Research Article


DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598    Full Text (PDF)

Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar

Banu Kumbasar

Sudden or slowly unexpected changes can occur in an organization. Issue management is a potential solution for predicting and evaluating these changes. With the issue management, the issues are determined in advance, and the potential crisis is prevented before it occurs with strategic public relations practice. A complaint from consumers may be the first indication of the issue. This research was conducted to examine the complaints about hospitals between January 1, 2019 and February 28, 2019 on the website of Şikâyetvar (“there is a complaint”), a digital platform. It was found that 74.8% of the complaints were directed toward private, 25.2% toward public hospitals. Staff communication was the most common issue of hospitals. Staff communication constitutes 40.6% of all complaints. 28.7% of the complaints toward private hospitals were about pricing, and 26.2% of the complaints about public hospitals were about the waiting period. 40.7% of the complaints for private hospitals were answered. 47.3% of the complaints were answered within 2-7 days, 24.8% within the same day. It was determined that 48% of the responses were about responsibility. While there was no response from consumers to messages containing responsibility, 45.3% of apology messages were answered by consumers with thank-you messages.

DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598    Full Text (PDF)

Halkla İlişkiler Perspektifinden Dijital Sağlık İletişiminde Konu Yönetimi: Şikâyetvar Web Sitesi Üzerinden Hastanelere Yönelik Bir İnceleme

Banu Kumbasar

Bir kuruluşta ani veya yavaşça gelişen beklenmedik değişiklikler ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Konu yönetimi, bu değişiklikleri öngörmek ve değerlendirmek için potansiyel bir çözüm kaynağı olarak geliştirilmiştir. Konu yönetimi ile krize neden olabilecek konular önceden tespit edilir ve stratejik halkla ilişkiler çalışması ile potansiyel krizin ortaya çıkmadan önlenmesi sağlanır. Tüketicilerden gelen bir şikâyet, konu ile ilgili ortaya çıkan ilk belirti olabilir. Bu araştırma, konu yönetiminin bir parçası olan şikâyetlerin hastaneler kapsamında incelenmesi ve tüketici iletişiminin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Dijital bir şikâyet platformu olan Şikâyetvar web sitesinde 1 Ocak 2019 – 28 Şubat 2019 tarihleri arasındaki hastaneler ile ilgili şikâyetler ve hastanelerin bu şikâyetler doğrultusundaki konu yönetimi yaklaşımları kapsamında tüketici iletişimleri incelenmiştir. Şikâyetlerin %74.8’inin özel hastanelere, %25.2’sinin kamu hastanelerine yönelik olduğu saptanmıştır. Özel ve kamu hastanelerinde yaygın şikâyet konusu personel iletişimidir. Personel iletişimi tüm şikâyetlerin %40.6’sını oluşturmaktadır. Özel hastanelere yönelik şikâyetlerin %28.7’si ücretlendirme, kamu hastanelerine yönelik şikâyetlerin %26.2’si bekleme süresi ile ilgilidir. Özel hastanelere gelen şikâyetlerin %40.7’si farklı mesaj stratejileriyle yanıtlanmıştır. Şikâyetlerin %47.3’ü 2-7 gün, %24.8’i aynı gün içerisinde yanıtlanmıştır. Yanıtların mesaj stratejisine bakıldığında mesajların %48’inin sorumluluk içerikli olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sorumluluk içerikli mesajlara tüketicilerden bir yanıt gelmezken, özür mesajlarının %45.3’ü tüketiciler tarafından teşekkür mesajı ile yanıtlanmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The smooth functioning of an organization is often threatened by sudden and unexpected events, such as the advent of new competitors, destructive technologies, or economic crises. In this regard, issue management approaches to tackle these challenges were discussed, and over time, issue management approaches began to develop. Issue management has been proposed as a potential solution to anticipate and address such threats. Issue management, which is one of the public relations functions; it covers a wide range of content, ranging from the management philosophy and policy of the organizations to their communication with the stakeholders. Issue management, with a focus on communication aims to identify, analyze, and solve issues that may cause a crisis in organization early on. The development of digital environments, has strengthened the ability to easily relay complaints, which has further reinforced the necessity of employing issue management, approaches in tackling such issues. With the help of issue management approaches, issues that may cause certain crises are identified in advance and strategic communication methods are used to intervene against potential crises and prevent the crises from emerging. In the context of issue management; issues are defined as controversial inconsistencies caused by gaps between the expectations of organizations and the expectations of the public. These gaps lead to a controversial point of difference where the decision can have significant consequences for an organization. While organizations and stakeholders may be concerned about the same issue, their perspectives are rarely the same. The role of the issue management process is to determine the existence and possible effects of these controversial differences. Issues are generally defined as having a life cycle consisting of five stages (early, developing, current, crisis, and dormant-passive). In simple terms, if an issue progresses to the first four stages, it gets more attention and becomes less manageable from the organization’s point of view. As the issue matures, the number of relevant stakeholders, the public and other influencers grow; the situation becomes more robust and the organization’s existing strategic preferences shrink. When the issue becomes a crisis for the organization, the responses then become reactive. Not all issues reach the stage of a crisis and many crises are not the result of a fundamental problem. 

