References

• 1. Nikfar Z, Shariatinia Z. The RGD tripeptide anticancer drug car-rier: DFT computations and molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Liq. 2019;281:565-583. google scholar
• 2. Sun A, Shoji M, Lu YJ, Liotta DC, Snyder, JP. Synthesis of EF24-tripeptide chloromethyl ketone: A novel curcumin-related anticancer drug delivery system. J Med Chem. 2006;49(11):3153-3158. google scholar
• 3. Ali H, Jabeen A, Maharjan, R, et al. Furan-conjugated tripep-tides as potent antitumor drugs. Biomolecules. 2020;10(12):1684. doi:10.3390/biom10121684 google scholar
• 4. Lau JL, Dunn MK. Therapeutic peptides: Historical perspectives, current development trends, and future directions. Bioorg Med Chem. 2018;26(10):2700-2707. google scholar
• 5. Ye N, Ding Y, Wild C, Shen Q, Zhou J. Small molecule inhibitors targeting activator protein 1 (AP-1). J Med Chem. 2014;57(16):6930-6948. google scholar
• 6. Kumar A, Kothari J, Lokhande KB, Seethamma TN, Venkateswara Swamy K, Sharma NK. Novel antiproliferative tripeptides inhibit AP-1 transcriptional complex. Int J Pept Res Ther. 2021;27(4):2163-2182. google scholar
• 7. Fan J, FuA, Zhang L. Progress in molecular docking. Quant Biol. 2019;7(2):83-89. google scholar
• 8. Pagadala NS, Syed K, Tuszynski J. Software for molecular dock-ing: A review. Biophys Rev. 2017;9(2):91-102. google scholar
• 9. Gilad Y, Senderowitz H. Docking studies on DNA intercalators. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54(1):96-107. google scholar
• 10. Celik S, Vagifli F, Akyuz S, et al. Synthesis, vibrational spec-troscopic investigation, molecular docking, antibacterial and an-timicrobial studies of a new anthraquinone derivative compound. Spectrosc Lett. 2022;55(4):259-277. google scholar
• 11. Protein Data Bank website. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb. Accessed November 09, 2023. google scholar
• 12. Halgren TA. Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J Comput Chem. 1996;17(5-6):490-519. google scholar
• 13. Shao Y, Molnar LF, Jung Y, et al. Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2006;8(27):3172-3191. google scholar
• 14. Trott O, Olson AJ. Autodock vina: Improving the speed and accu-racy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimiza-tion, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455-461. google scholar
• 15. Drew HR, Wing RM, Takano T, et al. Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer: Conformation and dynamics. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78(4): 2179-2183. google scholar
• 16. Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Liu X, et al. Structural basis for repli-case polyprotein cleavage and substrate specificity of main protease from SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(16):e2117142119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2117142119 google scholar
• 17. Jin Z, Du X, Xu Y, et al. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020;582(7811):289-293. google scholar
• 18. Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181(2):281-292. google scholar
• 19. Jurcik A, Bednar D, Byska J, et al. Caver analyst 2.0: Anal-ysis and visualization of channels and tunnels in protein structures and molecular dynamics trajectories. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(20):3586-3588. google scholar
• 20. Demirag AD, Çelik S, Akyuz S, Ozel A. Molecular docking anal-ysis of used drugs for the treatment of cancer. Süleyman Demirel University J Nat App Sci. 2021;25(3):539-547. google scholar
• 21. Sagaama A, Brandan SA, Issa TB, Issaoui N. Searching potential antiviral candidates for the treatment of the 2019 novel coron-avirus based on DFT calculations and molecular docking. He-liyon. 2020;6(8): e04640. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04640 google scholar
• 22. Arifa Begum SK, Begum S, Bandari P, Swapna BS, Reddemma M. Tetrandrine, an effective inhibitor of COVID-19 main protease (Mpro); Insights from molecular docking and dynamics simula-tions. Int J Pharm Investig. 2023;13(4):845-851. google scholar
• 23. Celik S, Yilmaz G, Akyuz S, Ozel AE. Shedding light into the bio-logical activity of aminopterin, via molecular structural, docking, and molecular dynamics analyses. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2023;1-22. doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2245493 google scholar
• 24. Liu X, Wang XJ. Potential inhibitors against 2019-nCoV coron-avirus M protease from clinically approved medicines. J Genet Genomics. 2020;47(2):119-121. google scholar
• 25. Özdemir M, Köksoy B, Ceyhan D, Bulut M, Yalcin B. In silico, 6LU7 protein inhibition using dihydroxy-3-phenyl coumarin derivatives for SARS-CoV-2. J Turk Chem Soc Sect A Chem. 2020;7(3):691-712. google scholar
• 26. Hatada R, Okuwaki K, Mochizuki Y, et al. Fragment molecular orbital based interaction analyses on COVID-19 main protease-inhibitor n3 complex (PDB ID:6LU7). J Chem Inf Model. 2020;60(7):3593-3602. google scholar
• 27. Celik S, Akyuz S, Ozel AE. Vibrational spectroscopic characterization and structural investigations of cepharan-thine, a natural alkaloid. J Mol Struct. 2022;1258:132693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132693 google scholar
• 28. Holanda VN, Lima EMDA, Silva WVD, et al. Identification of 1, 2, 3-triazole-phthalimide derivatives as potential drugs against COVID-19: A virtual screening, docking and molecular dynamic study. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022;40(12):5462-5480. google scholar
• 29. Joshi A, Sharma V, Singh J, Kaushik V. Chemi-informatic ap-proach to investigate putative pharmacoactive agents of plant ori-gin to eradicate COVID-19. Coronaviruses. 2022;3(3):40-54. google scholar

Citations