-Arts 74 (1991): 11-24. google scholar
  • Louvre Müzesi. "Tunique." Erişim 20 Temmuz 2025. https://coLLections.Louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cL010209546 google scholar
  • MustafaoğLu, Gökhan. “Maddi KüLtür ÇaLışmaLarı Çerçevesinde: NesneLer, ŞeyLer, AktörLer ve Taşın “Ötesini Görmek” Üzerine DüşünceLer.” Anadolu Prehistorya Araştırmaları Dergisi 4 (AraLık 2018): 61-78. google scholar
  • Ovidius Naso, PubLius. Metamorphoses. Çev. Arthur GoLding. Londra: 1567, 4.7.20. Erişim 15 Şubat 2024. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Ov.%20Met.%204.720&Lang=originaL. google scholar
  • Pearson, Mike Parker. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Teksas: A&M Üniversitesi YayınLarı, 1999. google scholar
  • Pendergast, Sara ve Tom Pendergast. Fashion, Costum and Culture: Clothing, Headwear, Body Decorations and Footwear through the Ages: Ancient World. 1. CiLt. New York: Thomson&GaLe, 2004. google scholar
  • Pennick Morgan, Faith. Dress and Personal Appearance in Late Antiquity. Ed. Luke Lavan. 1. CiLt. Leiden: BriLL, 2018. google scholar
  • PfuhL, Ernst ve Hans Möbius. Dieostgriechischen Grabreliefs. 1. CiLt (Metin ve GörseL). Mainz: PhiLipp Von Zabern, 1977. google scholar
  • PfuhL, Ernst ve Hans Möbius. Dieostgriechischen Grabreliefs. 2. CiLt (Metin ve GörseL). Mainz: PhiLipp Von Zabern, 1979. google scholar
  • Proeva, Nade. “Non-FiguraL Motifs on the Roman Funerary SteLae from Upper Macedonia (ProbLems of Dating and Interpretation).” Actual google scholar
  • Problems of Theory and History of Art 7 (Ocak 2017): 147-158. Erişim 20 Şubat 2024. https://doi.org/10.18688/aa177-1-16 google scholar
  • PoLat, Gürcan. “Bir AnadoLu-Akhaemenid Dönemi ÖLü KüLtü GeLeneği: TümüLüs Önünde SteLLer ve Seremoni ALanLarı.” Olba XI (Mayıs 2005): 1-24. google scholar
  • RooseveLt, Christopher H. “SymboLic Door SteLae and Graveside Monuments in Western AnatoLia.” American Journal of Archaeology 110/1 (Ocak 2006): 65-91. Erişim 28 Nisan 2021. https://www.jstor.org/stabLe/40026360 google scholar
  • Saint-Denis, E de. “FaLx Vinitoria.” Archeologie et Philologie 41 (Ocak-Haziran 1953): 163-176. google scholar
  • Savo, VaLentina, ALma Kumbaric ve GiuLia Caneva. “Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) SymboLism in the Ancient Euro-Mediterranean CuLtures.” Economic Botany 70 (Mayıs 2016): 190-197. Erişim 20 Şubat 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-016-9347-x google scholar
  • Smith, RoLand R. “Phrygian Doorstones,” The Classical Review 38/2 (1988): 349-350. Erişim 28 Nisan 2021. https://www.jstor.org/stabLe/3065626 google scholar
  • Smith, WiLLiam. "FaLx." A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Londra: John Murray, 1875. Erişim 20 Şubat 2024. https://peneLope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA*/FaLx.htmL google scholar
  • Susini, GiancarLo. The Roman Stonecutter: An Introduction to Latin Epigraphy. Londra: BasiL BLackweLL, 1973. Erişim 20 Mart 2024. https://archive.org/detaiLs/romanstonecutter0000susi/page/n3/mode/2up google scholar
  • UzunoğLu, Hüseyin. “Phrygia’dan Bir Grup Yeni Mezar SteLi.” Mediterranean Journal of Humanities 9 (Haziran 2019): 377-385. Erişim 13 Kasım 2024. https://doi.org/10.13114/mjh.2019.469 google scholar
  • VarinLioğLu, Ender. “Die Inschriften Aus Dem Museum Von Uşak.” Epigraphica Anatolica 13 (1989): 17-36. google scholar
  • VarinLioğLu, Ender. The Greek Inscriptions in The Museum of Usak. İstanbuL: Ege YayınLarı, 2022. google scholar
  • Vitruvius, Mimarlık Üzerine On Kitap. Çev. Suna Güven. Ankara: Şevki VanLı MimarLık Vakfı YayınLarı, 2013. google scholar
  • WaeLkens, Marc. Die Kleinasiatischen Türsteine: Typologische und Epigraphische Untersuchungen der Kleinasiatischen Grabreliefs mit Scheintür. Mainz: ALman ArkeoLoji Enstitüsü, 1986. google scholar
  • White, Kennth D. Agricultural Implements of The Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge Üniversitesi YayınLarı, 1967. google scholar
  • Woodward, Ian. Maddi Kültürü Anlamak. İstanbuL: İş Bankası YayınLarı, 2016. google scholar
  • Wujewski, Tomasz. Anatolian Sepulchral Stelae in Roman Times. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz Üniversitesi YayınLarı, 1991. google scholar
  • Zanker, Paul. "Veranderungen im ÖffentLichen Raum der ItaLischen Stadte der Kaiserzeit.” L'ltalle d'Auguste a Dlocletlen. Paris: Roma Fransız OkuLu YayınLarı, 1994, 259-284. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Fındık, A., Dinç, M., & Taştemür, E. (2025). Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Art-Sanat, 0(24), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017


AMA

Fındık A, Dinç M, Taştemür E. Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Art-Sanat. 2025;0(24):31-59. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017


ABNT

Fındık, A.; Dinç, M.; Taştemür, E. Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 24, p. 31-59, 2025.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Fındık, Ahsen, and Münteha Dinç and Emre Taştemür. 2025. “Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 24: 31-59. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017


Chicago: Humanities Style

Fındık, Ahsen, and Münteha Dinç and Emre Taştemür. Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 24 (Aug. 2025): 31-59. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017


Harvard: Australian Style

Fındık, A & Dinç, M & Taştemür, E 2025, 'Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 24, pp. 31-59, viewed 17 Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Fındık, A. and Dinç, M. and Taştemür, E. (2025) ‘Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme’, Art-Sanat, 0(24), pp. 31-59. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017 (17 Aug. 2025).


MLA

Fındık, Ahsen, and Münteha Dinç and Emre Taştemür. Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 24, 2025, pp. 31-59. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017


Vancouver

Fındık A, Dinç M, Taştemür E. Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 17 Aug. 2025 [cited 17 Aug. 2025];0(24):31-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017 doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017


ISNAD

Fındık, Ahsen - Dinç, Münteha - Taştemür, Emre. Uşak Müzesindeki Dört Kapı Tipli Mezar Stelindeki Betimlemelerin Sembolik Anlamı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”. Art-Sanat 0/24 (Aug. 2025): 31-59. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.24.0017



TIMELINE


Submitted18.05.2024
Accepted25.07.2025
Published Online01.08.2025

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.