This research was conducted to evaluate consumer communication and the hospitals’ response to consumer complaints. For this purpose, the following research questions were developed:

RQ1: What are the issues of shared complaints about hospitals in the digital environment?

RQ2: What are the message strategies that hospitals share in terms of issue management approach?

Şikâyetvar (“there is a complaint”) was established in 2001. It is a digital platform that serves all of Turkey, with offices in different provinces. Brands operating in different sectors are among the corporate members of this platform. It is a reference site that affects consumer behavior and brand preferences. Complaints toward the hospitals and the hospitals’ consumer communication approaches were examined. Complaints registered between January 1, 2019 – February 28, 2019 taken into account. The registered complaints were classified according to different issue categories. Complaints received within two months were evaluated by content analysis method within the scope of issue management. It was found that 74.8% of the complaints were toward the private hospitals and 25.2% were to the public hospitals. The most common complaint issue in public/private hospitals was staff communication. While the second most common issue in private hospitals was pricing, waiting period was the second most common complaint in public hospitals. 40.7% of the complaints received by private hospitals were answered. 47.3% of the complaints were answered within 2-7 days. 45.3% of apology messages were answered by consumers with thank-you messages. 

An organizational issue is an internal or external situation or event, which if it persists, will have a significant impact on the operation, performance, and future interests of the organization. The main purpose of issue management is to control the impact of such challenges. Therefore, it is necessary to identify any potential issue early on before it becomes a crisis and develop a strategy in line with management principles. As a result, it can be said that public relations practitioners are required to strategically address the complaints shared by the consumers in the digital environment before they turn into a crisis. It is also important to communicate with healthcare consumers within the same 24 hours of receiving a complaint.


PDF View

References

  • Ağırbaş, İ. (2019). Hastane yönetimi ve organizasyon. Ankara, Turkey: Siyasal Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Argan, M. T., & Arıcı, A. (2019). Sağlık iletişiminde e-şikâyet: Hastaların ve hasta yakınlarının Şikayetvar.com paylaşımları üzerine bir araştırma. Akdeniz İletişim Dergisi, 31, 339-355. google scholar
  • Aylan, S., Arpacı, Ö., & Celiloğlu, F.K. (2016). Bir internet şikâyet forumundaki termal otellere yönelik şikayetlerin incelenmesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 49-68. google scholar
  • Berkowitz, D., & Turnmire, K. (1994). Community relations and issues management: an issue orientation approach to segmenting publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(2), 105-123. google scholar
  • Bostan, S., Kılıç, T., & Çiftçi, F. (2014). Sağlık Bakanlığı 184 SABİM hattına yapılan şikâyetlerin karşılaştırmalı analizi. Küresel İktisat ve İşletme Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3(5), 32-40. google scholar
  • Bridges, J. A., & Nelson R. A. (2000). Issues management: A relational approach. In J. A. Ledingham & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: a relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 95-115). NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum. google scholar
  • Chase W. H. (1982). Issue management conference – A special report. Corporate Public Issues and Their Management, 7(3), 1-2. google scholar
  • Chase W. H. (1984). Issue management: Origins of the future. Stamford, CT: Issue Action. google scholar
  • Chaulk, D., Krueger, C., & Stang, A. S. (2019). A retrospective review of physician-related patient complaints from a tertiary pediatric hospital. Pediatr Qual Saf, 1(4), 1-5. google scholar
  • Chebat J. C., & Slusarczyk, W. (2005). How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 664-673. google scholar
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. google scholar
  • Coombs, W. T. (2002). Assesing online issue threats: Issue contagions and their effect on issue prioritization. Journal of Public Affairs, 2(4), 215-229. google scholar
  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2010). Handbook of crisis communication. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
  • Coombs, W. T., & Schmidt, L. (2000). An empirical analysis of image restoration: Texaco’s racism crisis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(2), 163-178. google scholar
  • Crable, R. E., & Vibbert, S. L. (1985). Managing issues and influencing public policy. Public Relations Review, 11(2), 3-16. google scholar
  • Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2006). Effective public relations (9th ed.). USA: Pearson Prentice Hall. google scholar
  • Dalton, J. (2011). Reputation and strategic issue management. In A. Hiles (Ed.), Reputation management: building and protecting your company’s profile in a digital world (pp. 203-216). UK: Bloomsburry. google scholar
  • Daniel, A. E., Burn, R. J., & Horarik, S. (1999). Patients’ complaints about medical practice. Med J Aust, 170(12), 598-602. google scholar
  • DiSatso, M. W., Vafeiadis, M., & Amaral, C. (2015). Managing a health crisis on Facebook: How the response strategies of apology, sympathy and information influence public relations. Public Relations Review, 41, 222-231. google scholar
  • Doig, G. (2004). Responding to formal complaints about the emergency department: Lessons from the service marketing literature. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 16(4), 353-360. google scholar
  • Dougall, E. K. (2005). Revelations of an ecological perspective: Issues, inertia and the public opinion environment of organizational populations. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 534-543. google scholar
  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. Public Interest, 28(12), 38-50. google scholar
  • Erbay, E., Karaağaç, C., & Esatoğlu, A. E. (2018). Özel hastanelere yapılan çevrimiçi şikayetlerin içerik analizi ile incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(24), 287-304. google scholar
  • Ewing, R. P. (1980). Evaluating issues management. Public Relations Journal, 36(6), 14-16. google scholar
  • Friele, R. D., Sluijs, E. M., & Legemaate, J. (2008). Complaints handling in hospitals: An empirical study of discrepancies between patients expectations and their experiences. BMC Health Services Research, 8(199), 1-11. google scholar
  • Galloway, C., & Kwansah-Aidoo, K. (2005). Getting to grips with issues management and crisis communication. In C. Galloway & K. Kwansah-Aidoo (Eds.), Public relations issues and crisis management (pp. 1-12), Australia: Thomson Social Science Press. google scholar
  • Gillespie, A., & Reader, T. W. (2018). Patient-centered insights: Using health care complaints to reveal hot spots and blind spots in quality and safety. The Milbank Quarterly, 96(3), 530-567. google scholar
  • Griffin, M., Babin, M. J., & Attaway, J. S. (1991). An empirical investigation of the impact of negative public publicity on consumer attitudes and intentions. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 334-341. google scholar
  • Grunig, J. E., & Repper, F. C. (1992). Strategic management, publics and issues. In J. E. Grunig, D. M. Dozier, W. P. Ehling, L. A. Grunig, F. C. Repper, & J. White (Eds.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 117-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. google scholar
  • Hainsworth, B. E. (1990). Issues management: An overview. Public Relations Review, 16(1), 3-5. google scholar
  • Hainsworth, B. E., & Meng, M. (1988). How corporations define issues management. Public Realtions Review, 14(4), 18-30. google scholar
  • Hareli, S., & Eisikovits, Z. (2006). The role of communicating social emotions accompanying apologies in forgiveness. Motivation and Emotion, 30(3), 189-197. google scholar
  • Heath, R. L. (1997). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. google scholar
  • Heath, R. L. (2002). Issues management: Its past, present and future. Journal of Public Affairs, 2(2), 209-214. google scholar
  • Heath, R. L., & Bowen, S. A. (2002). The public relations philosophy of John W. Hill: Bricks in the foundation of issues management. Journal of Public Affairs, 2(4), 230-246. google scholar
  • Heath, R. L., & Nelson, R. A. (1986). Issues management: Corporate public policy making in an information society. London, UK: SAGE. google scholar
  • Heath, R. L., & Palenchar, M. J. (2009). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges. USA: SAGE. google scholar
  • Heath, R. L. (2009). A rheoterical theory approach issues management. In C. H. Botan, & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 63-100). USA: Routledge. google scholar
  • Horine, G. M. (2014). Project management absolute beginner’s guide. USA: Que Publishing. google scholar
  • Hoşgör, D. G., & Hoşgör, H. (2019). Sağlık hizmeti tüketicileri perspektifinden özel hastane şikayetlerinin incelenmesi (Şikayetvar.com örneği). Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 22(4), 823-842. google scholar
  • Illia, L., Lurati, F., & Casalaz, R. (2013). Situational theory of publics: Exploring a cultural ethnocentric bias. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(2), 93-122. google scholar
  • Ito, Y. (1993). Beyond agendas: New directions in communication research from Japanese perspective. London, UK: Greenwood Press. google scholar
  • Jones, B. L., & Chase, W. H. (1979). Managing public policy issues. Public Relations Review, 5(2), 3-23. google scholar
  • Karademirlidağ, İ. (2005). Halkla ilişkilerde stratejik konu yönetiminde “jenerik ilaç” konusunun incelenmesi (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, Turkey. Retrieved from: http://libra.anadolu.edu.tr/tezler/2005/341508.pdf. google scholar
  • Karapınar, D. Ç., & Öcal, D. (2017). Halkla ilişkilerde konu yönetimi: Şikayetvar sitesi üzerinden bir inceleme. Atatürk İletişim Dergisi, 13, 103-124. google scholar
  • Kılıç, B., & Ok, S. (2012). Otel işletmelerinde müşteri şikâyetleri ve şikâyetlerin değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Yaşar University, 25(7), 4189-4202. google scholar
  • Ki, E. J., & Nekmat, E. (2014). Situational crisis communication and interactivity: Usage and effectiveness of Facebook for crisis management by Fortune 500 companies. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 140-147. google scholar
  • Kitto, J. A. (1999). The evaluation of public issues management. Public Relations Quarterly, 43(4), 34-38. google scholar
  • Laamanen, T., Maula, M., Kajanto, M., & Kunnas, P. (2018). The role of cognitiveload in effective strategic issue management. Long Range Planning, 51, 625-639. google scholar
  • Lazare, A. (2004). On apology. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Lauzen, M. M. (1997). Understanding the relation between public relations and issues management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1), 65-82. google scholar
  • Lee, B. K. (2004). Audience-oriented approach to crisis communication: A study of Hong Kong consumers’ evaluation of an organizational crisis. Communication Research, 31(5), 600-618. google scholar
  • Madden, S. (2019). The issue with issues management: Considering the emotional and gendered core of issues. Public Relations Inquiry, 8(3), 299-317. google scholar
  • Okay, A., & Okay, A. (2005). Halkla ilişkiler kavram strateji ve uygulamaları. İstanbul, Turkey: Der Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özel, A. P., & Sert, N. Y. (2014). Halkla ilişkilerde stratejik sorun yönetiminin işlevi üzerine bir değerlendirme. E-Journal of Intermedia, 1(1), 88-106. google scholar
  • Patel, A., & Reinsch, L. (2003). Companies can apologize: Corporate apologies and legal liability. Business Communication Quarterly, 66(1), 17-26. google scholar
  • Reader, T. W., Gillespie, A., & Roberts, J. (2014). Patient complaints in healthcare systems: A systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(8), 678-689. google scholar
  • Regester, M., & Larkin, J. (2008). Risks issues and crisis management: A casebook of best practice. Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page. google scholar
  • Regester, M., & Larkin, J. (2005). Risks issues and crisis management: A casebook of best practice (3rd ed.). London, UK: Kogan Page. google scholar
  • Robbennolt, J. K. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement: An empirical examination. Michigan Law Review, 102(3), 460-516. google scholar
  • Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1997). How effective are the tgings people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 127-140. google scholar
  • Sohodol Bir, Ç. (2006). Konu yönetimi sürecinde iletişim ve halkla ilişkiler. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Hakemli Dergisi, 25, 17-29. google scholar
  • Strikesky, V., Stranska, A., & Drabik, P. (2015). Crisis communication on Facebook. Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia, 8(29), 103-111. google scholar
  • Sugimoto, N. (1999). A Japan-U.S. comparison of apology styles. In N. Sugimoto (Ed.), Japanese apology across disciplines. Commack, NY: Nova Science. google scholar
  • Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan, E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. İstanbul, Turkey: Epsilon Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Vasquez, G. (1994). Testing a communication theory method message behavior complex fort he investigation of publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(2), 267-291. google scholar
  • Walton, M., Smith-Merry, J., & Healy, J. (2012). Health complaint commissions in Australia: Time for a national approach to data collection. Australian Review of Public Affairs, 11(1), 1-18. google scholar
  • Wartick, S. L., & Mahon, J. F. (1994). Towards a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literatüre. Business & Society, 33(3), 293-311. google scholar
  • Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O., & Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59(2), 281-312. google scholar
  • Wispe, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314-321. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, O., & Şatır, Ç. K. (2018). Halkla ilişkilerin stratejik bir işlevi olarak konu yönetimi: Bir havayolu şirketinde konu yönetimi analizi. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 651-662. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kumbasar, B. (2020). Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(59), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598


AMA

Kumbasar B. Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2020;0(59):237-264. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598


ABNT

Kumbasar, B. Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 59, p. 237-264, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kumbasar, Banu,. 2020. “Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 59: 237-264. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kumbasar, Banu,. Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 59 (May. 2024): 237-264. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598


Harvard: Australian Style

Kumbasar, B 2020, 'Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 59, pp. 237-264, viewed 17 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kumbasar, B. (2020) ‘Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(59), pp. 237-264. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598 (17 May. 2024).


MLA

Kumbasar, Banu,. Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 59, 2020, pp. 237-264. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598


Vancouver

Kumbasar B. Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 17 May. 2024 [cited 17 May. 2024];0(59):237-264. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598 doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598


ISNAD

Kumbasar, Banu. Issue Management in Digital Health Communication from the Perspective of Public Relations: A Review for Hospitals on the Website of Şikâyetvar”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/59 (May. 2024): 237-264. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0598



TIMELINE


Submitted23.12.2020
Accepted17.11.2020
Published Online30.12.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.